Hearth Record

A Path of Care Hospice IV, LLC

A hospice in Lawton, Oklahoma 73505

6202 NW Oak Ave, Lawton, Oklahoma 73505. (580) 492-6166.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 17 hospices serving ZIP code 73505 had 6.5.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 24, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 24, 2025: recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 621 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure completion of initial assessments for plans of care no later than five calendar days after election of hospice benefits for six (Patients # 1, 2, 8, 10, 12 and #13) of 14 patients. Findings: Patient #1A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 01/07/25 with current POC from 09/04/25 to 11/02/25. The clinical record showed no MSW assessment after the initial comprehensive assessment (election of benefits) and development of the POC. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of assessment and showed no communications or notifications to the physician. On 09/24/25 at 11:58 a.m., Staff H stated the MSW assessment component of the initial POC was not completed within the first five days after the election of the hospice benefit. Patient #2A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 08/26/24 with current POC from 08/21/25 to 10/19/25. The clinical record showed no MSW assessment after the initial comprehensive assessment (election of benefits) and development of the POC. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of assessment and showed no communications or notifications to the physician. On 09/24/25 at 12:05 p.m., Staff H stated the MSW assessment component of the initial POC was not completed within the first five days after the election of the hospice benefit. Patient #8A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 01/14/25 with current POC from 07/22/25 to 09/19/25. The clinical record showed no MSW assessment after the initial comprehensive assessment (election of benefits) and development of the POC. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of assessment and showed no communications or notifications to the physician. On 09/24/25 at 1:00 p.m., Staff H stated the MSW assessment component of the initial POC was not completed within the first five days after the election of the hospice benefit. Patient #10A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 01/14/25 with current POC from 09/11/25 to 11/09/25. The clinical record showed no MSW assessment after the initial comprehensive assessment (election of benefits) and development of the POC. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of assessment and showed no communications or notifications to the physician. On 09/24/25 at 1:09 p.m., Staff H stated the MSW assessment component of the initial POC was not completed within the first five days after the election of the hospice benefit. Patient #12A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 07/17/25 with current POC from 07/17/25 to 10/14/25. The clinical record showed a chaplain spiritual assessment dated 07/22/25 (6 days) after the initial comprehensive assessment (election of benefits) and development of the POC. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of assessment and showed no communications or notifications to the physician. On 09/24/25 at 1:17 p.m., Staff H stated the chaplain spiritual assessment component of the initial POC was not completed within the first five days after the election of the hospice benefit. Patient #13A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 03/26/25 with current POC from 03/19/25 to 06/16/25. The clinical record showed a chaplain spiritual assessment dated 03/26/25 (7 days) after the initial comprehensive assessment (election of benefits) and development of the POC. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of assessment and showed no communications or notifications to the physician. On 09/24/25 at 1:25 p.m., Staff H stated the chaplain spiritual assessment component of the initial POC was not completed within the first five days after the election of the hospice benefit.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 815 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure development of a bereavement POC at the time of initial assessment for nine (Patients #1, 2 3, 4, 6, 7, 11, 12 and #13) of 14 patients. Findings: Patient #1A review of the clinical record showed an initial bereavement assessment dated 01/07/25 with IDG updates on 08/19/25, 09/02/25 and 09/16/25. The clinical record showed no bereavement POC and no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC dated 09/04/25 to 11/02/25. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC since the bereavement assessment dated 01/07/25. On 09/24/25 at 11:58 a.m., Staff H stated the patient had no bereavement POC and showed no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC. Patient #2A review of the clinical record showed an initial bereavement assessment dated 09/03/24 with IDG updates on 08/19/25, 09/02/25 and 09/16/25. The clinical record showed no bereavement POC and no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC dated 08/21/25 to 10/19/25. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC since the bereavement assessment dated 09/03/24. On 09/24/25 at 12:05 p.m., Staff H stated the patient had no bereavement POC and showed no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC. Patient #3A review of the clinical record showed an initial bereavement assessment dated 09/24/24 with IDG updates on 09/02/25 and 09/16/25. The clinical record showed no bereavement POC and no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC dated 09/15/25 to 11/13/25. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC since the bereavement assessment dated 09/24/24. On 09/24/25 at 12:16 p.m., Staff H stated the patient had no bereavement POC and showed no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC. Patient #4A review of the clinical record showed an initial bereavement assessment dated 08/15/25 with IDG updates on 08/19/25, 09/02/25 and 09/16/25. The clinical record showed no bereavement POC and no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC dated 08/15/25 to 11/12/25. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC since the bereavement assessment dated 08/15/25. On 09/24/25 at 12:17 p.m., Staff H stated the patient had no bereavement POC and showed no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC. Patient #6A review of the clinical record showed an initial bereavement assessment dated 08/18/25 with IDG updates on 08/19/25, 09/02/25 and 09/16/25. The clinical record showed no bereavement POC and no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC dated 08/14/25 to 11/11/25. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC since the bereavement assessment dated 08/18/24. On 09/24/25 at 12:51 p.m., Staff H stated the patient had no bereavement POC and showed no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC. Patient #7A review of the clinical record showed an initial bereavement assessment dated 09/16/25 with IDG update on 09/16/25. The clinical record showed no bereavement POC and no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC dated 09/12/25 to 12/10/25. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC since the bereavement assessment dated 09/16/25. On 09/24/25 at 12:05 p.m., Staff H stated the patient had no bereavement POC and showed no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC. Patient #11A review of the clinical record showed an initial bereavement assessment dated 05/05/25 with IDG updates on 05/13/25 and 05/28/25. The clinical record showed no bereavement POC and no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC dated 05/01/25 to 07/29/25. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC since the bereavement assessment dated 05/05/25. On 09/24/25 at 1:11 p.m., Staff H stated the patient had no bereavement POC and showed no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC. Patient #12A review of the clinical record showed an initial bereavement assessment dated 07/21/25 with IDG updates on 07/30/25 and 08/01/25. The clinical record showed no bereavement POC and no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC dated 07/17/25 to 10/14/25. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC since the bereavement assessment dated 07/21/25. On 09/24/25 at 1:17 p.m., Staff H stated the patient had no bereavement POC and showed no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC. Patient #13A review of the clinical record showed an initial bereavement assessment dated 03/21/25 with IDG updates on 04/01/25 and 04/15/25. The clinical record showed no bereavement POC and no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC dated 03/19/25 to 06/16/25. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC since the bereavement assessment dated 05/05/25. On 09/24/25 at 1:25 p.m., Staff H stated the patient had no bereavement POC and showed no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 198 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure POCs included visit frequency and duration of services for three (Patients #6, 9 and #14) of 14 patients. Findings: Patient #6A review of the plan of care dated 08/14/25 to 11/11/25 with IDGs dated 08/19/25, 09/02/25 and 09/16/25 showed no frequency and duration of chaplain services for visits conducted on:· 08/15/25· 08/19/25 · 08/26/25· 09/07/25 · 09/16/25 On 09/24/25 at 12:51 p.m., Staff H stated the plan of care should have included frequency and duration for chaplain services. Patient #9A review of the plan of care dated 09/03/25 to 12/01/25 with IDGs dated 09/16/25 showed no frequency and duration of chaplain services for visits conducted on:· 09/05/25 · 09/08/25· 09/16/25 On 09/24/25 at 1:07 p.m., Staff H stated the plan of care should have included frequency and duration for chaplain services. Patient #14A review of the plan of care dated 05/07/25 to 08/04/25 with IDGs dated 05/21/25, 06/04/25 and 06/18/25 showed no frequency and duration of chaplain services for visits conducted on:· 05/15/25 · 05/28/25· 06/10/25 On 09/24/25 at 1:30 p.m., Staff H stated the plan of care should have included frequency and duration for chaplain services.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 243 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure POCs included service discipline goals for three (Patients #5, 8 and #14) of 14 patients. Findings: Patient #5A review of the plan of care dated 07/31/25 to 09/28/25 with IDGs dated 08/15/25, 08/19/25, 09/02/25 and 09/16/25 showed no SN goals for wound site care to the left elbow, right wrist, and bilateral lower extremities for visits conducted:· 07/31/25 · 08/03/25· 08/05/25· 08/06/25· 08/10/25· 08/11/25· 08/12/25· 08/13/25· 08/18/25· 08/22/25· 08/25/25· 08/28/25· 09/03/25· 09/05/25· 09/07/25· 09/08/25· 09/11/25· 09/12/25· 09/16/25· 09/19/25 On 09/24/25 at 12:32 p.m., Staff H stated the plan of care should have included goals for wound site care. Patient #8A review of the plan of care dated 07/22/25 to 09/19/25 with IDGs dated 08/06/25, 08/19/25, 09/02/25 and 09/16/25 showed no SN goals for foley catheter placement and management for visits conducted:· 09/02/25· 09/05/25· 09/09/25· 09/11/25· 09/12/25· 09/16/25· 09/19/25 On 09/24/25 at 1:00 p.m., Staff H stated the plan of care should have included goals for foley catheter placement and management. Patient #14A review of the plan of care dated 05/07/25 to 08/04/25 with POC updates dated 05/21/25, 06/04/25 and 06/18/25 showed no interventions and goals for MSW, chaplain and hospice aide services for visits conducted:· 05/09/25 MSW· 05/15/25 chaplain· 05/28/25 chaplain· 06/03/25 hospice aide· 06/10/25 chaplain and hospice aide On 09/24/25 at 1:30 p.m., Staff H stated the plan of care should have included goals for MSW, chaplain and hospice aide services.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 216 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure care was coordinated between the IDG members and the physician for two (Patients #4 and #5) of 14 patients. Findings: Patient #4A review of the POC dated 08/15/25 to 11/12/25 and plan of care updates dated 08/19/25, 09/02/25 and 09/16/25 showed a hospice aide visit frequency of one time a week for 13 weeks. A review of the clinical record showed missed hospice aide visits on:· 08/27/25· 09/01/25· 09/18/25 The clinical record showed no discussion by the IDG and showed no change in orders for the hospice aide visits. On 09/24/25 at 12:17 p.m., Staff H stated the hospice IDG team members did not discuss the hospice aide missed visits. Patient #5A review of the POC dated 07/31/25 to 09/28/25 and plan of care updates dated 08/05/25, 08/19/25, 09/02/25 and 09/16/25 showed a chaplain visit frequency of four visits in two months. A review of the clinical record showed chaplain visits on:· 08/05/25· 08/12/25· 08/18/25· 08/26/25· 09/02/25· 09/07/25· 09/16/25 The clinical record showed no discussion by the IDG for increased chaplain visit frequency and showed no change in orders for the chaplain visits. On 09/24/25 at 12:32 p.m., Staff H stated the hospice IDG team members did not discuss the need for increased chaplain visits.”

    Rule L0554. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 121 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure review and update to the hospice aide care plan for one (Patient #12) of 14 patients. Findings: Patient #12A review of the plan of care dated 07/17/25 to 10/14/25 and IDG plan of care updates on 07/30/25 and 08/01/25 showed an ordered hospice aide visit once a week and an hospice aide care plan dated 07/17/25. A review of a physician’s order dated 07/22/25 showed an increase in the hospice aide visits two times a week. The POC showed no update to the hospice aide care plan dated 07/17/25. On 09/24/25 at 1:17 p.m., Staff H stated the hospice aide care plan was not updated with the increased visit frequency.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure volunteer services met hospice program requirements in calendar year 2024 and 01/01/25 to 09/24/25 for all patients, caregivers, and staff. Findings: A review of volunteer records showed the hospice program had 0% utilization of volunteer personnel and showed no recruitment activities in calendar years 2024 and 01/01/25 to 09/24/25. On 09/24/25 at 11:30 a.m., Staff J stated:1. There has not been any utilization of volunteers.There wasn’t a volunteer coordinator for the Lawton office until last week.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 24, 2025Recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 11, 2004.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 90.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 91% at home, 9% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4.5%
Visits near death90.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Home Health Holdings LLP owns 80% directly since Jul 31, 2023; Gold Leaf Investments LLC owns 20% directly since Jul 21, 2023.
  • 2 owners or officers are people: John Kelly (corporate officer, 100%); John Kelly (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Home Health Holdings LLPOwns 5% or more directly80%Jul 31, 2023
Gold Leaf Investments LLCOwns 5% or more directly20%Jul 21, 2023

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 90.91% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 17 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73505, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6.5; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.