Hearth Record

Good Shepherd Hospice of Ardmore, LLC

A hospice in Ardmore, Oklahoma 73401

1505 North Commerce, Suite 104, Ardmore, Oklahoma 73401. (580) 798-6116.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 13 hospices serving ZIP code 73401 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 25, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 25, 2024: recertification inspection by the state8 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 235 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure completion of an initial assessments/plan of care no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice benefits for two (Patients #8 and 14) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #8 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 09/22/22 with POC from 09/22/22 to 12/21/22. Documentation showed a psychosocial assessment by the MSW was completed by telephone on 09/28/22 (6 days after the hospice election date) and a spiritual / bereavement assessment by the chaplain was completed by telephone on 10/07/22 (17 days after the hospice election date). Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of assessments and showed no communications or notifications to the physician. On 06/25/24 at 12:00 p.m., Staff A stated the initial POC was not completed within the first five days after the election of the hospice benefit for patient #8. Patient #14 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 05/22/24 with POC from 05/22/24 to 08/19/24. Documentation showed no spiritual / bereavement assessment by the chaplain was completed. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of assessments and showed no communications or notifications to the physician. On 06/25/24 at 12:15 p.m., Staff A stated the initial POC was not completed within the first five days after the election of the hospice benefit for patient #14.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,128 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the plan of care was fully developed to include: 1. A hospice diagnosis and; 2. As needed (PRN) visits were designated for use by SN, MSW and Chaplain services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness for 13 (Patients #1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18 and #19) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #1 A plan of care dated 05/29/24 to 07/27/24 and plan of care updates dated 05/30/24 and 06/13/24 failed to include a hospice diagnosis. On 06/25/24 at 11:42 a.m., Staff A stated the POC did not include a hospice diagnosis. Patient #3 A plan of care dated 06/15/24 to 08/13/24 and plan of care updates dated 06/13/24 failed to include a hospice diagnosis. Documentation showed PRN visits for SN and MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. On 06/25/24 at 11:45 a.m., Staff A stated the POC did not include a hospice diagnosis and documentation showed PRN visits for SN and MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. Patient #4 A plan of care dated 05/07/24 to 08/04/24 and plan of care updates dated 05/17/24, 05/30/24 and on 06/13/24 failed to include a hospice diagnosis. Documentation showed PRN visits for MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. On 06/25/24 at 11:50 a.m., Staff A stated the POC did not include a hospice diagnosis and documentation showed PRN visits for MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. Patient #6 A plan of care dated 05/02/24 to 07/30/24 and plan of care updates dated 05/17/24, 05/30/24 and on 06/13/24 failed to include a hospice diagnosis. Documentation showed PRN visits for SN, Chaplain and MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. On 06/25/24 at 11:58 a.m., Staff A stated the POC did not include a hospice diagnosis and documentation showed PRN visits for SN, Chaplain and MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. Patient #8 A plan of care dated 05/13/24 to 07/11/24 and plan of care updates dated 05/17/24, 05/30/24 and on 06/13/24 failed to include a hospice diagnosis. Documentation showed PRN visits for SN, Chaplain and MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. On 06/25/24 at 12:00 p.m., Staff A stated the POC did not include a hospice diagnosis and documentation showed PRN visits for SN, Chaplain and MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. Patient #9 A plan of care dated 03/21/24 to 06/18/24 and plan of care updates dated 04/29/24, showed documentation of an order for SN to replace urinary catheter. Documentation showed no catheter type or size. On 06/25/24 at 12:05 p.m., Staff A stated the POC did not include urinary catheter type and size. Patient #10 A plan of care dated 04/19/24 to 06/17/24 and plan of care updates dated 05/02/24, 05/17/24, 05/30/24 and on 06/13/24 documentation showed PRN visits for MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. On 06/25/24 at 11:58 a.m., Staff A stated the POC documentation showed PRN visits for MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. Patient #11 A plan of care dated 06/04/24 to 09/01/24 and plan of care updates dated 06/13/24 documentation showed PRN visits for SN, Chaplain and MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. On 06/25/24 at 12:10 p.m., Staff A stated the POC documentation showed PRN visits for SN, Chaplain and MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. Patient #12 A plan of care dated 04/24/24 to 06/22/24 and plan of care updates dated 05/02/24, 05/17/24, 05/30/24 and on 06/13/24 failed to include a hospice diagnosis. Documentation showed PRN visits for MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. On 06/25/24 at 12:10 p.m., Staff A stated the POC did not include a hospice diagnosis and documentation showed PRN visits for MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. Patient #16 A plan of care dated 02/04/24 to 04/03/24 and plan of care updates dated 02/08/24, 02/22/24, 03/07/24 and on 03/21/24 failed to include a hospice diagnosis. Documentation showed PRN visits for SN, Chaplain and MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. On 06/25/24 at 12:25 p.m., Staff A stated the POC did not include a hospice diagnosis and documentation showed PRN visits for SN, Chaplain and MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. Patient #17 A plan of care dated 01/24/24 to 03/23/24 and plan of care updates dated 02/08/24, 02/22/24, 03/07/24 and on 03/21/24 failed to include a hospice diagnosis. Documentation showed PRN visits for SN, Chaplain and MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. On 06/25/24 at 12:26 p.m., Staff A stated the POC did not include a hospice diagnosis and documentation showed PRN visits for SN, Chaplain and MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. Patient #18 A plan of care dated 12/25/24 to 03/23/24 and plan of care updates dated 01/11/24, 01/25/24, 02/08/24, 02/25/24 and on 03/02/24 failed to include a hospice diagnosis. Documentation showed PRN visits for SN, Chaplain and MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. On 06/25/24 at 12:30 p.m., Staff A stated the POC did not include a hospice diagnosis and documentation showed PRN visits for SN, Chaplain and MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. Patient #19 A plan of care dated 02/07/24 to 04/06/24 and plan of care updates dated 02/08/24, 02/22/24, 03/07/24 and on 03/21/24 failed to include a hospice diagnosis. Documentation showed PRN visits for SN and MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness. On 06/25/24 at 12:35 p.m., Staff A stated the POC did not include a hospice diagnosis and documentation showed PRN visits for SN and MSW did not designate use for services necessary for the palliation and management of terminal illness.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 240 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure individualized plans of care were fully developed to include medical social work and chaplain visit frequencies for two (Patients #9 and #13) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #9 A review of the plan of care dated 03/21/24 to 06/18/24 with update to the plan of care dated 04/04/24, 04/18/24, 05/02/24, 05/17/24, 05/30/24 and on 06/13/24 showed a Medical Social Work visit frequency of one time a month for one month and one PRN visit for psychosocial support. Documentation showed Medical Social Work visits were conducted on 03/25/24, 04/24/24, 05/31/24 and on 06/17/24 (2 visits ordered, 4 visits conducted). Documentation showed no changes in orders. On 06/25/24 at 12:05 p.m., Staff A stated the individualized POC for Patients #9 did not contain ordered MSW service discipline visit frequencies and durations. Patient #13 A review of the plan of care dated 04/20/24 to 07/18/24 with update to the plan of care dated 05/02/24, 05/17/24, 05/30/24 and on 06/13/24 showed a Chaplain visit frequency of one time a month for one month and two PRN visit for emotional and spiritual support. Documentation showed Chaplain visits were conducted on 05/22/24, 05/30/24, 06/06/24, 06/13/24 and on 06/18/24 (3 visits ordered, 5 visits conducted). Documentation showed no changes in orders. On 06/25/24 at 12:05 p.m., Staff A stated the individualized POC for Patients #13 did not contain ordered Chaplain service discipline visit frequencies and durations.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 565 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure: 1. Social Work services discipline was ordered in the plans of care or communicated and coordinated through the IDG for one (Patient #4) of 19 patients and; 2. Hospice aide services discipline was ordered in the plans of care or communicated and coordinated through the IDG for two (Patients #5 and #15) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #4 A review of the plan of care dated 05/07/24 to 08/04/24 and plan of care update dated 05/17/24, 05/30/24 and on 06/13/24 showed an ordered MSW visit frequency and duration one time a month for three months and showed no change in service discipline needs were communicated and coordinated through the IDG. Documentation showed during the weeks of 05/07/24 to 05/31/24 no MSW visit was conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted). Documentation showed no changes to the ordered visit frequency for the MSW service discipline needs communicated and coordinated through the IDG. On 06/25/24 at 11:50 a.m., Staff A stated MSW service discipline was ordered in the plans of care for one time a month and there were no changes in the MSW visit frequency communicated and coordinated through the IDG for patients #4. Patient #5 A review of the plan of care dated 05/02/24 to 06/03/24 and plan of care update dated 05/17/24, 05/30/24 and on 06/13/24 showed an ordered aide visit frequency and duration one time a week for one week, then three times a week for eight weeks and showed no change in service discipline needs were communicated and coordinated through the IDG. Documentation showed during the weeks of 05/02/24 to 05/04/24 no aide visit was conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted). Documentation showed no changes to the ordered visit frequency for the aide service discipline needs communicated and coordinated through the IDG. On 06/25/24 at 11:55 a.m., Staff A stated aide service discipline was ordered in the plans of care for one time a week for one week, then three times a week for eight weeks and there were no changes in the aide visit frequency communicated and coordinated through the IDG for patients #5. Patient #15 A review of the plan of care dated 12/09/23 to 03/07/24 and plan of care update dated 12/14/23 and on 12/28/23 showed an ordered aide visit frequency and duration three times a week for 12 weeks, then two times a week for one week and showed no change in service discipline needs were communicated and coordinated through the IDG. Documentation showed during the weeks of 12/10/23 to 12/16/23 one aide visit was conducted on 12/11/23 (three visits ordered, one visit conducted), 12/17/23 to 12/23/23 one aide visit was conducted on 12/20/23 (three visits ordered, one visit conducted), 12/24/23 to 12/30/23 one aide visit was conducted on 12/27/23 (three visits ordered, one visit conducted), 12/30/23 to 01/06/24 one aide visit was conducted on 01/01/24 (three visits ordered, one visit conducted). Documentation showed no changes to the ordered visit frequency for the aide service discipline needs communicated and coordinated through the IDG. On 06/25/24 at 12:17 p.m., Staff A stated aide service discipline was ordered in the plans of care for three times a week for 12 weeks, then one time a week for one week and there were no changes in the aide visit frequency communicated and coordinated through the IDG for patients #15.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide training (42 CFR 418.76(b)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Based on a record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure documentation which showed completion of alternative training requirements to meet the qualifications of a Certified Home Health Aide for one (Staff F) of four employees reviewed. Findings: Staff F A review of personnel records showed certification as a Long-Term Care Aide. Documentation showed no current Home Health Aide certification and showed no documentation which showed completion of alternative training requirements to meet the qualifications of a Certified Home Health [Hospice] Aide. On 06/25/22 at 2:00 p.m., Staff A stated the personnel records were provided in their entirety and did not contain all the required information for Staff F.”

    Rule L0614. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 296 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure continued review and update of the hospice aide care plan for three (Patients #3, 10 and #12) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #3 A review of the clinical record showed a hospice aide care plan last reviewed and updated on 02/12/24 for the episode of 06/15/24 through 08/13/24 and IDG POC update dated 06/13/24. Documentation showed hospice aide visits were conducted on 06/18/24. On 06/25/24 at 11:45 a.m., Staff A stated the clinical record showed the hospice aide care plan dated 02/16/23 was not reviewed and updated for HA visits beginning 06/15/24 through 08/13/24. Patient #10 A review of the clinical record showed a hospice aide care plan last reviewed and updated on 02/13/24 for the episode of 04/19/24 through 06/17/24 and IDG POC update dated 05/02/24, 05/17/24, 05/30/24 and on 06/13/24. Documentation showed hospice aide visits were conducted on 04/23/24, 04/25/24, 04/30/24, 05/01/24, 05/07/24, 05/09/24, 05/14/24, 05/16/24, 05/21/24, 05/23/24, 05/28/24, 05/30/24, 06/04/24. 06/06/24, 06/11/24 and on 06/12/24. On 06/25/24 at 12:07 p.m., Staff A stated the clinical record showed the hospice aide care plan dated 02/13/24 was not reviewed and updated for HA visits beginning 04/19/24 through 06/17/24. Patient #12 A review of the clinical record showed a hospice aide care plan last reviewed and updated on 02/13/24 for the episode of 04/24/24 through 06/22/24 and IDG POC update dated 05/02/24, 05/17/24, 05/30/24 and on 06/13/24. Documentation showed hospice aide visits were conducted on 04/24/24, 04/29/24, 05/01/24, 05/06/24, 05/08/24, 05/13/24, 05/16/24, 05/21/24, 05/23/24, 05/27/24, 05/29/24, 06/04/24. 06/06/24, 06/11/24, 06/13/24, 06/18/24 and on 06/20/24. On 06/25/24 at 12:07 p.m., Staff A stated the clinical record showed the hospice aide care plan dated 02/13/24 was not reviewed and updated for HA visits beginning 04/24/24 through 06/20/24.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure personnel records were maintained with required annual employee performance evaluations for two (Volunteer #1 and 3) of three volunteers and four employees. Findings: Volunteer 1 A review of personnel records showed no annual performance evaluation for 04/23/23 to 04/23/24 employment period. Volunteer 3 A review of personnel records showed no annual performance evaluation for 12/12/22 to 06/25/24 employment period. On 06/25/22 at 2:00 p.m., Staff A stated the personnel records were provided in their entirety and did not contain all the required information for Volunteers 1 and 3.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure provision of a discharge summary of care for one (Patient #15) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #15 A review of the clinical record showed the patient was discharged from the hospice on 01/10/24. Documentation showed no discharge summary of care was completed or provided to the attending physician. On 06/25/24 at 12:17 p.m., Staff A stated the hospice failed to provide a discharge summary of care from the 01/10/24 discharge to the attending physician for patient #15.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 25, 2024Recertification inspection by the state8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 20, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 58% at home, 4% in assisted living, 38% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8%
Visits near death94.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Shellie K Greiner Revocable Trust owns 95% directly since Jan 1, 2021.
  • 5 owners or officers are people: Brian M Shockey (corporate director, 100%); Patricia Marsh (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Shellie K Greiner (owns 5% or more through other companies, 95.1%); Jason Kyle Delester (corporate officer); Brian M Shockey (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Shellie K Greiner Revocable TrustOwns 5% or more directly95%Jan 1, 2021

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 85.12% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 50% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 13 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73401, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.