Hearth Record

Eternal Faith Hospice and Palliative Care

A hospice in Blairsville, Georgia 30512

426 Cleveland St Ste 3, Blairsville, Georgia 30512. (706) 835-3960.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 16 hospices serving ZIP code 30512 had 2.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 22, 2024: an initial inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 22, 2024: initial inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies
  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 12 patient records reviewed, During RR# 4’s patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured it maintained complete and accurate patient records. For example: review of RR# 4’s registered nurse (RN) start of care comprehensive assessment revealed RR# 4 was admitted at the General Inpatient (GIP) level of care with a diagnosis of Sepsis and was unresponsive. Further review of RR# 4’s RN start of care comprehensive assessment revealed under pain a Patient self-identified acceptable pain level of 1 and documentation of the duration and character of the pain the patient was experiencing. Review of RR# 4’s plan of care revealed both GIP and Respite levels of care. Review of RR# 4’s physician certificate of terminal illness revealed RR# 4 was admitted on GIP.This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Administrator/Branch Director.”

    Rule L0535. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 220 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 8 of 12 patient records reviewed, During RRHV# 1, RRHV# 2, RRHV# 3, RR# 1, RR# 2, RR# 3, RR# 4, and RR# 7 it was noted the organization had not ensured the plan of care was based on the patient’s goals and the time frames, settings, and services required to meet those goals. For example: review of the eight patients’ plans of care and recertification plans of care revealed Chaplain services with the goal that the Chaplain would develop a care plan and all recertification had the same goal that the Chaplain would develop a care plan. All patients with MSW had the goal “Patient/Caregiver will have decreased fear/anxiety regarding the death and dying process with no indication how to measure “decreased” and/or “Patient will experience an increased sense of closure and peacefulness at end of life” with no indication of how to measure “increased”. In addition, review of RRHV# 2’s plan of care revealed the pain goal, Pain will be managed at a level acceptable to the patient. However, there was no indication what an acceptable level for RRHV# 2 was. Review of RR# 4’s plan of care revealed the pain goal Pain will be managed at a level acceptable to the patient. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Administrator/Branch Director.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 159 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 6 patient records reviewed with oxygen, During RRHV# 1, RRHV# 2, RRHV# 3, RR# 3, RR# 5, and RR# 6’s patient records review it was noted the organization had not ensured the plan of care included treatments necessary to meet the patient’s needs. For example: review of RRHV# 1, RRHV# 2, RRHV# 3, RR# 5, and RR# 6’s plans of care revealed oxygen orders with no documentation on the delivery method of oxygen, such as nasal canula. Review of RR# 3’s patient record revealed documentation that RR# 3 was on continuous oxygen at 3 lpm. However, review of the plan of care and recertification plan of care revealed no order for oxygen. Further review of RR# 3’s patient record revealed an order dated one day prior to the survey for continuous oxygen at 3-4 lpm with no indication of the deliver method. This was reviewed, discussed and validated with the Administrator/Branch Director.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 138 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 2 home visits conducted with a nurse bag, During RRHV# 1 and RRHV# 3 home observation it was noted the organization had not ensured staff followed the organization policy Bag Technique that included using a barrier for the nurse bag if a safe and clean surface is not available and to close the bag before performing patient care. For example: During RRHV# 1 and RRHV# 3’s home observations the nurse bag was left open for the duration of the visit. During RRHV# 1’s home observation the registered nurse was observed picking up the nurse bag at the end of the visit to remove the barrier and then placed the nurse bag back on the bare mattress at the Skilled Nursing Facility. This was observed, discussed, and validated with the Administrator/Branch Director.”

    Rule L0580. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 252 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 4 of 8 patient records reviewed with hospice aide services, During RRHV# 1, RRHV# 2, RRHV# 3, and RR# 3’s patient records review it was noted the registered nurse (RN) had not ensured the hospice aide written patient care instructions were complete. For example: review of RRHV# 1’s patient record revealed RRHV# 1 as on continuous oxygen at 4L. Review of RRHV# 1’s hospice aide written patient care instructions revealed the task of bed bath. However, review of the hospice aide written patient care instructions revealed no documentation of oxygen, directions regarding if oxygen could be removed during care, or oxygen precautions. Review of RRHV# 3’s patient record revealed RRHV# 3 was on continuous oxygen at 2L. Review of RRHV# 3’s hospice aide written patient care instructions revealed the task of a shower. However, further review of RRHV# 3’s hospice aide written patient care instructions revealed no documentation of oxygen, directions regarding if oxygen could be removed during care, or oxygen precautions. Review of RR# 3’s patient record revealed RR# 3 was on continuous oxygen at 3L. Review of RR# 3’s hospice aide written patient care instructions revealed the task of bathing with no documentation regarding if oxygen could be removed during care, or oxygen precautions. Review of RRHV# 2’s patient record revealed RRHV# 2 was on continuous oxygen at 2l. Review of RRHV# 2’s hospice aide written patient care instructions revealed no documentation of oxygen precautions. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Administrator/Branch Director.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Serving the hospice patient and family (42 CFR 418.100(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 2 home visits conducted at a Skilled Nursing Facility, During RRHV# 1 and RRHV# 2’s home observation the organization had not ensured it treated the patient in a dignified and respectful manner that supports the patient’s dignity. For example: during RRHV# 1’s home observation at the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) the registered nurse was observed assessing the patient with the privacy curtain open and the room door open. During RRHV# 2’s home observation at the SNF the Chaplain was observed providing spiritual support with the privacy curtain open with the roommate present. In addition, the room door was left open. This was observed, discussed, and validated with the Administrator/Branch Director.”

    Rule L0650. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, During HR# 10’s HR file reviewed it was noted the organization had not ensured contracted staff education and training complied with law and regulation, and the organization’s policy Agency In-Services, HR.65 that included annual Bloodborne Pathogen education. Review of HR# 10’s HR files revealed no annual Bloodborne Pathogen education for approximately 20 months. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Administrator/Branch Director.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 178 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 2 home visits conducted with medication reconciliation, During RRHV# 1 and RRHV# 3’s home observation it was noted the organization had not ensured it maintained a current medication list, including prescribed and over-the-counter medications. For example: during RRHV# 1’s home observation the medication reconciliation revealed the organization’s medication list had a multivitamin daily, nasal spray as needed, and Refresh eyedrops. However, review of the Skilled Nursing Facility’s (SNF) medication list revealed no documentation of a multivitamin, nasal spray, or eyedrops. Further review of the SNF’s medication list revealed Culture Digestive 200mg daily. However, review of the organization’s medication list revealed no documentation of Culture Digestive. During RRHV# 3’s medication reconciliation it was noted RRHV# 3 was taking Quinine 500 mg 1 tablets every day at 2:00 p.m. and had stopped taking Calcium with vitamin D approximately 2-3 week prior to the surveyor’s home observation. However, review of the organization’s medication list revealed Calcium with vitamin D and no documentation of Quinine. This was observed, discussed, and validated with the Administrator/Branch Director.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 2 home visits conducted at a Skilled Nursing Facility, During RRHV# 1 and RRHV# 2’s home observations it was noted the organization had not ensured it provided the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) with the most recent plan of care. For example: review of RRHV# 1’s SNF Hospice binder revealed no documentation of RRHV# 1’s current plan of care. Review of RRHV# 2’s SNF Hospice binder revealed no documentation of the current plan of care. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Administrator/Branch Director.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(iii))

    The inspectors’ words, 100 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 2 home visits conducted at a Skilled Nursing Facility, During RRHV# 1 and RRHV# 2’s patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured it provided the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) with the physician recertification of the patient’s terminal illness. For example: review of RRHV# 1’s SNF Hospice binder revealed no documentation of the current physician recertification of RRHV# 1’s terminal illness. Review of RRHV# 2’s SNF Hospice binder revealed no documentation of the physician recertification of RRHV# 2’s terminal illness. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Administrator/Branch Director.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 22, 2024Initial inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies cited
Jun 12, 2024Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 23, 2015.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 67% at home, 22% in assisted living, 9% in a nursing facility, 2% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day15.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.2%
Visits near death97.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Creative Hospice Holdings LLC owns 100% directly since Jul 1, 2014.
  • 5 owners or officers are people: Jeffrey T Talbot (managing employee (under contract)); James M Douthitt (corporate officer); Georgette T Robbins (managing employee (on the payroll)); Michelle Bowden (managing employee (on the payroll)); William Dean Alverson (corporate officer).
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Lifecare Intermediate II LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 3, 2025
Lifecare Intermediate I LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 3, 2025
Lifecare Home Health Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 3, 2025
Lifecare Home Health Acquisition LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 3, 2025
Lifecare Home Health Intermediate Sub LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 3, 2025
Creative Hospice Care, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 27, 2006
Creative Hospice Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jul 1, 2014
Lifecare Home Health Partners LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies80.78%Dec 3, 2025
Zenyth Partners II-A LPOwns 5% or more through other companies50.12%Dec 3, 2025
Zenyth Partners II LPOwns 5% or more through other companies30.66%Dec 3, 2025
Z1967 LimitedOwns 5% or more through other companies13.32%Dec 3, 2025
Allstate Insurance CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies10.13%Dec 3, 2025
Zenyth Partners II Gp LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies9.94%Dec 3, 2025
Thrivent White Rose Fund Xv Fund of Funds, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies7.99%Dec 3, 2025
Alpinvest CAPM Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies7.99%Dec 3, 2025
The UCLA FoundationOwns 5% or more through other companies6.66%Dec 3, 2025

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 91% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 73.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 16 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 30512, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.