Hearth Record

Vitas Healthcare Corporation Atlantic

A hospice in Middlebury, Connecticut 06762

199 Park Rd Extension, Middlebury, Connecticut 06762. (203) 437-3111.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 8 hospices serving ZIP code 06762 had 2.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 15, 2024: an initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 15, 2024: initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner2 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 248 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. Agency policy “Standard- Obtaining Orders” (no date) stated in part, “E3 Ordering: All initial and refill medication dispense orders may only be ordered via the E3 app (application).” In 1 of 30 (3%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the patient’s medication (drug) profile contained all prescribed medications. Clinical Record 18: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/11/2024 with a diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure. The initial plan of care dated 06/11/2024 ordered continuous oxygen at 4 liters via nasal cannula. On 07/25/2024, the oxygen order increased to 5 liters continuously via nasal cannula. The drug profile, effective from 06/11/2024 to the present, did not include the prescribed oxygen. During an interview on 08/15/2024, the Patient Care Administrator stated that the patient’s drug profile was created by entering the medication into the E3 app and confirmed that oxygen should be included as a prescription medication. The PCA stated that the E3 system was used to enter all prescription and over-the-counter medications into the hospice pharmacy system to create the comprehensive medication (drug) profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 446 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care: reflects patient and family goals; [and] identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 30 (3%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the patient’s plan of care included planned interventions based on the problems identified in the comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 6: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/21/2021 with a diagnosis of heart failure. The patient resided in an assisted living facility (ALF). The following RN notes were documented on the agency form “Plan of Care Review for Recertification” used for updates: on 05/29/2024, the RN documented “increased weakness, wheelchair dependent, fall 05/24/2024;” on 06/05/2024, “recent fall, missed chair;” on 06/19/2024, “recent falls (3 in 1 month). Education ongoing;” on 07/03/2024, “increased weakness, recent falls;” on 07/17/2024, “Stand and pivot. No ambulation. Hunched posture;” and on 07/31/2024, “Weak, stooped posture with bowed legs. Holds furniture to stand and pivot.” The RN focus visit dated 08/06/2024 documented, “follow-up related to report of fall… Per staff patient was attempting to stand and pivot independently and slid to floor onto buttocks...staff educated and recommendation to keep patient’s walker in a different part of room to reduce likelihood of attempt to get up independently.” The patient’s plan of care, initiated on 05/22/2024, documented the outcome and interventions “maintain safety” and “assess level of function…educate patient on body positioning and DME (durable medical equipment) use to prevent falls.” A clinical record review revealed no updated plan of care interventions and safety measures since 05/22/2024 to address the patient’s increased number and frequency of falls and promote patient safety. During an interview and a joint review of the plan of care, plan of care updates, and nursing visit documentation on 08/15/2024, the Patient Care Administrator (PCA) confirmed that the specific interventions and education provided to the patient and facility staff were not listed on the plan of care. The PCA and the General Manager confirmed that with the patient continuing to experience falls, the plan of care updates should have included additional interventions to promote patient safety. The PCA also reported that a call was placed to the patient’s RN case manager, who stated, “The facility won’t allow bed alarms or fall mats, but the patient does wear a neck pendant to call for help.” The PCA reported they were unsure why the plan of care did not provide the specific interventions but was sending the RN out today to visit the patient to identify all fall/safety-related interventions and update the plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 15, 2024Initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 29, 2005.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 19 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 56% at home, 20% in assisted living, 21% in a nursing facility, 2% in a hospital, 1% in an inpatient hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day19.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends11.2%
Visits near death97.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Vitas Hospice Services, LLC owns 100% directly since Apr 27, 2001.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Kevin Mcnamara (corporate director, 33.3%); Laura Lusebrink (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Joel Wherley (corporate officer, 0%); Joel Wherley (corporate director, 0%); Alexander Fernandez (corporate officer, 0%); Michael Witzeman (corporate officer, 0%); Kuang-Wen Tsao (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Brian Judkins (corporate officer, 0%); Brian Judkins (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Chemed CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 27, 2001
Comfort CARE Holdings CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 27, 2001
Vitas Hospice Services, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Apr 27, 2001
Vitas Healthcare CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 27, 2001

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 74% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 76% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 94.84% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 58.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 52 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 8 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 06762, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 2.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.