Hearth Record

Frontier Hospice

A hospice in Benbrook, Texas 76109

6410 Southwest Blvd, Suite 127, Benbrook, Texas 76109. (832) 553-2276.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

1 deficiency cited in the last three years

The middle of the 55 hospices serving ZIP code 76109 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 16, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 16, 2025: recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 961 words

    “Based on record reviews and interviews the agency’s hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), failed to complete the comprehensive assessment for 3 (Patients 1,2, and 3) of 4 active patients’ records, no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Failure to have all disciplines conduct initial assessments during the 5-day timeframe prevented the agency from developing a comprehensive plan of care that met all the patient’s needs, which had the potential for psychosocial, spiritual, and physical needs to be unmet by the interdisciplinary team. Record review of Patient 1 revealed a hospice plan of care for period 2/4/2025 to 5/4/2025 with a start of care date of 2/4/2025. The POC had MSW frequency as one visit in month 1. Records contained an initial medical social worker hospice evaluation dated 2/10/2025. Coordination notes in Patient 1’s records did not contain documentation or evidence that contact with the patient or family was made by the MSW within the 5-day timeframe. An interview was conducted with the former MSW on 4/16/2025 at 12:14pm. The surveyor asked about the agency’s policy on the timeframe for completion of the initial medical social worker hospice evaluation. The MSW stated “have to be out there within 5 days.” The surveyor shared the findings on Patient 1 and asked why the initial visit was completed after the 5-day time frame. The MSW said Patient 1’s family “didn’t want me coming out sooner, so I had to adjust my time around that.” The Surveyor asked if the communication was documented in the patient’s records. The MSW stated “I put down that I attempted to contact them. I wouldn’t put it down every single time.” The surveyor asked why there was not a communication note in Patient 1’s records that a call was made. MSW stated, “I don’t want to comment, but I’m not really sure why.”Record review of Patient 2 revealed a hospice plan of care for period 3/24/2025 to 6/21/2025 with a start of care date of 3/24/2025. The POC had MSW frequency as one visit in month 1. Records contained an initial medical social worker hospice evaluation dated 3/31/2025. Coordination notes in Patient 2’s records did not contain documentation or evidence that contact with the patient or family was made by the MSW within the 5-day timeframe. An interview was conducted with the former MSW on 4/16/2025 at 12:14pm. The surveyor asked about the agency’s policy on the timeframe for completion of the initial medical social worker hospice evaluation. The MSW stated “have to be out there within 5 days.” The surveyor shared the findings on Patient 2 and asked why the initial visit was completed after the 5-day time frame. The MSW said “I failed on the job” and did not document the call. Record review of Patient 3 revealed a hospice plan of care for period 2/20/2025 to 5/20/2025 with a start of care date of 2/20/2025. The POC had MSW frequency as one visit in month 1. Records contained an initial medical social worker hospice evaluation dated 2/26/2025. Coordination notes in Patient 3’s records did not contain documentation or evidence that contact with the patient or family was made by the MSW within the 5-day timeframe. An interview was conducted with the former MSW on 4/16/2025 at 12:14pm. The surveyor asked about the agency’s policy on the timeframe for completion of the initial medical social worker hospice evaluation. The MSW stated “have to be out there within 5 days.” The surveyor shared the findings on Patient 3 and asked why the initial visit was completed after the 5-day time frame. The MSW stated “I don’t know what to say because I’m not sure why that didn’t happen within a timely manner.”An interview was conducted with the Adm, DON and Alt DON on 4/16/2025 at 1:15pm. The surveyor shared the findings of Patients 1, 2 and 3. The surveyor asked about the agency’s policy on the timeframe for completion of the initial medical social worker hospice evaluation. The Adm stated “It needs to be within 5 days of the nursing start of care for the social worker and chaplain.” The surveyor asked why the agency’s policy was not followed. The Adm stated he was responsible for ensuring that the IDG team members completed patients’ assessments/evaluations within the 5-day time frame. The Adm said he contacted the IDG team through phone calls and text messages and notified the team of the scheduled initial patients’ assessments/evaluations. The Adm stated when he followed up with the MSW with in the 5-day time frame, he was told by the MSW that the patients’ families wanted to reschedule the visits. The Adm stated the MSW told him that the phone calls were documented in the patient’s medical records. The Adm stated that once management noticed a pattern of rescheduled visits by the MSW they reviewed the patients’ records and “saw things that didn’t happen.” The Adm stated the MSW “chose to leave because we knew there was an issue.” The Alt DON stated, review of patients’ records by management revealed missing documentation of phone calls by the MSW and rescheduled visits past the 5 days. The surveyor asked how the delay in the MSW’s patients’ initial evaluations could have affected patients’ outcomes. The Alt DON stated, the delay resulted in the MSW’s inability to contribute to the development of the patients’ comprehensive plan of cares, which had the potential for the patients’ psychosocial needs to be unmet.Review of agency’s policy “Comprehensive Assessment, Policy No. 2-030.1, revision November 2024,” reads in part “A comprehensive patient assessment will be performed by the hospice IDG no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care in consultation with the attending physician.””

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 16, 2025Recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 8, 2018.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Cornerstone Healthcare Inc. owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 2021.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: Brent Mills (corporate officer, 0%); Jance Morris (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Jonathan Travis Jones (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Molly Dame (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Philip Mnason Hamby (managing employee (under contract)); Shelton Johnson (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Shelton Johnson (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); John Gochnour (corporate officer, 0%); Amanda Periman (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Amber L Tueller (corporate officer, 0%); Elliot Mcmillan (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Cornerstone Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jan 1, 2021
The Pennant Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2021

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 55 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 76109, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 1.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.