Family Hospice, Ltd D/B/A Gentiva
A hospice in Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109
7500 Jefferson Street NE, Ste 210, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109. (505) 821-5404.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 16 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 3of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
16 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 25 hospices serving ZIP code 87109 had 7.5.
The last inspection on record was on Sep 5, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
16 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Sep 5, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care16 deficiencies
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
The inspectors’ words, 152 words
“Upon patient record review 3 of 19 (Patient #6,10,14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 6: No evidence that the initial spiritual comprehensive assessment was completed within 5 days of admission. The patient was admitted on 03/20/25. The spiritual care assessment was completed on 3/31/25, 11 days after admission. Patient 10: No evidence that the initial spiritual comprehensive assessment was completed within 5 days of admission. The patient was admitted on 03/21/25. The spiritual care assessment was completed on 3/27/25, 6 days after admission. Patient 14: No evidence that the initial spiritual comprehensive assessment was completed within 5 days of admission. The patient was admitted on 03/05/25. The spiritual care assessment was completed on 3/11/25, 6 days after admission.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 260 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1,5,6,7) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1: The RN documentation indicated that patient has oxygen at 2L at bedtime. No evidence that oxygen was added to the current medication list. COS- new order placed for oxygen at 2LNC PRN during survey. Patient 5: The RN documentation indicated that patient uses a BIPAP at 7L continuously. No evidence that BIPAP orders were added to the current medication list. COS - new order placed for CPAP during survey. Patient 6: The RN documentation indicated that patient has oxygen at 2L as needed at bedtime. No evidence that oxygen was added to the current medication list. COS - new order placed for oxygen at 2LNC PRN during survey. Patient 7: The current plan of care includes orders for Lorazepam 1mg tab PRN as needed for seizures. No evidence active medication profile included a frequency for the medication to be given. The RN documentation indicated that the patient used oxygen at 3-5L NC. The current medication profile has the oxygen flow rate ordered at 5-10L via NC. No evidence that the an order was received for 3LNC. COS - new order placed to update oxygen flow during survey.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 105 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 6: The patient was admitted on 03/20/2025. No evidence that the initial bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of admission. Assessment completed on 04/22/2025.”
-
Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))
The inspectors’ words, 135 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #9,13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient 9: No evidence that a RN comprehensive assessment was completed every 15 days between 06/26/2025 and 07/17/2025. 21 days between assessments. Patient 13: No evidence that a RN comprehensive assessment was completed every 15 days between 06/27/2025 and 07/19/2025. 22 days between assessments.”
-
Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 143 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. policy is for wounds to be measured weekly. Patient 3: The record indicates that patient developed cellulitis on 02/13/2025 that healed on 03/13/2025. No evidence that the wound was measured since the day it was first assessed by the RN. The record indicates that patient developed a wound to the left buttock on 04/23/2025. No evidence that the wound was assessed. The documentation reflects that the wound was active from 04/23/2025 - 05/27/2025. Gentiva policy is for wounds to be measured weekly.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 169 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #8,14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 8: The documentation indicated that the patient has trouble swallowing and is a risk for aspiration. No evidence of problems, interventions, and goals related to safety/risk of aspiration. COS - Plan of care order written to add aspiration to the active plan of care during survey. Patient 14: The documentation indicated that the patient has trouble swallowing and is a risk for aspiration. No evidence of problems, interventions, and goals related to safety/risk of aspiration. COS - Plan of care order written to add aspiration to the active plan of care during survey.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 138 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. use. Physician order updated during the survey. Patient 5: The initial visit frequency for both the social worker and the spiritual care counselor was 1 PRN without a standing order on the initial evaluation order, order corrected once the disciplines completed their evaluations.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 238 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1,5,6,7) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. medications and treatments. Patient 1: The RN documentation indicated that patient has oxygen at 2L at bedtime. No evidence that an order was received for oxygen. COS- new order placed for oxygen at 2LNC PRN during survey. Patient 5: The RN documentation indicated that patient uses a BIPAP at 7L continuously. No evidence that an order was placed for BIPAP. COS - new order placed for CPAP during survey. COS - new order placed for CPAP during survey Patient 6: The RN documentation indicated that patient has oxygen at 2L as needed at bedtime. No evidence that an order was received for oxygen. COS- new order placed for oxygen. COS - new order placed for oxygen at 2LNC PRN during survey. Patient 7: The current plan of care includes orders for Lorazepam 1mg tab PRN as needed for seizures. No evidence that the order included a frequency for the medication to be given. The RN documentation indicated that the patient used oxygen at 3-5L NC. The plan of care has the oxygen flow rate ordered at 5-10L via NC. No evidence that the an order was received for 3LNC. COS - new order placed to update oxygen flow during survey.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 148 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #1,5) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The medical record indicated the patient has oxygen PRN available in the home. No evidence that oxygen was included on the current DME supply list. The current supply list included wound care supplies. No evidence that the patient has ever had a wound during time of service. COS - New order written to update the current DME and supply list during survey. Patient 5: The clinical documentation indicated that the patient uses a Hoyer lift due to altered mobility that is used for transfers. No evidence that a Hoyer lift was included on the current DME list. COS- New order written to update the current DME list.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 96 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #14) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 14: The medical record indicated that patient requested to end chaplain services on 05/28/2025. Problems, interventions, and goals related to spiritual care remain on the current the plan of care - new benefit period started on 07/12/2025. COS - new order written to remove the spiritual care plan from the plan of care during survey.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #9) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 9: The RN documentation indicated that the patient acquired a skin tear on 08/17 and that the nurse changed the bandage on 08/18/2025. No evidence that an order was received that contained specific wound care orders for the skin tear.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #9) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient 9: An order for volunteer evaluation placed on 05/28/2025. The VC documented that there was no volunteers available at that time and that a follow-up will occur in 2 weeks. No evidence that the follow-up was completed at the time of survey.”
-
Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 251 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #17,18,19) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient #17: No evidence that the bereavement plan of care was being followed. No evidence of post-death 2 week mailing was mailed within 2 weeks of the date of death. Patient died on 11/05/2024, sent on 12/23/2024. Patient #18: No evidence that the bereavement plan of care was being followed. Patient had 2 bereavement contacts. One was mailed a unable to contact letter. The other had a care plan for letters to be sent. No evidence of post-death 2 week mailing was mailed within 2 weeks of the date of death. Patient died on 10/04/2024, sent on 12/23/2024. No evidence that the 6 month letter was sent. Patient #19: No evidence that the bereavement plan of care was being followed. No evidence of post-death 2 week mailing was mailed within 2 weeks of the date of death. Patient died on 12/27/2024, no evidence that the mailing was sent.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #1) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 1: No evidence that a registered nurse made an aide supervisory visit every 14 days between 07/15/25- 07/31/25 (16 days).”
-
Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. Agency volunteer hours for 2024 was 1.51%”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
“Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient 3: Legal representative elected to receive the notice of hospice Non-covered items, services, and drugs at the time of admission, 03/12/2025. No evidence that the addendum was furnished within 5 days of the request. The addendum was furnished on 03/27/2025.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 16 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 1, 1994.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.1% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 40% at home, 25% in assisted living, 21% in a nursing facility, 13% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 10.4 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 7.1% |
| Visits near death | 94.1% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Fhi LP, Inc. owns 99% directly since Nov 1, 1997; Fhi Gp, Inc. owns 1% directly since Nov 1, 1997.
- 7 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%); Jolavon Romero (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Deborah A Grady (managing employee (under contract)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Odyssey Healthcare Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 6, 2008 |
| Charlotte Midco, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Falcon Hospice, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Charlotte Buyer, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Curo Health Services LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Fhi Health Systems, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Nov 1, 1997 |
| Fhi Health Systems, Inc. | Limited partner | 100% | Nov 1, 1997 |
| Odyssey Healthcare Holding Company | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 6, 2008 |
| Kah Hospice Company, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Vistacare LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 17, 1998 |
| Ch Services Group Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Ch Services Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Fhi LP, Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 99% | Nov 1, 1997 |
| Fhi LP, Inc. | Limited partner | 99% | Nov 1, 1997 |
| Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 60% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Humana Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Centerwell Health Services Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Dec 22, 2022 |
| Fhi Gp, Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 1% | Nov 1, 1997 |
| Fhi Gp, Inc. | General partner | Nov 1, 1997 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 81% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 97.52% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 70.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 25 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 87109, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7.5; this one had 16.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Family Hospice, Ltd D/B/A Gentiva This hospice | 16 |
| Harmony Home Health Services, LLC | 5 |
| Compassus Hospice Albuquerque South | 17 |
| Heritage Hospice Inc. | Not given |
| Hospice De La Luz | 10 |
| Luna Del Valle | 21 |
| Q Hospice | 5 |
| Lilycare of New Mexico | 24 |
| Rio Grande Hospice LLC | 6 |
| Presbyterian Hospice Inpatient Unit | 2 |
| Ambercare Hospice Inc. | 7 |
| Hospice of New Mexico, LLC | 60 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.