Hearth Record

Hospice De La Luz

A hospice in Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109

3812 Academy Parkway N NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109. (505) 217-2490.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Condition-level, immediate jeopardy. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean5
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
Immediate jeopardy
CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 25 hospices serving ZIP code 87109 had 7.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 17, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Patients in immediate jeopardy, CMS’s most serious finding: Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114), Jul 17, 2025

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Condition-level, immediate jeopardy. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 17, 2025: recertification inspection by the state9 deficiencies
  • Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114)

    “Based on record review and interview the facility failed to meet the Condition of Participation to ensure nursing personnel were licensed by the New Mexico Nursing Practice Act 61-3-5. This deficient practice led to patient’s receiving skilled nursing services from an individual that did not hold a valid nursing license. The findings are:A. Refer to tag L784.”

    Rule L0783. Condition-level, immediate jeopardy.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(4)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 244 words

    “Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to report money stolen from 1 (P[patient] 22) out of 1 (P22) patient reviewed for complaints. This failure to report is legally noncompliant with NMAC 8.370.9.8 Incident Management System Reporting Requirements for Licensed Health Care Facilities and may result in a loss of public trust. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility’s complaint log dated 11/20/2024, showed an entry stating P22 had accused S (staff)8, clinical, of using a debit card belonging to P22 to pay S8’s rent.B. During an interview on 07/14/2025 at 2:20 PM with S (staff)1, clinical, she stated she was advised by the facility’s human resources department not to report the incident involving P22 and S8 to the authorities or licensing agency for misappropriation of funds to law enforcement or the state.C. Record review of a legal document dated 09/29/2022 found in S8’s employee file showed an approved garnishment of wages (legal process that allows a creditor to collect money directly from a debtor’s wages). The creditor of the garnishment was an assisted living facility where S8 had previously been employed. D. During an interview with S1 on 07/15/2025 at 4:30PM, S1 confirmed she was aware of the garnishment on S8 from the ALF. The legal paperwork was in S8’s personnel file. This incident was documented prior to the incident with P22 that occurred at the hospice agency. S1did not report this information to law enforcement or to the state.”

    Rule L0511. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 168 words

    “Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure patient rights were protected. This failure resulted in money being stolen from 1 (P[patient] 22) out of 1 (P22) patients reviewed for complaints. The findings are:A Record review of the facility’s complaint log dated 11/20/2024, showed an entry stating P22 had accused S (staff) 8, clinical, of using a debit card belonging to P22 to pay S8’s rent.B. During an interview on 07/14/2025 at 2:20PM with S1, clinical, S1 was asked about the complaint involving S8 and P22. S1 stated the S22 reported a discrepancy on her bank account statement. S1 confirmed the patient alerted her after checking her bank statement and realizing there was money missing. S1 consulted with the human resources department and S8 was terminated. S1 stated she was advised by the human resources department not to notify the police or the state agency.C. Record review of a statement provided by S1, clinical, on 07/17/2025 it revealed that S8 confirmed, P22 paid her rent.”

    Rule L0517. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 124 words

    “Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop an individualized plan of care for 14 patients (P[patient]3, P4, P5, P9, P12, P14, P15, P16, P17, P18, P19, P20, P21, P23) out of 23 (P1-P23) patients reviewed for plan of care. This deficient practice could lead to patient’s not receiving the services they need based on patient’s goals at the end-of-life. The findings are:A. Refer to tag L546.B. Refer to tag L548.C. Record review of the patient’s plan of care for P3, P4, P5, P9, P12, P14, P15, P16, P17, P18, P19, P20, P21, and P23 revealed that all patients had the same interventions and goals for identified problems. The plan of care did not reflect the patient’s personal or stated goals.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 702 words

    “Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a plan of care that included interventions to manage pain and symptoms for 14 (P[patient]3, P4, P5, P9, P12, P14, P15, P16, P17, P18, P19, P20, P21, P23) out of 23 (P1-P23) patients reviewed for plan of care. This deficient practice could lead to patient’s pain being uncontrolled at the end of life. The findings are:A. Record review of P3’s plan of care for start of care date 01/31/2025 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The interventions used for pain control were not included in the plan of care.B. Record review of P4’s plan of care for start of care date 12/05/2024 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The interventions used for pain control were not included in the plan of care.C. Record review of P5’s plan of care for start of care date 10/18/2024 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The interventions used for pain control were not included in the plan of care.D. Record review of P9’s plan of care for start of care date 09/15/2023 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The interventions used for pain control were not included in the plan of care.E. Record review of P14’s plan of care for start of care date 03/04/2025 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The interventions used for pain control were not included in the plan of care.F. Record review of P12’s plan of care for start of care date 08/24/2021 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The interventions used for pain control were not included in the plan of care.G. Record review of P15’s plan of care for start of care date 08/10/2023 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The interventions used for pain control were not included in the plan of care.H. Record review of P16’s plan of care for start of care date 05/21/2025 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The interventions used for pain control were not included in the plan of care.I. Record review of P17’s plan of care for start of care date 12/19/2024 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The interventions used for pain control were not included in the plan of care.J. Record review of P18’s plan of care for start of care date 01/15/2025 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The interventions used for pain control were not included in the plan of care.K. Record review of P19’s plan of care for start of care date 07/12/2024 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The interventions used for pain control were not included in the plan of care.L. Record review of P20’s plan of care for start of care date 07/30/2024 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The interventions used for pain control were not included in the plan of care.M. Record review of P21’s plan of care for start of care date 01/30/2025 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The interventions used for pain control were not included in the plan of care.N. Record review of P23’s plan of care for start of care date 12/14/2023 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The interventions used for pain control were not included in the plan of care.O. During an interview with S(staff)1, clinical, on 07/17/2025 at 12:34 PM it was explained that due to limitations in the charting system they are unable to add specifics to the plan of care.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,324 words

    “Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a plan of care that was measurable for 14 (P[patient]3, P4, P5, P9, P12, P14, P15, P16, P17, P18, P19, P20, P21 and P23) out of 23 (P1-P23) patients reviewed for plan of care. This deficient practice could lead to unmet needs without goals being established, monitored and adjusted as needed. The findings are:A. Record review of P3’s plan of care for start of care date 01/31/2025 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The goal stated, “Pain is currently managed at a level acceptable to patient.” There was no specific pain level goal or anticipated date that goal would be met for measuring/tracking patient’s pain. Reviewing the plan of care revealed that none of the problems or goals included a way to measure whether the patient was meeting the intended outcome.B. Record review of P4’s plan of care for start of care date 12/05/2024 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The goal stated, “Pain is currently managed at a level acceptable to patient.” There was no specific pain level goal or anticipated date that goal would be met for measuring/tracking patient’s pain. Reviewing the plan of care revealed that none of the problems or goals included a way to measure whether the patient was meeting the intended outcome.C. Record review of P5’s plan of care for start of care date 10/18/2024 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The goal stated, “Pain is currently managed at a level acceptable to patient.” There was no specific pain level goal or anticipated date that goal would be met for measuring/tracking patient’s pain. Reviewing the plan of care revealed that none of the problems or goals included a way to measure whether the patient was meeting the intended outcome.D. Record review of P9’s plan of care for start of care date 09/15/2023 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The goal stated, “Pain is currently managed at a level acceptable to patient.” There was no specific pain level goal or anticipated date that goal would be met for measuring/tracking patient’s pain. Reviewing the plan of care revealed that none of the problems or goals included a way to measure whether the patient was meeting the intended outcome.E. Record review of P12’s plan of care for start of care date 08/24/2021 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The goal stated, “Pain is currently managed at a level acceptable to patient.” There was no specific pain level goal or anticipated date that goal would be met for measuring/tracking patient’s pain. Reviewing the plan of care revealed that none of the problems or goals included a way to measure whether the patient was meeting the intended outcome.F. Record review of P14’s plan of care for start of care date 03/04/2025 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The goal stated, “Pain is currently managed at a level acceptable to patient.” There was no specific pain level goal or anticipated date that goal would be met for measuring/tracking patient’s pain. Reviewing the plan of care revealed that none of the problems or goals included a way to measure whether the patient was meeting the intended outcome.G. Record review of P15’s plan of care for start of care date 08/10/2023 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The goal stated, “Pain is currently managed at a level acceptable to patient.” There was no specific pain level goal or anticipated date that goal would be met for measuring/tracking patient’s pain. Reviewing the plan of care revealed that none of the problems or goals included a way to measure whether the patient was meeting the intended outcome.H. Record review of P16’s plan of care for start of care date 05/21/2025 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The goal stated, “Pain is currently managed at a level acceptable to patient.” There was no specific pain level goal or anticipated date that goal would be met for measuring/tracking patient’s pain. Reviewing the plan of care revealed that none of the problems or goals included a way to measure whether the patient was meeting the intended outcome.I. Record review of P17’s plan of care for start of care date 12/19/2024 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The goal stated, “Pain is currently managed at a level acceptable to patient.” There was no specific pain level goal or anticipated date that goal would be met for measuring/tracking patient’s pain. Reviewing the plan of care revealed that none of the problems or goals included a way to measure whether the patient was meeting the intended outcome.J. Record review of P18’s plan of care for start of care date 01/15/2025 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The goal stated, “Pain is currently managed at a level acceptable to patient.” There was no specific pain level goal or anticipated date that goal would be met for measuring/tracking patient’s pain. Reviewing the plan of care revealed that none of the problems or goals included a way to measure whether the patient was meeting the intended outcome.K. Record review of P19’s plan of care for start of care date 07/12/2024 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The goal stated, “Pain is currently managed at a level acceptable to patient.” There was no specific pain level goal or anticipated date that goal would be met for measuring/tracking patient’s pain. Reviewing the plan of care revealed that none of the problems or goals included a way to measure whether the patient was meeting the intended outcome.L. Record review of P20’s plan of care for start of care date 07/30/2024 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The goal stated, “Pain is currently managed at a level acceptable to patient.” There was no specific pain level goal or anticipated date that goal would be met for measuring/tracking patient’s pain. Reviewing the plan of care revealed that none of the problems or goals included a way to measure whether the patient was meeting the intended outcome.M. Record review of P21’s plan of care for start of care date 01/30/2025 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The goal stated, “Pain is currently managed at a level acceptable to patient.” There was no specific pain level goal or anticipated date that goal would be met for measuring/tracking patient’s pain. Reviewing the plan of care revealed that none of the problems or goals included a way to measure whether the patient was meeting the intended outcome.N. Record review of P23’s plan of care for start of care date 12/14/2023 revealed the interventions for the problem of “Pain/Altered Comfort” stated, “Evaluated effectiveness of pain control measures”. The goal stated, “Pain is currently managed at a level acceptable to patient.” There was no specific pain level goal or anticipated date that goal would be met for measuring/tracking patient’s pain. Reviewing the plan of care revealed that none of the problems or goals included a way to measure whether the patient was meeting the intended outcome..O. During an interview with S(staff)1, clinical, on 07/17/2025 at 12:34 PM it was explained that due to limitations in the charting system they are unable to add specifics such as pain level goals or anticipated dates to the plan of care.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 391 words

    “Based on record review and observations during patient visits the hospice agency failed to follow accepted standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infection in 3 (P[patient] P3, P9, and P18) out of 4 (P3, P9, P12, P18) patients observed during home visits. This failure could result in the transmission of disease-causing bacteria resulting in an infection in the patient. The Findings are:A. Record review of “Indwelling Urinary Catheter Insertion and Maintenance, (2024),” found at cdc.gov a recommendation to keep indwelling Foley drainage bag off the floor to maintain unobstructed urine flow.B. Record review of “Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care hospitals 2022 update, (2023)” found at nih.gov under heading “Management of indwelling catheters”, the following statement was found: “…b. “Do not place bag on floor.” c. “Keep the catheter and collecting tube free from kinking, which can impair urinary flow and increase stasis within the bladder, increasing infection risk…”C. Record review of Clinical Safety: “Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers (2024)” found at cdc.gov performing hand hygiene immediately before touching a patient was important in preventing the transmission of disease-causing bacteria.D. Record review of “Why should I clean my mobile device (2021)” found at gamahealthcare.com it stated mobile devices can become contaminated with pathogens and should be cleaned with disinfectant wipes after use.E. Record review of “Glove Usage Guideline: From the Joint Commission, CDC, and World Health Organization (2025)” found at infectioncontroltoday.com it stated gloves must be changed when moving from contaminated to clean tasks for the same patient because gloves can become contaminated and are not a substitute for hand hygiene.F. During an observation of home visit, 07/15/2025 at 10:00AM, S (Staff) 2, clinical, placed the indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag for P9 on the floor. S2 instructed caregiver staff to place the drainage bag on the floor.G. During an observation of home visit,07/16/2025 at 09:30AM, S (Staff) 9, clinical, did not perform hand hygiene before contact with P3. S9 used her tablet to document information during the home visit and then handed the tablet to P3 to sign without cleaning the device.H. During an observation of home visit, 07/16/2025 at 3:30PM, S2, clinical, removed a soiled dressing from P18 and did not change gloves before cleaning, packing the wound (the process of filling an open wound with a dressing), and applying a clean dressing.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(B))

    The inspectors’ words, 442 words

    “Based on record review and interview the facility failed to have a policy in place and failed to educate patients on disposal of controlled drugs (substances that are regulated by law due to their potential for harm and abuse) for 14 (P[patient]3, P4, P5, P9, P12, P14, P15, P16, P17, P18, P19, P20, P21 and P23) out of 14 (P3 through P23) patients reviewed for education of drug disposal. This deficient practice could lead to improper disposal or mishandling of controlled drugs. The findings are:A. Record review of P3’s plan of care and start of care dated 01/31/2025 did not reveal education regarding the disposal of controlled substances.B. Record review of P4’s plan of care and start of care dated 12/05/2024 did not reveal education regarding the disposal of controlled substances. C. Record review of P5’s plan of care and start of care dated 10/18/2024 did not reveal education regarding the disposal of controlled substances.D. Record review of P9’s plan of care and start of care dated 09/15/2023 did not reveal education regarding the disposal of controlled substances. E. Record review of P14’s plan of care and start of care dated 03/04/2025 did not reveal education regarding the disposal of controlled substances. F. Record review of P12’s plan of care and start of care dated 08/24/2021 did not reveal education regarding the disposal of controlled substances.G. Record review of P15’s plan of care and start of care dated 08/10/2023 did not reveal education regarding the disposal of controlled substances.H. Record review of P16’s plan of care and start of care dated 05/21/2025 did not reveal education regarding the disposal of controlled substances.I. Record review of P17’s plan of care and start of care dated 12/19/2024 did not reveal education regarding the disposal of controlled substances.J. Record review of P18’s plan of care and start of care dated 01/15/2025 did not reveal education regarding the disposal of controlled substances.K. Record review of P19’s plan of care and start of care dated 07/12/2024 did not reveal education regarding the disposal of controlled substances. L. Record review of P20’s plan of care and start of care dated 07/30/2024 did not reveal education regarding the disposal of controlled substances. M. Record review of P21’s plan of care and start of care dated 01/30/2025 did not reveal education regarding the disposal of controlled substances. N. Record review of P23’s plan of care and start of care dated 12/14/2023 did not reveal education regarding the disposal of controlled substances. O. During an interview on 07/15/2025 at 1:15 PM with S(staff)1, clinical, it was confirmed that staff do not provide education to patients or their families regarding medication disposal.”

    Rule L0696. Standard-level.

  • Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 928 words

    “Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure personnel were licensed as required by the New Mexico Nursing Practice Act 61-3-5 for 1 (S[staff] 10) out of 3 (S2, S3, and S10) staff members reviewed for nursing licensure. This deficient practice led to patient’s receiving skilled nursing services from an individual that did not hold a valid nursing license. The findings are:A. Record review of the “New Mexico Nursing Practice Act” under “61-3-5 License Required” it stated, “Except as otherwise provided in the Nursing Practice Act, no person shall use the title ‘nurse’ unless the person is licensed or has been licensed in the past as a registered nurse or licensed practical nurse under the Nursing Practice Act.”B. Record review of S10’s employee file, revealed the following:C. Review of resume for S10 revealed she has been employed in New Mexico since 2014 and has worked as a nurse in New Mexico since 2020. S10 started at the facility on 06/23/2025.D. Record review of S’10’s personnel file revealed a license verification report dated 06/19/2025 that showed an active license for Texas. The active license for Texas indicated that it was a compact license (type of nursing license that allows nurses to work in various states right away without having to wait for a license in one of the allowed states). It was revealed this license did not belong to S10.E. Record review of P21’s visit dated 07/10/2025 revealed that S10 conducted a “SN [skilled nursing] Hospice Subsequent Visit” and performed an assessment and provided education to caregiver regarding medication, pain management and patient care.1. On 07/14/2025 conducted a “RN [registered nurse] Subsequent Visit” and performed an assessment, foley catheter care and flushed the foley catheter, and provided education to facility staff regarding medication, pain management and patient care.F. Record review of P24’s visit dated 07/15/2025 revealed that S10 conducted a “RN Hospice Subsequent Visit” and performed an assessment, adjusted oxygen prescription, provided education to facility staff regarding medication and patient care.G. Record review of P25’s visit dated 07/09/2025 revealed that S10 conducted a “RN Hospice Subsequent Visit” and performed an assessment, provided education to patient regarding medication, and called in medication refills to the pharmacy.H. Record review of P26’s visits dated 07/08/2025, 07/11/2025, and 07/15/2025 revealed that S10 conducted a “RN Hospice Subsequent Visit” and performed an assessment and provided education to facility staff regarding medication and patient care.I. Record review of P28’s visit dated 07/09/2025 revealed that S10 conducted a “SN Hospice Subsequent Visit” and performed an assessment, called in medication refills to the pharmacy, and provided education to caregiver regarding patient care.J. Record review of P28’s visit dated 07/08/2025 revealed that S10 conducted a “SN Hospice Subsequent Visit” and performed an assessment, provided provider with medication adjustment recommendations and took the verbal order from the provider, and provided education to facility staff regarding medication and patient care.1. Review of a coordination note dated 07/10/2025 revealed that S10 was involved in a care planning meeting at the patient’s place of residence with patient, patient’s sister, house manager, volunteer coordinator, and physician. At this care planning meeting S10 discussed medication changes and received medication orders from the physician.2. On visit dated 07/11/2025 S10 conducted a “RN Hospice Subsequent Visit” and performed an assessment, received new orders from provider, performed medication reconciliation at the facility and provided education to facility staff.K. Record review of P29’s visit dated 07/08/2025 revealed that S10 conducted a “RN Hospice Subsequent Visit” and performed an assessment, provided recommendations on medication adjustments and received orders from the provider, called in medication refills to the pharmacy, and provided education to caregiver regarding medication education patient care.1. Review of a coordination note dated 07/09/2025 revealed that S10 contacted the provider regarding medication interactions.2. Review of a coordination note dated 07/10/2025 revealed that S10 was involved a care planning meeting at the patient’s place of residence with patient, patient’s daughter, house manager, volunteer, hospice licensed practical nurse, and volunteer coordinator. At this care planning meeting S10 discussed medication changes, pain management and received medication orders from the physician.3. On 07/10/2025 S10 conducted an “RN Hospice Subsequent Visit” and performed an assessment, placed an order for an oxygen concentrator, and called in medication refills to the pharmacy.4. On 07/15/2025 S10 conducted a “RN Hospice Subsequent Visit” and performed an assessment and provided education to facility staff regarding patient care.K. Record review of P30’s visit dated 07/08/2025, 07/14/2025 revealed that S10 conducted a “RN Hospice Subsequent Visit” and performed an assessment and provided education to facility staff regarding pain management and patient care.1. On visit dated 07/14/2025 S10 conducted a “RN Hospice Subsequent Visit” and performed an assessment, called in medication refills to the pharmacy, contacted the provider regarding medication management, medication interactions and pain management. S10 also provided education to facility staff regarding medication, pain management, and patient care.2. Review of coordination note date 07/15/2025 S10 placed an additional call the provider regarding medication interactions.L. During an interview with S1, clinical, on 07/17/2025 at 2:00 PM it was explained that initially they did have trouble verifying S10’s license but were able to verify that there was an active license in Texas and S10 had told the facility that her license was under that name. S10 told the facility it was a maiden name. The facility failed to verify the information provided by S10. M. During an interview with S12, staff of licensing authority, on 07/17/2025 at 2:15 PM it was confirmed that the individual that held the nursing license had a different date of birth than S10.”

    Rule L0784. Standard-level.

Oct 29, 2024: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 325 words

    “Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure all patient care was provided in accordance with the patients Hospice Plan of Care for 1 (P[patient]5) out of 3 (P3-P6) patients being reviewed. This deficient practice could possibly lead to patients hospice needs being unmet. The findings are: A. Record review of the facilitys policy titled “;Plan of Care Process” dated 09/01/24 stated “;All hospice care and services furnished to patients and their families will follow an individualized written POC (plan of care) . . . B. Record review of P5s medical record under the section plan of care with the date of 09/25/2024 through 11/23/2024 revealed a care plan that stated “;Hospice Skilled Nurse to insert/maintain indwelling catheter (a tube that is inserted in the bladder). Skilled Nurse to change foley every 30 days and may irrigate (push normal saline into the foley to clear blockage) the foley with 60 milliliters of normal saline as needed. C. During an observation of P5s home visit on 10/29/2024 at 10:15 am to 10:50 am S [staff] 5 (clinical) emptied the indwelling foley bag (a bag at the end of the indwelling foley to collect the urine) of urine. S5 did not change the indwelling foley at this time. D. During an interview on 10/29/2024 at 10:55 am, S2 (clinical) was asked when the indwelling foley catheter was going to be changed, S2 stated “;I dont change it the patient is taken to a urologist (a medical doctor who specializes in diagnosing and treating conditions that affect the urinary tract and reproductive system) for the indwelling foley to be changed. S2 was asked to look at the care plan and S2 confirmed that the care for P5 stated the skilled nurse was to change the foley. E. During an interview on 10/29/2024 at 1:00 pm S1 (non-clinical) confirmed the care plan printed was the current plan of care and should be followed as written.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 17, 2025Recertification inspection by the state9 deficiencies cited
Oct 29, 2024Complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 3, 2006.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited for to patients’ health or safety in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 32% at home, 67% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends2%
Visits near death93.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Jet Health, Inc. owns 100% directly since Apr 8, 2021.
  • 5 owners or officers are people: Jim D Glynn (owns 5% or more through other companies, 6%); Danielle Pete (managing employee (on the payroll)); Larry Nabb (corporate officer, 0%); Joy A Lovette (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Jim D Glynn (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Jet Health, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Apr 8, 2021
Sv Life Sciences Fund VI LPOwns 5% or more through other companies58.13%Apr 9, 2021
Health Enterprise Partners II LPOwns 5% or more through other companies27.89%Apr 9, 2021

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 91% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.02% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 62.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 25 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 87109, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7.5; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.