Hearth Record

Signature Healthcare at Home

A hospice in Tigard, Oregon 97224

7632 SW Durham Road, Suite 130, Tigard, Oregon 97224. (503) 261-8599.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 27 hospices serving ZIP code 97224 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 23, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 23, 2025: recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 209 words

    “Based on patient record review and interview, it was determined that the agency failed to complete a bereavement assessment, which is part of the initial comprehensive assessment, in the timeframe as stipulated in the requirements of this standard. Findings:Review of 14 patient medical records revealed that 3 patient records (#5, #7 and #14) lacked documentation of a bereavement assessment completed with the initial comprehensive assessment.Review of Patient medical record #5 with an election of hospice care date of 01/17/2025, revealed the bereavement assessment was not completed until 03/28/2025, which exceeds the 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care.Review of Patient medical record #7 with an election of hospice care date of 08/18/2025, revealed the bereavement assessment was not completed until 09/03/2025, which exceeds the 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care.Review of Patient medical record #14 with an election of hospice care date of 05/02/2025, revealed the bereavement assessment was not completed until 06/02/2025, which exceeds the 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care.During interview with the Bereavement Coordinator on 09/22/2025 beginning at 09:30 AM, it was acknowledged the three assessments were not completed in the timeframe as required. “This has been a struggle and because of this we have created a PIP.””

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 258 words

    “Based on patient medical record review, it was determined the agency failed to include on the individualized care plan for each patient, the problems identified during the initial, comprehensive and updated comprehensive assessments. Findings:Review of 7 patient medical records (Patients #7-14) revealed that patient problems identified during the initial comprehensive assessment were not included in the patient care plan.Review of Patient #7 medical record revealed a document titled, “SOC Initial Comprehensive Assessment” dated 06/20/2025. Problems identified during the initial comprehensive assessment included risk for falls, pain, bowel elimination and dysphagia. Review of the document titled, “Comprehensive Care Plan Report” failed to include the problems identified and individualized goals to meet the patient’s needs.Review of Patient #8 medical record revealed a document titled, “SOC Initial Comprehensive Assessment” dated 04/08/2025. A problem identified during the initial comprehensive assessment included a need for bowel care. Review of the document titled, “Comprehensive Care Plan Report” failed to include the problem identified and an individualized goal to meet the patient’s need.Review of Patient #10 medical record revealed a document titled, “SOC Initial Comprehensive Assessment” dated 06/27/2025. A problem identified during the initial comprehensive assessment included nutritional impairment, weight loss. Review of the document titled, “Comprehensive Care Plan Report” failed to include the problem identified and an individualized goal to meet the patient’s need.Similar findings were revealed for Patient’s #9 and #11-14.During an interview with the Executive Director, Director of Clinical Services and Clinical Manager on 09/23/2025 beginning at 1:30 PM, the above findings were presented. The Director of Clinical Services acknowledged the findings.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 291 words

    “Based on patient medical records reviewed, it was determined the agency failed to include individualized measurable outcomes anticipated from implementing and coordinating the care plan for 12 of 14 patient care plans reviewed (Patients #1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12). Findings:Review of the medical record of Patient #1 reflected an admission date on 01/23/2025. The “Hospice IDG Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Report” revealed the problem, “Pain Managment” with the goal “Pain is managed at a level acceptable to the patient.” The care plan lacked individualized and measurable patient goals/outcomes anticipated from implementing the plan of care to address pain management.Similar findings were identified for patients #2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, and 12. Review of the medical record of Patient #6 reflected an admission date on 04/21/2025. The “Hospice IDG Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Report” revealed the problem, “Nutrition/Hydration management” with the goal “Patient is in control of what, how much, and when to eat.” The care plan lacked individualized and measurable patient goals/outcomes anticipated from implementing the plan of care to address nutrition/hydration management.Similar findings were identified for patients #7, 9, 11, and 12.Review of the medical record of Patient #8 reflected an admission date on 08/04/2025. The “Hospice IDG Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Report” revealed the problem, “Gastrointestinal Managment “ with the goal “Patient ‘s constipation will be controlled/relieved.” The care plan lacked individualized and measurable patient goals/outcomes anticipated from implementing the plan of care to address gastrointestinal management.Similar findings were identified for patients #7 and 11.During an interview with the Executive Director, Director of Clinical Services, and Clinical Manager on 09/23/2025 beginning at 1:30 PM, the above findings were presented and acknowledged.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 23, 2025Recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 16, 2016.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 2.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 81.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 54% at home, 33% in assisted living, 12% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends2.1%
Visits near death81.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Cornerstone Healthcare Inc. owns 100% directly since Apr 13, 2015.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: James Arp (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Brent Mills (corporate officer, 0%); Brent Guerisoli (corporate director, 0%); Carma Lee (managing employee (under contract), 0%); John Gochnour (corporate officer, 0%); Amber L Tueller (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Cornerstone Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Apr 13, 2015
The Pennant Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 1, 2019

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 81% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.03% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 24.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 27 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 97224, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 3.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.