Hearth Record

Ahc Home Health of Kansas, LLC (Hospice)

A hospice in Overland Park, Kansas 66207

4700 Indian Creek Parkway, Overland Park, Kansas 66207. (913) 890-8400.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 32 hospices serving ZIP code 66207 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on May 20, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 20, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 211 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #8,11,14,17,19) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #8 - Medication profile contained Nystatin 100,00 topical powder - apply 1 application every 8 hours as needed for yeast - did not contain site. Patient #11 - Medication profile contained Epoetin alfa 20,000 u/ml inject 3,000 units IV once a week. Order does not contain ml to give and mediation is being given subcutaneous and not IV. Patient #14 - Medication profile contained Triamcinolone 0.1% apply 1application every 24 hours as needed for rash - did not contain site. Patient #17 - Medication profile contained Mupirocin 2% apply 1application topically 2 times a day - did not contain site. Patient #19 - Medication profile contained Gentamicin 40 mg/ml; Inject 40mg/ml 3 times a week - Inject via catheter three times a week - Order on bottle reads: Gentamicin 160mg/500 ml Inject 60ml via catheter three times a week.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 200 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #11,15,19) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #11 - Plan of care contained Epoetin alfa 20,000 u/ml inject 3,000 units IV once a week. Order does not contain ml to give and medication is being given subcutaneous and not IV. Patient #15 - Plan of care contains “skin care teaching to open blister on feet and legs apply Zinc or Antibiotic ointment, cover with ABD and Kerlix or bordered dressing until healed” does not contain what to clean wound with or frequency of wound care. Wound care should be specific as to what topical should be used and type of cover dressing. Patient #19 - Order for Gentamicin 40 mg/ml; Inject 40mg/ml 3 times a week - Inject via catheter three times a week - Order on bottle reads: Gentamicin 160mg/500 ml Inject 60ml via catheter three times a week. Contained change Foley Catheter #14F 1 x month and PRN for leakage or dislodged - did not contain balloon size or that it was a Coude’ Foley Catheter.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #15) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #15 - SN visit 05/05/26 “SN cleaned posterior thigh with wound cleanser, applied foam dressing” no order noted for this.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 159 words

    “Upon home visit observation on 1 of 4 visits, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient #4 - Upon observation of hospice nurse the following was observed: SN put bag on floor without a barrier, washed hands in bathroom using patient’s soap and drying hands with patient’s cloth towel. Nurse went back into bag several times without using hand sanitizer. When nurse arrived patient had bag lying on floor next to his chair and did not educate patient that bag should not be kept below the waist and should not be placed on the floor. Per agency Bag Technique Policy No. 66-013.1 - Clinician should carry own soap and paper towels and alcohol based hand rub for washing hands. Bag should be placed on a clean surface or barrier. Before entering the bag hands should be decontaminated prior to returning to bag.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 100 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patient #8, 9) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Aide missed visit Patient #8 - Aide visit frequency 2wk 12, only 1 visit made week 1 without documentation of missed visit. Patient #9 - Aide visit frequency 2wk 12, only 1 visit made week 1 without documentation of missed visit.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patient #8,15) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient #8 - The record indicated that an aide supervisory visit was conducted on 4/16/26 and no other supervisory visit as of 5/19/26. Patient #15 - The record indicated the aide first visit was 4/23/26 aide supervisory visit was conducted on 5/8/26 - one day late.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 17 (Personnel #15) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Employee #15 - Personnel record did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment was completed by like discipline. The CD, RN completed SLP competency assessment.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 102 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #11, 17) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #11 - SN documented on visit 04/27/26 “wound care performed without complaints” and 05/13/26 - “wound care performed per care plan”. Patient #17 - SN documented on visit 05/12/26 and 05/12/26 - “wound care right leg performed per care plan”.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 20, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 8, 2020.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 18% at home, 73% in assisted living, 8% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6%
Visits near death95.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Lhm Man Hhh LLC owns 100% directly since Jul 1, 2024.
  • 3 owners or officers are people: Forest Arnett (corporate officer); Amber Whitehill (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ira W Marsh (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Advanced Health Care - Larry H Miller CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2021
Lhm Man Hhh LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jul 1, 2024
The Gail Miller Gst TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies70%Jan 1, 2021
Karen Gail Miller Irrev Tr Fbo Zane MillerOwns 5% or more through other companies5%Jan 2, 2021
The Bryan Miller Utah Dynasty Trust Dated April 22, 2014Owns 5% or more through other companies5%Jan 2, 2021
The G&h Miller Utah Trust Dated February 26, 2019Owns 5% or more through other companies5%Jan 2, 2021
The Karen Gail Miller Irrevocable Trust for the Benefit of Karen R. WIOwns 5% or more through other companies5%Jan 2, 2021
The Miller Utah Trust, Dated August 22, 2019Owns 5% or more through other companies5%Jan 2, 2021
The Rnc Opportunity TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies5%Jan 2, 2021

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.64% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 69.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 32 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 66207, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.