Community Home Care & Hospice
A hospice in Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina 27870
52 Anna Louise Lane, Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina 27870. (252) 291-5353.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 15 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
15 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 8 hospices serving ZIP code 27870 had 8.
The last inspection on record was on Apr 24, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
15 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Apr 24, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 191 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 27 (Patient #4,14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 4: During home visit medication reconciliation with the pt’s caregiver, hospice medication profiles did not match what was being given in the home. The hospice profile contained orders for Mucinex 2 times daily, Spiriva 1 puff daily, Symbicort 2 puffs twice daily, and Zyrtec daily. The caregiver reported that the patient does not take those medications on a daily basis, they are being given PRN daily. Patient 14: RN documentation indicated that the patient uses oxygen at 2LNC as needed. No evidence that an order was received for oxygen at 2L via NC PRN. No evidence of a titration order with parameters for titration. The current oxygen order on the medication profile is for 4L via NC as needed.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 110 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #7) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 7: No evidence that the initial bereavement assessment was completed within 5 days of election of hospice. The patient was admitted on 03/26/2026. The bereavement risk assessment was completed on 04/01/2026.”
-
Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 213 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 27 (Patient #1, 12,17) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 1: The medical record indicated that the agency preformed a UA on the patient for suspected UTI on 04/07/2026. No evidence that the RN completed a follow up or that those results were uploaded to the chart at the time that the chart was surveyed. Patient 12: MSW documentation on 04/02/2026 indicated that the caregiver informed her that the patient was more agitated at night and has hit the caregiver twice. The caregiver inquired about a way to give medications when the patient is agitated. The MSW documented that she told the RNCM on 04/02/2026. There was no indication that a follow up was completed by the RN. Patient 17: MSW documentation on 03/30/2026 indicated that the patient had complaints of new onset dizziness and trouble reading. The MSW documented that she told the RNCM on 03/30/2026. There was no indication that a follow up was completed by the RN.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 147 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 27 (Patient 11,12) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. of care. Patient 11: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient as having altered mobility. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to altered mobility included in the plan of care. Patient 12: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient as having altered mobility. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to altered mobility included in the plan of care.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 220 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 27(Patient #4,5,8,14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 4: During home visit medication reconciliation with the pt’s caregiver, hospice medication profiles did not match what was being given in the home. The hospice profile contained orders for Mucinex 2 times daily, Spiriva 1 puff daily, Symbicort 2 puffs twice daily, and Zyrtec daily. The caregiver reported that the patient does not take those medications on a daily bases, they are being given PRN daily. No evidence that an order was received to change the frequency of those medications. Patient 5: RN documentation that the patient had an indwelling 16fr foley catheter. No evidence that an order was received for placement of the 16fr foley catheter. The current order is for 14fr foley catheter. Patient 8: RN documentation indicated that the patient has a suprapubic cath. No evidence that an order was received that included the catheter size, change frequency, or maintenance instructions. Patient 14: RN documentation indicated that the patient uses oxygen at 2LNC as needed. No evidence that an order was received for oxygen at 2L via NC. The current oxygen order is for 4L via NC as needed.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 7: The medical record indicated that both the RN and the MSW identified a need to assist with applying for assistance and SNF placement. No evidence that the plan of care was updated to include the problem, goals, and interventions related to applying for assistance or SNF placement.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 209 words
“Upon client record review, 3 of 27 (Patient #6,17,20) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 6: Plan of care has SN visits ordered as 3 times weekly. No evidence that the patient received 3 visits for the week of 02/01/2026. No evidence that the visit was missed at the request of the patient or the caregiver. No evidence that a physician order was received to decrease the visit frequency for the week. Patient 17: Plan of care has SN visits ordered as 2 times weekly. No evidence that the patient received 2 visits for the week of 02/08/2026. No evidence that the visit was missed at the request of the patient or the caregiver. No evidence that a physician order was received to decrease the visit frequency for the week. Patient 20: Plan of care has SN visits ordered as 4 times for the week of 3/08/26. No evidence that the patient received 4 visits for the week of 03/08/2026. No evidence that the visit was missed at the request of the patient or the caregiver. No evidence that a physician order was received to decrease the visit frequency for the week.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
“Upon observation 1 of 6 home visits, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient #6: During the home visit, the hospice aide placed her electronic tablet onto the counter in the patient’s room without a barrier of any sort.”
-
Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(1))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence in QAPI reports that the hospice maintains a coordinated agency-wide program for the surveillance, identification, prevention, control, and investigation of infectious and communicable diseases that is an integral part of the hospice’s Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement program. Patient 12: Medical record indicated that the patient was diagnosed with a UTI in March 29th 2026. No evidence that a surveillance report was completed at the time of survey.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 145 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 27(Patient #2) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 2: Aide plan of care task included both bed bath and a shower, both ordered to given at every visit.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 223 words
“Upon patient record review 4 of 27 (Patient #4,6,19,20) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 4: The plan of care had aide frequency ordered as twice a week. No evidence that 2 visits were completed for the week of 04/12/26. Only one visit documented, that visit occurred on 04/16/26. Patient 6: The aide plan of care has weekly linen changes, nail care, and hair shampooing. The medical record indicated that the aide performed nail care at every visit. For the week of 3/29 and 4/13 linen changes/ hair shampoos were completed at every visit. Patient 19: The aide plan of care has weekly linen changes. The medical record indicated that aide completed linen changes at every visit starting at 04/01/2026. Patient 20: The plan of care had aide frequency ordered as once for the week of 03/06/2026 and twice for the week 03/08/2026. No evidence that a visit was completed for the week of 03/06/26, nor did 2 visits occur for the week of 3/08/3026. Only one visit documented for the week of 03/08/2026, that visit occurred on 03/09/26.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(5))
“Upon patient client record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #15) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Physician certification and recertification of terminal illness. Patient 15: Patient choice an attending at the time of admit, 3/17/2026. The admitting nurse obtained verbal certification at that time. No evidence that the attending physician signed the CTI at the time that the chart was surveyed. Gentiva policy is all orders must be signed and within the chart within 30 days”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #22) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient 22: No evidence that a discharge summary was completed at the time that the patient was discharged.”
Sep 3, 2024: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 190 words
“Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews the agency failed to include a Do Not Resuscitate order in the hospice plan of care for 1 of 1 patient with a change in code status. (patient #2) Findings included: A policy, The Plan of Care (revised 08/30/23) received on 09/03/24 at approximately 2:50 PM from the agency area director of clinical operations stated, “;The written plan of care will contain, but not limited to, the following: ... End-of-life preferences.” Patient #2 was admitted for routine home care on 08/01/2024 with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (lung disease that blocks airflow). Review of the clinical record revealed that on 08/13/24 patient #2 was transported to an emergency room and admitted for hospice general inpatient care. On 08/14/2024 hospice registered nurse #3 stated, “;New order, DNR [Do Not Resuscitate]...” There was no evidence in the hospice plan of care of a DNR order. An interview with the area director of clinical operations on 09/03/24 at approximately 2:30 PM revealed that the expectation is for the hospice plan of care to be updated with a change in code status.”
Jun 3, 2024: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 519 words
“Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews the agency failed to notify a patients family/power of attorney of a planned discharge for 1 of 3 patients with a planned discharge and a decline in mental status. (Patient #2) Finding included: A policy LIVE DISCHARGE AND DISCHARGE PLANNING PROCESS (revised 01/22/2024) was received on 06/03/2024 at approximately 12:00 P.M. from the agency director. The policy stated, “;As soon as the IGD [interdisciplinary group] determines the patient will be discharged because his/her condition has plateaued organization personnel will: ... Consult with the patient and family/caregiver regarding the need for discharge.” Patient #2 was admitted on 01/25/2022 with a diagnosis of hypertensive chronic kidney disease (high blood pressure causing damage to the kidneys). The plan of care (POC) for 03/15/2024-05/13/2024 included orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 2 times a week for 9 weeks and 4 PRN (as needed). The POC for 05/14/2024-07/12/2024 included orders for SN visits 2 times a week for 9 weeks, 3 PRN, and effective 05/07/2024 SN TO INITIATE DISCHARGE PLANNING. For the following SN visits the SNs stated: On 03/18/2024 the registered nurse case manager (RNCM) #3 stated, “;Periods of confusion... cognitive impairment.” On 03/21/2024 the licensed practical nurse (LPN) #7 stated, “;Periods of confusion... has cognitive deficits.” On 03/26/2024 RNCM #3 stated, “;forgetful...cognitive impairment.” On 03/27/2024 LPN #7 stated, “;periods of confusion...forgetful...has cognitive impairment.” On 04/01/2024 RNCM #3 stated, “;periods of confusion... cog [cognitive] impairment.” On 04/03/2024 RNCM #3 stated, “;forgetful...cognitive impairment.” On 04/16/2024 RNCM stated, “;disorganized thinking...cognitive impairment.” On 04/23/2024 RNCM #3 stated, “;Abnormal new learning ability...inability to recall recent events... periods of confusion... cognitive impairment.” On 04/25/2024 RNCM #3 stated, “;forgetful... periods of confusion... cognitive impairment.” On 04/29/2024 RNCM #3 stated, “;disorganized thinking...forgetful... cognitive impairment.” On 05/01/2024 RNCM #3 stated, “;Explained that he [patient #2] did not meet the criteria to stay on hospice...periods of confusion.” On 05/06/2024 RNCM #3 stated, “;forgetful... cognitive impairment.” On 05/09/2024 LPN #7 stated, “;has cognitive deficits... Patient aware of discharge from hospice next week.” For the discharge visit of 05/25/2024 RNCM #3 stated, “;cognitive impairment.” There was no evidence in the clinical record of patient #2s family/power of attorney being notified of the discharge. An interview was conducted on 05/30/2024 with patient #2s son/power of attorney. The patients son stated, “;He was informed of the discharge by the assisted living facility on the day of discharge.” An interview was conducted on 06/03/20/24 at approximately 12:45 P.M. with RNCM #3. RNCM #3 stated, “;I did not [notify the patients son of the discharge], the facility said they did. If the patient is not alert and oriented, I would notify the family. Why would I call him [patients son] I never had any contact with him? I was never told that we had a power of attorney. Yes, I would tell the family of a pending discharge if they were cognitively impaired” An interview with the agency director on 06/03/2024 at approximately 12:50 P.M. revealed that the nurses have access to the power of attorney documents and the family should be included in the plan of care.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 13 deficiencies cited |
| Sep 3, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | 1 deficiency cited |
| Jun 3, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | 1 deficiency cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 16, 2002.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.7% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 56% at home, 33% in assisted living, 7% in a nursing facility, 4% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 12.4 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 6.8% |
| Visits near death | 96.7% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Curo Community Hospice, LLC owns 100% directly since Jun 1, 2012.
- 7 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Rhonda Boykin (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 5, 2015 |
| Curo Community Hospice, LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Jun 1, 2012 |
| Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Nov 9, 2011 |
| Charlotte Midco, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Falcon Hospice, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Charlotte Buyer, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 1, 2018 |
| Curo Health Services LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Nov 9, 2011 |
| Kah Hospice Company, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Ch Services Group Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 5, 2015 |
| Ch Services Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 5, 2015 |
| Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 60% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Humana Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Centerwell Health Services Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 87% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 75.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 8 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 27870, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 15.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Liberty Home Care VI, LLC | 8 |
| Community Home Care & Hospice This hospice | 15 |
| Accentcare Hospice & Palliative Care of Georgia | 5 |
| Hospice and Palliative Care of Nash General Hospital | Not given |
| Albemarle Home Care and Hospice | 1 |
| Amedisys Hospice | 10 |
| Continuum Home Care & Hospice | 8 |
| Pruitthealth Hospice - Rocky Mount | 20 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.