Hearth Record

Appalachian Hospice, LLC

A hospice in Blairsville, Georgia 30512

1346 Pat Haralson Drive, Blairsville, Georgia 30512. (706) 781-0924.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 16 hospices serving ZIP code 30512 had 2.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 12, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 12, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission14 deficiencies
  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 159 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 patient records reviewed, with hospice revocation, the organization failed to respect the patient’s right to exercise his or her rights as a patient of hospice. On review of RRDC#2 the documentation noted the patient revoked the hospice benefit yet the signed revocation was not found on the record. This observation was reviewed with the Assistant Administrator. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 patient records reviewed, with live discharge for extended prognosis, the organization failed to respect the patient’s right to participate in decisions about their care, treatment or services. On Review of RRDC#1 the patient was discharged live with documentation that condition had stabilized however there was no signed Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage noted on the record. There was an ABN signed but was the incorrect CMS form and did not give the patient information of how to appeal the discharge. This observation was reviewed with the Assistant Administrator.”

    Rule L0505. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 147 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to conduct and document a patient-specific comprehensive assessment and reassessment that identified the patient’s need for hospice care and services. On review of RRNHV#5 the patient had documentation of a stage 1 sacral pressure wound yet there was no documentation of a wound assessment as required such as size, color, and surrounding skin. The patient also had cancerous wounds to the scalp. there was no documentation of comprehensive wound assessment as required every 15 days or less noted in the record. In RRNHV#7 there were multiple wounds documented, a sacral wound that was present on admission there was no documentation of a comprehensive wound assessment after April. There were 3 additional wounds documented, yet no comprehensive wound assessment documented as required. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator, Assistant Administrator, and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(8))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to conduct and document a patient-specific comprehensive assessment and reassessment that identified the patient’s need for hospice care and services. On review of RRNHV#11 the documentation noted the patient/family was interested in volunteer services yet there was no documentation that an assessment for volunteer needs was conducted. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator, Assistant Administrator, and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0532. Standard-level.

  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the clinical record was complete, promptly and accurately documented. On review of RRNHV#8 there was documentation of an LVN supervisory visit every RN visit yet there was no LVN seeing the patient per the record. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator, Assistant Administrator, and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0535. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 179 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 12 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the individualized written plan of care reflect patient and family goals that were specific, measurable, and time-bound. On review of all of the clinical records there were goals that were not individualized, specific, measurable and time-bound. An example in RRHV#1 was Patient/caregiver will feel more comfortable and Promote optimal patient orientation and communication skills. In RRHV#2 and example was provide patient with resources to assist him in funding a medical necessity. In RRHV#3 a goal was Nutritional intake to be consistent during this cert period, and in RRHV#4 Patient will maintain optimal swallowing this certification period. In RRNHV#5 an example was Social worker will provide supportive listening, validation, and counseling throughout plan of care. Examples of goals that were not specific, measurable, and time-bound can be seen throughout the clinical records. Similar examples of goals that were not specific, measurable, and time-bound were noted in RRNHV#6, RRNHV#7, RRNHV#8, RRNHV#11, RRNHV#12, RRNHV#14. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator, Assistant Administrator, and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 163 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related condition. On review of RRNHV#5 there was documentation of constipation with the addition of Milk of Magnesia and skin infection with pain of the patient’s scalp wound requiring topical medications yet the issues were not reflected in the care plans. On review of RRNHV#6 the patent had diabetes type 2 with insulin. There was documentation of issues with hypoglycemia and monitoring of blood glucose by the family yet there was no endocrine care plan to guide the care. There was also documentation of a UTI with antibiotics but no care plan for the infection. In RRNHV#12 there was documentation of a Upper respiratory infection with antibiotics yet the issue was not reflected on the care plan. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator, Assistant Administrator, and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 203 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 12 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. On review of RRHV#1, RRHV#3, RRNHV#6, RRNHV#9, and RRNHV#14 there were medication orders with ranges with no specific instructions to guide the user in choosing the correct dosage. For example: Morphine concentrate 100mg/5ml (20 mg/mL) oral solution 0.25 ml – 1 ml every 2 hours as needed - pain or shortness of breath. Lorazepam 1 mg tablet ½ - 2 tablets every 2 hours as needed - anxiety or agitation. Similar range orders were noted in RRHV#4, RRNHV#5, RRNHV#6, RRNHV#9, and RRNHV#14. In RRHV#2, RRNHV#7, RRNHV#10, RRNHV#11, and RRNHV#13 the Morphine order for the e-Kit was noted to not have a specific dosage for administration as the dosage section stated 100 mg/5ml (20mg/ml) only and not how much to give. In RRNHV#11 there were multiple 4 as needed medications for pain (Tylenol, Tylenol with Codeine, Ibuprofen, and Tramadol) but there were no specific instruction to guide the user to know when to choose which medication. These observations were reviewed with the Assistant Administrator, Administrator, and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization failed to ensure staff follow accepted standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. On home observation for RRHV#1 the LPN was observed to wash hand in the home sink and dried hands using a bath towel hanging in the patient’s bathroom. Further, there was no observation of performing hand hygiene throughout the visit such as after vital signs and patient assessment, cleansing the equipment, and returning the equipment to the nurse’s bag. This observation was reviewed with the LPN, Clinical Manager, and Administrator.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(3)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to conduct and document a patient-specific comprehensive assessment that identified the patient’s need for hospice care and services. On review of RRNHV#14 there was documentation from the spiritual counselor that they were unable to contact the patient/caregiver and no spiritual assessment had been documented from admission in late July to date of survey. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator, Assistant Administrator, and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0598. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 100 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 11 patient records reviewed, with aide services provided, the organization failed to ensure written patient care instructions for the hospice aide were prepared by the Registered Nurse. On review of RRNHV#5 the patient had multiple cancerous scalp lesions. There were no specific instructions to the aide on how to handle the cancerous lesions while providing care. In RRNHV#7 there were multiple wounds that required wound dressings yet there were no specific instructions on how to handle the dressings while performing tasks. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator, Assistant Administrator, and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 10 HR files reviewed, the organization failed to ensure staff competence was initially assessed and documented as part of orientation. On review of HR#5 for the volunteer coordinator there was no documentation that competency was assessed as part of orientation. This observation was reviewed with the Assistant Administrator and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization failed to ensure the patient record contain all information that reflects the patient’s care, treatment, and services. On home observation of medication reconciliation at RRHV#1 the was Fluticasone Prop 50 mcg nasal spray 2 sprays each nostril daily was noted in the patient home and the caregiver stated he given it to the patient daily over the past year however the medication was not included on the medication profile for the patient. This observation was reviewed with the LPN, Administrator, and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, for live discharge, the organization failed to ensure the hospice provide the receiving facility with a copy of the discharge summary and copy of patient clinical record if requested within 2 days as required. On review of RRDC#2 where documentation showed the patient revoked and was sent to a hospital yet there was no documentation that the discharge summary was sent to the receiving facility. This observation was reviewed with the Assistant Administrator, and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure when a patient was discharged or transferred the hospice provides the attending physician with a copy of the hospice discharge summary. On review of RRDC#1 and RRDC#2 there was no documentation that the completed discharge summary was provided to the attending physician within 5 days as required. This observation was reviewed with the Assistant Administrator.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 12, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission14 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 28, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 99.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 74% at home, 26% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day15.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends11.6%
Visits near death99.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Blairsville Hospice Partners LLC owns 90% directly since Jan 1, 2022.
  • 17 owners or officers are people: Media L Bragg (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Barbara L Rasmussen (corporate officer, 45%); Barbara L Rasmussen (corporate director, 45%); Barbara L Rasmussen (managing employee (on the payroll), 45%); Barbara L Rasmussen (runs it (operational or managerial control), 45%); Barbara L Rasmussen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 37.5%); Gary W Rasmussen (corporate officer, 25%); Gary W Rasmussen (corporate director, 25%); Gary W Rasmussen (managing employee (on the payroll), 25%); Gary W Rasmussen (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%); Gary W Rasmussen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 22.5%); Andre C Schoeffler (owns 5% or more through other companies, 15%); Andre C Schoeffler (runs it (operational or managerial control), 15%); Alan M Sanders (owns 5% or more through other companies, 15%); Alan M Sanders (runs it (operational or managerial control), 15%); Barbara L Rasmussen (owns 5% or more directly, 7.5%); Gary W Rasmussen (owns 5% or more directly, 2.5%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Trident Healthcare Services Inc.Holds 5% or more security interest100%Jan 1, 2022
Blairsville Hospice Partners LLCOwns 5% or more directly90%Jan 1, 2022
Mhns Investments LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Jan 1, 2022

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 91% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 94.09% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 70.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 16 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 30512, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.