Hearth Record

Tapestry Hospice of Northwest Georgia, LLC

A hospice in Calhoun, Georgia 30701

189 Professional Court SE Ste 300, Calhoun, Georgia 30701. (706) 383-8812.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 27 hospices serving ZIP code 30701 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on May 5, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 22, 2024: recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies
  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1)(i)-(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 136 words

    “Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the hospice failed to ensure that the interdisciplinary group included physician attendance for eight of 15 sampled Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) meetings. Findings include: Review of documents in the binder titled, “;IDG Meetings”, revealed IDG minutes with attached attendance sign-in sheets. A review of documents titled “;IDG MEETING AGENDA/ ATTENDANCE” for dates of September 6, 2023, through March 20, 2024, revealed sign-in sheets failed to reveal physician signatures for IDG meetings dated 9/6/2023, 10/18/2023, 11/1/2023, 11/29/2023, 12/13/2023, 2/7/2024, 3/6/2024, and 3/20/2024. On 5/22/2024 at 10:00 a.m., an interview with the Director of Clinical Services (DCS) revealed all IDG meeting attendees are to sign the attendance sheet during the meeting. The DCS agreed the records lacked physician signatures but stated a physician is always present for IDG meetings.”

    Rule L0541. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 491 words

    “Based on record reviews, staff interview, and review of policy titled “;Physician Orders,” it was determined the agency failed to develop a plan of care that included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions for one patient (P) (P#8) of 19 sampled patients. The findings include: Review of policy titled, “;Physician Orders”, Policy #704, dated October 2012 reveals the following: Policy “;Only a physician or nurse practitioner in accordance with the plan of care and State law, may provide orders for the patient.” Procedure 5. “;A copy of the physicians order is kept in the clinical record.” Record review reveals P#8 was admitted to hospice on 9/7/23. Review of the plan of care dated 3/5/24 – 5/3/24 revealed pressure ulcers to the right and left buttocks (unstaged) and unspecified part of spine, stage 3 wound (full thickness tissue loss but bone and tendons not visible). Review of the clinical record for P#8 reveals home visits by a Registered Nurse (RN) on dates of 4/8/24 and 4/17/24. RN noted performing the following wound care to pressure ulcer upper spine: cleansed with wound cleanser, applied Medi honey (wound and burn gel made from 100% Leptospermum (Manuka) honey that has antibacterial and bacterial resistant properties) to areas of eschar (piece of dead tissue that is cast off from the surface of the skin) and applied calcium alginate (biodegradable dressing made from seaweed that absorbs exudate and forms a gel) to wound bed and covered with optifoam (foam dressing with a silicone border, waterproof backing and high absorbency). Review of Skilled Visit dated 4/18/2024 revealed RN documentation of the following: “;I performed wound care as ordered.” Review of Skilled Visit dated 4/23/2024 revealed RN documentation of the following: “;Wound care performed as ordered.” The RN failed to document supplies used or steps used to complete wound care during the visits on 4/18/2024 and 4/23/2024. Review of a physician’s order for wound care is dated 5/21/24 (one month after wound care was provided). A review of the clinical record failed to reveal physician orders regarding wound care interventions or goals prior to the start the certification period dated 3/5/24 – 5/3/24. Additional review of plan of care dated 3/5/24 – 5/3/24 revealed P#8 has an indwelling suprapubic catheter (a thin flexible rubber tube used to help drain urine from your bladder through a small incision in your abdomen). Further review of the clinical record failed to reveal a physician order for suprapubic catheter insertion or care, maintenance of the catheter, and failure to reveal insertion date for the catheter. Interview with the Regional Director of Clinical Services on 5/22/2024 at 10:00 a.m. confirmed P#8 lacked a physician order for management of the pressure wounds before 5/21/2024 or any documentation of discussions with the physician regarding wound care. Regional Director of Clinical Services acknowledged that the plan of care lacked physicians orders for the Foley catheter care and maintenance.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 461 words

    “Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined the hospice governing body failed to ensure the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) developed a plan of care to include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness for one patient (P) (P#8) of 19 sampled patients and to ensure physician attendance at IDG meetings for eight of 15 sampled IDG meetings. Findings include: Record review reveals P#8 was admitted to hospice on 9/7/23. The plan of care dated 3/5/24 – 5/3/24 revealed pressure ulcers to the right and left buttocks (unstaged) and unspecified part of spine, stage 3 wound (full thickness tissue loss but bone and tendons not visible). Review of the clinical record for P#8 reveals visits by a Registered Nurse (RN) on dates of 4/8/24 and 4/17/24, noting the pressure ulcer to the upper spine and wound care consisting of cleansed with wound cleanser, applied Medi honey to areas of eschar and applied calcium alginate to wound bed and covered with optifoam. The RN visited P#8 on 4/18/24 and 4/23/24 and documented wound care was provided as ordered. The RN failed to document supplies used or steps used to complete wound care. Review of a physician’s order for wound care is dated 5/21/24 (one month after wound care was provided). A review of the clinical record reveals no physician orders regarding wound care interventions or goals prior to the start the certification period dated 3/5/24 – 5/3/24. Additional review of plan of care dated 3/5/24 – 5/3/24 revealed P#8 has an indwelling suprapubic catheter (a thin flexible rubber tube used to help drain urine from your bladder through a small incision in your abdomen). Further review of the clinical record failed to reveal a physician order for suprapubic catheter insertion or care and maintenance of the catheter. Review of documents in a binder titled, “;IDG Meetings”, revealed IDG meeting minutes with attached attendance sign-in sheets. A review of documents titled “;IDG MEETING AGENDA/ ATTENDANCE” for dates of September 6, 2023, through March 20, 2024, revealed sign-in sheets lacked physician signatures for IDG meetings dated 9/6/2023, 10/18/2023, 11/1/2023, 11/29/2023, 12/13/2023, 2/7/2024, 3/6/2024, and 3/20/2024. On 5/22/2024 at 10:00 a.m., an interview with the Director of Clinical Services (DCS) revealed all IDG meeting attendees are to sign the attendance sheet during the meeting. The DCS agreed the records lacked physician signatures but stated a physician is always present for IDG meetings. Interview with the Regional Director of Clinical Services on 5/22/2024 at 10:00 a.m. confirmed P#8 lacked a physician order for management of the pressure wounds before 5/21/2024 or any documentation of discussions with the physician regarding wound care. Regional Director of Clinical Services acknowledged that the plan of care lacked physicians orders for catheter care and maintenance.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 5, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
May 22, 2024Recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 25, 2012.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 54% at home, 36% in assisted living, 8% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.8%
Visits near death96.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 10 owners or officers are people: David G Lovell (owns 5% or more directly, 40%); David G Lovell (corporate officer, 40%); David G Lovell (corporate director, 40%); David G Lovell (managing employee (on the payroll), 40%); Ben Harbour (owns 5% or more directly, 40%); Andrew Nall (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Andrew Nall (corporate officer, 20%); Andrew Nall (corporate director, 20%); Andrew Nall (managing employee (on the payroll), 20%); Andrew Nall (runs it (operational or managerial control), 20%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.07% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 73% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 27 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 30701, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 3.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.