Hearth Record

Interim Healthcare

A hospice in Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110

5201 Constitution Ave. NE, Suite 103, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110. (505) 910-4725.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 27 hospices serving ZIP code 87110 had 9.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 18, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 18, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner4 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 191 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 14 (14%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) completed a comprehensive assessment within five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care. CLINICAL RECORD 10: The patient elected hospice care on 05/06/2025 with a terminal diagnosis of traumatic subdural hematoma. A clinical record review on 09/17/2025 revealed that the Chaplain (SC) completed the initial SC assessment on 06/27/2025, 52 days after the election of the hospice benefit. CLINICAL RECORD 12: The patient elected hospice care on 01/14/2025 with a terminal diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the prostate. A clinical record review on 09/17/2025 revealed that the SC completed the initial SC assessment on 01/20/2025, six (6) days after the election of the hospice benefit. During an interview and joint record review on 09/17/2025, the Director of Clinical Services confirmed the findings.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 348 words

    “It is required that Hospice aides are supervised by a registered nurse who makes an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to: assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 11 (36%) clinical records reviewed of patients who received Hospice Aide (HA) services, the agency did not ensure that the Hospice Aide was supervised by a Registered Nurse at least every 14 days. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/19/2025 with a diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease. The plan of care dated 06/19/2025 through 09/16/2025 ordered “HA 2x/week.” The first HA visit was dated 06/23/2025. Hospice Aide supervisory visits were documented as completed on 07/03/2025 and 07/18/2025 (with 15 days outstanding). CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/29/2025 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The plan of care dated 07/29/2025 through 10/26/2025 ordered “HA 2x/week.” The first HA visit was dated 07/30/2025. The first Hospice Aide supervisory visit was dated 08/15/2025 (with 16 days outstanding). CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/16/2025 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The plans of care dated 01/16/2025 through 04/15/2025 and 04/16/2025 through 07/14/2025 ordered “HA 2x/week.” The first HA visit was dated 01/16/2025. Hospice Aide supervisory visits were documented as completed on 03/31/2025, 04/18/2025 (with 18 days outstanding), 05/14/2025 (with 26 days outstanding), and 05/29/2025 (with 15 days outstanding). CLINICAL RECORD 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/06/2025 with a diagnosis of traumatic subdural hematoma. The plan of care dated 05/06/2025 through 08/03/2025 ordered “HA 2x/week.” The first HA visit was dated 05/08/2025. Hospice Aide supervisory visits were documented as completed on 05/21/2025, 06/10/2025 (with 20 days outstanding), 06/27/2025 (with 17 days outstanding), 07/09/2025, and 07/24/2025 (with 15 days outstanding). During a joint record review on 09/18/2025, the Director of Clinical Operations confirmed that HA supervisory visits were not completed at least every 14 days.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 294 words

    “It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice per hospice regulation §418.26 (i.e., no longer terminally ill), the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician: a copy of the hospice discharge summary. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. Agency policy “Transfer, Benefit Revocation or Discharge” stated in part: “When the patient/family is transferring to another hospice provider, the designated RN ensures that the following information is provided to the receiving provider: a) The hospice discharge summary; and b) if requested, a copy of the patient/family record.” In 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records reviewed, of patients with a live discharge, the agency did not ensure that a discharge summary was sent to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/16/2024. The patient revoked the hospice benefit on 03/19/2025 to be admitted to the hospital for additional care. The patient was seen by a Registered Nurse (RN) on 03/19/2025 for a discharge visit. A clinical record review revealed no evidence of a discharge summary being sent to the patient’s physician. CLINICAL RECORD 12: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/14/2025. The patient revoked the hospice benefit on 03/02/2025 to be admitted to the hospital for additional care. The patient was seen by the RN on 03/02/2025 for a discharge visit. A clinical record review revealed no evidence of a discharge summary being sent to the patient’s physician. During a joint clinical record review and interview on 09/17/2025, the Director of Clinical Operations agreed that the record lacked evidence of the discharge summary being sent after discharge from hospice. She stated, “The record lacks evidence that this was communicated.””

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 389 words

    “It is required that the hospice discharge summary provided to a facility receiving a hospice patient for care—or to the patient’s community attending physician upon hospice discharge—includes at least the following: a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management; the patient’s current plan of care; the patient’s latest physician orders; and any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the receiving facility or the attending physician. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. Agency policy “Transfer, Benefit Revocation or Discharge” states in part: “The hospice discharge summary documented by a designated Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) member includes at least the following: a) A summary of the patient’s stay, including treatments, symptoms and pain management; b) The current IDG plan of care; c) The latest physician orders relating to the care of the patient; and d) Any other documentation that supports post discharge continuity of care or is requested by the attending physician or physician designee or the receiving provider.” In 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records reviewed of discharged patients, the agency did not ensure that a summary of the patient’s stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management, was completed at the time of discharge. CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/16/2024. The patient revoked the hospice benefit on 03/19/2025 to be admitted to the hospital for additional care. The patient was seen by a Registered Nurse (RN) on 03/19/2025 for a discharge visit. A clinical record review revealed no evidence of a discharge summary being completed by the RN. CLINICAL RECORD 12: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/14/2025. The patient revoked the hospice benefit on 03/02/2025 to be admitted to the hospital for additional care. The patient was seen by the RN on 03/02/2025 for a discharge visit. A clinical record review revealed no evidence of a discharge summary being completed by the RN. During joint clinical record reviews and an interview on 09/17/2025, the Director of Clinical Operations (DCO) agreed that the record lacked evidence of a discharge summary. The DCO stated, “I don’t even know if the electronic medical record has a discharge summary, but I will reach out to our representative and see if they can help us.””

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 18, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 21, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 56% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 8 owners or officers are people: Brandon T Sayler (limited partner, 67%); Brandon T Sayler (corporate officer, 67%); Brandon T Sayler (corporate director, 67%); Brandon T Sayler (runs it (operational or managerial control), 67%); Gwen A Sayler (limited partner, 33%); Gwen A Sayler (corporate officer, 33%); Gwen A Sayler (corporate director, 33%); Gwen A Sayler (runs it (operational or managerial control), 33%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
  • 84% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 27 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 87110, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.