Hearth Record

Care Initiatives Hospice - West Des Moines

A hospice in West Des Moines, Iowa 50266

7055 Vista Drive, West Des Moines, Iowa 50266. (515) 223-3813.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 17 hospices serving ZIP code 50266 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 4, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 4, 2025: recertification inspection by the state13 deficiencies
  • EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 134 words

    “Based on review of emergency preparedness training rosters, review of the emergency preparedness plan and staff interview, the hospice failed to ensure training in emergency preparedness for 1 of 1 contracted staff consistent with their expected roles for the calendar years of 2023 and 2024. Lack of emergency preparedness training for staff puts patients at risk should an emergency situation arise and staff would be needed to assist patients to ensure patient safety. During interview on 11/4/25 at 9:20 AM, Staff A, Administrator, gave the surveyor the most current emergency preparedness training documentation for contracted Staff J, massage therapist. The Emergency preparedness training was dated 3/30/2020.. The agency failed to provide emergency preparedness training to their contracted staff every 2 years. The above findings were reviewed with the Quality and Education Coordinator and Administrator.”

    Rule E0037. Standard-level.

  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 189 words

    “Based on hospice staff interview and clinical record review, the hospice failed to ensure the documentation and correct identification, in a prominent part of the patient’s clinical record, any advance directives executed by the patient for 1 of 19 sampled patients (Patient #18). Failure to ensure the hospice documented and correctly identified any executed advance directives in a prominent part of the record placed patients at risk for their advance directives not being correctly carried out. Findings include: Patient #18 had a hospice admission date of 11/22/24, a death date of 2/1/25 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed: a. The Plan of Care (POC), dated 11/22/24 to 2/19/25, identified the patient’s advance directive information as do not resuscitate. b. The resuscitation instruction form, signed by the patient’s medical power of attorney on 11/22/24, identified resuscitation measures. On 10/30/25 at 8:52 AM, the Administrator confirmed the discrepancy with the patient’s code status. The hospice agency failed to include accurate advance directive information on the patient’s plan of care. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Vice President of Clinical Services.”

    Rule L0503. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 467 words

    “Based on home visit observation, patient interview, staff interview, clinical record reviews and agency policy reviews, the agency failed to complete an accurate drug regimen review with each comprehensive assessment for 1 of 4 sampled patients with home observation visits (Patient #1). Failure to ensure medications reviewed at the time of each drug regimen review are current and accurate placed the patients at risk for increased potential unidentified medication interactions, side effects and duplication of medications. Findings include: According to the agency policy titled Medication-Drug Regimen Review, an initial drug regimen review (DRR) is completed on admission and ongoing with medication changes, changes in patient condition and/or at a minimum of every 14 days. The DRR includes a review of the patient’s medications for side effects of drug therapy, lab monitoring for associated drug therapy, actual or potential drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy and effectiveness of drug therapy. During an interview on 10/28/25 at 10:00 AM, Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN), stated DRR’s are completed a minimum of every 14 days. Patient #1 had a hospice admission date of 11/29/23 and received hospice services while residing in a private residence. Clinical record review revealed: a. The Plan of Care (POC), dated 9/19/25 to 11/17/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and included physician orders for medication and skilled nursing services. b. The recertification comprehensive assessment, dated 9/9/25, completed by Staff C, RN, included documentation a DRR was completed and no discrepancies were identified. c. During a home observation visit on 10/28/25 at 8:55 AM with Staff C, RN, interview with the patient stated he/she takes medication independently from the bottles. The following medication discrepancies were identified: 1) The IDG POC, dated 10/15/25, identified patient takes milk of magnesia 8% oral suspension as needed for constipation. The patient reported he/she does not take milk of magnesia and he/she does not have the medication in the home. 2) The IDG POC, dated 10/15/25, identified the patient takes hexylresorcinol 2.4 milligram (mg) mucous membrane lozenges (relieves sore throat). The patient reported he/she has not used these lozenges for a long time and he/she does not have any in the home. 3) The IDG POC, dated 10/15/25, identified the patient utilizes fluticasone 50 micrograms (mcg)/inhalation nasal spray with instructions to administer 1 spray in each nostril 1 time a day. The bottle in the home identifies fluticasone 50 mcg/inhalation spray with instructions to administer 2 sprays in each nostril 1 time a day, last filled on 9/29/25. The patient reported he/she sprays 2 sprays in each nostril 1 time a day per the instructions on the bottle. The DRR failed to include an accurate review of all medications taken by the patient. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Vice President of Clinical Services.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 426 words

    “Based on clinical record review, hospice policy review and hospice staff interview, the hospice failed to ensure the provision of care in accordance with the patient’s plan of care for 2 of 7 sampled patients (Patients #2 and #3) with wounds. Failure to follow the patient’s Plan of Care as directed by the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) put the patient at risk for inconsistent care that may not meet the needs of the patient. Findings include: Review of the hospice policy, titled Palliative Wound Care Management and Treatment, dated 9/5/24, identified the hospice nurse collaborates with the patient’s provider to determine wound care treatment and wound care is administered as ordered by the patient’s attending physician, physician designee or nurse practitioner. 1. Patient #2 had a hospice admission date of 4/24/25 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed: a. The recert Plan of Care (POC), dated 7/23/25 to 10/20/25, included primary diagnosis of osteomyelitis of vertebra thoracic region, and identified skilled nurse to provide wound care per physician orders. b. The IDG (Interdisciplinary Group) update to the POC, dated 10/1/25, included orders for skilled nursing services one time per week and midline upper posterior superior buttocks coccyx pressure ulcer, apply foam dressing to open area and change every 3 days and as needed, apply calmoseptine to rest of moisture-associated skin damage 3 times a day. c. Skilled nurse visit note, dated 10/11/25, included documentation of an open wound to the midline upper posterior superior buttocks coccyx and wound cleansed with soap and water. d. The clinical record failed to identify an interim physician order to cleanse the wound. The hospice nurse failed to obtain an order to cleanse the wound prior to cleansing the wound on 10/11/25. 2. Patient #3 had a hospice admission date of 9/23/25 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 9/23/25 to 12/210/25, included primary diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of left kidney; identified right posterior foot heel pressure ulcer, clean with wound cleanser and leave open to air; left lower distal leg shin abrasion, clean with soap and water and leave open to air. b. Skilled nurse comprehensive assessment, dated 9/23/25, included wound care to right posterior foot heel pressure ulcer, cleaned with soap and water; and left lower distal leg shin abrasion, cleaned with wound cleanser. The hospice nurse failed to clean the wounds as ordered by the plan of care. The above findings were reviewed with the Quality and Education Coordinator and Administrator.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 374 words

    “Based on clinical record review, hospice policy review and hospice staff interview, the hospice failed to ensure interventions completed by hospice staff included in the patient’s plan of care for 1 of 2 sampled patients with home observation visits in a nursing home (Patient #4). Failure to follow the interventions in patient’s Plan of Care as directed by the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) put the patient at risk for inconsistent care that may not meet the needs of the patient. Findings include: Review of the hospice policy, titled Plan of Care, dated 2/1/23, the content of the plan of care includes, but is not limited to: interventions to facilitate the management of pain and symptoms, drugs and treatment necessary to meet the needs of the patient and documentation from the IDG of the patient and/or caregiver’s understanding, involvement, and agreement with the care plan. Patient #4 had a hospice admission date of 12/17/24 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed: a. The Plan of Care (POC), dated 10/13/25 to 12/11/25, included primary diagnosis of hemiplegia post cerebral vascular accident, and identified skilled nursing services per physician orders. b. The IDG update to the POC, dated 10/15/25, included orders for skilled nursing services one time per week to provide assessment of pain management, fatigue and response, falls, neurological status, nutritional status, speech, and equipment and assistive device needs. c. The home visit on 10/28/25 at 9:30 AM with Staff H, Registered Nurse (RN), the surveyor observed Staff H received medication in a medication cup, mixed in applesauce, from the nursing home RN. During an interview at the same observation home visit, Staff H stated the nursing home RN identified the patient’s pain medication hydrocodone was mixed in the applesauce. Staff H administered the medication and later identified the applesauce contained additional medication and must have been the morning medications, that included the hydrocodone and all of patient # 4’s scheduled morning medications. d. The clinical record failed to identify a physician order for the hospice nurse to administer medications. The hospice nurse failed to obtain an order to administer medications prior to 10/28/25. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator, Clinical Manager and Vice President of Clinical Services.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 612 words

    “Based on clinical record review, hospice policy review, home visit observation and hospice staff interview, the hospice failed to ensure the Plan of Care (POC) for 3 of 19 sampled patients (Patient #2, #4 and #8) included all medical equipment and supplies necessary to meet identified patient needs. Failure to include all needed items of medical equipment and supplies the patient used on the Plans of Care placed the patients at risk of unanticipated decline or injury and of needs not met. Findings include: 2. Patient #4 had a start of care date of 12/17/24. Record review revealed the following: a. The plans of care (POCs), dated 8/14/25 to 10/12/25 and 10/13/25 to 12/11/25, included the following medical supplies and appliances: adult diapers, blue pads, wheelchair, wheelchair cushion, gait/transfer belt, shower chair, hand-held shower, grab bars/safety rails, nebulizer tubing/supplies, wipes, and lift chair. b. During a home observation visit on 10/28/25 at 9:30 AM, with Staff H, RN, the patient had a reacher on the table next to the lift chair. The patient stated the reacher required at times. The hospice failed to list all medical supplies and appliances required by the patient on the POC. 3. Patient #8 had a start of care date of 8/14/25. Record review revealed the following: a. The POC, dated 8/14/25 to 11/11/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of Myelodysplastic syndrome and included the following medical supplies and appliances: Moisture barrier, scooter/power chair, shower chair, hand-held shower, cane, gloves, rolling walker and grab bars/safety rails. b. The comprehensive skilled nurse visit at start of care, dated 8/14/25, identified the patient required use of a medication planner to set up medications. The hospice failed to list all medical supplies and appliances required by the patient on the POC. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator, Clinical Manager and Vice President of Clinical Services. Review of the hospice policy, titled Plan of Care, dated 2/1/23, identified the content of the POC includes medical supplies and appliances necessary to meet the needs of the patient. 1. Patient #2 had a hospice admission date of 4/24/25 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 4/24/25 to 7/22/25, included primary diagnosis of osteomyelitis of vertebra thoracic region, and identified the patient used the following medical equipment and supplies: hospital bed with bed rails, overbed table, bedside drainage bag, adult diapers, blue pads/chux, hoyer lift, gloves, wheelchair, pressure release mattress, wheelchair cushion, shower chair, foley catheter, hand-held shower, and long handled sponge. b. The recert POC, dated 7/23/25 to 10/20/25, identified the patient used the following medical equipment and supplies: hospital bed with bed rails, overbed table, bedside drainage bag, adult diapers, blue pads/chux, hoyer lift, gloves, wheelchair, pressure release mattress, wheelchair cushion, shower chair, foley catheter, hand-held shower, and long handled sponge. c. The recert POC, dated 10/21/25 to 12/19/25, identified the patient used the following medical equipment and supplies: hospital bed with bed rails, overbed table, adult diapers, blue pads/chux, hoyer lift, wheelchair, pressure release mattress, wheelchair cushion, shower chair, hand-held shower, and long handled sponge. d. During a home visit observation with Staff F, RN (Registered Nurse) on 10/28/25 at 9:40 AM, the surveyor observed Patient #2 resting in bed with waffle boots (heel protectors to prevent pressure ulcers) on bilateral feet. Staff F reported the patient had been wearing waffle boots “for a while now”. The waffle boots were added to the plan of care, dated 10/27/25, one day prior to the home visit observation. The Plans of Care failed to identify all necessary medical equipment and supplies used by the patient, including the waffle boots.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 580 words

    “Based on home observations, staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the agency failed to maintain and develop a system of communication and integration in accordance with the hospices’ own policy to ensure the interdisciplinary group maintains responsibility for directing coordination and supervising the care and services provided for 2 of 7 with wounds. (Patient #4 and #9). Failure of the interdisciplinary team to collaborate and communicate effectively increased the risk that patients did not receive services to meet assessed needs. Findings include: 2. Patient #9 had a hospice admission date of 8/19/25 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 8/19/25 to 10/17/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of parkinsonism and included orders for skilled nursing services. b. Skilled nurse visit note, dated 9/7/25, completed by Staff F, RN, included documentation the patient had a new wound to the left anterior foot, 2nd toe. Staff F, described the wound bed as clean, dry and red, normal peri wound skin, noted a small amount of sanguineous/bloody drainage and identified the wound measured 1.3 cm X 0.1 cm X 0 cm. The measurements lacked an accurate depth measurement for the open wound. The clinical record lacked accurate wound measurements including length, width and depth in centimeters. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Vice President of Clinical Services. According to the policy titled Interdisciplinary Team Meetings, dated 7/28/2021, Interdisciplinary team (IDT) members review each patinet care plan at least every 15 days, or more frequently if needed, to continually monitor care and services and continued eligibility for hospice care. During IDT meetings patinet care plans are reviewed and updated and changes are communicated to primary (attending) physicians with requests for new orders as needed, IDT documentation reflects team discussion and changes in the care plan. According to the hospice policy titled Palliative Wound Care Management and Treatment, dated 9/5/24,wound assessment is performed by the Registered Nurse (RN) Case Manager during initial assessment and by a hospice nurse a minimum of every 7 days and as necessary to meet patient needs. The wound assessment documented in the electronic health record and includes location, length, sidth, depth and description. Description includes color, odor, exudate and appearance of wound/peri-wound area. During an interview on 10/29/25 at 10:40 AM, the Clinical Manager stated the expectation for wound assessment completed every 7 days and to include length, width and depth, drainage, odor, tunneling and pain. 1.Patient #4 had a start of care date of 12/17/24. Clinical record revealed the following: a. The Plan of Care (POC), dated 8/14/25 to 10/12/25 and 10/13/25 to 12/11/25 included a diagnosis of hemiplegia post cerebral vascular accident. The POC included physician orders for skilled nurse visits 1 time a week. The POC included orders for the skilled nurse to appy triad ointment to the abrasion on the left buttock every shift until healed. b. The skilled nurse note, dated 10/23/25, Staff H, RN, documented the patient had a wound on the upper left buttock. The wound bed described clean and granulating and pink in color. The wound measurements documented length 0.69 centimeters (cm) by width 1 cm and depth 0 cm. c. During an home visit on 10/28/25 at 9:00 AM, Staff H, RN stated the abraision had been a superficial open wound. The IDG team failed to maintain responsibility for coordinating and supervising the care and services provided to meet the individualized needs of the patient.”

    Rule L0554. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 894 words

    “Based on staff interview, clinical record reviews and agency policy review, the hospice failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) developed hospice aide instructions for patient care that were specific and individualized to the patient’s needs for 5 of 19 sampled patients receiving hospice aide services (Patients #9, #11, #12, #16 and #18). Failure to identify specific tasks for the hospice aide to perform or a specific frequency for the task increases the potential risk that patients may fail to receive necessary services ordered on the plan of care in a safe and effective manner. Findings include: 4. Patient #12 had a hospice admission date of 6/20/25 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POCs, dated 6/20/25 to 9/17/25 and 9/18/25 to 12/16/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and included physician orders for skilled nurse and hospice aide services. b. Hospice aide care plan, dated 6/26/25, included aide instructions to provide the following: file fingernails, file toe nails and nail care. The hospice RN failed to include specific instructions to provide patient nail care. 5. Patient #16 had a hospice admission date of 2/20/25 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POCs, dated 2/20/25 to 5/20/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain and included physician orders for skilled nurse and hospice aide services. The POC included medical supplies and appliances for Hoyer lift, gait belt and EZ stand lift. b. The comprehensive assessment at start of care, dated 2/20/25, identified the patient chair bound/bed bound and required the use of an EZ stand to transfer. c. Hospice aide care plan, dated 2/24/25, provide included aide instructions to assist with transfers and transfer to bed/chair with assistance. The care plan did not identify equipment to be used for transfer. The hospice RN failed to include specific instructions to use equipment to transfer the patient. The above findings reviewed with the Administrator, Clinical Manager and Vice President of Clinical Services. According to the hospice policy titled Hospice Aide Services, last revised November 2023, hospice aide services are provided under the supervision of a Registered Nurse (RN). The RN case manager develops a written hospice aide care plan that provides instructions to the hospice aide of the care to be provided. The hospice aide care plan is reviewed as often as necessary and at a minimum every 14 days by the RN case manager. 1.Patient #9 had a hospice admission date of 8/19/25 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed: a. The Plan of Care (POC), dated 8/19/25 to 10/17/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of parkinsonism and included physician orders for skilled nurse and hospice aide services. b. The skilled nurse initial assessment, dated 8/19/25, completed by Staff C, RN, identified the patient requires the use of a gait belt during transfers. c. Hospice aide care plan, dated 8/21/25, included aide instructions to assist with transfers x 2 assist and assist to toilet. The assignment did not include specific instruction on what assistive device should be used when transferring the patient. During an interview on 10/29/25 at 8:52 AM, Staff D, Hospice Aide, reported the patient is a pivot transfer and he does not use a gait belt when transferring the patient. During an interview on 10/29/25 at 9:25 AM, Nursing home Administrator reported the patient requires the assistance of 1 for a stand pivot transfer using a gait belt and front wheeled walker. The hospice RN failed to include what specific assistive device the aide should use when transferring the patient. 2.Patient #11 had a hospice admission date of 10/2/25 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 10/2/25 to 11/30/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and included physician orders for skilled nurse and hospice aide services. b. The skilled nurse initial assessment, dated 10/2/25, completed by Staff G, RN, identified the patient requires the use of a gait belt during transfers. c. Hospice aide care plan, dated 10/7/25, included aide instructions to ambulate patient using rollator. The assignment failed to include the patient required the use of a gait belt. During an interview on 10/29/25 at 8:53 AM, Staff D, Home Health Aide, reported he has not transferred the patient due to patient being in bed at the time of visit. During an interview on 10/29/25 at 9:18 AM, Nursing home RN reported the patient requires the assistance of 1 using a gait belt. The hospice RN failed to include all specific assistive devices the aide should use when transferring the patient. 3.Patient #18 had a hospice admission date of 11/22/24, a death date of 2/1/25 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 11/22/24 to 2/19/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure and included physician orders for skilled nurse and hospice aide services. b. Hospice aide care plan, dated 11/27/24, included aide instructions to provide skin care. The assignment did not include specific instructions on what skin care the aide should provide. The hospice RN failed to include specific skin care instructions for the patient.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,035 words

    “Based on hospice staff interview, clinical record reviews and hospice policy review, the hospice failed to ensure hospice aides provided care to patients only as directed by the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) and according to the hospice aide care plan for 6 of 17 sampled patients receiving hospice aide services (Patients #1, #4, #8, #9, #18 and #19). Failure to ensure that hospice aide services are provided only as ordered by the physician and according to the hospice aide care plan increased the risk that patients’ personal care needs were not adequately met. Findings include: 6. Patient #19 had a hospice admission date of 11/4/24, a death date of 2/15/25 and received hospice services while residing in a private residence. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 11/4/24 to 2/1/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and included physician orders for skilled nurse and hospice aide services. Hospice aide intervention included the task vital signs: weight. b. IDG updates to the POC, dated 1/29/25 and 2/12/25, included the hospice aide intervention: vital signs: weight. c. Hospice aide visit notes, dated 12/17/24, 19, 23, 26, 30, 1/2/25, 7, 10, 14, 15, 16, 20, 22, 23, 27, 29, 30, 2/3, 5, 7, 11, 12 and 2/13/25, identified the task vital signs: weight “not required today”. The hospice aide failed to obtain a weight as ordered. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator, Clinical Manager, Vice President of Clinical Services and Quality and Education Coordinator. 4. Patient #4 had a hospice admission date of 12/17/24 and received hospice services while residing in a private residence. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POCs, dated 8/14/25 to 10/12/25 and 10/13/25 to 12/11/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of hemiplegia post cerebral vascular accident and included physician orders for skilled nurse and hospice aide services. b. Hospice aide care plan, dated 12/20/2024, identified the task to provide a shower. On 3/10/25, the aide care plan updated to include the task to provide a whirlpool bath. c. Hospice aide visit note, dated 9/9/25, completed by Staff D, Hospice Aide, identified the task of both a shower and whirlpool provided during the visit. The hospice aide failed to identify which bath provided per RN instruction. 5. Patient #8 had a hospice admission date of 8/14/25 and received hospice services while residing in a private residence. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 8/14/25 to 11/11/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of Myelodysplastic syndrom and included physician orders for skilled nurse and hospice aide services. b. Hospice aide care plan, dated 8/15/2025, identified the following tasks: ambulate using a cane, clean bathroom, patinet laundry, shower chair built into walk in shower, file long or uneven finger nails once a week, file long or uneven toe nails once a month, apply polish, oral care, shampoo with showers, lotion to extremities, fall precautions and standard precautions. c. The hospice aide note, dated 8/29/25 and 9/15/25, identified the patinet refusedd all tasks assigned to the hospice aide. The clinical record lacked documentation the hospice aide notified the case manager. The hospice aide failed to notify the case manager of lack of completion of the task per RN instruction. According to the hospice policy titled Hospice Aide Services, last revised in November 2023, the registered nurse (RN) case manager develops a written hospice aide care plan that provides instructions to the hospice aide of the care to be provided. 1.Patient #1 had a hospice admission date of 11/29/23 and received hospice services while residing in a private residence. Clinical record review revealed: a. IDG update to the Plan of Care (POC), dated 9/17/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and included physician orders for skilled nurse and hospice aide services. b. Hospice aide care plan, dated 9/19/2025, identified the task of weigh patient by the 7th of each month. c. Hospice aide visit note, dated 9/4/25, completed by Staff D, Hospice Aide, identified the task weigh patient by the 7th of the month as not required today. The hospice aide failed to complete the task of obtaining the patient’s weight by the 7th of the month per RN instruction. 2. Patient #9 had a hospice admission date of 8/19/25 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 8/19/25 to 10/17/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of parkinsonism and included physician orders for skilled nurse and hospice aide services. b. Hospice aide care plan, dated 8/21/25, identified the following tasks: assist with transfers x2 assist, companionship, assist with meal set up, offer snacks and fluids between meals, assist to toilet, change adult diapers, provide incontinent care, change patient linen when soiled, assist patient with dressing, file any long or uneven fingernails and toenails and weigh patient between the 1st and 7th of each month. c. Hospice aide visit note, dated 9/3/25, completed by Staff D, Hospice Aide, identified the task weigh patient by the 7th of the month as not required today. d. Hospice aide visit note, dated 10/1/25, completed by Staff D, Hospice Aide, identified the hospice aide shaved the patient. The hospice aide failed to complete the task of obtaining the patient’s weight by the 7th of the month and failed to provided services only as ordered on the plan of care. 3. Patient #18 had a hospice admission date of 11/22/24, a death date of 2/1/25 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 11/22/24 to 2/19/25, identified the patient had a diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure and included physician orders for skilled nurse and hospice aide services. b. Hospice aide care plan, dated 11/27/24, included aide instructions to shampoo the patient and shower the patient. c. Hospice aide visit note, dated 1/27/25, completed by Staff D, Hospice Aide, documented the tasks of shampoo and shower not required today. d. Hospice aide visit note, dated 1/31/25, completed by Staff I, Hospice Aide, documented the tasks of shampoo and shower not required today. The hospice aides failed to complete tasks of shampoo patient and shower patient per RN instruction.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Professional management responsibility (42 CFR 418.100(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 159 words

    “Based on review of written hospice agreements for services under arrangement, the hospice failed to ensure written agreements between the hospice agency and agencies providing services under arrangement included all required contract components for 1 of 2 sampled services (Medical supply and equipment provider). Failure to include this provision within the contractual agreement increased the potential that hospice management and oversight failed to occur and the patient would not receive services as specified on the plan of care. Review of the contract between the hospice and sampled medical supply and equipment provider, dated 10/23/25, identified the contract lacked the following required components: a. The hospice retains administrative management, b. The hospice retains financial management and c. The hospice retains oversight of staff and services. The hospice failed to include all required contract components in written agreements between the hospice agency and agency providing services under arrangement. The above findings were reviewed with the Quality and Education Coordinator and Administrator.”

    Rule L0655. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 288 words

    “Based on hospice staff interview and clinical record reviews the hospice failed to ensure the hospice staff sent a copy of the patient’s transfer summary to the receiving facility for 1 of 1 sampled, live transferred patients (Patients #16). Failure to ensure the hospice staff included the receiving facility in the process of transfer placed the patients at risk for not receiving ongoing medical care and services to meet the needs of the patient. Findings include: According to the hospice policy titled Discharge Summary, dated 2/1/23, the discharge summary is completed for any hospice discharge, patient revocation of services, or patient transfer to another hospice or care provider, by the registered nurse case manager or designee by adding the discharge summary form, clinical document discharge summary identifying a transfer in the electronic health record. Patient #16 had a start of care date of 2/20/25, a discharge date of 4/28/25 and received hospice services while residing in a private residence. a. The Plan of Care (POC), dated 2/20/25 to 5/20/25, identified the patient had a primary diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The POC included orders for skilled nursing services. b. The physicians order dated 4/28/25, included an order to transfer the patient to another hospice. The communication note note, dated 4/30/25, identified a discharge summary forwarded to the Medical Director and the personal care Physician. c. The transfer summary, dated 4/30/25, included a summary of hospice services and a list of the patient’s current medications. d. Clinical record review lacked documentation the transfer summary was forwarded to the receiving hospice. The hospice failed to forward the transfer summary to the receiving hospice. The above findings reviewed with the Administrator, Clinical Manager and Vice President of Clinical Services.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 651 words

    “Based on staff interview, clinical record reviews and review of nursing home medication administration records, the hospice failed to ensure hospice staff provided overall coordination of the hospice care in regards to the patient’s medications with the nursing home for 2 of 3 sampled patients (Patients #3 and #4) with a nursing home medication review. Failure to ensure the hospice staff provided overall coordination of the patient’s medications with the nursing home placed the patients at risk for receiving inadequate care and/or treatments needed to meet the individual needs of the patient. Findings include: 2. Patient #3 had a hospice admission date of 9/23/25 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 9/23/25 to 12/210/25, included primary diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of left kidney, orders for skilled nursing services and medications: Protonix 40 milligrams (mg) 1 tablet once a day, Sertraline 25 mg 1 tablet once a day, Miconazole Nitrate topical cream 2 times a day left breast. b. IDG updates to the POC, dated 10/1/25 and 10/15/25, include medication orders Protonix 40 mg 1 tablet once a day, Sertraline 25 mg 1 tablet once a day, Miconazole Nitrate topical cream 2 times a day left breast. c. Review of the nursing facility MAR revealed: i. Protonix 40 mg 1 tablet by mouth two times a day with a start date of 8/29/25; ii. Sertraline 25 mg discontinued 10/23/25; and iii. Miconazole Nitrate topical cream discontinued on 10/1/25. Hospice skilled nurse failed to accurately update the POC with medication orders on the nursing facility MAR. The above findings were reviewed with the Quality and Education Coordinator and Administrator. Review of the hospice policy, titled Nursing Facility Care Plan, Coordination and Communication, dated 4/2/25, identified registered nurse case managers for patients are responsible for coordinating and implementing patient care plans in collaboration with members of the IDG, facility representatives and the attending physician. All care provided to facility patients must be in accordance with a written care plan that includes the patient’s current medical, physical, social, emotional, and spiritual needs. 1.Patient #4 had a hospice admission date of 12/17/24 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed: a. The Plan of Care (POC), dated 10/13/25 to 12/11/25, included Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) orders for skilled nursing services 1 time per week and included physician orders for medications. b. Review of the patient’s nursing home Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 10/1/25, identified the following medication discrepancy with the hospice’s POC and Medication Profile for patient #4:1) The hospice POC had an order for Ondanstron 4 milligram (mg) tablet with instructions to take 4 mg by mouth every 8 hours as needed for agitation or anxiety. The hospice’s Medication Profile identified a start date for the medication, dated 7/14/25. The nursing home’s MAR had an order for Ativan (Lorazepam) 4 mg oral tablet with instructions to give 4 mg by mouth every 6 hours as needed for nausea”. The nursing home MAR identified a start date for the medication, dated 7/14/25. 2) The nursing home’s MAR had an order for Senna 8.6 mg every 12 hours as needed for constipation. The hospice POC and medication list failed to include orders for Senna.3) The hospice had an order for Gieaofemeson 100 mg/5 milliliters (ML) 10 ml every 8 hours. The nurisng home’s MAR failed to include an order for Gueaifenesin.3) The hospice POV had an order for Escitaloprm 20n mg daily. The nursing home’s MAR had an order for Escitalopram 30 mg daily.4) The hospice POC and medication list included an order for Tylenol HR arthritis pain give 650 mg oral tablet 2 times a day. The POC and medication list also included a duplicate order for Acetaminophen 650 mg 2 times a day. Hospice staff failed to ensure the coordination of the patient’s medications with the patient’s nursing home.”

    Rule L0778. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 294 words

    “Based on clinical record review, nursing home clinical record review, hospice policy review and hospice staff interview, the hospice failed to ensure the nursing home received copies of the physician certification of terminal illness and the physician recertification of terminal illness for 1 of 3 sampled patients (Patient #3) with home visit observations in nursing homes. Failure to ensure the hospice staff provided the required documentation to the nursing home staff placed the patient at risk for receiving inadequate care and/or treatments needed to meet the individual needs of the patient. Findings include: Review of the hospice’s policy, titled Nursing Facility Care Plan, Coordination and Communication, dated 4/2/25, revealed when the CTI (Certification of Terminal Illness) and POC (Plan of Care) have all of the required signatures, within 3 business days, the business office manager is responsible for patients with access to the EHR (electronic health record), create a PDF (portable document format) of the completed CTI and POC and upload them into the patient’s nursing facility clinical record according to the Scanned Documents Crosswalk. Patient #3 had a hospice admission date of 9/23/25 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed the POC, dated 9/23/25 to 12/210/25, included primary diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of left kidney and orders for skilled nursing services. Before a home visit observation on 10/28/25 at 9:40 AM, Staff F, RN (registered nurse), reported the business office manager is responsible for uploading completed CTIs and POCs to the nursing facility EHR. Staff F reviewed the nursing facility EHR and was unable to find the CTI and POC for Patient #3, she was unsure why documents had not been uploaded yet. The above findings were reviewed with the Quality and Education Coordinator and Administrator.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 4, 2025Recertification inspection by the state13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 15, 2009.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 9% at home, 35% in assisted living, 56% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.5%
Visits near death94.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 15 owners or officers are people: Kevin Childs (corporate director); Linda L Upmeyer (corporate director); Emily Drake (corporate officer); Jeramy D Kuhn (corporate officer); Keith K Krein (corporate director); Mary Jane Carothers (corporate director); Denise D Sturm (corporate director); Jennifer White (corporate officer); Roy W Overton (managing employee (on the payroll)); Elizabeth Rust (corporate director); Michael W Beal (corporate officer); Michael W Beal (corporate director); Lane Morrell Bowen (corporate director); David B Dixon (corporate officer); Brandon Kranovich (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Holds 5% or more of the mortgage16.47%Jan 1, 2024

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 75% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 75% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 94.89% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 63% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 17 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 50266, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 13.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 17 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 50266
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Care Initiatives Hospice - West Des Moines This hospice13
Suncrest Hospice, LLC6
Moments Hospice of Des Moines LLC1
Everystep4
Mercyone Des Moines Hospice13
Unitypoint Hospice11
Unitypoint Hospice8
Myrtue Medical Center Hospice15
Gentiva15
Essence of Life Hospice2
Gentiva6
St Croix Hospice3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.