Hearth Record

Harbor Hospice of Kansas LP

A hospice in Overland Park, Kansas 66212

7223 West 95th Street Suite 230, Overland Park, Kansas 66212. (913) 291-1883.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 37 hospices serving ZIP code 66212 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 24, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 24, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission6 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 17 resident records reviewed, it was noted that the comprehensive assessment was incomplete. For example in record RRHV#3 the patient had 5 open wounds, however the documentation for the initial and second nurse visits stated that bruising was in place with wounds, some with dressings in place. No documentation of wound assessment, measurements, locations or dressing changes. This was confirmed and discussed with the Regional Director, QA nurse and DON/Administrator.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 17 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization had not completed the comprehensive assessment. For example, in record RRBR#1 and RRBR#2 an assessment at death was not done to assess bereavement risk in order to inform the decisions made by the IDG. This was confirmed and discussed with the Regional Director, DON/Administrator and QA nurse present. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 17 patient records reviewed, During record review it was noted that the organization had not completed the comprehensive assessment. For example, in record RRBR#1 the initial bereavement assessment was not completed. This was confirmed and discussed with the Regional Director, DON/Administrator and QA nurse present.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 173 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 11 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the written plan of care was not completed based on the patient’s goals, settings, and services required to meet needs. For example, in RRNHV#1 the goal Patient will be able to demonstrate improved safety awareness as evidenced by:_____ was incomplete. For example, in record RRNHV#5 the plan of care had no nursing or spiritual goals or interventions documented although both services visited the patient and had visit frequency orders. For example in record RRNHV#7 the plan of care goal for volunteer services Educate patient and family on volunteer services to determine needs and frequency of visits. For example, in record RRNHV#9 the plan of care wound goal was incomplete, Perform wound care/dressing change:______ For example in record RRHV#4 the goal Change foley catheter as ordered:___ was incomplete. For example, in record RRHV#1 the pain goal was not individualized Patient’s pain will be well controlled. This was confirmed and discussed with the Regional Director, DON/Administrator and QA nurse present.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that care was not provided according to hospice plan of care. For example, in RRHV#1 the plan of care for the patient’s foley catheter stated 16Fr, 10 cc balloon however nurse assessment stated that the patient had a 18 Fr foley catheter with 20cc balloon in place on one visit and at the next nurse visit stated 18 Fr with 30cc balloon. This was confirmed with and discussed with the DON/Administrator and Quality Nurse.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 190 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 14 patient records reviewed, that included hospice aide services it was noted during record review that the hospice had not completed aide supervision every 14 days. For example, in record RRHV#2 the aide supervision was documented one time at 15 days and one additional time with 55 days between supervision. In record RRNHV#2 the aide supervision was documented one time with 40 days between documented supervision. In record RRNHV#7 the aide supervision was documented one time at 30 days and one additional time with 16 days between supervision. In record RRNHV#10 the aide supervision was documented one time at 15 days and one additional time with 41 days between supervision. In record RRNHV#9 the aide supervision was documented one time with 56 days between documented supervision. In record RRNHV#3 the aide supervision was documented one time with 20 days between documented supervision. In record RRNHV#5 the aide supervision was documented one time with 69 days between documented supervision. In record RRHV#3 and RRNHV#8 there was no aide supervision documented. This was confirmed and discussed with the Regional Director, DON/Administrator and QA nurse present.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. During discussion with the Volunteer Coordinator and Quality Nurse and review of documentation it was noted that volunteers did not provide at least 5% of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. For example during 2024 it was reported that volunteers provided 3.67% of total patient care hours. This was discussed and the leaders reported that the current Volunteer Coordinator had been in place for the past 6 months and that the organization had been without a Volunteer Coordinator for some time in 2024.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 24, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission6 deficiencies cited
Jul 2, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 22, 2016.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 54% at home, 14% in assisted living, 31% in a nursing facility, 2% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7%
Visits near death92.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Arfeen Properties, L.P. owns 99% directly since Jun 15, 2015.
  • 5 owners or officers are people: Qamar U Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50.5%); Kelley L Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 49.5%); Karen Carter (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Mariya Cashman (managing employee (on the payroll)); Qamar U Arfeen (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Arfeen Properties, L.P.Owns 5% or more directly99%Jun 15, 2015
Hhcs Managers LLCGeneral partner1%Jun 15, 2015

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 76% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 88.13% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 32.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 37 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 66212, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.