Hearth Record

Samaritan Evergreen Hospice

A hospice in Albany, Oregon 97322

4600 Evergreen Place, SE, Albany, Oregon 97322. (541) 812-4662.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 12 hospices serving ZIP code 97322 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 23, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 23, 2024: recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 204 words

    “Based on record review and interview, it was determined the agency failed to discuss in the IDT meeting and make efforts to resolve multiple missed Home Health Aide and Social Worker visits for 2 of 29 patient records reviewed (Patients #20 and #21). Findings: Patient #20: Review of a document titled “HOSPICE OUTPATIENT ADMIT 11/14/2023” revealed an order to provide services of Home Health Aide (HHA), Medical Social Worker (MSW), Skilled Nursing, Chaplain, and Case Manager to Patient #20. Review of a screen shot document titled “HHA Missed Visits” revealed “MSW - HOSPICE REASSESSMENT” missed days on “04/05/2024, 03/21/2024, 01/26/2024, 01/10/2024, 12/20/2023, 11/17/2023” and HHA “MISSED VISIT - HOSPICE” on “07/17/2024, 06/12/2024, 01/24/2024, and 01/17/2024.” The agency failed to provide documentation on efforts made by clinicians to resolve missed visits or discussion in IDT meetings. Patient #21: Review of a document titled with Patient 21’s name revealed Home Health Aide missed visits on “08/05/2024, 06/21/2024, 05/31/2024, 05/24/2024, 05/10/2024, 05/03/2024, 04/19/2024, 02/21/2023.” The agancy failed to provide documentation on efforts made by clinicians to resolve missed visits or discussion in IDT meetings. During an interview on 8/20/2024 at 2:00 PM with Employee #10 and Employee #11, the finding was discussed. No additional documentation was provided.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

Aug 2, 2024: recertification inspection by the state10 deficiencies
  • Develop EP Plan, Review and Update Annually (42 CFR 418.113(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 283 words

    “Based on observations, record review and interview during the survey, it was determined through on-going dialog with the Hospice House Manager and Emergency Management Coordinator that the facility failed to comply with the Federal, State and local EP requirements to establish and maintain a comprehensive EP program that includes development of an emergency preparedness plan and that the plan is reviewed and updated annually (CFR 42 Part 483113(a)) . Findings include: 1. On 8/2/2024, during survey between 11:42 am and 4:55 pm, the Hospice House Manager who was identified as the individual in charge, did not have immediate access to the Facility Emergency Plan (EP) and failed to provide the necessary documentation that demonstrates proficiency in the safeguarding of residents and staff during various emergencies situations. The initial EP presented to the surveyor at 12:10 pm was missing multiple components including an Emergency Policies and Procedures based on all hazards approach, Evacuation Procedures, Shelter-in-Place Procedures, Communications Plan, and Training and Testing program. At approximately 1:45 the Hospice House Manager was able to locate another EP Binder that contained some of the necessary EP components but was still incomplete (i.e. evacuation plan, shelter in place, policies and procedures). At approximately 4:00 the Samaritan Emergency Management Coordinator joined the survey and additional EP information was obtained although not readily available onsite at time of the survey. 2. On 8/2/2024, during record review between 12:10 pm and 4:45 pm, the facility failed to provide the necessary annual program review needed to ensure compliance. The last documented review was conducted in July 2022. These findings were confirmed by the Hospice House Manager and Emergency Management Coordinator at the time of discovery and reviewed at the exit conference”

    Rule E0004. Standard-level.

  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1)-(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 159 words

    “Based on observations and interview during the survey, it was determined through on-going dialog with the Hospice House Manager and Emergency Management Coordinator that the facility failed to comply with Federal, State and local EP requirements to establish and maintain a comprehensive EP program based on an all hazards approach and includes strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment (CFR 42 Part 418.113 (a)(1)-(2)). Findings include: On 8/2/2024, during record review between 12:10 pm and 4:45 pm, the facility Hazard Vulnerability Assessment did not identify all risks that could impact the facility. For example the facility utilizes natural gas, however gas leaks were not identified as a risk that could impact the facility including a gas leak that could lead to an explosion and a policy and procedure to address the risk. These findings were confirmed by the Hospice House Manager and Emergency Management Coordinator at the time of discovery and reviewed at the exit conference”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • Development of EP Policies and Procedures (42 CFR 418.113(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 139 words

    “Based on document review and interview during the survey, it was determined through on-going dialog with the Hospice House Manager and Emergency Management Coordinator that the facility failed to comply with Federal, State and local EP requirements to establish and maintain a comprehensive EP program by developing and implementing policies and procedures base on the emergency plan and risk assessment (CFR 42 Part 483.113(b)). Findings include: On 8/2/2024, during record review between 12:10 pm and 4:45 pm, the facility failed to develop and implement EP policies and procedure, based on the risks identified in the Hazards Vulnerability Assessment (HVA) and the EP did not provide clear direction on how to access EP policies and procedures. These findings were confirmed by the Hospice House Manager and Emergency Management Coordinator at the time of discovery and reviewed at the exit conference”

    Rule E0013. Standard-level.

  • Subsistence Needs for Staff and Patients (42 CFR 418.113(b)(6)(iii))

    The inspectors’ words, 140 words

    “Based on document review and interview during the survey, it was determined through on-going dialog with the Hospice House Manager and Emergency Management Coordinator that the facility failed to comply with Federal, State and local EP requirements to establish and maintain a comprehensive EP program to provide that includes the provision of subsistence needs for staff and patients whether they evacuate or shelter in place (CFR 42 Part 483.113(b)(6)(iii)). Findings include: On 8/2/2024, during record review between 12:10 pm and 4:45 pm, the facility failed to provide evidence of a secure and stable patient environment in the event of an elongated emergency, to include: (iii) defined policies and/or protocols for medical, and pharmaceutical supplies of staff. These findings were confirmed by the Hospice House Manager and Emergency Management Coordinator at the time of discovery and reviewed at the exit conference”

    Rule E0015. Standard-level.

  • Policies for Evac. and Primary/Alt. Comm. (42 CFR 418.113(b)(6)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 116 words

    “Based on observations and interview during the survey, it was determined through on-going dialog with the Hospice House Manager that the facility failed to comply with Federal, State and local EP requirements to establish and maintain a comprehensive EP program that includes policies and procedures for safe evacuation of the facility (CFR 42 Part 483.113(b)(6)(ii)). Findings include: On 8/2/2024, during record review between 12:10 pm and approximately 2:00 pm, the Hospice House Manager that was identified as the individual in charge in the event of an emergency did not have readily available access to evacuation procedures. These findings were confirmed by the Hospice House Manager at the time of discovery and reviewed at the exit conference”

    Rule E0020. Standard-level.

  • Policies/Procedures for Sheltering in Place (42 CFR 418.113(b)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 132 words

    “Based on observations and interview during the survey, it was determined through on-going dialog with the Hospice House Manager and Emergency Management Coordinator that the facility failed to comply with Federal, State and local EP requirements to establish and maintain a comprehensive EP program that includes a means to shelter in place for patients, staff and volunteers (CFR 42 Part 483.113(b)(6)(i)). Findings include: On 8/2/2024, during record review between 12:10 pm and 4:45 pm, the facility failed to provide the policy and procedure documentation that includes a means for sheltering all patients, staff, and volunteers who remain in the facility in the event an evacuation cannot be executed. These findings were confirmed by the Hospice House Manager and Emergency Management Coordinator at the time of discovery and reviewed at the exit conference”

    Rule E0022. Standard-level.

  • Emergency Officials Contact Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 148 words

    “Based on observations and interview during the survey, it was determined through on-going dialog with the Hospice House Manager and Emergency Management Coordinator that the facility failed to comply with Federal, State and local EP requirements to establish and maintain a comprehensive EP program that includes contact information for Emergency Officials and other sources of assistance (CFR 42 Part 483.113(c)(2)). Findings include: On 8/2/2024, during record review between 12:10 pm and 4:45 pm, the facility did not have current and updated Emergency Officials contact information. Surveyor does not have the ability to confirm all of the facilities emergency officials and sources of assistance contact information, however the Department of State Fire Marshal’s information including phone, email, and website was more than 5 years old. These findings were confirmed by the Hospice House Manager and Emergency Management Coordinator at the time of discovery and reviewed at the exit conference.”

    Rule E0031. Standard-level.

  • Integrated EP Program (42 CFR 418.113(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 270 words

    “Based on observations and interview during the survey, it was determined through on-going dialog with the Hospice House Manager and Emergency Management Coordinator that the facility failed to comply with Federal, State and local EP requirements to establish and maintain a comprehensive EP program for an integrated health care system (CFR 42 Part 483.113(e)). Findings include: On 8/2/2024, during record review between 12:10 pm and 4:45 pm, the Emergency Management Coordinator indicated that the facility is part of an Integrated Healthcare System. Staff indicated that the EP is an integrated plan for all Samaritan facilities. The facilities EP was not specific to the facility Staff indicated the facility relies on assistance from Samaritan staff that are not located on site but responds to emergencies as they are able. The facility failed to provide evidence that the facility meets the following requirements for an integrated EP plan: 1. Demonstrate that each separately certified facility within the system actively participated in the development of the unified and integrated EP program. 2. Be developed and maintained in a manner that takes into account each separately certified facility’s unique circumstances, patient populations and services offered. 3. Demonstrate that each separately certified facility is capable of actively using the unified and integrated EP program and is in compliance. 4. Include a unified and integrated EP plan that is based on a community-based and facility-based all hazards approach . 5. Include integrated policies and procedures based on the all hazards risk analysis. These findings were confirmed by the Hospice House Manager and Emergency Management Coordinator at the time of discovery and reviewed at the exit conference.”

    Rule E0042. Standard-level.

  • Sprinkler System - Maintenance and Testing (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Based on observations, record review and interview during the survey, it was determined through on-going dialog with the Hospice House Manager that the facility failed to ensure the automatic sprinkler and standpipe systems were continuously maintained, inspected and tested in a reliable operating condition for entire building. This resulted in the potential for system failure during fire emergencies (LSC 19.3.5, 9.7.5, 9.7.7, 9.7.8, NFPA 25). Findings include: On 8/2/2024, during survey of physical environment between 3:15 pm and 3:50 pm, there were gaps between the fire sprinkler escutcheon and the ceiling on fire sprinkler heads throughout the facility. This would allow for the spread of fire and smoke to other areas of the facility. Surveyor was accompanied by the Hospice House Manager who acknowledged the existence of these conditions.”

    Rule K0353. Standard-level.

  • Fire Drills (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 285 words

    “Based on observations, interviews and record review during the survey, it was determined through on-going dialog with the Hospice House Manager that the facility failed to provide fire drills for all staff affecting the entire building. This resulted in the potential for inadequate staff knowledge during fire emergencies, potentially exposing residents to smoke and fire in the facility (LSC 19.7.1.4 – 19.7.1.7). Findings include: 1. On 8/2/2022, during record review between 12:10 pm and 4:45 pm, facility documentation presented to the surveyor by the facility showed that fire drills for day and night shifts in 2023 and 2024 were at random times throughout the shifts. Fire drills were for day shift were conducted at 9:30 am, 9:15 am, and 10:15 am; fire drills for night shift were conducted at 6:30 am, 6:35 am, and 6:00 am; which demonstrates that fire drills were conducted in a manner that created a pattern, instead of on different times throughout the shifts. 2. On 8/2/2022, during record review between 12:10 pm and 4:45 pm, facility documentation presented to the surveyor showed incomplete fire drill forms for the facility. Fire drill forms were missing items such as but not limited to the number of simulated occupants evacuated from the affected smoke compartment, time to complete the simulated evacuation from the affected smoke compartment to an unaffected smoke compartment, specific type of fire simulated, specific location of simulated fire and Staff Performance during the drill. 3. On 8/2/2022, during record review between 12:10 pm and 4:45 pm, the facility had no documentation for a fire drill conducted for night shift in the 4th quarter of 2023. Surveyor was accompanied by the Hospice House Manage who acknowledged the existence of these conditions.”

    Rule K0712. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 23, 2024Recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency cited
Aug 2, 2024Recertification inspection by the state10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 6, 1991.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 91.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 58% at home, 17% in assisted living, 8% in a nursing facility, 7% in a skilled nursing facility, 10% in an inpatient hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends11.3%
Visits near death91.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Samaritan Health Services Inc. and Albany General Hospital run it.
  • 13 owners or officers are people: Daniel Burton Smith (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Brian R Summers (corporate director); Seth K Arrow (corporate director); Stacy Koos (corporate director); Kristal Dufour (corporate director); Daniel Keteri (corporate officer); Daniel Keteri (managing employee (on the payroll)); Scott A Schindell (corporate director); Karsen O’bryan (corporate officer); Paul M Greaves (corporate director); April Grace Jensen (corporate director); Rick Kenyon (corporate director); Paul B Daskalos (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Samaritan Health Services Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)100%Jan 1, 2000
Albany General HospitalRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Jan 1, 2000

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 81% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 87% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 81.36% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 63.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 97322, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.