Hearth Record

First Call Hospice LLC

A hospice in Salem, Oregon 97302

2608 Cascadia Industrial Street SE, Salem, Oregon 97302. (503) 371-4567.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 18 hospices serving ZIP code 97302 had 6.5.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 17, 2025: a complaint inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 17, 2025: complaint inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 5 (Patients #1,#2,#3,#4,#5) did not have evidence that the hospice informed and provided written information to the patient concerning its policies on advance directives, including a description of applicable state law.”

    Rule L0503. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 208 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 5 (Patients #1,#2,#3,#4) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1: The medical record contained an order 9/17/25 for oxygen rate, frequency, and delivery method. There was no evidence of oxygen listed on the medication profile. The medication profile contained latanoprost eye drops with no instructions for which eye or eyes require administration. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation 10/4/25 identifying patient use of Advil. There was no evidence of Advil listed on the medication profile. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of oxygen listed on the medication profile. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of oxygen listed on the medication profile. The medication profile also contained Miralax oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 1: The medical record contained an order for wound care 9/30/25. There was no evidence of wound assessments or measurements after 9/30/25.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 119 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #1) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient issues with dysphagia and use of Eliquis listed in medications since admission. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to risks for aspiration and bleeding included in the plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 162 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 5 (Patients #1,#2,#3,#4) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: The medical record contained an order for latanoprost eye drops with no instructions for which eye or eyes requiring administration. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation 10/4/25 identifying patient use of Advil. There was no evidence of an order for Advil dose and frequency. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of an order for oxygen rate, frequency, and delivery method. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of an order for oxygen rate, frequency, and delivery method. The record also contained an order for Miralax oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 188 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 5 (Patients, #1,#2,#4,#5) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The medical record contained an order 9/17/25 for oxygen rate, frequency, and delivery method and nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a Hoyer lift for transfers. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation 10/4/25 identifying a commode was ordered to be delivered by the supplier. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of an order for the oxygen DME included in the plan of care. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of hospital bed, overbed table, commode, and wheelchair. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation 10/3/25 identifying nurse increased oxygen flow rate from one to three liters per minute. There was no evidence of an order for oxygen.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Retrieval of clinical records (42 CFR 418.104(f))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the patient record, whether hard copy or in electronic form, is made readily available on request by an appropriate authority. The administrator did not have access to EMR and additional knowledge of the hospice program to start the survey resulting in an hour and a half delay until the director arrived.”

    Rule L0685. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Sep 10, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care6 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 5 (Patient #1, 2, 3, 4, 5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment takes into consideration the imminence of death.”

    Rule L0528. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patient #1, 2) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1: Patient taking Sennosides 8.6mg po prn constipation. (bottle found in home). This medication is not listed on the medication profile. Corrected on Site Patient #2: Patient using Albuterol inhaler prn shortness of breath. (found in home) This medication is not listed on the medication profile. Corrected on Site”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patient #1, 2) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: Patient taking Sennosides 8.6mg po prn constipation. This medication is not listed on the Plan of Care orders. Corrected on site. Patient #2: Patient using Albuterol inhaler prn shortness of breath. This medication is not listed on the Plan of Care orders. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #1: PRN visit completed by RN on 09/07/24 at 14:00 for “leaking catheter”. RN documents,” irrigated with 50cc normal saline.” Supplemental order written and states “flush with 30cc normal saline”.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 118 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 5 (Patient #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice aides report: • Changes in the patient’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, and social needs to a registered nurse, as the changes relate to the plan of care and quality assessment and improvement activities • Hospice aides must also complete appropriate records in compliance with the hospice’s policies and procedures Patient #5: Aide care plan indicates “assist to toilet, assist to bedside commode, stand by assist with ambulation” are to be performed every visit. Aide note dated 07-19-24 hospice aide marked, “NO-patient not able”, for assist to toilet, assist to bedside commode and ambulation”. No documentation that RN was notified.”

    Rule L0628. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #1: Acknowledgement of receipt of Patient Rights and Responsibilities was signed by patient with the date of 08/08/24 on the signature line, which was incorrect. Hospice representative signed and dated 08/18/24. All other consents were signed 08/18/24.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 17, 2025Complaint inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies cited
Sep 10, 2024Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 1, 2024.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 8 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 7 owners or officers are people: Sheryl Mullin (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Adam N Glaser (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ronald Greg Bartel (corporate officer); Emilie D Dohman (corporate director); Jacob Mullin (corporate officer); Jacob Mullin (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jacob Mullin (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 18 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 97302, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6.5; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.