Hearth Record

Unitypoint Hospice

A hospice in Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501

214 S 25th St, Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501. (515) 574-6420.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 11 hospices serving ZIP code 50501 had 9.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 25, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 25, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 141 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 21 (Patient #4) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 04: The medication profile includes duplicate orders for Hydrocodone 5-325mg, take 1-2 tablets by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain, may also take 1-2 tablets every 4 hrs PRN for pain. The medication profile includes duplicate orders for Lorazepam 0.5mg, take 1 tablet by mouth 2 times daily and 2 tablets nightly, and may have additional 1 tablet every hour as needed for anxiety/restlessness. (Corrected on site.)”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 21 (Patient 6) have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 06: The patient was admitted on 7/11/23, the bereavement assessment was completed on 9/25/23.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 200 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 21 (Patient #1, 10)) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 01: The patient was admitted on 8/26/23 with a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer’s and a secondary condition of Type II Diabetes Mellitus, the patient takes Lispro three times daily with meals, the plan of care does not include a problem statement with interventions and goals that address the management of the diabetes. The admit assessment includes evidence that the patient has 2+ edema, dysphagia and weight loss, the plan of care does not include a problem statement with interventions and goals to address these issues. Patient 10: The patient was admitted on 4/6/24 and reports frequent bouts of diarrhea, the patient uses Immodium, as needed to control the symptom, the POC does not include interventions and goals for the management of the diarrhea.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 21 (Patient #3) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient 03: Volunteer services are ordered for this patient and indicated as PRN with no quantity indicated.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 21 (Patient #10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 10: The medication profile includes orders for Duoneb respiratory treatments, the POC does not include a nebulizer.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 21 (Patient #1,14) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 01: The patient recertification visit assessment and updated comprehensive assessment includes information that the patient continues with swallowing difficulties and edema, the plan of care has not been updated to include a problem statement with interventions and goals for the management of the issues. Patient 14: The patient medication orders include Eliquis 2.5mg BID effective 2/22/24, the plan of care was not updated to include bleeding precautions.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 172 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 21 (Patient #3, 8) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable. Patient 03: The following hospice aide task assignments are indicated as PRN; assist with feeding, assist with ambulation, nail care & filing. (Corrected on site) Patient 08: The following hospice aide task assignments are indicated as PRN; assist with feeding, assist with ambulation. (Corrected on site.)”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 120 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 21 (Patient #7, 8) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 07: The hospice aide visit order is indicated for 2 x per week, there was only 1 visit performed for the week of 3/17/24 - 3/23/24, the documentation indicated “due to agency staffing issues.” Patient 08: The patient hospice aide task assignment includes assistance with feeding, the documentation for 4/18/24 does not indicate if the task was performed or declined.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 21 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient 02: The plan of care includes wound care orders for a wound to the right buttock, cleanse with warm soapy water, pat dry apply zinc oxide paste BID and PRN. The order does not include which provider is responsible for performing the care and does not include an indicator for PRN.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

  • N/a (42 CFR 418.110(c)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice inpatient facility tests their power systems in accordance with NFPA 99 and NFPA 110 including the maintenance and testing of alternate power sources and transfer inspection and testing and maintenance and testing of circuitry. NFPA 110 Part 8.3.7: A fuel quality test shall be performed at least annually using appropriate ASTM standards. The agency is unable to provide evidence of annual fuel quality testing reports for the generator located at the Paula Baber Hospice House.”

    Rule L0826. Standard-level.

  • N/a (42 CFR 418.110(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 217 words

    “Upon observation, there is no evidence the corridor walls and doors of a facility is provided consistent with the 2012 editions of the LSC of the National Fire Protection Association and NFPA 99. Hospices are exempt from chapter 19.3.6.3.5 “exception number 1 and 2 and 19.3.6.3.6 number 2”. If recommended by state survey agency, CMS may waive for periods deemed appropriate, specific provisions of the LSC which, if rigidly applied, would result in unreasonable hardship to the hospice, but only if the waiver would not adversely affect the health and safety of patients. The provisions of the adopted edition of the Life Safety Code do not apply in a State if CMS finds that a fire and safety code imposed by State law adequately protects patients in hospices. Existing Construction During the walk through inspection it was identified that the cross corridor fire rated doors within the smoke compartment located in the west corridor do not prevent the passage of smoke. Upon release of the doors, it was noted that the outward swinging door towards the path of egress became stuck at the top and center of the frame leaving a gap and preventing the door from closing properly. A gasket would also be required where the doors should properly meet, to prevent the passage of smoke.”

    Rule L0827. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 25, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies cited
Apr 25, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Feb 8, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 21, 1995.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 23.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 12.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 28% at home, 3% in assisted living, 60% in a nursing facility, 1% in a hospital, 8% in an inpatient hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day23.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends12.1%
Visits near death95.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Iowa Health System and Unitypoint at Home run it.
  • 22 owners or officers are people: Eric M Neverman (corporate director); Todd M Wenck (corporate director); Krista A Bishop (managing employee (on the payroll)); Michael Welsch (corporate officer, 0%); Michael Welsch (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Lance Horbach (corporate director, 0%); Jamie Lynn Miller (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Scott Kizer (corporate officer, 0%); Andrea White (corporate director); Marissa Smith (managing employee (on the payroll)); Debra A Shriver (corporate director); Debra D Johnson (corporate director); Candice Schlafmann (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Rachel Hurtt (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Jane M Arnold (corporate director, 0%); Dianna L Edwards (corporate director); Kenneth Felz (corporate director, 0%); Jennifer Ofelt (corporate officer, 0%); Jennifer Ofelt (corporate director, 0%); Jennifer Ofelt (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Brian C Scott (corporate director); Deborah Freiburg (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Iowa Health SystemRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Mar 20, 1998
Unitypoint at HomeRuns it (operational or managerial control)Mar 20, 1998

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 90% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 89.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 11 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 50501, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.