Hearth Record

Care Central VNA & Hospice

A hospice in Gardner, Massachusetts 01440

34 Pearly Lane, Gardner, Massachusetts 01440. (978) 632-1230.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 10 hospices serving ZIP code 01440 had 3.5.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 10, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 8, 2025: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 171 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment was completed by the hospice interdisciplinary group no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care for one patient(#5), out of a total of sample of 19 patients.Findings include: Review of the agency policy entitled, Comprehensive Assessment Content, approved February 2025, indicated the following:*The comprehensive assessment of the patient is completed by designated members of the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) in consultation with the patient’s attending physician no later than five (5) calendar days after the patient elects the hospice benefit. (Exception is by patient /family request.)Patient #5 was admitted to the agency in September 2025 with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the thyroid gland.Review of the clinical record indicated the Comprehensive Assessment was completed on 9/26/25.During an interview on 10/8/25 at 2:25 P.M., after reviewing the clinical record, the Hospice Officer said the Comprehensive Assessment was not completed within the five calendar days after the patient was admitted to the agency, as required.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 372 words

    “Based on document review and interview, the agency failed to ensure a review of all medications the patient is currently using included allergies in order to identify any potential adverse effects, drug reactions or potentially significant side effects for 2 patients (#3 and #6), out of a total sample of 19 patients.Findings include: Review of the agency policy, titled, Comprehensive Assessment Content, last reviewed 1/2025, included the following:The comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional and spiritual needs of the patient related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the patient’s well-being, comfort and dignity throughout the dying process.1. The comprehensive assessment of the patient consists of discipline-specific assessment tools that address the following factors:f. A review of all the patient’s prescription and over-the-counter drugs, herbal remedies and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy.2. Each assessment tool is designed to obtain information related to the patient’s history, current status, problems, and needs and contain data elements for the collection of information related to patient outcomes.1. Patient #3 was admitted to the agency in September 2025 with a diagnosis of Heart Failure.Review of the referral summary form indicated that Patient #3 was allergic to carbamazepine (used to treat seizures or neuropathic pain), Xarelto (blood thinner), Eliquis (blood thinner), Vyndaqel (used to treat heart disease), penicillin (antibiotic) and simvastatin (used to lower cholesterol).Review of the physician ordered Hospice Certification and Plan of Care (POC) for certification period 9/17/25 to 10/3/25 indicated there were no known allergies.During an interview on 10/7/25 at 1:30 P.M., the Hospice Officer said that the allergies from the referral should have been identified and listed in the medical record.2. Patient #6 was admitted to the agency in February 2025 with a diagnosis of Hypertensive heart disease with Heart Failure.Review of the referral summary form indicated that Patient #6 was allergic to penicillin, bee stings, and metformin (used to treat elevated blood sugar levels).Review of the physician ordered Hospice Certification and Plan of Care for certification periods 2/19/25 to 4/19/25, 6/19/25 to 8/17/25 and 8/18/25 to 10/16/25 indicated there were no known allergies.During an interview on 10/8/25 at 9:00 A.M., the Hospice Officer said that allergies should have been listed in the medical record.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 290 words

    “Based on record review, policy review and interview, the agency failed to ensure an initial bereavement assessment was completed for 2 patients (#1 and #12), out of a total sample of 19 patients.Findings include: Review of the agency’s policy entitled, Bereavement Services and Assessment, dated May 2025, indicated the following:*Assess bereavement risk upon admission and on an ongoing basis to identify survivor risk factors utilizing the Bereavement Risk Assessment and Plan of Care Tool.*Complete the comprehensive bereavement assessment to address anticipatory grief needs within five days from the start of care and as appropriate.*Document all assessment care and services in the electronic medical record.1.Patient #1 was admitted to the agency in September 2025 with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain (progressive decline in cognitive abilities that occurs with aging) and required hospice services.Review on the clinical record indicated an initial bereavement assessment had not been completed.During an interview on 10/7/25 at 3:25 P.M., the Hospice Officer said the initial bereavement assessment had not been completed within 5 days from the start of care, as required.2.Patient #12 was admitted to the agency in December 2024 with a terminal diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart Disease and Heart Failure (prolonged high blood pressure that damages the heart and leads to heart failure) and required hospice services.Review of the clinical record indicated the initial bereavement assessment was completed on 12/23/24, 14 days after the start of care.During an interview on 10/8/25 at 1:50 P.M, the Hospice Officer said nursing should have completed the assessment within the first 5 days from the start of care when the social worker had not completed it. She said the bereavement assessment was completed late, and not within 5 days from the start of care, as required.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 344 words

    “Based on record review, policy review and interview, the agency failed to ensure hospice care and services furnished to patients and their families followed an individualized written plan of care established by the hospice interdisciplinary group in collaboration with the attending physician (if any), the patient or representative, and the primary caregiver in accordance with the patient’s needs if any of them so desire, for one patient (#13), out of a total sample of 19 patients.Findings include: Review of the agency’s policy entitled, Comprehensive Assessment Content, dated February 2025, indicated the following:*The comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional and spiritual needs of the patient related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the patient’s well-being, comfort and dignity throughout the dying process.*The Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) uses information obtained from the comprehensive assessment tools to develop an effective plan of care with interventions that address the identified needs of the patient/caregiver.Patient #13 was admitted to the agency in November 2024 with a terminal diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure (prolonged high blood pressure that damages the heart and leads to heart failure) and required hospice services.Review of the physician ordered Hospice Certification and Plan Of Care (POC), dated 11/23/24 through 2/20/25, indicated the following:-Skilled Nurse Visit (SNV): 1 SNV a week for 14 weeks, and 4 as needed (PRN) visits for symptom management.Review of the clinical record indicated a PRN SNV was made on 11/29/24 due to a fall the patient sustained while trying to urinate. The note further indicated a Foley Catheter (FC-a thin flexible tube inserted into the urethra to drain urine from the bladder to outside the body) was inserted and caregiver was educated on catheter care and services.Review of the physician ordered POC did not include orders to insert a FC, nor care and services to maintain it.During an interview on 10/8/25 at 10:15 A.M., Nurse #1 said a physician order should have been obtained to insert the FC (including size and balloon size) as well as care and services to maintain it.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 10, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Oct 8, 2025Recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 9, 1991.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 89% at home, 1% in assisted living, 10% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.5%
Visits near death93.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 20 owners or officers are people: Holly A Chaffee (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); John Harrington (managing employee (under contract), 2%); John A Olson (corporate director); Edward F Manzi (corporate director, 0%); John F Kalinowski (corporate director); Albert S Rose (corporate director); Holly A Chaffee (corporate officer); Holly A Chaffee (corporate director); Holly A Chaffee (runs it (operational or managerial control)); David A Tiberii (corporate director); James S Gondek (corporate director); Nancy L Bouchard (corporate director); Constance A Favreau (corporate director); Matthew Williams (corporate director); Norman J Sczepanski (corporate director); Lisa J Sabacinski (corporate officer); Lisa J Sabacinski (corporate director); Lisa J Sabacinski (managing employee (on the payroll)); Lisa J Sabacinski (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Anne L Peepas (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 90% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.72% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 53.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 10 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 01440, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3.5; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.