Hearth Record

Harbor Hospice of West Dallas-Fort Worth, LP

A hospice in Benbrook, Texas 76132

6471 Southwest Blvd Ste B, Benbrook, Texas 76132. (817) 237-2255.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 72 hospices serving ZIP code 76132 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 27, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 27, 2025: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,103 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to take into consideration with its comprehensive assessment, an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that could impact their ability to cope with the patients death in that the hospice did not conduct an initial bereavement assessment for 4 (#1, #6, #10, #14) of 14 patient records reviewed. The failure placed the patients’ family or other individuals at risk that appropriate bereavement services would not be provided which could result in complicated grief or inadequate coping. Patient #1:Record review of Patient #1’s clinical record revealed an Initial Plan of Care dated 2/7/2025 to 5/7/2025. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #1 started on the agency’s services on 2/7/2025. The Plan of Care listed Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease with Stage 1-4 Unspecified Chronic Kidney (force of blood pushing against the artery walls consistently too high causing damage to the kidneys) as the terminal diagnosis. The Supervising Nurse (was not the Supervising Nurse at the time of the visit) performed a start of care comprehensive assessment on 2/7/2025. The Supervising Nurse did not conduct a bereavement risk assessment. The Supervising Nurse documented that the assessment would be completed by the chaplain. Patient #1’s record did not contain an initial bereavement assessment. Patient #6:Record review of Patient #6’s clinical record revealed an Initial Plan of Care dated 8/23/2024 to 10/21/2024. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #6 started on the agency’s services on 8/23/2024. The Plan of Care listed Other Speech/Language Deficits following Cerebral Infarction (speech disorder due to weakness or paralysis of the muscles from interrupted or reduced blood flow to the brain) as the terminal diagnosis. Patient #6 died on 9/22/2024. Patient #6 was on services greater than 5 days. Registered Nurse D conducted a start of care comprehensive assessment on 8/23/2024. Registered Nurse D did not conduct a bereavement assessment. Registered Nurse D documented that the bereavement risk assessment was be completed by the Social Worker and Chaplain. Patient #6’s record did not contain an initial bereavement assessment. Patient #10:Record review of Patient #10’s clinical record revealed an Initial Plan of Care dated 3/1/2025 to 5/29/2025. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #10 started on the agency’s services on 3/1/2025. The Plan of Care listed Heart Failure Unspecified (condition where the heart can’t pump enough blood to meet the needs of the body) as the terminal diagnosis. Patient #10 died on 3/7/2025 and was on the agency’s services greater than 5 days. Registered Nurse E conducted a start of care comprehensive assessment on 3/1/2025. Registered Nurse D did not conduct an initial bereavement assessment. Registered Nurse E documented that the bereavement assessment was completed by the social worker and chaplain. Patient #10’s record did not contain an initial bereavement assessment. Patient #14:Record review of Patient #14’s clinical record revealed a Plan of Care dated 12/16/2024 to 3/15/2025. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #14 started on the agency’s services on 9/17/2024. The Plan of Care listed Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure (force of blood pushing against the artery walls consistently too high causing damage to the inability of the heart to pump enough blood to meet the body’s needs) as the terminal diagnosis. Patient #14 revoked services on 1/15/2025. Patient #14 was on the agency’s services greater than 5 days. The Supervising Nurse (was not the Supervising Nurse at the time) conducted a start of care comprehensive assessment on 9/18/2024. The Supervising Nurse did not conduct a bereavement risk assessment. Patient #14’s record did not contain an initial bereavement assessment. Registered Nurse D and Registered Nurse E were no longer employed at the agency. During an interview on 6/26/2025 at 1:05 p.m. with the Administrator (new Administrator) and Supervising Nurse (new Supervising Nurse), the surveyor discussed that initial bereavement assessments were not completed as part of the comprehensive assessment, no initial bereavement assessments were in the clinical records. The surveyor asked who was responsible to perform the initial bereavement assessments. The Administrator stated, “That would be the Chaplain.” The Administrator and Supervising Nurse did not know why the initial bereavement assessments had not been done. The Administrator informed the surveyor that the social worker would perform the bereavement assessment if chaplain services was declined, and the nurse would perform it if social work services was declined. The surveyor asked why the initial bereavement assessments were not done. The Administrator and Supervising Nurse informed the surveyor that the initial bereavement assessments were to be completed within 5 days of the start of care. During an interview on 6/27/2025 at 10:04 a.m., with Chaplain F/Bereavement Coordinator, Chaplain F informed the surveyor that the timeframe to complete initial bereavement assessment was 5 days. Chaplain F did not know why the initial bereavement assessments were not done. Chaplain F informed the surveyor that the social workers and nurses could complete the assessments. Review of the agency’s policy titled “Initial Assessment”, labeled 2-029.1, and dated February 2025 read in part; “Purpose to provide guidelines for the initial assessment to evaluate the patients’ physician, psychosocial and emotional needs and determine immediate care and support needs. Policy An initial assessment will be performed by a registered nurse within 48 hours after election of hospice care unless otherwise specified by the physician, patient or representative to be completed in less than 48 hours. Procedure 1. Admitting registered nurse uses an assessment scale/rating tool to assess for problems and to establish a baseline status of each symptom rated. Items assessed may include, but are not limited to, the following...5. Admitting registered nurse will determine the other disciplines to complete the appropriate sections of the comprehensive assessment based on identified problems and needs during this initial assessment. A. Nursing and bereavement sections will always be identified...” Review of the agency’s policy titled “Bereavement Services,” labeled 2-010.1, and dated February 2025 read in part; “Purpose To ensure that appropriate and coordinated bereavement services are provided to family/caregivers. Policy [Agency] will provide an organized bereavement program supervised by a qualified Bereavement Coordinator for up to one year following the death of the patient...Procedure 1. On admission, the hospice registered nurse will complete a bereavement risk assessment that will be given to the Bereavement Coordinator. If the nurse is unable to complete the bereavement risk assessment on admission the social work and/or spiritual counselor will complete. The information gathered will be incorporated into the plan of care and considered in the bereavement plan of care...7. The bereavement risk assessment will be performed on admission and after death...””

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,037 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions that included drugs and treatment necessary to meet the needs of the patient in that the plans of care did not include the wound care treatment to be performed, the frequency that would care treatments were to be performed, or changes made in the wound care to be provided for 3 (#4, #6, #7) of 3 patient records reviewed where the patients were receiving wound care. The failure placed the patients at risk that wound would worsen or become infected. Patient #4:Record review of Patient #4’s clinical record revealed a Plan of Care dated 9/25/2024 to 12/23/2024. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #4 started on the agency’s services on 9/25/2024. The Plan of Care listed Alzheimer’s Disease (brain disorder that destroys memory and thinking skills over time eventually losing the ability to carry out simple tasks) as the terminal diagnosis. The Supervising Nurse conducted a skilled nurse visit on 10/11/2024. The Supervising Nurse documented that Patient #4 had a fall and received a skin tears to the right forearm, right elbow, and left forearm. The Supervising Nurse documented that Patient #4 experienced soreness when the Supervising Nurse provided wound care. Patient #4’s record did not contain a physician’s order for wound care to be provided to Patient #4’s skin tears. The agency did not include in the Plan of Care the wound care treatment that was provided to Patient #4’s skin tears. Patient #6:Record review of Patient #6’s clinical record revealed an Initial Plan of Care dated 8/23/2024 to 10/21/2024. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #6 started on the agency’s services on 8/23/2024. The Plan of Care listed Other Speech/Language Deficits following Cerebral Infarction (speech disorder due to weakness or paralysis of the muscles from interrupted or reduced blood flow to the brain) as the terminal diagnosis. The Supervising Nurse conducted a skilled nurse visit on 9/21/2024. The Supervising Nurse documented that Patient #6’s right toe was bruised, swollen, and wound care was provided. The Supervising Nurse documented that Patient #6’s right toe was cleaned, antibiotic ointment was applied, and covered with a bandage. Patient #6’s record did not contain a physician’s order for the wound care that was provided to Patient #6’s right toe. The agency did not include in the Plan of Care the wound care treatment to be provided to Patient #6’s right toe. Patient #7:Record review of Patient #7 clinical record revealed a Plan of Care dated 4/2/2025 (sic) to 5/31/2025. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #7 started on the agency’s services on 4/7/2024 (sic). The Plan of Care listed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Polyneuropathy (group of metabolic -chemical reactions in the body’s cells that change food into energy, diseases that cause nerve damage affecting the extremities, hands, and feet due to high blood sugar levels) as the terminal diagnosis. Patient #7’s clinical record contained documentation of an Interdisciplinary Group Meeting dated 4/24/2025. The Interdisciplinary Group Meeting contained wound care orders to clean the wounds to Patient #7’s left lower leg and left heel. The wound care per the Interdisciplinary Group meeting: Left lower leg -clean with normal saline or wound cleaner, apply collagen (used as a dressing to promote healing by stimulating new tissue growth) powder, and Xeroform (a fine-mesh gauze wound dressing, designed to not stick to a wound and to maintain a moist wound environment to promote healing). Cover with an abdominal pad (large, highly absorbent dressing used to absorb moderate to heavy draining wounds) and wrap with gauze. Left heel -clean with normal saline or wound cleaner, apply Xeroform to open area. Cover with abdominal pad and wrap with gauze. The Plan of Care did not include the frequency that the wound care was to be provided. The Supervising Nurse performed skilled nurse visits on 5/5/2025 and 5/7/2025. The Supervising Nurse documented providing wound care to Patient #7’s left heel. The Supervising Nurse documented applying Therahoney (medical-grade honey dressing used to treat burns, cuts, and chronic wounds) to the wound. Patient #7’s clinical record did not contain a physician order to apply Therahoney to Patient #7’s left heel wound. The agency did not include in the Plan of Care the frequency that the wound care was to be performed to Patient #7’s wounds and did not include the use of Therahoney. During an interview on 6/26/2025 at 1:05 p.m. with the Administrator and Supervising Nurse, the surveyor discussed that the Plans of Care did not include wound care treatments, the frequency that the wound care was to be performed, or when the wound care treatment changes. The surveyor asked who would be responsible for including wound care treatments in the Plans of Care. The Administrator informed the surveyor that the nurse wound put in the orders. The Administrator informed the surveyor that the nurse would have talked with the physician and would then put in the order. The surveyor asked if the nurses received orders for wound care from the physicians. The Administrator informed the surveyor that the Administrator felt sure they did. The Supervising Nurse stated, “Yes.” The surveyor asked the reason why the wound care treatments were not included in the Plans of Care. The Administrator and Supervising Nurse did not know why the orders were not included in the Plans of Care. The surveyor asked what the frequency for wound care was for Patient #7. The Supervising Nurse stated, “Twice a week.” Review of the agency’s policy titled “The Plan of Care,” labeled 2-044.1, and dated February 2025 read in part; “Purpose To ensure that an individualized plan of care is completed that complies with accepted standards of care and regulatory issues. Policy A written individualized patient and family/caregiver plan of care will be established and maintained for each individual admitted to the hospice program. The care provided to the patient must be in accordance with the plan of care...Procedure...The plan of care will identify the patient’s needs and services to meet those needs...12. The written plan of care will contain, but will not be limited to, the following...Q. Drugs and treatments...””

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 27, 2025Recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 18, 2013.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 75% at home, 23% in assisted living, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Arfeen Properties, L.P. owns 99% directly since Oct 1, 2012.
  • 4 owners or officers are people: Qamar U Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Kelley L Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Karen Carter (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Bryan Gaspard (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Arfeen Properties, L.P.Owns 5% or more directly99%Oct 1, 2012
Hhcs Managers LLCGeneral partner1%Oct 1, 2012

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 72 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 76132, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 2.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.