Hearth Record

Notre Dame Hospice

A hospice in Worcester, Massachusetts 01605

555 Plantation Street, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605. (508) 852-5505.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 17 hospices serving ZIP code 01605 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 18, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 6, 2025: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 382 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment was completed by the hospice interdisciplinary group no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care for 2 patients (#3 and #1), out of a total of sample of 19 patients.Findings include: 2. Patient #1 was admitted to the agency in February 2025 and had a diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease (group of conditions that impact the brain’s blood vessels and blood flow).Review of the medical record indicated the following:*2/6/25 initial assessment Skilled Nursing Visit (SNV) note*2/13/25 initial assessment Medical Social Worker (MSW) noteFurther review of the medical record indicated the Comprehensive Skilled Nursing Assessment was completed on 2/14/25. During an interview on 8/6/24 at 3:24 P.M., the surveyor reviewed the medical record with the Executive Director, the Quality Assurance Nurse, and the Director of Psychosocial Services who said the initial SNV note is the comprehensive assessment, however, there was no documentation in the 2/6/25 note of other IDG members’ involvement. They said the initial MSW visit note was not completed until 2/13/25 and did not contain a narrative as to other IDG members’ involvement. They further said the Comprehensive Skilled Nursing Assessment was not completed within the required timeframe. Review of the agency policy entitled, Comprehensive Assessment of the Patient, with the revision date of September 2024, included the following:*The comprehensive assessment of the patient is completed by at least 3 designated members of the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) including the Registered Nurse (RN) and medical director in consultation with the patient’s attending physician or primary caregiver prior to the provision of services no later than three (3) calendar days after the patient elects the hospice benefit. The initial care plan shall be reviewed and ratified by the full interdisciplinary team at their next scheduled meeting.1. Patient #3 was admitted to the agency in January 2025 with a diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy (narrowing of the coronary arteries which supply blood to the heart).Review of the clinical record indicated the Comprehensive Skilled Nursing Assessment was completed on 1/13/25. During an interview on 8/6/25 at 5:00 P.M., the Quality Assurance Nurse after reviewing the clinical record said, the Comprehensive Assessment was not completed within the five calendar days after the patient was admitted to the agency, as required.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 350 words

    “Based on record review and staff interview, the agency failed to ensure a Bereavement Care Plan was active for identified family members after a patient’s death for 2 patients (#16 and #17), out of a total sample of 3 bereavement records reviewed.Findings include: 2. Patient #17 was admitted to the agency in February 2025 with a diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. The patient expired on 3/4/25 while receiving hospice services. Review of the clinical record indicated the Bereavement Care Plan was resolved on 3/4/25.During an interview on 8/6/25 at 4:00 P.M., the Director of Psychosocial Services said the previous Bereavement Coordinator (no longer employed by the agency) resolved the Bereavement Care Plan, and that it should have remained active. Review of the agency policy entitled, Bereavement Care Planning, revised August 2024, indicated the following:*A bereavement care plan is developed for identified family members and other involved individuals after the patient’s death.*The Bereavement Coordinator is notified of all deaths and initiates the bereavement discussion and care planning at the first Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) meeting following the patient’s death. At this time, the bereavement plan of care is developed and information from the initial bereavement assessment is considered.*The bereavement plan of care reflects the assessed needs of the bereaved and notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of delivery.*The Bereavement Coordinator ensures the bereavement plan of care is followed for 13 months following the patient’s death, appropriate to the level of need assessed.1. Patient #16 was admitted to the agency in October 2024 with a diagnosis of systolic Congestive Heart Failure (the heart muscle weakens and cannot pump enough blood to meet the body’s needs) and expired in February 2025 while on hospice services.Review of the clinical record indicated the Bereavement Care Plan was resolved on 2/05/2025.During an interview on 8/6/25 at 4:00 P.M., the Director of Psychosocial Services said the Bereavement Coordinator, prior to leaving employment at the agency, resolved the Bereavement Care Plan. She further said the agency should have corrected the care plan to keep it current, but it did not.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 199 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency staff failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan to address any grief/loss issues of the patient’s family for 1 patient (#15) out of a total sample of 19 patient records reviewed. Findings include:Review of the Agency Policy, titled Bereavement Services, revised 9/2024 indicated the following but not limited to:*The hospice provides bereavement services to the family, caregivers and/or significant others of deceased hospice patients for thirteen months following the patient’s death. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of skilled nursing facilities or other formal care settings when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care.*The bereavement services provided area based on the assessed needs of the deceased’s survivors and are in accordance with a bereavement plan of care formulated after the patient’s death.Patient #15 was admitted to Hospice services in February 2025 and expired in March 2025.Review of the clinical record did not indicate a Bereavement care plan had been developed and implemented.During an interview on 8/6/25 at 4:45 P.M., the Director of Psychosocial Services said there was no documentation found in the clinical record to indicate a Bereavement care plan had been developed and implemented as required.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,006 words

    “Based on record review and staff interview, the agency failed to ensure clinical documentation was complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with currently accepted standards of practice for patients (#3, #13, #1, #5, #12, #7 and #8), out of a total sample of 19 patients.Findings include: 5. Patient #1 was admitted to the agency in February 2025 and had a diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease (group of conditions that affect the brain’s blood vessels and blood flow).Review of the physician ordered plan of care for certification period 5/7/25 though 8/4/25 indicated the following:SNV; twice weekly for 12 weeks and 7 PRN, start the week of 5/7/25 and ending on 8/2/25Health Aide (HA) visit; three times a week for 13 weeks and 13 PRN, start the week of 5/7/25 and ending on 8/4/25Review of the clinical record indicated the following:*6/13/25 SNV note was signed on 6/16/25*6/27/25 HA note was signed 6/30/25During an interview on 8/6/25 at 3:24 P.M., the ED and Director of Psychosocial Services said the visit notes should have been electronically signed within 48 hours but weren’t.6. Patient #5 was admitted to the agency in June 2025 and had a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease.Review of the physician ordered plan of care for certification period 6/18/25 through 9/15/25 indicated the following:SNV; to assess and evaluate 6/18/25 through 6/20/25; SNV once weekly for 12 weeks and 6 PRN, start the week of 6/22/25 and ending on 9/13/25Review of the clinical record indicated the following:*6/26/25 SNV note was signed on 7/1/25*7/3/25 SNV note was signed on 7/9/25*7/18/25 SNV note was signed on 7/22/257. Patient #12 was admitted to the agency in January 2025 and had a diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS-nervous system disease that weakens muscles and impacts physical function).Review of the physician ordered plan of care for certification period 4/28/25 through 7/26/25 indicated the following:SNV; once weekly for 13 weeks and 7 PRN, start the week of 4/28/25 and ending on 7/26/25Review of the clinical record indicated the following:*6/9/25 SNV note was signed 6/13/25*6/17/25 SNV note was signed 7/1/25*7/1/25 SNV note was signed 7/6/25*7/8/25 SNV note was signed 7/13/25*7/15/25 SNV note was signed 7/24/25During an interview on 8/6/25 at 3:59 P.M., the Director of Psychosocial Services said Patient #5 and #12’s visit notes should have been electronically signed within 48 hours but weren’t. 3. Patient #7 was admitted to the agency in June 2025 with a diagnosis of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (a type of blood cancer).Review of the physician ordered plan of care for certification period 6/5/25-9/2/25 indicated the following:Skilled Nursing Visit (SNV) twice weekly for 4 weeks and 6 as needed (PRN) start week of 6/8/25 and ending 7/15/25.Review of the clinical record indicated the following:*6/9/25 SNV note was signed on 6/12/25*6/11/25 SNV note was signed 6/16/25*7/9/25 SNV note was signed 7/13/254. Patient #8 was admitted to the agency in May 2025 with a diagnosis of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy. Review of the physician ordered plan of care for certification period 5/16/25-8/13/25 indicated the following:Skilled Nursing Visit (SNV) twice weekly for 12 weeks and 5 as needed (PRN) start week of 5/19/25 and ending 8/13/25.Review of the clinical record indicated the following:*6/13/25 SNV note was signed 6/16/25*7/11/25 SNV note was signed 7/14/25*7/23/25 SNV note was signed 7/26/25During an interview on 8/6/25 at 4:00 P.M., Executive Director (ED) said that all notes should be completed and signed within 48 hours. She said after review of these clinical records the nurse did not sign the notes within the 48 hours making the notes late. Review of the agency policy entitled, Clinical Record and Documentation, revised April 2025, indicated the following:*To ensure continuum of care across all disciplines, clinical documentation must be complete, timely, and accurately reflect the patient’s status and plan of care. The clinical record must contain correct clinical information that is available to the patient’s attending physician and hospice staff. Whether hard copy or in electronic form, the clinical record is completed promptly and is readily accessible, and systematically organized to facilitate retrieval and made readily available on request by an appropriate authority.*Without exception, all visit notes must be completed and locked within 48 hours.Findings include:1. Patient #3 was admitted to the agency in January 2025 with a diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy (narrowing of the coronary arteries which supply blood to the heart).Review of the physician ordered plan of care for certification period 1/6/25 through 4/5/25 indicated the following:Skilled Nurse Visit (SNV) once weekly for 9 weeks and 6 as needed (PRN) start the week of 2/2/25 and ending on 4/5/25.Medical Social Worker Visit (MSWV) once monthly for one month, 3 times monthly for 2 months and 2 PRN start 1/22/25 and end 3/31/25.Review of the clinical record indicated the following:*2/19/25 SNV note was signed on 2/25/25. *2/28/25 MSWV note was signed on 3/3/25.Review of the physician ordered plan of care for certification period 3/15/25 through 5/13/25 indicated the following:SNV twice weekly and 6 PRN visits.Review of the clinical record indicated the following:*3/19/25 SNV note was signed on 3/24/25.Review of the physician ordered plan of care for certification period 4/6/25 through 7/4/25 indicated the following:SNV twice weekly and 7 PRN visits.Review of the clinical record indicated the following:*6/20/25 SNV note was signed on 6/26/25.2. Patient #13 was admitted to the agency in July 2023 with a diagnosis of Huntington’s Disease (an inherited condition in which nerve cells in the brain break over time resulting in progressive movement, thinking and psychiatric symptoms).Review of the physician ordered plan of care for certification period 5/14/25 through 7/12/25 indicated the following:SNV twice weekly and 7 PRN visits.Review of the clinical record indicated the following:*7/1/25 SNV note was signed on 7/6/25.*7/3/25 SNV note was signed on 7/8/25. *7/11/25 SNV note was signed on 7/14/25.During an interview on 8/6/25 at 5:00 P.M., the Quality Assurance Nurse after reviewing the clinical records for Patients #3 and #13 said the staff is expected to sign their notes within 48 hours. She said the MSWV and SNV notes were dated and signed more than 48 hours after the visits, making them late.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 18, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Aug 6, 2025Recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 5, 2007.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 91.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 35% at home, 9% in assisted living, 44% in a nursing facility, 12% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.9%
Visits near death91.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 29 owners or officers are people: Maryann Colaizzi (corporate director); Stephen Totino (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Leonore Coan (corporate director); Jacqueline Murphy (corporate director); Amy Meyer (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Amy Meyer (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); H Louis Rocheleau (corporate director); Tara L O’connor (corporate director, 0%); Susan Keefe (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Susan Keefe (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Robert K Ferguson (corporate director); Cherie Sirard (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Cherie Sirard (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Patricia O’brien (corporate director, 0%); Eric Torkornoo (corporate director, 0%); Charles Webb (corporate director); Kevin Mcgovern (corporate director, 0%); Brenda Rivard (corporate director, 0%); Sarah M Mcgee (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Elizabeth Murphy (corporate director, 0%); Mary D Roche (corporate director, 0%); Kevin Kozak (corporate director, 0%); Jennifer Garcia (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Jennifer Garcia (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); John E. Mannila (corporate director, 0%); Philip Hickey (corporate officer, 0%); Kathleen Colin (corporate director, 0%); Patricia Toce (corporate director, 0%); Elaine Bain (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Notre Dame Health Care Center Inc.Other role (CMS gives no detail)0%Jun 1, 2007

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 94.02% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 68.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 17 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 01605, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.