Liberty Home Care and Hospice
A hospice in Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
420 Eastwood Road ,suite 102, Wilmington, North Carolina 28403. (910) 251-8111.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 11 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 3of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
11 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 5 hospices serving ZIP code 28403 had 11.
The last inspection on record was on Dec 16, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
11 deficiencies in 4 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Dec 16, 2025: complaint inspection by the state3 deficiencies
-
Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))
The inspectors’ words, 421 words
“Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the agency failed to update the plan of care to include contact precautions (requirement to wear gloves and gowns to enter a patient’s room) for 1 of 1 patient requiring contact precautions. (Patient #1)Finding’s included: A policy, Care Planning: Initial Care Plan and Updates to the Plan of Care (revised 02/2025) received on 12/16/2025 at 12:20 PM from the agency administrator stated, “The comprehensive assessment must be updated and revised as frequently as the patient’s condition warrants… In addition, the patient is reassessed and the plan of care is reviewed/updated when: There is a significant change in the patient’s condition, diagnosis…”A policy, Exposure Control Plan: Isolation Precaution (revised 01/2025) received on 12/16/2025 at 12:20 PM from the agency administrator stated, “Health care workers and other hospice personnel use Transmission Bases Precaution with patients documented or suspected to be infected with highly transmittable or epidemiologically important pathogens for which additional precautions beyond Standard Precaution are needed to interrupt transmission.”Patient #1 was admitted on 09/26/2025 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain (severe mental decline). Patient #1 resided in a facility. The plan of care for 11/25/2025-01/23/2025 included orders for skilled nurse visits 1 time a week for 8 weeks with 3 PRN (as needed) and home health aide (HHA) visits 7 times a week for 7 weeks and 6 times a week for 1 week. Review of the clinical record revealed that on 12/05/2025 licensed practical nurse (LPN) #5 documented, “Upon arrival, noted contact precautions [requirement to wear gloves and gowns to enter a patient’s room] on patient’s door. Facility staff notified this nurse that patient was on contact precaution and being treated for shingles [contagious blistering rash].” Further review revealed that the HHA plan of care had not been updated to include contact precautions and HHA #7 completed visits on 12/08/2025, 12/09/2025, and 12/10/2025 and failed to document using contact precautions for personal care.During an interview conducted on 12/16/2025 at 1:43 PM LPN #5 stated, “I don’t think that I did [update the plan of care], as an LPN I don’t normally do that, I would normally notify the case manager or office. I did go to the office and tell [clinical manager’s #8’s name] …”During an interview conducted on 12/16/2025 at 1:49 PM clinical manager #8 stated, “She did come in and tell us. I asked her to make sure that [case manager’s name] is aware. We should update our care plan and start taking the proper precautions.””
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 182 words
“Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the agency failed to provide home health aide (HHA) services as ordered in the plan of care for 1 of 3 patients receiving HHA services (patient #1).Findings included: A policy, Physician Interim Orders (revised 02/2025), received on 12/169/2025 at 12:20 PM from the agency administrator stated, “All hospice services are provided under the supervision of the patient’s physician and in accordance with the physician’s orders and written plan of care…”Patient #1 was admitted on 09/26/2025 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain (severe mental decline). The plan of care for 11/25/2025-01/23/2025 included orders for home health aide (HHA) visits 7 times a week for 7 weeks and 6 times a week for 1 week. Review of the clinical record revealed that patient #1 did not receive HHA visits on 12/06/2025 or 12/07/2025. Further review revealed that there was no documentation for missed visits.An interview conducted on 12/16/2025 at approximately 12:00 revealed that the visits were not scheduled as ordered and the expectation is for all ordered visits to be scheduled.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(ii))
The inspectors’ words, 211 words
“Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, the agency failed to conduct home health aide supervisory visits every 14 days for 1 of 3 patients with HHA visits ordered (patient #3).Findings included: A policy, Aide Supervisory Visits Hospice (revised 09/20/21), received on 12/16/2025 at 12:20 PM from the agency administrator stated, “An RN [registered nurse] makes a supervisory home visit to the patient’s residence no less frequently than every 14 days…”Patient #3 was admitted on 09/20/2025 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain (severe mental decline). The plan of care for 09/20/2025-11/18/2025 included orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 2 times a week for 1 week, 1 time a week for 7 weeks, and 1 time a week for 4 weeks with 3 PRN (as needed) and home health aide (HHA) visits 5 times a week for 8 weeks. Review of the clinical record revealed that HHA supervisory visits were documented on 10/02/2025 and 11/11/2025 and no HHA supervisory visits were completed between 10/03/2025 and 11/10/2025.Registered nurse #4 was not available for an interview.An interview conducted on 12/16/2025 at 11:20 AM with the agency administrator revealed that the expectation is for the registered nurse to complete and document HHA supervisory visits at least every 14 days.”
Apr 24, 2025: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 2,595 words
“Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews the IDG [interdisciplinary group] failed to project visit frequencies for the next 15 days for 17 of 27 patients [ #22, 24, 4, 7, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 25, 26, 27, and 1]. The findings included:The policy, Interdisciplinary Group and Coordination of Care [01/25], was provided by the agency director on 4/23/25 at 3:02 pm. The policy stated, “...The IDG conducts team conferences and participates in developing and updating the plan of care. The IDG reviews the effectiveness of the plan of care including progress toward goals as the patients [sic] condition indicates and not less frequently than every 15 days...” 14. Patient #25 had a start of care date of 1/7/25 with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of brain (decline in brain function associated with age). Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period of 4/17/25-7/15/25 included orders for SN (skilled nursing) 1 time a week for 11 weeks; hospice aide 3 times a week for 12 weeks, 2 times a week for 1 week; MSW (medical social worker) 2 times a month for 1 month, 2 times a month for 1 month, 2 times a month for 1 month; Spiritual Counselor 1 time a month for 1 month, 2 times a month for 2 months, 1 time a month for 1 month. Review of the clinical record revealed the agency conducted an IDG (interdisciplinary group) meeting on 4/23/25. Review of the IDG minutes revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days by the Spirit Counselor. 15. Patient #26 had a start of care date of 1/20/25 with a terminal diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis (chronic lung disease where lung tissue becomes damaged and scarred). Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period of 3/21/25-5/19/25 included orders for SN (skilled nursing) 1 time a week for 8 weeks; hospice aide 3 times a week for 8 weeks; MSW (medical social worker) 1 time a month for 2 months; Spiritual Counselor 1 time a month for 1 month, 2 times a month for 2 months, 1 time a month for 1 month. Review of the clinical record revealed the agency conducted IDG (interdisciplinary group) meetings on 3/26/25, 4/9,25, and 4/23/25. Review of the IDG minutes revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days by the MSW or the Spiritual Counselor for any of these 3 meetings. 16. Patient #27 had a start of care date of 3/29/25 with a terminal diagnosis of progressive supranuclear ophthalmoplegia (a rare, incurable brain disorder that causes deterioration of brain cells). Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period of 3/29/25-6/26/25 included orders for SN (skilled nursing) 2 times a week for 3 weeks, 1 time a week for 10 weeks; MSW (medical social worker) 1 time a month for 1 months, 2 times a month for 2 months; Spiritual Counselor 3 times a month for 1 month, 4 times a month for 2 months. Review of the clinical record revealed the agency conducted IDG (interdisciplinary group) meetings on 4/9/25 and 4/23/25. Review of the IDG minutes revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days by the MSW on 4/9/25 and no visit projections for the next 15 days by the Spiritual Counselor on 4/23/25. 17. Patient #1 had a start of care date of 9/17/24 with a terminal diagnosis of unspecified protein/calorie malnutrition (a state of insufficient intake of both protein and calories). Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period of 9/17/24-11/15/24 included orders for SN (skilled nursing) 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 1 week,1 time a week for 7 weeks; hospice aide 2 times a week for 1 week, 3 times a week for 7 weeks,2 times a week for 1 week; MSW (medical social worker) 1 time a week for 1 week, 1 time a month for 2 months. Review of the clinical record revealed the agency conducted IDG (interdisciplinary group) meetings on 9/25/24, 10/9/24, and 10/23/24. Review of the IDG minutes revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days by the MSW for any of these 3 meetings. 1. Patient #22 had a start of care date of 11/18/22 with a terminal diagnosis of Parkinson’s [a progressive neurological disorder that affects movement]. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 3/7/25-5/5/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time a week for 9 weeks; hospice aide 4 times a week for 9 weeks; MSW [medical social worker] 2 times a month for 2 months. Review of the clinical record revealed the agency conducted IDG [interdisciplinary group] meetings on 3/26/25 and 4/9/25. Further review of the clinical record revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days by the MSW for either meeting.2. Patient # 24 had a start of care date of 7/25/24 with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain [decline in mental functioning associated with old age]. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 3/22/25-5/20/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time a week for 9 weeks; hospice aide 5 times a week for 9 weeks; MSW [medical social worker] 2 times a month for 2 months; Volunteer 1 time a month for 1 month. Review of the clinical record revealed the agency conducted IDG [interdisciplinary group] meetings on 3/12/25, 3/26/25, and 4/9/25. Review of the clinical record revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days by the MSW on 3/12/25 or 3/26/25 meetings. Further review revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days by the Volunteer for any of the meetings.3. Patient # 4 had a start of care date of 5/8/24 with a terminal diagnosis of hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease without heart failure [uncontrolled high blood pressure damages the heart]. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification episode 8/6/24-11/3/24 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time a week for 13 weeks; MSW [medical social worker] 2 times a month for 3 months; Volunteer 1 time a month for 3 months. Review of the clinical record revealed the agency conducted IDG [interdisciplinary group] meetings on 8/13/24, 8/27/24, 9/10/24, and 9/24/24. Review of the IDG minutes revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days by the volunteer or the MSW for 8/13/24, 8/27/24 or 9/10/2. The patient expired on 9/12/24.4. Patient # 7 had a start of care date of 11/7/24 with a terminal diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD-a lung condition]. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 11/7/24-2/5/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 2 times a week for 3 weeks, 1 time a week for 10 weeks; MSW [medical social worker] 1 time a week for 1 week, 1 time a month for 1 month, 2 times a month for 2 months; Spiritual Counselor 1 time a week for 1 week, 1 time a month for 1 month. Review of the clinical record revealed the agency conducted IDG [interdisciplinary group] meetings 11/20/24 and 12/11/24. Further review of the clinical record revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days for the 11/20/24 meeting by the MSW or the Spiritual Counselor. The patient passed away on 12/3/24.5. Patient # 11 had a start of care date of 3/21/25 with a terminal diagnosis of other lymphoid leukemia not having achieved remission [cancer of the blood]. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period of 3/21/25-6/18/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 3 times a week for 12 weeks, 2 times a week for 1 week; hospice aide 5 times a week for 12 weeks, 3 times a week for 1 week; MSW [medical social worker] 1 time a week for 1 week then 1 time a month for 1 month, 5 times a month for 1 month, 4 times a month for 1 month, 1 time a month for 1 month; Spiritual Counselor 1 time a week for 1 week then 2 times a month for 1 month, 2 times a month for 1 month [sic], 1 time a month for 1 month; Volunteer Coordinator 1 time a week for 1 week then 1 time a month for 1 month. Review of the clinical record revealed the agency conducted IDG [interdisciplinary group] meetings on 4/1/25 and 4/15/25. Review of the IDG minutes revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days by the Spirit Counselor or the Volunteer for either meeting.6. Patient # 12 had a start of care date of 3/13/25 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease with early onset. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 3/13/25-6/10/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time a week for 14 weeks; hospice aide 2 times a week for 12 weeks, 1 time a week for 1 week; MSW [medical social worker] 1 time a month for 1 month, 2 times a month for 2 months, 1 time a month for 1 month; Spiritual Counselor 1 time a day for 1 day, 1 time a month for 1 month, 2 times a month for 2 month, 1 time a month for 1 month. . Review of the clinical record revealed the agency conducted IDG [interdisciplinary group] meetings on 3/20/25, 4/3/25, and 4/17/25. Review of the IDG minutes for those dates revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days by the MSW or the Spiritual Counselor for any of the IDG meetings.7. Patient # 14 had a start of care date of 4/10/25 and a terminal diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of supralottis [cancer of the voice box]. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 4/10/25-7/8/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time a week for 9 weeks, 1 time a week for 3 weeks; hospice aide 1 time a week for 12 weeks; MSW [medical social worker] 1 time a month for 1 week, 2 times a month for 2 months, 1 time a month for 1 month. Review of the clinical record revealed the agency conducted an IDG [interdisciplinary group] meeting on 4/15/25. Review of the minutes for that meeting revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days by the MSW.8. Patient # 15 had a start of care date of 3/13/54 with a terminal diagnosis of malignant neoplasm [cancer] of the pancreas. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 3/13/25-6/10/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 3 times a week for 12 weeks; hospice aide 3 times a week for 1 week, 7 times a week for 12 weeks; MSW [medical social worker] 1 time a month for 1 month, 2 times a month for 2 months, 1 time a month for 1 month; Spiritual Counselor 1 time a month for 1 month, 2 times a month for 2 months, 1 time a month for 1 month. Review of the clinical record revealed the agency conducted IDG [interdisciplinary group] meetings on 4/2/25 and 4/16/25. Review of the IDG minutes revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days by the MSW for the 4/2/25 meeting.9. Patient # 16 had a start of care date of 4/2/25 with a terminal diagnosis of sepsis [infection of the blood]. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 4/2/25-6/30/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 12 weeks; hospice aide 2 times a week for 1 week, 5 times a week for 12 weeks, 1 time a week for 1 week; MSW [medical social worker] 2 times a month for 3 months; Spiritual Counselor 2 times a month for 3 months. Review of the clinical record revealed the agency conducted an IDG [interdisciplinary group] meeting on 4/16/25. Review of the minutes for that meeting revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days by the MSW or the Spiritual Counselor.10. Patient # 17 had a start of care date of 3/31/25 and a terminal diagnosis of congestive heart failure [heart is unable to pump effectively]. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 3/31/25-6/28/25 revealed orders for SN [skilled nursing] 2 times a week for 3 weeks, 1 time a week for 8 weeks; hospice aide 2 times a week for 12 weeks; MSW [medical social worker] 3 times a month for 3 months. Review of the clinical record revealed the agency conducted an IDG [interdisciplinary group] meeting on 4/2/25. Review of the minutes for that meeting revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days by the MSW.11. Patient # 18 had a start of care date of 3/19/25 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 3/19/25-6/16/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 2 times a week for 2 weeks, 1 time a week for 10 weeks; hospice aide 1 time a week for 1 week, 5 times a week for 12 weeks, 1 time a week for 1 week; MSW [medical social worker] 2 times a month for 2 months, 1 time a month for 1 month. Review of the clinical record revealed the agency conducted IDG [interdisciplinary group] meetings on 3/25/25 and 4/8/25. Review of the clinical record revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days by the MSW during the IDG meeting on 3/25/25.12. Patient # 19 had a start of care date of 3/26/25 with a terminal diagnosis of hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure [high blood pressure affects the heart’s pumping ability and affects blood vessels in the kidneys]. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 3/26/25-5/24/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 1 week, 1 time a week for 7 weeks; hospice aide 2 times a week for 1 week, 5 times a week for 8 weeks; MSW [medical social worker] 2 times a month for 1 month; Spiritual Counselor 2 times a month for 2 months. Review of the clinical record revealed the agency conducted IDG [interdisciplinary group] meetings on 4/1/25 and 4/15/25. Review of the IDG minutes revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days by the MSW or the Spiritual Counselor for either meeting.13. Patient # 21 had a start of care date of 3/14/25 with a terminal diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia of B-cell [cancer of the blood]. Review of the Plan of care for the certification period 3/14/25-6/11/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 2 times a week for 2 weeks, 1 time a week for 11 weeks; hospice aide 5 times a week for 12 weeks, 3 times a week for 1 week; Medical social worker 1 time a week for 1 week, 1 time a month for 1 month, 3 times a month for 2 months, 1 time a month for 1 month; Spiritual Counselor 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a month for 2 months, 1 time a month for 1 month. Review of the clinical record revealed the agency conducted IDG [interdisciplinary group] meetings on 3/25/25 and 4/8/25. Review of the IDG minutes revealed no visit projections for the next 15 days by the Spirit Counselor or the MSW for either meeting.During an interview with the agency director on 4/24/25 at approximately 11 am, the director stated, “They [IDG team] know they have to say if they expect to see the patient within the next 15 days. We used to do that.””
-
Nursing services (42 CFR 418.64(b)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 1,056 words
“Based on agency policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the nurse failed to measure and accurately describe wounds for 2 out of 6 patients with wounds (#1 and #13).The policy, Wound Assessment, Home Care revised 2/24/2025, was provided by the agency administrator 04/23/2025 at 3:44 pm. The policy stated, “A comprehensive wound assessment is necessary during every visit and documented in the patient’s medical record. Wound measurements are to be taken at least one time every week…Documentation associated with wound assessment includes…size in length, width, and depth.”CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) follow best practice guidelines revised April 2016, that are outlined by the NPUAP (National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel), which state, “If the pressure ulcer has ever been classified at a higher numerical stage than what is observed now, it should continue to be classified at the higher numerical stage.” 1.Patient #1 had a start of care date of 9/17/24 with a terminal diagnosis of unspecified protein/calorie malnutrition (a state of insufficient intake of both protein and calories). The Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period of 9/17/24-11/15/24 included orders for SN (skilled nursing) 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 1 week, 1 time a week for 7 weeks and “Stage IV pressure ulcer (full thickness skin and tissue loss, exposing muscle, tendon, or bone) left heel…monitor the site of impaired skin integrity at least weekly for size/measurements…”. Review of the clinical record revealed that on the admission comprehensive assessment on 9/17/24, RN#1 documented the patient had a stage IV pressure ulcer on his left heel that measured 6 x 6 [sic] and a stage II pressure ulcer (partial thickness skin loss) on right heel that measured 2 x 0.5 [sic]. Further review of the documentation revealed no wound depth for either area. On 9/25/24, RN #2 documented the patient had a stage IV pressure ulcer on left heel that measured 6.3 x 5.3 x 0.7 [sic] with undermining (the separation of the skin edge from the underlying tissue, creating a pocket beneath the wound’s surface) of 0.5 cm between 11o’clock and 12 0’clock (area of wound is broken down into segments that correspond to a clock face) and a stage 1 pressure ulcer on right heel that measured 0.9 cm x 1cm. (previously documented as a stage II). Review of the documentation revealed RN #2 back staged (the incorrect practice of downgrading the stage of a pressure ulcer as it heals) the ulcer on the right heel to a stage I. On 10/2/24, RN #2 documented that the patient had a stage III pressure ulcer(wound penetrates through the top layers of skin and into the underlying fatty tissue) on his left heel (previously documented as a stage IV) that measured 6.2 x 5.2 [sic] with undermining 0.5cm between 11o’clock and 12 o’clock. Review of the documentation on 10/2/24 indicated the RN back staged the stage IV on the left heel to a stage III.On 10/7/24, RN #2 documented that the patient had a stage III pressure ulcer on the left heel that measured 6.2 x 5.2 [sic]. This wound was previously staged as a stage IV on the initial assessment on 9/17/2024. Further review of the documentation revealed that no depth or undermining measurements were documented and there was no mention of any other wounds, and that RN #2 back staged the stage IV on the left heel to a stage III. On 10/14/24, RN #2 documented that the patient had a stage 1 pressure ulcer on right heel (stage II on the original assessment on 9/17/2024) that measured 0.5 x 0.7 [sic] and a stage III pressure ulcer (stage IV on the initial assessment on 9/17/2024) on left heel that measured 6.2 x 5.2 [sic]. Further review of the documentation revealed that no depth or undermining measurements were documented, and that RN #2 back staged the stage IV on the left heel to a stage III.On 10/21/24, RN #2 documented only a stage III (stage IV on initial assessment on 9/17/2024) pressure ulcer on left heel that measured 6.2 x 5.2 [sic]. No depth or undermining measurement documented. During an interview with the agency director on 4/27/25 at approximately 11 am, the director confirmed the RNs failed to measure wounds in accordance with the agency policy.2. Patient #13 had a start of care date of 3/28/2025 with a terminal diagnosis of malignant neoplasm (cancerous tumor) of connective and soft tissue of the head, face, and neck. The Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period of 3/28/2025-6/25/2025 included orders for SN (skilled nursing) 5 times a week for 1 week, 3 times a week for 11 weeks, 2 times a week for 1 week and “Perform wound care to left leg. Cleanse/irrigate affected areas with wound cleanser, apply 4x4, and wrap with Kerlix. For head angiosarcoma, clean gently with wound spray, apply xeroform, a 4x4 gauze, and an abdominal pad. Cover and secure with tape or kerlix using aseptic technique.” On the admission comprehensive assessment on 9/17/24, RN#3 documented, “Angiosarcoma (a rare and aggressive cancerous tumor) of scalp serosanguinous (a combination of clear fluid and blood) weeping of large circular slightly raised area on left side of scalp”. Left leg “there is a 5cm x 2.5 [sic], a 5cm x 1.5 [sic], a ½ [sic] x 1 cm, and another small circular area”. RN #3 failed to record the depth of these wounds. On 3/30/2025, RN #4 documented wound #1 as scalp wound “Back-Upper Cranial, Left, Head” that measured 4 x 4 x 0.1 [sic], wound #2 as ulcer “Left – Lower leg, Distal, Left Lower Leg that measured 5 x 2.5 x 0.1 [sic], wound #3 as ulcer “Front-Lower leg, Distal, Left Lower leg” that measured 5 x 1.5 x 0.1 [sic], and wound #4 as ulcer ““Front-Lower leg, Distal, Left Lower leg” that measured 1.2 x 1 x 0.1 [sic].On 4/10/2025, RN #6 documented wound #1 as “Front-Lower leg, Distal, Left lower leg”, wound #2 as “Front-Lower leg, Distal, Right lower leg”, and wound #3 “Back-Upper Cranial, Left, Head”. Review of the clinical record revealed that no wound measurements were documented during the week of 4/6/2024 – 4/12/2024.During an interview with the agency director on 4/24/25 at approximately 11:15 am, the director confirmed that the location/area of the wounds were inconsistent.”
Jan 28, 2025: complaint inspection by the state3 deficiencies
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 216 words
“Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews the agency failed to update the plan of care to reflect patient/family goals for 1 of 1 patient with a request. (patient #1) Findings included: A policy, Care Planning: Initial Care Plan and Updates to the Plan of care (revised 03/2024), received on 01/28/2025 at 10:30 AM from the agency administrator stated, “;The plan of care is reviewed/updated when: ... Requested by the patient.” Patient #1 was admitted on 06/24/2023 with a diagnosis of Alzheimers Disease (progressive disease that destroys mental function). The plan of care (POC) for 11/15/2024-01/13/2025 included orders for skilled nurse visits 1 time a week for 9 weeks and 3 PRN (as needed). Review of the clinical record revealed on 11/22/2024 registered nurse (RN) #7 stated, “;Request mask to be worn in the home.” Further review of the clinical record revealed that the POC had not been updated to reflect the request. During an interview conducted on 01/28/2025 at 10:03 AM RN #7 stated, “;That would probably be a good idea [to update the POC]. During an interview on 01/28/2025 at 10:15 AM the agency administrator stated, “;I would expect it [request to wear mask] to be on the plan of care and documented that the IDG [interdisciplinary group] was made aware.””
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 450 words
“Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the agency failed to provide home health aide and/or registered nurse visits as ordered for 3 of 3 patients. (#1,2, and 3) Findings included: A policy Assessment: Ongoing and Reassessment (revised 10/2022) received on 01/28/2025 at approximately 8:30 AM from the agency administrator stated, “;Hospice personnel provide ongoing services to the patient/family in accordance with a written plan of care...” Patient #1 was admitted on 06/24/2023 with a diagnosis of Alzheimers Disease (progressive disease that destroys mental function). The plan of care for 11/15/2024-01/13/2025 included orders for hospice aide (HHA) visits 1 time a week for 1 week, 5 times a week for 8 weeks, and 4 times a week for 1 week. Review of the clinical record revealed that on 01/09/2025 HHA #3 stated, “;Spoke with patient [sic] daughter [daughters name] to let her know I wouldnt be there today.” Further review of the clinical record revealed that during the week of 12/22/2024-12/28/2024 4 of 5 ordered HHA visits were conducted. 2. Patient #2 was admitted on 09/17/2024 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The plan of care for 12/16/2024-03/15/2025 included orders for hospice aide (HHA) visits 3 times a week for 13 weeks. Review of the clinical revealed a missed visit from 12/25/2024 were HHA #6 stated, “;Holiday PTO [paid time off] day.” and a missed visit from 12/27/2024 HHA #6 stated, “;PTO Time Off.” Further review of the clinical record reveal that no HHA visits were conducted during the week of 12/22/2024-12/28/2024. 3. Patient #3 was admitted on 11/18/2024 with a diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (a nervous system disease that weakens muscles and impacts physical functioning). The plan of care for 11/18/2024-02/15/2025 included orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 2 times a week for 2 weeks and 1 time a week for 11 weeks and hospice aide (HHA) visits 2 times a week for 12 weeks. Review of the clinical record revealed a missed visit from 11/29/2024 were registered nurse (RN) #4 stated, “;This nurse stated to patient and her caregiver that she was taking time off today and that another nurse would not be able to cover...” and a missed visit from 11/29/2024 were HHA #6 stated, “;PTO time off.” Further review of the clinical record reveal that 1 of 2 ordered SN visits and 1 of 2 HHA visits were conducted during the week of 11/24/2024-11/30/2024. During an interview conducted on 01/27/2025 at 1:30 PM the agency administrator stated, “;We have to meet the frequency of the patients, the case manager contacts the family to let them know that the aide is off, offer another aide, or allow them to refuse.””
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 463 words
“Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the agency failed to notify the physician of missed visits for 3 of 3 patients with missed visits. (patients # 1, 2, and 3) Findings included: A policy, Coordination and Communication Activities (revised 03/2024), received on 01/28/2025 at 8:30 AM from the agency administrator stated, “;If a visit is missed due to an agency scheduling problem and staff is not available to provide or make up the visit in the week it is due, notify the MD/MD representative.” Patient #1 was admitted on 06/24/2023 with a diagnosis of Alzheimers Disease (progressive disease that destroys mental function). The plan of care for 11/15/2024-01/13/2025 included orders for hospice aide (HHA) visits 1 time a week for 1 week, 5 times a week for 8 weeks, and 4 times a week for 1 week. Review of the clinical record revealed that on 01/09/2025 HHA #3 stated, “;Spoke with patient [sic] daughter [daughters name] to let her know I wouldnt be there today.” Further review of the clinical record revealed that during the week of 12/22/2024-12/28/2024 4 of 5 ordered HHA visits were conducted. There was no evidence in the clinical record of the physician being notified. 2. Patient #2 was admitted on 09/17/2024 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The plan of care for 12/16/2024-03/15/2025 included orders for hospice aide (HHA) visits 3 times a week for 13 weeks. Review of the clinical revealed a missed visit from 12/25/2024 were HHA #6 stated, “;Holiday PTO [paid time off] day.” and a missed visit from 12/27/2024 HHA #6 stated, “;PTO Time Off.” Further review of the clinical record reveal that no HHA visits were conducted during the week of 12/22/2024-12/28/2024. There was no evidence in the clinical record of the physician being notified. 3. Patient #3 was admitted on 11/18/2024 with a diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (a nervous system disease that weakens muscles and impacts physical functioning). The plan of care for 11/18/2024-02/15/2025 included orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 2 times a week for 2 weeks and 1 time a week for 11 weeks and hospice aide (HHA) visits 2 times a week for 12 weeks. Review of the clinical record revealed a missed visit from 11/29/2024 were registered nurse (RN) #4 stated, “;This nurse stated to patient and her caregiver that she was taking time off today and that another nurse would not be able to cover...” and a missed visit from 11/29/2024 were HHA #6 stated, “;PTO time off.” Further review of the clinical record revealed that only 1 of 2 ordered SN visits and 1 of 2 HHA visits were conducted during the week of 11/24/2024-11/30/2024. There was no evidence in the clinical record of the physician being notified.”
Jul 15, 2024: complaint inspection by the state3 deficiencies
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 200 words
“Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews the agency failed to provide pain management to a patient with unmanaged pain. (patient # 3) Findings included: A policy, Rights and Responsibilities (revised 08/2021) was received on 07/15/2024 at 1:49 from the clinical manager. The policy stated, “;Patients have the right... To received effective pain management...” Patient #3 was admitted on 01/10/2024 with a diagnosis of Alzheimers disease. Patient #3 was a resident of an assisted living facility (ALF). The plan of care for 01/10/2024-04/08/2024 included orders for skilled nurse visits 1 time a week for 1 week. An incident report was completed by registered nurse (RN) #4 on 01/14/2024 for a fall that occurred 01/11/2024. RN #4 stated, “;Patient laid on her right side and [sic] still screaming in pain...” There was no evidence in the clinical record of the RN #4 of obtaining orders for pain management. RN #4 was not available for an interview. An interview was conducted on 07/15/24 at approximately 1:30 PM with the clinical manager. The clinical manager stated, “;My expectation would be for the nurse to obtain orders for effective pain management. We [hospice agency] are responsible for managing the patients symptoms.””
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
The inspectors’ words, 273 words
“Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews the agency failed to conduct the Chaplain assessment within 5 days of the start of care for 1 of 2 patients. (patient #2) Finding included: A policy, Spiritual Assessment and Services (revised 05/2022) was received on 07/15/2024 at 3:25 P.M. from the clinical director. The policy stated, “;A comprehensive assessment of spiritual needs related to the terminal illness will be completed..., within five (5) days...” Patient # 2 was admitted on 05/03/2024 with a diagnosis of Malignant carcinoid tumor of the bronchus and lung (lung cancer). The plan of care for 05/03/2024- 05/14/2024 included orders for nursing visits 2 times a week for 12 weeks and 3 PRN (as needed) and medical social worker visits 2 times a month for 2 months and 3 PRN. Patient #2 was discharged on 05/14/2024. There was no evidence in the clinical record of patient #2 declining Chaplain visits. There was no evidence in the clinical record of a Chaplain conducting an initial assessment. An interview was conducted 07/15/24 at 3:00 P.M. with the agency Chaplain. The Chaplain stated, “;I have 5 days to complete initial assessment. When she first came on to hospice, they did not elect for Chaplain services, I was added later.” An interview was conducted on 07/15/2024 at approximately 3:05 P.M with the clinical manager. The clinical manager stated, “;Usually within 5 days of admission [conduct the Chaplain assessment, the admitting nurse will discuss elective services and the family/patient will decide if they want those services from admission. They [admitting nurse] should document that the services were discussed and if they are elected.””
-
Nursing services (42 CFR 418.64(b)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 207 words
“Based on the agencys patient and caregiver handbook, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the agency failed to conduct a physical assessment after a patient experienced a fall. (patient #2) Findings included: The Hospice Patient & Caregiver Handbook was received on 07/15/2024 at 10:30 A.M. from the clinical manager. The handbook stated, “;NURSE ... Provides on-call service (24 hours a day 7 days a week for unexpected situations that arise). Assesses pain, symptoms, nutritional status, bowel function, safety...” Patient #3 was admitted on 01/10/2024 with a diagnosis of Alzheimers disease. Patient #3 was a resident of an assisted living facility (ALF). The plan of care for 01/10/2024-04/08/2024 included orders for skilled nurse visits 1 time a week for 1 week. An incident report was completed by registered nurse (RN) #4 on 01/14/2024 for a fall that occurred 01/11/2024. RN #4 stated, “;Patient laid on her right side and [sic] still screaming in pain...” There was no evidence in the clinical record of the RN #4 of performing a physical assessment. RN #4 was not available for an interview. An interview conducted on 07/15/2024 at approximately 1:00 P.M. with the clinical manager revealed that the expectation is for the RN to perform a physical assessment after an incident.”
All 4 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2025 | Complaint inspection by the state | 3 deficiencies cited |
| Apr 24, 2025 | Recertification inspection by the state | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Complaint inspection by the state | 3 deficiencies cited |
| Jul 15, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 29, 1994.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 9 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 89.4% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 51% at home, 10% in assisted living, 36% in a nursing facility, 2% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 11.3 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 7.5% |
| Visits near death | 89.4% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Home Care Management Services LLC and Liberty Homecare Group, LLC run it.
- 18 owners or officers are people: John Albert Mcneill (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); John Albert Mcneill (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Ronald Benjamin Mcneill (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Ronald Benjamin Mcneill (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Sami Jo Taglieri (managing employee (on the payroll)); Brandi Devane (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Ariel Greenleaf (managing employee (on the payroll)); Barbara Ring (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Kehinde Peralte (managing employee (on the payroll)); Stephanie Adair (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Katrina Stanley (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kristi Cannon (managing employee (on the payroll)); Donna Turlington (managing employee (on the payroll)); Megan Vinson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ronald Benjamin Mcneill (corporate director); Ronald Benjamin Mcneill (managing employee (on the payroll)); Christopher Michael Wood (managing employee (on the payroll)); Vanessa Monk (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home Care Management Services LLC | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | Oct 26, 2006 | |
| Liberty Homecare Group, LLC | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | Jun 7, 2002 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 97.7% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 54.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 5 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 28403, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 11; this one had 11.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Liberty Home Care and Hospice This hospice | 11 |
| Lower Cape Fear Lifecare | 0 |
| Firsthealth Hospice | 8 |
| Gentiva | 18 |
| Amedisys Hospice Care | 14 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.