Blue Skies Hospice
A hospice in San Antonio, Texas 78245
12455 Freedom Way, San Antonio, Texas 78245. (210) 838-6340.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 12 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
12 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 106 hospices serving ZIP code 78245 had 4.
The last inspection on record was on May 9, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
May 9, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission12 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 106 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to conduct and document a patient-specific comprehensive assessment and reassessment that identifies the patient’s need for hospice care and services. For example: on review of RRNHV#6 the patient had two wounds however there was no wound assessment documented the last week of April. Per the Patient Care Manager the organization policy is to document a wound assessment weekly. In RRNHV#8 and RRNHV#9 the patient had documentation of wounds yet there was no documentation of wound assessments weekly as required by policy. These observations were reviewed with the Patient Care Manager and Administrator.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 127 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to develop an individualized written plan of care that included goals that were specific, measurable, and time-bound. Throughout all records reviewed the goals were noted to not be specific, measurable and time-bound. Examples of goals in RRHV#1 were Patient will participate in personally identified desired activities and Patient and family will report an understanding of interventions for fatigue and weakness. In RRHV#2 examples were Pt has needs met through EOL and family is supported. END DATE 7/19/2024. In RRHV#3 Patient’s skin will be maintained at optimal integrity, Patient will report comfort and Patient and family will report understanding of skin breakdown management. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator and Patient Care Manager.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 272 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care included all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. For example: on review of RRHV#2 conversation with the RN and documentation noted the patient was having increased secretions that necessitated a medication change yet the change in condition was not reflected in the plan of care. Further there was ongoing documentation of education on what to expect as the end of life nears yet there was no care plan to reflect the issue. In RRHV#3 the patient had documentation of a yeast, eye, and urinary infection yet no care plans opened to guide the care. The patient also had a foley catheter but the plan of care was for incontinence and did not fully reflect the presence of the foley. In RRNHV#8 there was also documentation of a foley catheter that was not reflected in the plan of care. In RRNHV#5 the patient was noted to be a high fall risk with documentation of a fall yet no safety care plan open. There was also documentation of an antifungal cream started for excoriation yet no care plan to guide the care. In RRNHV#6 there was documentation of wounds but no care plan for skin integrity. In RRNHV#9 there was documentation of constipation with medication additions and digital stool removal yet no care plan to reflect the changes. Further, there were multiple medications discontinued yet no reflection of the changes in the plan of care. These observation were reviewed with the Administrator and Patient Care Manager.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 178 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all medications and treatments necessary to meet the patient’s needs. For example: on review of RRHV#3 and RRNHV#8 the patient had a foley catheter but the plan of care did not include a complete order as the only order was on the initial hospice order that stated to change catheter per hospice protocol without further explanation such as type, size, and frequency for the change. In RRNHV#9 there were orders for wound care that were incomplete as one stated clean RLE, pat dry and leave open to air during night. There was no indication of who was to perform care, what to clean with nor how to treat the wound during the day. In RRNHV#10 there were orders in the medication profile that were incomplete as the noted q2 PRN and G3 scheduled. The orders did not specify a time frame such as hours or days. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator and Patient Care Manager.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 298 words
“Observed in HR File Review. In 2 of 2 HR files reviewed, for Hospice Aides the organization failed to document competency evaluation as part of orientation that that included all required elements. On review of HR#3 for the Aide there was no documentation of competencies evaluated by an RN supervisor by observing the aides performance of tasks with a patient or pseudo-patient as part of a simulation for: Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other staff - Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respirations - Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include bed, sponge, tub, or shower bath; sink, tub, or bed shampoo; nail and skin care; oral hygiene; toileting and elimination - Safe transfer techniques and ambulation - Normal range of motion and positioning as the only competency on file only covered hospice philosophy, death and dying concepts, and adhering to the plan of care, and infection control with no documentation of how the skill was assessed. On review of HR#7 the aide’s initial competency was noted to be completed with demonstration yet was completed one year after the Aide’s hire date. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator. Observed in HR File Review. In 2 of 2 HR files reviewed, for hospice aides, the organization failed to ensure competency evaluation for Aide’s include all required elements. On review of HR#3 and HR#7 for Hospice Aides the competencies documented did not include all required elements. For HR#3 there was only an annual core competency completed shortly after hire and no documentation of an initial competency, and for HR#7 the initial competency was completed a year after hire and had missing pages not meeting all requirements. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))
The inspectors’ words, 128 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the hospice aide provided care that was ordered in the plan of care. For example: on review of RRHV#2 the aide plan of care assigned a shower yet the aide documented that a bed bath was provided. In RRHV#3 the patient had a foley catheter and the aide documented providing foley care however, foley care was not assigned on the Plan of Care. In RRNHV#7 the aide documented that a shower was given yet there was no bath assigned. Further, the aide plan of care noted to record the latest bowel movement, yet the aide did not document the last BM. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator and Patient Care Manager.”
-
Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. the organization failed to document and demonstrate viable and ongoing efforts to recruit and retain volunteers. On review of the volunteer program the volunteer coordinator noted they have recruitment and retention efforts yet none of the efforts are documented. This observation was reviewed with the Volunteer Coordinator and the Administrator.”
-
Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))
The inspectors’ words, 92 words
“Observed in Tracer Activities. On review of the volunteer program the organization failed to provided day -to-day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. The organization had multiple volunteers as part of their program yet consistently failed to log 5 percent or greater of the total patient care hours, as the average for the past year was 2.03 %. This observation was reviewed with the Volunteer Coordinator and the Administrator.”
-
Professional management responsibility (42 CFR 418.100(e)(3))
“Observed in Competency Session. In 1 of 4 contracts reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the written agreement with an outside agency providing contracted services for the hospice include a stipulation that services may be provided only with the authorization of the hospice and delivered in accordance with the patient’s plan of care as evidenced by the Therapy contract reviewed lacked this information. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 3 of 7 HR files reviewed, the organization failed to ensure documentation of providing an initial orientation for each employee that addressed the employee’s specific job duties. On review of HR#1 for the Patient Care Manager, and HR#3, and HR#7 for the Hospice Aide’s there was no documentation of orientation specific to the job duties and this documentation could not be produced on survey. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 131 words
“Observed in HR File Review. In 2 of 3 HR files reviewed, for staff employed greater than one year the hospice failed to ensure staff competence is assessed and documented annually as required by policy. On review of HR#6 for the MD and HR#2 for the RN there was no documentation of annual competency assessment as required. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator. Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 7 HR files reviewed, the organization failed to ensure that staff competence is initially assessed and documented as part of orientation. On review of HR#1 for the Patient Care Manager, HR#5 for Spiritual Counselor, and Bereavement Coordinator, and HR#4 for Volunteer Coordinator there was no documentation of competency assessed as part of orientation. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to ensure the discharge summary included all the required elements. On review of RRDC#1 and RRDC#2 the discharge summary lacked a summary of the patient’s stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management, and the patient’s current plan of care. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2024 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 12 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 28, 2009.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 27% at home, 42% in assisted living, 32% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 9.6 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 9.8% |
| Visits near death | 95.0% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Air Force Village Inc. and Bst Health Services Corp run it.
- 3 owners or officers are people: Amy Lyons (corporate officer, 100%); Amy Lyons (corporate director, 100%); Amy Lyons (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Air Force Village Inc. | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 100% | Oct 17, 2024 |
| Bst Health Services Corp | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | Oct 17, 2024 |
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 94.25% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 72.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 106 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78245, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 12.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Blue Skies Hospice This hospice | 12 |
| Bexar Hospice | 2 |
| Christus VNA Hospice San Antonio | 0 |
| Gentiva Hospice | 15 |
| Vitas Healthcare of Texas LP | 3 |
| Gentiva | 10 |
| Amedisys Hospice of San Antonio | 14 |
| Elara Caring | 0 |
| Heart to Heart Hospice of San Antonio, LLC | 6 |
| Alamo Hospice | 25 |
| Compassus - San Antonio | 4 |
| Harbour Hospice | 5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.