Hearth Record

Bristol Home Care and Hospice Agency, Inc.

A hospice in Bristol, Connecticut 06010

32 Valley Street, Ste D, Bristol, Connecticut 06010. (860) 585-4752.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 16 hospices serving ZIP code 06010 had 2.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 3, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 3, 2026: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 492 words

    “Based on clinical record reviews, agency documentation and staff interviews, for three of six patients (Patient’s #3, 7 and 11) receiving volunteer services, the Registered Nurse/RN Coordinator failed to ensure all hospice disciplines contributed to the patient’s comprehensive and ongoing assessments and care planning process. The findings include: Patient #3 elected the Hospice benefit on 4/07/26 and resided at home. Patient #3’s diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease with failure, acute and chronic respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 7/06/26 to 10/03/26 included nursing, hospice aide, social worker and chaplain services.Review of the clinical record identified volunteer visits weekly on 7/08/26, 7/15/26, 7/22/26, 7/29/26, 8/05/26, 8/11/26, 8/19/26 and 8/26/26 for respite, socialization/companionship, active listening, prayer and provided music.Review of the Inter-Disciplinary Group/IDG notes dated 7/08/26, 7/22/26, 8/05/26 and 8/19/26 identified that the volunteer coordinator participated in the IDG, documented a volunteer was in place but did not document the patient’s progress and response to care. Patient #7 elected the Hospice benefit on 2/27/26 and resided at home. Patient #7’s diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, dementia and type II diabetes mellitus. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 6/24/26 to 8/25/26 included nursing, hospice aide, social worker and chaplain services.Review of the clinical record identified volunteer visits weekly on 7/02/26, 7/07/26, 7/14/26, 7/21/26, 7/26/26, 7/27/26, 7/28/26, 7/29/26, 7/30/26, 8/04/26, 8/12/26, 8/18/26 and 8/25/26 for respite, socialization/companionship, active listening, prayer and provided music.Review of the IDG notes dated 7/08/26, 7/22/26, 8/05/26 and 8/19/26 identified that the volunteer coordinator participated in the IDG, documented a volunteer was in place but did not document the patient’s progress and response to care. Interview and review of Patient’s #3 and 7’s IDG notes with the Interim Hospice Program Director on 9/01/26 at 2:30 PM indicated that the volunteer coordinator verbally discusses each patient’s volunteer roles but should have documented specific volunteer services provided during the IDG meetings and failed to ensure such documentation occurred. Patient #11 elected the Hospice benefit on 11/12/25 and resided in a skilled nursing facility. Patient #11’s diagnoses included hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and chronic kidney disease, chronic diastolic heart failure, and vascular dementia. The physician’s orders for the certification period from 7/10/26 through 9/7/26 included nursing, hospice aide, social worker, and chaplain services.Review of the clinical record identified volunteer visits on 7/14/26, 7/24/26, and 8/13/26 for socialization/companionship and active listening.Review of the IDG notes dated 7/15/26, 7/29/26, 8/12/26, and 8/26/26 identified that although the volunteer coordinator participated in the IDG and documented that volunteer services were in place, there was no documentation to reflect the patient’s progress and response to care.Interview and review of Patient’s #11’s IDG notes with the Interim Hospice Program Director on 9/02/26 at 10: 50 AM indicated that the volunteer coordinator verbally discussed each patient’s volunteer roles but should have documented specific volunteer services provided during the IDG meetings and failed to ensure such documentation occurred.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 528 words

    “Based on clinical record and agency documentation reviews and staff interview, for six of six patients (Patient’s #2, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 11) receiving volunteer services, the hospice agency failed to develop an individualized plan of care to include the provision of volunteer services. The findings include: Patient #5 elected the Hospice benefit on 8/6/26 at home. Patient #5’s diagnoses included heart failure and chronic kidney disease. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 8/6/26 to 11/3/26 included nursing, social services and hospice aide. Review of the clinical record identified volunteer visits May 22 and June 29,2026.Patient #2 elected the Hospice benefit 5/28/26 and resided at a skilled nursing facility. Patient #2’s diagnoses included Alzheimer’s disease, epilepsy and abnormalities of gait and mobility. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 5/28/26 through 8/26/26 included nursing, social services, and hospice aide. Review of the clinical record identified volunteer visits 6/3/26, 6/9/26, 6/24/26,and 6/30/26.Patient #10 elected the Hospice benefit 5/26/26. Patient #10 diagnoses included pulmonary fibrosis, COPD, and chronic kidney disease. The physician’s orders for the certification period 5/26/26 through 7/20/26 included nursing, social services and spiritual counseling. Review of the clinical record identified volunteer visits 6/27/26 and 6/30/26. Patient #11 elected the Hospice benefit on 11/12/25 and resided in a skilled nursing facility. Patient #11’s diagnoses included hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and chronic kidney disease, chronic diastolic heart failure, and vascular dementia. The physician’s orders for the certification period from 7/10/26 through 9/7/26 included nursing, hospice aide, social worker, and chaplain services.Review of the clinical record identified volunteer visits on 7/14/26, 7/24/26, and 8/13/26 for socialization/companionship and active listening.Interview and review of Patient #11’s physician’s orders with the Interim Hospice Program Director on 9/2/26 at 10:45 AM indicated that volunteer services with the frequency of services provided should have been included in the plan of care and failed to ensure volunteer services were included. Patient #3 elected the Hospice benefit on 4/07/26 and resided at home. Patient #3’s diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease with failure, acute and chronic respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 7/06/26 to 10/03/26 included nursing, hospice aide, social worker and chaplain services.Review of the clinical record identified volunteer visits weekly on 7/08/26, 7/15/26, 7/22/26, 7/29/26, 8/05/26, 8/11/26, 8/19/26 and 8/26/26 for respite, socialization/companionship, active listening, prayer and provided music. Patient #7 elected the Hospice benefit on 2/27/26 and resided at home. Patient #7’s diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, dementia and type II diabetes mellitus. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 6/24/26 to 8/25/26 included nursing, hospice aide, social worker and chaplain services.Review of the clinical record identified volunteer visits weekly on 7/02/26, 7/07/26, 7/14/26, 7/21/26, 7/26/26, 7/27/26, 7/28/26, 7/29/26, 7/30/26, 8/04/26, 8/12/26, 8/18/26 and 8/25/26 for respite, socialization/companionship, active listening, prayer and provided music. Interview and review of Patient’s #2, 3, 5, 7, and 10’s physician’s orders with the Interim Hospice Program Director on 9/01/26 at 2:40 PM indicated that volunteer services with the frequency of services to be provided should have been included in the plan of care and failed to ensure volunteer services were included.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 3, 2026Recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited
Aug 14, 2024Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 19, 1994.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 68% at home, 1% in assisted living, 29% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital, 1% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.4%
Visits near death92.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 10 owners or officers are people: Kurt A Barwis (corporate officer, 100%); Chris Ann Meaney (corporate director, 0%); Jenny Cinquemani (corporate director, 0%); Jenny Cinquemani (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Jenny Cinquemani (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Margarita Reyes (managing employee (under contract)); Margarita Reyes (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Timothy Ajayi (corporate director, 0%); Christine Laprise (corporate director, 0%); Louis Auletta (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.41% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 51.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 16 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 06010, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 2.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.