Community Hospice LLC
A hospice in New Bern, North Carolina 28562
1423-A South Glenburnie Road, New Bern, North Carolina 28562. (252) 672-8301.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 17 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
17 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 10 hospices serving ZIP code 28562 had 9.5.
The last inspection on record was on Apr 17, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
17 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Apr 17, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care17 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 27 (Patient #19) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient 19: There was no evidence of a spiritual assessment.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 243 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 27 (Patients #1,#5,#10,#12,#13,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. Patient 1: The medication profile contained Lumigan eye drops without instructions of whether to administer in both eyes or one eye. Patient 5: The medication profile contained Pepto-Bismol with no frequency, stating as needed without parameters for how often it can be administered. During home visit medication reconciliation, the daughter confirmed there was no oxygen in the home, patient’s dose of metoprolol is 12.5 mg daily, and takes prevastatin 40 mg daily. The hospice profile contained oxygen, metoprolol 25 mg daily, and no prevastatin. Patient 10: Nursing Facility contains vit C 500mg BID, vit D3 5,000 units daily, methenam 1 gm HS, ibuprofen 400mg daily not on the hospice profile; the hospice profile has evista 60mg daily, meloxicam 15mg daily, and rasagiline 1 mg daily not on NF, NF has tylenol 325mg BID PRN and hospice has 650 mg Q6h PRN Patient 12: During home visit medication reconciliation, the son confirmed patient is taking cetirizine for allergies approximately for a month. There was no evidence of cetirizine included on the medication profile. Patient 13: The medication profile contained Voltaren topical gel with no area defined for administration. Patient 14: The medication profile contained a fluticasone inhaler with incorrect route via nasal cannula, and polyethylene glycol oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent.”
-
Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))
The inspectors’ words, 132 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #1) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient 1: There was no evidence of a physical assessment completed by an RN between 3/5/26 and 4/3/26. All nursing visits completing in between those dates were by an LPN. Per Gentiva’s procedures an RN visit is required every 15 days.”
-
Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 6: There was no evidence of wound measurements between discovery 3/19/26 and wound de-activation 4/14/26, and no assessments after 4/2/26. Agency policy requires weekly wound assessments and measurements.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 124 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #17) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient 17: The plan of care included problems, goals, and interventions to be completed by the chaplain. There was no evidence of an ordered frequency for spiritual care visits.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 176 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 27 (Patients #1,#5,#13,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: The medical record contained an order for Lumigan eye drops without instructions of whether to administer in both eyes or one eye. Patient 5: The medical record contained an order for Pepto-Bismol with no frequency, stating as needed without parameters for how often it can be administered. During home visit medication reconciliation, the daughter confirmed patient’s dose of metoprolol is 12.5 mg daily, and takes prevastatin 40 mg daily. The medical record contained an order for metoprolol 25 mg daily, and did not have an order for prevastatin. Patient 13: The medical record contained an order for Voltaren topical gel with no area defined for administration. Patient 14: The medical record contained orders for a fluticasone inhaler with incorrect route via nasal cannula, and polyethylene glycol oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 204 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 27 (Patients #3,#4,#5,#10,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification assessment 2/3/26 identifying patient use of a fall pad. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification assessment 1/23/26 identifying patient use of a specialty mattress. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of a shower chair. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Patient 10: The plan of care included an order for a nebulizer and there was no evidence of any orders for nebulized medication. Patient 14: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification assessment identifying patient use of a hospital bed, full rails, walker, wheelchair, and nebulizer. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 195 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 27 (Patients #3,#13,#15,#20) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 3: The current plan of care contained former wound care interventions. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to reflect the wound had been documented as healed 3/2/26. Patient 13: The medical record contained nursing documentation since recertification assessment identifying patient is a high risk for skin impairment requiring a specialty mattress. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to include problems, goals, and interventions related to risk for skin breakdown. Patient 15: There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to omit problems, goals, and interventions to be completed by the chaplain. Spiritual care visits were ordered to be discontinued 3/5/26. Patient 20: There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to omit problems, goals, and interventions related to oxygen safety that were entered in error. The medical record did not contain an order for oxygen or documentation identifying patient use of oxygen.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
“Upon client record review, 2 of 27 (Patients #1,#18) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1: The medical record contained an order for nursing visits twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the week of 3/8/26. Patient 18: The medical record contained an order for nursing visits twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the week of 3/1/26.”
-
Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(2))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice investigates all adverse events, incidents, accidents, variances or unusual occurrences that involve patient care and develops a plan of correction to prevent the same or similar event from occurring again. Patient 16: The medical record contained nursing documentation 3/21/26 identifying patient fell sustaining two black eyes and a bump on the temple. There was no evidence the incident was investigated and a plan of correction was developed to prevent similar events.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient 6: During observation of the RN, equipment used for vitals was placed on a barrier after use and was placed back onto the same area of the barrier after cleansing. There was no separation of clean and dirty sections maintained on the surface.”
-
Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 119 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #21) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient 21: There was no evidence tasks were completed as assigned on the bereavement care plan.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))
The inspectors’ words, 164 words
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 17 (Personnel #8) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. Personnel #8: No evidence of a competency assessment completed on all tasks.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are specific to patient needs. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient was a max assist with transfers since admission and use of a wheelchair since at least the recertification assessment 2/3/26. There was no evidence of instructions for transfer assistance and use of wheelchair on the aide care plan.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 27 (Patient #11) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group Patient 11: The medical record contained an order for aide visits twice weekly. There was no evidence of second visits completed the weeks of 3/22/26 and 3/29/26.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 27 (Patient #1) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 1: There was no evidence of an aide supervisory visit completed between 3/5/26 and 4/3/26.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 96 words
“Upon patient client record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 2: The medical record contained social worker documentation 4/7/26 stating a visit was missed due to patient death. Additional visits were completed by other disciplines to show evidence the documentation of death was in error.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 17 deficiencies cited |
| Aug 19, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since May 30, 2003.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.5% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 64% at home, 28% in assisted living, 4% in a nursing facility, 3% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 12.9 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 6.8% |
| Visits near death | 95.5% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Curo Community Hospice, LLC owns 100% directly since Jun 1, 2012.
- 7 owners or officers are people: Melvin Gene Woolard (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); David W Baker (managing employee (on the payroll)); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 5, 2015 |
| Curo Community Hospice, LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Jun 1, 2012 |
| Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jun 6, 2014 |
| Charlotte Midco, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Falcon Hospice, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Charlotte Buyer, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 11, 2018 |
| Curo Health Services LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jun 6, 2014 |
| Kah Hospice Company, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Ch Services Group Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 5, 2015 |
| Ch Services Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 5, 2015 |
| Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 60% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Humana Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Centerwell Health Services Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 99.24% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 76% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 10 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 28562, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9.5; this one had 17.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Community Hospice LLC This hospice | 17 |
| Craven County Hospice | 3 |
| Hospice of the Piedmont Inc. | 12 |
| Amedisys Hospice | 0 |
| Lower Cape Fear Lifecare | 0 |
| 3hc | 32 |
| Liberty Home Care and Hospice | 11 |
| Continuum Home Care & Hospice | 8 |
| Pruitthealth Hospice - Rocky Mount | 20 |
| Hospice of Pamlico County, Inc. | 2 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.