St Croix Hospice
A hospice in Ankeny, Iowa 50021
1555 SE Delaware Suite Q, Ankeny, Iowa 50021. (515) 276-2700.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 13 hospices serving ZIP code 50021 had 9.
The last inspection on record was on Sep 12, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Apr 11, 2024: complaint inspection by the state3 deficiencies
-
Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)
The inspectors’ words, 92 words
“Based on clinical record review, hospice policy review, nursing home record review, nursing home staff interview and hospice staff interview, the hospice failed to: ensure the hospice nurse member of the interdisciplinary group updated the comprehensive assessment with changes to the patient condition and included wound assessment and measurements per hospice policy (see L0533). Findings include: The cumulative effects of these systemic practices resulted in the failure of the hospice to ensure the Interdisciplinary Group of personnel completed a comprehensive assessment of all patient care and treatment needs to their hospice patients.”
-
Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))
The inspectors’ words, 965 words
“Based on clinical record review, hospice policy review, and staff interview, the hospice failed to ensure nurse members of the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) updated the comprehensive assessment with changes to the patient condition regarding wound description, measurements, and changes to treatment for 2 of 6 sampled patients with a wound (Patients #2 and #5). Failure by the hospice IDG registered nurses to update the comprehensive assessment with complete wound descriptions and measurements placed the patient at risk for ineffective staff collaboration and communication regarding patient’s wound status and effectiveness of treatments and interventions. Findings include: According to the undated hospice policy titled, Comprehensive Assessment, during the comprehensive patient assessment, all baseline data and other relevant information will be documented in the patient’s clinical record, including an assessment of severity of skin integrity. During an interview on 4/9/24 at 11:10 AM, Staff C, RN (Registered Nurse) stated Patient #5 developed a pressure sore that appeared out of nowhere. The patient also had necrotic toes and the hospice was treating the necrotic toes with betadine and gauze. During an interview with Staff L, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 4/10/24 at 9:34 AM she stated Patient #5 had wounds on the toes that were superficial. I did not measure the toe wounds because I did not feel the toe wounds were any type of wound that needed to be measured. During an interview on 4/10/24 9:47 AM, the Administrator stated she was unaware patient # 5 had any wounds. She further stated the expectation of staff was to assess wounds weekly and include measurements in the assessment. During an interview on 4/10/24 at 2:48 PM, Staff F, Hospice Aide (HA) stated she noticed an open are on Patient #5 bottom. She further stated she notified Staff C, RN of the open area. Staff F reported, Staff C stated he would look at the wound at his next visit. 1. Patient #5 had a hospice admission date of 1/5/24 and date of death of 2/27/24 and received hospice services while residing in a private residence. Review of the clinical record revealed the following: a. The hospice aide visit note, dated 2/12/24, Staff F , HA documented the patient had open area to both buttocks soiled through the pants, sheet and chuck. Registered Nurse Case Manager notified. b. Staff B, Clinical Manager, skilled nurse visit notes, dated 2/13, 2/15 and 2/16/24, lacked documentation of assessment of the patient’s buttocks. c. Staff L, LPN, skilled nurse visit notes, dated 2/17/24, included documentation the patient toes were necrotic with sores on the toes. New order included Vaseline gauze to provide wound care. The documentation lacked assessment of the sores on the toes. d. Staff M, RN, skilled nurse visit note, dated 2/18/24, included documentation the aide reported a reddened area on the patient’s coccyx during the visit. The documentation included the patient refused to allow the RN to assess the area. e. Staff C, RN skilled nurse visit note, dated 2/19/24, included documentation the patient had a stage 2 pressure area to the coccyx. Staff C contacted the physician and received new orders which included zinc oxide ointment, cover with optifoam pad. Change daily and as needed if soiled. The nurse to assess every visit. The document also included a Roho cushion ordered. The note failed to include documentation of an assessment of the pressure wound on the coccyx or necrotic toes including measurements. f. The physician’s order, dated 2/19/24, included orders for zinc oxide 20% ointment: apply thin layer to affected area 2 times a day and as needed for pressure wounds, cover with optifoam pad. Change daily and as needed if soiled for pressure wounds. Caregiver to complete. Hospice nurse to assess every visit. Wound care for necrotic left toes, paint with betadine, wrap with Vaseline gauze. Caregiver to complete daily and as needed. Hospice nurse to assess every visit. g. Staff C, RN skilled nurse visit notes, dated 2/21/24 and 2/26/24, included documentation the patient had wounds to the left dorsum foot and necrotic toes and a stage 2 pressure area to the coccyx. The document failed to include assessment including measurements. The hospice staff failed to complete timely assessment which caused a delay in receiving Physician orders. The skilled nurse failed to fully assess the patients’ wounds in order to provide a complete description of the patient’s current physical status with updates to the comprehensive assessment. 2. Patient #2 had a hospice admission date of 11/29/23 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing facility. Review of the clinical record revealed the following: a. The plan of care (POC) dated 2/27/24 to 5/26/24, included skilled nursing services 1 time per week. b. Comprehensive assessments completed by Staff O, RN, dated 3/25/24 included documentation of a skin tear to the left proximal dorsum (top foot/ankle) with an onset on 3/22/24 due to a fall. The facility provided wound care and dressing change this morning so no assessment of the wound was made. The assessment failed to include documentation of the Nursing facilities findings or any further description or measurements of the wound. c. A comprehensive assessment completed by Staff P, RN, dated 4/1/24, included documentation of skin tear to the left proximal dorsum and a new skin tear to the left mid pretibial area (shin). The assessments failed to include a description or measurements of the wounds. d. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 4/5/24, Staff O, RN included documentation of skin tear to the left proximal dorsum and a skin tear to the left mid pretibial area (shin). The assessments failed to include a description or measurements of the wounds. The hospice failed to complete assessments of wounds or identify the facilities assessments including wound measurements. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Clinical Manager.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 384 words
“Based on clinical record review, home visit observation, family interview and hospice policy review, the hospice failed to ensure the hospice plan of care included all necessary treatments to meet the needs of the patient for 2 of 6 sampled patients (Patient #2 and #4). Failure to ensure the plan of care included complete and accurate physician orders for all necessary medications and treatments placed patients at risk to receive inappropriate treatment of symptoms. Findings include: Review of the hospice’s policy, titled Plan of Care (POC), dated 2/1/23, identified the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) gathers the information from the initial and comprehensive assessment to develop the POC. Review of the hospice’s policy, titled Interdisciplinary Team Meetings, dated 7/28/21, identified the IDG reviews and updates each patient’s Plan of Care (POC) at least every 15 days, or more frequently, if needed. 1. Patient #2 had a hospice admission date of 11/20/23 and received routine home care services from the hospice while residing in an assisted living facility. Review of the clinical record revealed the following: a. The plan of care (POC), dated 3/19/24 through 5/17/24, identified the patient had orders for skilled nursing services and medications. b. The assisted living physician’s ordered, dated 4/9/24, included orders for lorazepam 0.5 mg every 6 hours as needed for agitation/anxiety effective 9/5/23. c. The Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) meeting, dated 3/21/24, did not include any information about the patient’s order for Lorazepam. d. The hospice medication report, dated 4/9/24, did not include the order for Lorazepam. The hospice failed to include the patient’s order for Lorazepam on the plan of care. 2. Patient #4 had a hospice admission date of 2/7/24 and received routine home care services from the hospice while residing in a private residence. a. The POC, dated 2/7/24 to 5/6/24, included orders for skilled nursing services and the medication cranberry supplements. b. The hospital discharge orders, dated 2/7/24, included orders for cranberry supplement 500 mg 3 times a day. c. The IDG note, dated 2/15/24, 2/29/24 and 3/1424, included orders for cranberry supplement 500 mg daily. The hospice failed to include IDG orders for correct, current medication of cranberry supplement of cranberry supplement 500 mg 3 times a day or clarify the discrepancy with the physician. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Clinical Manager.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2024 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner | No deficiencies cited |
| Jul 31, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Apr 11, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 5, 2007.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.8% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 17% at home, 29% in assisted living, 54% in a nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 14.7 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 9.6% |
| Visits near death | 96.8% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- St Croix Hospice Acquisition Corp owns 100% directly since Oct 1, 2013.
- 18 owners or officers are people: Andrew Graham Mayo (managing employee (on the payroll)); Andrew Graham Mayo (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Stephen C Phenneger (corporate officer); Stephen C Phenneger (corporate director); Stephen C Phenneger (managing employee (on the payroll)); Stephen C Phenneger (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Tamila A Johnson-White (managing employee (on the payroll)); Tamila A Johnson-White (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Mandy L Cogswell (managing employee (on the payroll)); Mandy L Cogswell (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Elizabeth A Stuck (managing employee (on the payroll)); Elizabeth A Stuck (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Heath A Bartness (corporate officer); Heath A Bartness (corporate director); Heath A Bartness (managing employee (on the payroll)); Heath A Bartness (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Samuel Eliot Stanton (managing employee (on the payroll)); Samuel Eliot Stanton (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
- A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antares Capital LP | Holds 5% or more security interest | 100% | Oct 30, 2020 |
| Tvg-Stc Intermediate Corp | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Sep 29, 2017 |
| Stch Acquisition Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Oct 30, 2020 |
| Stch Intermediate Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Oct 30, 2020 |
| SCHP Holdings LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Oct 24, 2025 |
| Schp Topco Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Oct 24, 2025 |
| St Croix Hospice Acquisition Corp | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Oct 1, 2013 |
| Stch Parent Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Oct 30, 2020 |
| Schp Midco Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Oct 24, 2025 |
| Schp Intermediate Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Oct 24, 2025 |
| Schp Purchaser Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Oct 24, 2025 |
| Partners Group Access Pf 882 LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 60.09% | Oct 24, 2025 |
| Hig Stch II LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 13.71% | Oct 24, 2025 |
| Partners Group Global Value Sicav | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 9.3% | Oct 24, 2025 |
| Partners Group Direct Equity V Eur | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 5.9% | Oct 24, 2025 |
| Qsuper Global Private Equity Tr | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 5.04% | Oct 24, 2025 |
| The State Public Sector | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 5.04% | Oct 24, 2025 |
| Partners Group Daintree Credit Co-Invest LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 5.04% | Oct 24, 2025 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 99.79% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 85.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 13 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 50021, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 3.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| St Croix Hospice This hospice | 3 |
| Everystep | 4 |
| Mercyone Des Moines Hospice | 13 |
| Mary Greeley Hospice Services | 9 |
| Unitypoint Hospice | 8 |
| Gentiva | 15 |
| Wesleylife Hospice | 12 |
| Care Initiatives Hospice - West Des Moines | 13 |
| Care Initiatives Hospice - Greenfield | 12 |
| St Croix Hospice | 4 |
| Suncrest Hospice, LLC | 6 |
| Hospice of the Midwest, LLC | 8 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.