Hearth Record

Hospice of Wilson Medical Center

A hospice in Wilson, North Carolina 27893

1901 Tarboro St SW, Suite 301, Wilson, North Carolina 27893. (252) 399-8924.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 14 hospices serving ZIP code 27893 had 11.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 15, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 15, 2026: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 485 words

    “Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the agency failed to develop an individualized plan of care for 1 of 2 patients with a colostomy (artificial opening in the abdominal wall for the passage of stool) (#4) and 1 of 2 patient with a mechanical lift (#17).Findings included: A policy, Plan of Care (revised 10/01/24) received on 7/15/26 at 10:15 AM from the Executive Director stated, “The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following… Drugs, biologicals and treatments necessary to meet the needs of the patient. Durable medical equipment, medical supplies and appliances necessary to meet the needs of the patient.”A policy, Physician’s Orders (revised 10/1/24), received on 7/15/26 at 10:15 AM from the Executive Director stated, “Services are provided according to the most recent orders updating the patient’s plan of care.”accurate…”1. Patient #4 was admitted on 6/18/26 with a diagnoses of other sequelae of other cerebrovascular disease (long-term effects following a stroke) and colostomy status (artificial opening in abdomen for the passage of stool). The plan of care for 6/18/26-8/16/26 included orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 1 time a week for 1 week, 3 times a week for 8 weeks with 3 PRN (as needed). Review of the clinical record revealed that on 6/18/26 registered nurse (RN) #11 documented, “Patient also has a colostomy bag. Patient’s stoma (surgically created opening) is pink and moist.” On 6/22/26 RN #9 documented, “Patient has a colostomy bag noted with brown stool.” On 7/6/26 RN #9 documented, “Patient has an ostomy bag that is clean and intact.” Further review revealed that the colostomy was not included in the plan of care.During an interview conducted on 7/15/26 at 9:30 AM RN #11 stated, “I don’t see the ostomy on the plan of care, I should have added it at that time.”RN #9 was not available for an interview.2. Patient #17 was admitted on 3/10/26 with a diagnosis of motor neuron disease (progressive neurological disorder). The plan of care (POC) for 6/8/26-9/5/26 included orders for skilled nurse visits 1 time a week for 13 weeks with 3 PRN (as needed). Review of the clinical record revealed that on 6/10/26 RN #13 documented, “This RN demonstrated to daughter how to use Hoyer [brand name of a mechanical lift].” On 7/8/26 RN #13 documented, “Hoyer lift in home and daughter educated on use.” Further review revealed that there were no orders in the plan of care for a mechanical lift.During an interview conducted on 7/15/26 at 8:58 AM RN #13 stated, “I honestly do not know [if the lift included in the POC] I will need to put that in…. Normally I would create a POC for new DME.”During an interview conducted on 7/15/26 at 11:48 AM the Executive Director stated, “The plan of care should be personalized and updated as needed.””

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,088 words

    “Based on agency policy clinical record review, and staff interviews, the registered nurses and medical social workers failed to provide accurate documentation in the clinical record in accordance with the agency’s policy for 5 of 13 active patients with record reviews conducted (#4, 6, 11, 12, &17).Findings included: A policy, Hospice Medical Record (revised 10/1/24), received on 7/13/26 at 10:57 AM from the business office manager stated, “All entries in the hospice record must be legible and accurate…”1. Patient #4 was admitted on 6/18/26 with a diagnoses of other sequelae of other cerebrovascular disease (long-term effects following a stroke), colostomy status (artificial opening in abdomen for the passage of stool), and do not resuscitate (DNR). The plan of care for 6/18/26-8/16/26 included orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 1 time a week for 1 week, 3 times a week for 8 weeks with 3 PRN (as needed), medical social worker (MSW) visits 1 time a month for 1 month and “Do Not Resuscitate (medical directive that indicates that the patient does not want cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the heart stops beating).” Review of the clinical record revealed the following:During the MSW visit on 7/6/26 MSW #10 documented, “Patient remains a Full Code [the patient wants cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the heart stop beating].”During the SN visit on 7/6/26 registered nurse (RN) #9 documented, “Patient’s urostomy (artificial opening bypassing the bladder to drain urine) is draining clear yellow urine.” Further review revealed that patient #4 did not have a urostomy.During an interview conducted on 7/13/26 at 3:20 PM MSW #10 stated, “He [patient] is a DNR, I made a mistake, he’s been a DNR.”RN #9 was not available for an interview.2. Patient #6 was admitted on 8/14/25 with a diagnosis of acute chronic systolic diastolic heart failure. The plan of care for 6/10/26-8/8/26 included orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 8 weeks with 3 PRN (as needed) and home hospice aide (HHA) visits 2 times a week for 1 week and 3 times a week for 8 weeks. Review of the clinical record revealed the following:During the SN visit on 6/18/26 RN #7 documented a home hospice aide (HHA) supervisory visit for HHA #8 and documented, “Does not meet requirements” for the following: Does the Hospice aide observe standard precautions and body mechanics;Does the Hospice aide notify the patient/family in a timely fashion of any schedule changes;Does the Hospice aide respect patient’s rights…;Does the Hospice aide utilize equipment effectively…;Does the hospice aide maintain patient’s personal hygiene?During the SN visit on 7/2/26 RN #7 documented, “Recognizes her name when called…” Further review revealed that patient #6 is and identifies as a male.During the SN visit on 7/9/26 RN #10 documented an HHA supervisory visit for HHA #8 and documented, “Does not meet requirements” for Does the Hospice aide notify the patient/family in a timely fashion of any schedule changes?During an interview conducted on 7/15/26 at 9:01 AM RN #7 stated, “That was just an accident [HHA #8’s name] meets or exceeds expectations.” RN #7 stated, “[patient #6 name] is a Mister not a her.” 3. Patient #11 was admitted on 5/21/26 with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (disease affecting the central nervous system). The plan of care for 5/21/26-7/19/26 included orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 2 times a week for 1 week, 3 times a week for 8 weeks with 3 PRN (as needed) and, “Insert 16F, 10mL suprapubic (device inserted through the abdominal wall into the bladder to drain urine). Catheter to continuous bedside drainage related to retention of urine. Catheter to be changed every 2 weeks and PRN…”Review of the clinical record revealed that on 5/29/26 RN #14 documented a suprapubic catheter change as follows, Indicate insertion date: “5/29/26”, Indicate Catheter Size: “18” Indicate date of scheduled catheter change: “Changed today…”During an interview conducted on 7/15/26 at 9:39 RN #14 stated, “He always gets a 16F I don’t know why I put an 18F.”4. Patient #12 was admitted on 6/23/26 with a diagnosis of acute leukemia (cancer effecting the blood and bone marrow). The plan of care for 6/23/26-9/20/26 include orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 2 times a week for 13 weeks with 3 PRN (as needed), home hospice aide (HHA) 2 times a week for 1 week, 3 times a week for 8 weeks, and “Insert 16F, 10mL Foley [name brand] catheter (device inserted through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine). Catheter to continuous bedside drainage related to retention of urine. Catheter to be changed every 2 weeks and PRN.” Review of the clinical record revealed the following:During the SN visit on 6/24/26 RN #11 documented, “RN made visit patient’s asthma being red and swollen…” Further review revealed that the patient did not have a documented diagnosis of asthma.During the SN visit on 6/29/26 RN #7 documented that the catheter size was 18.During the SN visit on 7/9/26 RN #7 documented an HHA supervisory visit for HHA # 15 and stated, “Does not meet requirements” for the following task; Does the hospice aide report abnormal findings to the appropriate staff; Does the hospice aide notify the patient/family in a timely fashion of any schedule changes; Does the hospice aide respect patient’s rights…; and does the hospice aide utilize equipment effectively…” Further review revealed that RN #7 also documented that the patient resides in a facility and the patient/caregiver was, “unwilling” to provide care.During an interview conducted on 7/15/26 at 9:15 AM RN #11 stated, “That was a typo, it should have been eyes [not asthma].”During an interview conducted on 7/15/26 at 9:09 AM RN #7 stated, “It [catheter] was not changed to a different size.” RN #7 stated, “[HHA #15 name] definitely meets the requirements.” RN #7 also stated, “That’s not accurate [caregiver is willing to provide care].”5. Patient #17 was admitted on 3/10/26 with a diagnosis of motor neuron disease (progressive neurological disorder). The plan of care for 6/8/26-9/5/26 included orders for medical social worker visits 1 time a month for 3 months with 3 PRN (as needed). Review of the clinical record revealed that on 6/11/26 MSW #16 documented, “Daughter expresses she has reached out to 1 year but she was both note.”During an interview conducted on 7/15/26 at 10:21 AM MSW #16 stated, “I was talking to text and I missed fixing that… It was the lawyer was booked up.”During an interview conducted on 7/15/26 at11:50 AM- the Executive Director stated, “They [all staff] should review documentation to ensure accuracy.””

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

Nov 20, 2024: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 180 words

    “Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews the social worker failed to make visits in accordance with the plan of care for 1 of 3 patients [#1]. The findings included: Patient # 1 had a Start of Care [SOC] date of 8/20/24 with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of brain [progressive decline in cognitive function that can lead to memory loss, impaired thinking and loss of independence]. Review of the plan of care [POC] for the certification period 8/20/24-11/17/24 included orders for MSW [medical social worker] 1 time a month for 1 month, 2 times a month for 1 month, 3 times a month for 1 month and 1 time a month for 1 month. A supplemental order was written on 10/1/24 for MSW 1 time a month. Review of the clinical record revealed the only MSW visits was made on 8/21/24. During an interview the director of the agency on 11/20/24 at approximately 9 am, the director stated, “;The social worker just quit without a notice. So, the visits were not made in accordance with the POC.””

    Rule L0555. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 15, 2026Recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited
Nov 20, 2024Complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 14, 1988.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 72% at home, 17% in assisted living, 3% in a nursing facility, 8% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4.6%
Visits near death94.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • North Carolina in Home Health Care Partnership - VII LLC owns 100% directly since Apr 1, 2017.
  • 2 owners or officers are people: Scottie Goodwin (managing employee (on the payroll)); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
North Carolina in Home Health Care Partnership - VII LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Apr 1, 2017
In-Home Healthcare Partnership LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 1, 2017
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies80%Feb 22, 2023
Lhcg Partner LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies80%Apr 1, 2017
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies80%Apr 1, 2017
Home Health Partner LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Apr 1, 2017
Lifepoint Hospitals Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Apr 1, 2017
Historic Lifepoint Hospitals LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Apr 1, 2017
Legacy Lifepoint Health LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Apr 1, 2017

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 91% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 71.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 14 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 27893, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 11; this one had 3.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.