Hearth Record

Community Hospice LLC

A hospice in New Bern, North Carolina 28562

1423-A South Glenburnie Road, New Bern, North Carolina 28562. (252) 672-8301.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 17 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

17 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 10 hospices serving ZIP code 28562 had 9.5.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 17, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

17 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

17 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 17, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care17 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 27 (Patient #19) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient 19: There was no evidence of a spiritual assessment.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 243 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 27 (Patients #1,#5,#10,#12,#13,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. Patient 1: The medication profile contained Lumigan eye drops without instructions of whether to administer in both eyes or one eye. Patient 5: The medication profile contained Pepto-Bismol with no frequency, stating as needed without parameters for how often it can be administered. During home visit medication reconciliation, the daughter confirmed there was no oxygen in the home, patient’s dose of metoprolol is 12.5 mg daily, and takes prevastatin 40 mg daily. The hospice profile contained oxygen, metoprolol 25 mg daily, and no prevastatin. Patient 10: Nursing Facility contains vit C 500mg BID, vit D3 5,000 units daily, methenam 1 gm HS, ibuprofen 400mg daily not on the hospice profile; the hospice profile has evista 60mg daily, meloxicam 15mg daily, and rasagiline 1 mg daily not on NF, NF has tylenol 325mg BID PRN and hospice has 650 mg Q6h PRN Patient 12: During home visit medication reconciliation, the son confirmed patient is taking cetirizine for allergies approximately for a month. There was no evidence of cetirizine included on the medication profile. Patient 13: The medication profile contained Voltaren topical gel with no area defined for administration. Patient 14: The medication profile contained a fluticasone inhaler with incorrect route via nasal cannula, and polyethylene glycol oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 132 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #1) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient 1: There was no evidence of a physical assessment completed by an RN between 3/5/26 and 4/3/26. All nursing visits completing in between those dates were by an LPN. Per Gentiva’s procedures an RN visit is required every 15 days.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 6: There was no evidence of wound measurements between discovery 3/19/26 and wound de-activation 4/14/26, and no assessments after 4/2/26. Agency policy requires weekly wound assessments and measurements.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 124 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #17) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient 17: The plan of care included problems, goals, and interventions to be completed by the chaplain. There was no evidence of an ordered frequency for spiritual care visits.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 176 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 27 (Patients #1,#5,#13,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: The medical record contained an order for Lumigan eye drops without instructions of whether to administer in both eyes or one eye. Patient 5: The medical record contained an order for Pepto-Bismol with no frequency, stating as needed without parameters for how often it can be administered. During home visit medication reconciliation, the daughter confirmed patient’s dose of metoprolol is 12.5 mg daily, and takes prevastatin 40 mg daily. The medical record contained an order for metoprolol 25 mg daily, and did not have an order for prevastatin. Patient 13: The medical record contained an order for Voltaren topical gel with no area defined for administration. Patient 14: The medical record contained orders for a fluticasone inhaler with incorrect route via nasal cannula, and polyethylene glycol oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 204 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 27 (Patients #3,#4,#5,#10,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification assessment 2/3/26 identifying patient use of a fall pad. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification assessment 1/23/26 identifying patient use of a specialty mattress. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of a shower chair. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Patient 10: The plan of care included an order for a nebulizer and there was no evidence of any orders for nebulized medication. Patient 14: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification assessment identifying patient use of a hospital bed, full rails, walker, wheelchair, and nebulizer. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 195 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 27 (Patients #3,#13,#15,#20) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 3: The current plan of care contained former wound care interventions. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to reflect the wound had been documented as healed 3/2/26. Patient 13: The medical record contained nursing documentation since recertification assessment identifying patient is a high risk for skin impairment requiring a specialty mattress. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to include problems, goals, and interventions related to risk for skin breakdown. Patient 15: There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to omit problems, goals, and interventions to be completed by the chaplain. Spiritual care visits were ordered to be discontinued 3/5/26. Patient 20: There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to omit problems, goals, and interventions related to oxygen safety that were entered in error. The medical record did not contain an order for oxygen or documentation identifying patient use of oxygen.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 27 (Patients #1,#18) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1: The medical record contained an order for nursing visits twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the week of 3/8/26. Patient 18: The medical record contained an order for nursing visits twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the week of 3/1/26.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice investigates all adverse events, incidents, accidents, variances or unusual occurrences that involve patient care and develops a plan of correction to prevent the same or similar event from occurring again. Patient 16: The medical record contained nursing documentation 3/21/26 identifying patient fell sustaining two black eyes and a bump on the temple. There was no evidence the incident was investigated and a plan of correction was developed to prevent similar events.”

    Rule L0569. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient 6: During observation of the RN, equipment used for vitals was placed on a barrier after use and was placed back onto the same area of the barrier after cleansing. There was no separation of clean and dirty sections maintained on the surface.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 119 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #21) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient 21: There was no evidence tasks were completed as assigned on the bereavement care plan.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 164 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 17 (Personnel #8) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. Personnel #8: No evidence of a competency assessment completed on all tasks.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are specific to patient needs. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient was a max assist with transfers since admission and use of a wheelchair since at least the recertification assessment 2/3/26. There was no evidence of instructions for transfer assistance and use of wheelchair on the aide care plan.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 27 (Patient #11) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group Patient 11: The medical record contained an order for aide visits twice weekly. There was no evidence of second visits completed the weeks of 3/22/26 and 3/29/26.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 27 (Patient #1) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 1: There was no evidence of an aide supervisory visit completed between 3/5/26 and 4/3/26.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 2: The medical record contained social worker documentation 4/7/26 stating a visit was missed due to patient death. Additional visits were completed by other disciplines to show evidence the documentation of death was in error.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 17, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care17 deficiencies cited
Aug 19, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 30, 2003.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 64% at home, 28% in assisted living, 4% in a nursing facility, 3% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.8%
Visits near death95.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Curo Community Hospice, LLC owns 100% directly since Jun 1, 2012.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Melvin Gene Woolard (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); David W Baker (managing employee (on the payroll)); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Curo Community Hospice, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jun 1, 2012
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.24% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 76% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 10 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 28562, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9.5; this one had 17.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.