Comforting Hands Hospice, LLC
A hospice in Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74006
1366 SE Washington Blvd., Suite A, Bartlesville, Oklahoma 74006. (918) 331-0003.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 22 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 8of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
22 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 22 hospices serving ZIP code 74006 had 8.
The last inspection on record was on Apr 24, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
22 deficiencies in 4 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Apr 24, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies
-
EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1)(i))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 8 HR files reviewed, it was noted the organization failed to ensure that the initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing hospice employees consistent with their expected roles. For example in HR#8 Volunteer personnel file review, the surveyor noted that the staff had not attended an emergency management training during orientation. This finding was reviewed and confirmed by the Volunteer Coordinator.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 93 words
“Observed in Record Review. it was noted the organization failed to ensure that the patient was informed in advance about the expected outcomes of care and services. For example in review of record of HOSRRDC#18, the notice of Medicare non-coverage (NOMNC) was signed by the patient 11 days late from the date patient was discharged from hospice services. In HOSRRDC#20, there was no evidence that patient had received NOMNC from the date patient was discharged from hospice services. This finding was discussed and validated by the hospice Administrator and Patient Care Coordinator (PCC).”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))
“Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 4 home visits conducted, it was noted the organization failed to conduct to reconcile medications in order to assess potential medication-related problems, including effectiveness of drug therapy. For example during home visit of HOSRRHV#2, the hospice registered nurse (RN) did not reconcile medications. Also observed during home visit of HOSRRHV#3, wherein the hospice registered nurse (RN) did not reconcile medications as well. This finding was discussed and validated by the hospice Administrator who was present during the visit.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 218 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 active patient records, it was noted the organization had failed to ensure that the written plan of care was developed in accordance with the patient’s identified goals with defined timeframes for achieving those goals. For example, HOSRRHV#1: MSW: Patient will maintain optimal coping through hospice care. HOSRRHV#2: SN Patient will pain free or verbalize an acceptable pain level with current pain management regimen. HOSRRHV#3: SN: Measured arm circumference will not decrease by more than 1 cm per month. HOSRRHV#4: MSW: Patient will demonstrate ability to cope with limitation. HOSRRNHV#5: HOSRRNHV#6: SC: Patient/Caregiver will feel needs are being met as they have defined; SN: Anxiety/agitation controlled through course of care. HOSRRNHV#7: Patient/Caregiver will verbalize appropriate interventions for stress/anxiety management. HOSRRNHV#8, HOSRRNHV#9: SC: Family/Caregiver will minimize effects of abnormal grief.(SN): Skin will remain intact. HOSRRNHV#10: Maintenance of respiratory baseline as evidenced by breathing at optimal level within disease parameters. HOSRRNHV#11: Aide: Patient’s personal care needs will be met. HOSRRNHV#12: SN: Family/caregiver maintain and modify environment according to patient’s cognitive and comfort status. HOSRRNHV#13: SC: Patient/Caregiver will feel needs are being met as they have defined. HOSRRNHV#14: SN: Patient/Caregiver will verbalize understanding of falls/injury prevention and home safety measures. This finding was discussed and validated by the Hospice Administrator and Patient Care Coordinator.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 136 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 active patient records reviewed, it was noted the organization failed to ensure that the hospice plan of care plan includes all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatment necessary to meet the patient’s needs. For example, on review of record HOSRRHV#2, SN was ordered to perform wound care/dressing change. apply thin layer of barrier cream. However, it did not indicate how often the wound dressing change and what kind of wound barrier cream; In record of HOSRRHV#4, an order for Oxygen 3 LPM via NC to maintain oxygen saturation above 90% and comfort, however, it did not specify frequency (continuously or intermittent). This finding was discussed and validated by the hospice Administrator and patient care coordinator (PCC).”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 97 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 active hospice patient records reviewed, it was noted the organization failed to ensure that a revised plan of care must include information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress toward outcomes and goals specified in the plan of care. For example on review of records HOSRRHV#1, HOSRRHV#2, HOSRRHV#3, HOSRRHV#4, HOSRRNHV#5,HOSRRNHV#6,HOSRRNHV#7,HOSRRNHV#8,HOSRRNHV#9,HOSRRNHV#10,HOSRRNHV#11,HOSRRNHV#12,HOSRRNHV#13,HOSRRNHV#14, The plan of care goals and interventions remained the same and not updated from admission and continued IDT to IDT meeting. This finding was discussed and validated by the Administrator and Patient Care Coordinator.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 117 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 active patient records with hospice aide services, it was noted the organization had failed to ensure that the written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a registered nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide. For example, HOSRRHV#1, HOSRRHV#2, HOSRRHV#3, HOSRRHV#4, HOSRRNHV#5,HOSRRNHV#6,HOSRRNHV#7,HOSRRNHV#8,HOSRRNHV#9,HOSRRNHV#10,HOSRRNHV#11,HOSRRNHV#12,HOSRRNHV#13,HOSRRNHV#14, the aide care plan did not include a frequency for each of the task assigned. Also noted in other records, HOSRRNHV#5 Patient takes Aspirin 81 mg 1 tablet PO once a day. No instructions related to bleeding precaution or not use razor blade when shaving. This finding was discussed with and validated by the Administrator and Patient Care Coordinator.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 121 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 active patient records with hospice aide services reviewed, it was noted the organization failed to ensure that hospice aide supervision was conducted at the patient’s home no less than every 14 days as required. For example in HOSRRHV#4, there was a gap of 15 days hospice aide supervision between the 2nd week and 4rth week of March (certification benefit period 1). Another example, in HOSRRHV#8, there was a gap of 15 days hospice aide supervision between 2nd week and 4rth week of March and also noted between the 1st and 3rd week of April (certification benefit period 4). This finding was discussed and validated by the hospice administrator and patient care coordinator (PCC).”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 3 Live discharge hospice records reviewed, it was noted the organization failed to ensure that the hospice discharge summary includes a summary of the patient’s stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management. For example in review of record of HOSRRDC#18, HOSRRDC#19, and HOSRRDC#20, the discharge summary sections such as reason for admission, discharge condition, summary of care, post-dc goals left were left blank. This finding was discussed and validated by the hospice Administrator and Patient Care Coordinator (PCC).”
-
Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 109 words
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 1 hospice patient with home oxygen observed, it was noted the organization failed to provide patient education and training related to storage, handling, and access of home oxygen. For example, during home visit of HHRRHV#4 , the hospice nurse surveyor had noticed 1 oxygen cylinder stored in the living room, although in upright position, but unsecured and also found another oxygen cylinder stored in the garage. The clinical staff had not re-educated patient the proper storage and safety nor taking action during the entire home visit. This finding was discussed and validated by hospice Administrator (RN), who was present during the visit.”
Aug 26, 2024: follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission1 deficiency
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 143 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 5 patient records reviewed, the plan of care failed to include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including treatments necessary to meet the patient’s needs. For RRNHV #3 who had been admitted to the hospice program 9 weeks ago the initial assessment documented a pressure ulcer to the patient’s coccyx, and left ankle but there were no physician orders for wound care in the medical record. On subsequent visits the nursing staff documented measurements of the ankle wound and reported that the wound bed had granulating tissue and also documented performing dressing changes to the left outer ankle however there was no evidence of physician orders for wound care. The Administrator and Patient Care Coordinator confirmed that an physician order for wound care had not been obtained.”
Feb 16, 2024: follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission3 deficiencies
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 5 patient records reviewed, goals were not identified for all problems identified on patient assessments. Examples include: MR 2 plan of care did not include an HHA goal for services being provided and MR 5 did not include a goal for the MSW providing services. This was verified by the Administrator and PCC.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 101 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 5 patient records reviewed, all problems identified on assessments were not included on the plan of care. Examples include: MR 1: the plan of care did not include the heart disease primary problem, pain or caregiver for moderate risk assessment during bereavement; MR 2: no plan of care for the HHA providing services, heart disease/edema (CHF was primary diagnosis) or fall risk; MR 5 plan of care did not include an update when the patient was placed on oxygen, which was noted on the IDT note. This was verified by the Administrator and PCC.”
-
Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))
“Observed in Record Review. The organization did not complete the Certificate of Terminal Illness by the Medical Director in MR 3 (1 of 5 CTIs reviewed); specific reference to the content of the assessment being present, however it was not signed or dated due to a glitch in the electronic medical record at the time of entry. This was verified by the Administrator.”
Jan 4, 2024: follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission8 deficiencies
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 134 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 5 patient records reviewed, the organization did not develop plans of care that were based on patient’s goals and the time frames, settings, and services required to meet those goals. In every record reviewed goals were not specific, measurable, and individualized. For example: Personal care needs will be met; respirations will not be labored as evidenced by respirations will be at or below 24 at each visit; patients personal care needs will be met as evidenced by skin clean, dry, intact and free from odors; patient achieves feelings of spiritual comfort by evidence of face expressions or body movement; patient will complete oral antibiotics as disease will allow as evidence by patient able to swallow medication. This RFI was confirmed by the Administrator and Patient Care Coordinator.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 140 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 5 patient records reviewed, the organization did not ensure that the plan of care included all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the scope and frequency of the services necessary to meet the patient’s and family’s needs. For example, in comprehensive assessments and re-assessments of RRNHV#1 it was identified that the patient was at risk for skin breakdown; had sluggish perfusion; was saturating at 91% at 4 lpm of oxygen without dyspnea or shortness of breath; had an indwelling foley catheter; bowel incontinence; and a high risk for falls. None of these problems were addressed in the plan of care. Similar omissions were found in the records of RRHV#1, RRNHV#2, RRBR#1, and RRBR#2. This RFI was confirmed by the Administrator and Patient Care Coordinator.
”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d ))
“Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 5 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to document its review and revision of the patient’s plan of care. Interdisciplinary meeting notes did not document decline, updates to the plan of care, and progress toward goals in the records of RRHV#1, RRNHV#1, RRNHV#2, RRBR#1, and RRBR#2. This RFI was confirmed by the Administrator and Patient Care Coordinator.”
-
Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(2)(ii))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization’s written infection prevention and control plan continued not to address prioritized risks as they had not been identified. This RFI was confirmed by the Administrator and Patient Care Coordinator.”
-
Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, where patients died, the organization did not develop a bereavement plan of care that specified the type and frequency of services. In the records of RRBR#1 and RRBR#2 no bereavement plans of care were created. This RFI was confirmed by the Administrator and Patient Care Coordinator.”
-
Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. There was no evidence that the governing body and leadership had established processes to support patient care, treatment, and services through sustained compliance as evidenced by repeat and condition level requirements for improvement at §418.56, §418.100, and §418.102. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrator and Patient Care Coordinator.”
-
Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))
The inspectors’ words, 106 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 5 patient records reviewed, the organization did not ensure that written certifications documented primary terminal conditions, and current subjective and objective medical findings. In the record of RRHV#1 the terminal diagnosis was identified as chronic respiratory failure in some CTIs and COPD in other CTIs. These were intermingled and there was nothing in the record to indicate that the terminal diagnosis was changed. In the records of RRHV#1, RRNHV#1, RRNHV#2, RRBR#1, and RRBR#2 subjective and objective documentation to support on-going appropriateness for hospice services was minimal or absent. This RFI was confirmed by the Administrator and Patient Care Coordinator.”
-
Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. Contracts with therapy services were not revised to include a stipulation that criminal background checks would be completed on employees providing direct patient care or having access to patient records. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrator and Patient Care Coordinator.”
All 4 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 10 deficiencies cited |
| Aug 26, 2024 | Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission | 1 deficiency cited |
| Feb 16, 2024 | Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission | 3 deficiencies cited |
| Jan 4, 2024 | Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission | 8 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 18, 2008.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 98.2% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 49% at home, 7% in assisted living, 43% in a nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 9.8 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 7% |
| Visits near death | 98.2% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 8 owners or officers are people: Alexander Dout (owns 5% or more directly, 37.5%); James Oren Brown (owns 5% or more directly, 37.5%); Samuel Hill (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); William W Davito (managing employee (under contract)); Alexander Dout (corporate director); Rhiannon Hansen (managing employee (on the payroll)); James Oren Brown (corporate director); Samuel Hill (corporate director).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 82.7% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 70.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 8 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 22 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74006, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 22.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Rivercross Healthcare | 3 |
| Comforting Hands Hospice, LLC This hospice | 22 |
| Cornerstone Hospice of Tulsa | 31 |
| Saint Francis Hospice | 8 |
| Good Shepherd Hospice, Inc. | 1 |
| Good Shepherd Hospice, Inc. | 6 |
| Carter Healthcare Hospice of Northeast Oklahoma LLC | 17 |
| Grace Hospice | 14 |
| Compassus - Vinita | 4 |
| Acg Hospice | 7 |
| Elara Caring Xiv | 14 |
| Luminos Hospice | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.