Trinity Health of New England at Home
A hospice in Hartford, Connecticut 06112
659 Tower Ave, Fl 2, Hartford, Connecticut 06112. (860) 763-7600.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 3of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 9 hospices serving ZIP code 06112 had 3.
The last inspection on record was on Oct 16, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jul 23, 2025: complaint inspection by the state2 deficiencies
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 906 words
“Based on clinical record review, review of agency policies and interviews with hospice personnel, for one of one patient (Patient #1) who received hospice services, the hospice agency failed to ensure effective symptom control for a condition related to the terminal illness. The finding includes: Patient #1 elected the hospice benefits on 05/13/2024 with diagnoses of left kidney cancer with metastases to the lungs, protein calorie malnutrition and sepsis. The physician’s orders dated 05/13/2024 included nursing services weekly for assessments, social work services and chaplain services. Patient #1 had been residing in a skilled nursing facility but requested to return home for the management of the terminal illness. Review of Patient #1’s coordination note report dated 05/10/2024, identified the social worker from the skilled nursing facility requested the hospice agency contact the Patient’s responsible party to discuss hospice care and determine if the Patient would remain at the skilled nursing facility or be discharged to home. Review of Patient #1’s coordination note report dated 05/11/2024, identified the hospice agency spoke with the Patient’s responsible caregiver to provide additional hospice information and philosophy. The hospice agency ordered the Patient’s durable medical equipment which would be delivered to the Patient’s home on 05/13/2024. Review of Patient #1’s coordination note report dated 05/13/2024, identified the social worker from the skilled nursing facility reported the skilled nursing facility would attempt to discharge the patient home on 05/13/2024. Review of Supervisor of Clinical Services (SCS) #1’s nursing admission note dated 05/13/2024 at 3:42 PM, identified the Patient was discharged to home on 05/13/2024 from a skilled nursing facility. The Patient was received lying in a hospital bed in the living room. The Patient presented with facial grimacing with repositioning, brief episodes of hyperventilation and intermittent moaning. Patient #1 was on two (2) liters of oxygen via nasal cannula continuously for comfort. SCS #1 ordered Morphine and Lorazepam from a local pharmacy for the Patient’s responsible caregiver to obtain, and ordered the Patient’s hospice Comfort Pak (a pre-packaged set of medications provided to the patient to manage common end of life symptoms) to be delivered to the home. Physician’s orders for the hospice Comfort Pak directed to administer Haloperidol Lactate 2 mg/milliliter (ml) oral concentrate 0.5 ml every six (6) hours as needed for severe agitation, Hyoscyamine 0.125 mg sublingual tablet every four (4) hours as needed for increased secretions, Lorazepam 0.5 mg one (1) tablet every three (3) hours as needed for mild anxiety, Lorazepam 0.5 mg two (2) tablets every three (3) hours as needed for moderate anxiety, Lorazepam 0.5 mg four (4) tablets every three (3) hours as needed for severe anxiety, Morphine Concentrate 20 mg/ml 0.25 ml every three (3) hours by mouth as needed for mild pain or shortness of breath, Morphine Concentrate 20 mg/ml 0.5 ml every three (3) hours by mouth as needed for moderate pain or shortness of breath, Morphine Concentrate 20 mg/ml 1 ml every three (3) hours by mouth as needed for severe pain or shortness of breath, Prochlorperazine maleate 10 mg one (1) tablet every four (4) hours as needed for nausea or vomiting and Oxygen two (2) liters as needed for comfort. Review of RN #1’s nursing note dated 05/14/2024 at 12:52 PM identified Patient #1 was lying in a hospital bed on his/her left side with two (2) liters of oxygen via nasal cannula in place. Patient #1 was unresponsive to verbal or tactile stimuli, respirations were deep, and swallow and he/she received Morphine and Lorazepam every three (3) hours with effectiveness. Review of Patient #1’s coordination note report dated 05/14/2024 at 6:45 PM by the hospice’s on-call RN #2, identified the Patient had terminal secretions (the accumulation of saliva and mucus in the upper airway of a patient nearing the end of life which is treated with positioning, mouth swabs and medication) but had no medication in the home to treat the secretions and a nursing visit was planned for the morning. Review of Patient #1’s coordination note report dated 05/14/2024, identified the Patient had expired and a nursing visit was scheduled. Review of Patient #1’s nursing note dated 05/14/2024 at 9:15 PM, identified the Patient #1 was pronounced at 9:15 PM by the nurse, the Morphine and Lorazepam was discarded and emotional support was provided. Interview with the Administrator and SCS #1 on 07/23/2025 at 11:30 AM, failed to identify on-call RN #2 followed the Agency Service Hours and After-Hours Process policy, as on-call RN #2 identified the Patient had not received the hospice Comfort Pak medication to treat the Patient’s terminal secretions, but failed to provide additional interventions such as contacting the primary physician for an additional order, or the scheduling of an on-call hospice clinician to perform an after-hours visit for the management of the terminal illness end of life symptoms. Review of the Agency Service Hours and After-Hours Process policy, identified the hospice after-hour visits may be unscheduled, initiated through the after-hours system, or scheduled to accommodate a particular patient’s need or request. During a patient call to the answering service/ Virtual Care Center RN, the RN would medically triage the patient call and recommend clinical interventions based on the hospice plan of care or contact the primary physician for additional orders or schedule on-call hospice clinicians to perform an after hours visit. The hospice staff would offer a home visit when the patient’s pain or other symptoms are not controlled and require intervention.”
-
Professional management (42 CFR 418.112(b))
The inspectors’ words, 901 words
“Based on clinical record review, review of agency policies and interview with hospice personnel for one of one patient (Patient #1) the hospice agency failed to maintain professional management of the hospice care. The findings include: Patient #1 elected the hospice benefits on 05/13/2024 with diagnoses of left kidney cancer with metastases to the lungs, protein calorie malnutrition and sepsis. The physician’s orders dated 05/13/2024 included nursing services weekly for assessments, social work services and chaplain services. Patient #1 had been residing in a skilled nursing facility but requested to return home for the management of the terminal illness. Review of Patient #1’s coordination note report dated 05/10/2024, identified the social worker from the skilled nursing facility requested the hospice agency contact the Patient’s responsible party to discuss hospice care and determine if the Patient would remain at the skilled nursing facility or be discharged to home. Review of Patient #1’s coordination note report dated 05/11/2024, identified the hospice agency spoke with the Patient’s responsible caregiver to provide additional hospice information and philosophy. The hospice agency ordered the Patient’s durable medical equipment which would be delivered to the Patient’s home on 05/13/2024. Review of Patient #1’s coordination note report dated 05/13/2024, identified the social worker from the skilled nursing facility reported the skilled nursing facility would attempt to discharge the patient home on 05/13/2024. Review of Supervisor of Clinical Services (SCS) #1’s nursing admission note dated 05/13/2024 at 3:42 PM, identified the Patient was discharged to home on 05/13/2024 from a skilled nursing facility. The Patient was received lying in a hospital bed in the living room. The Patient presented with facial grimacing with repositioning, brief episodes of hyperventilation and intermittent moaning. Patient #1 was on two (2) liters of oxygen via nasal cannula continuously for comfort. SCS #1 ordered Morphine and Lorazepam from a local pharmacy for the Patient’s responsible caregiver to obtain and ordered the Patient’s hospice Comfort Pak (a pre-packaged set of medications provided to the patient to manage common end of life symptoms) to be delivered to the home. Physician’s orders for the hospice Comfort Pak directed to administer Haloperidol Lactate 2 mg/milliliter (ml) oral concentrate 0.5 ml every six (6) hours as needed for severe agitation, Hyoscyamine 0.125 mg sublingual tablet every four (4) hours as needed for increased secretions, Lorazepam 0.5 mg one (1) tablet every three (3) hours as needed for mild anxiety, Lorazepam 0.5 mg two (2) tablets every three (3) hours as needed for moderate anxiety, Lorazepam 0.5 mg four (4) tablets every three (3) hours as needed for severe anxiety, Morphine Concentrate 20 mg/ml 0.25 ml every three (3) hours by mouth as needed for mild pain or shortness of breath, Morphine Concentrate 20 mg/ml 0.5 ml every three (3) hours by mouth as needed for moderate pain or shortness of breath, Morphine Concentrate 20 mg/ml 1 ml every three (3) hours by mouth as needed for severe pain or shortness of breath, Prochlorperazine maleate 10 mg one (1) tablet every four (4) hours as needed for nausea or vomiting and Oxygen two (2) liters as needed for comfort. Review of RN #1’s nursing note dated 05/14/2024 at 12:52 PM identified Patient #1 was lying in a hospital bed on his/her left side with two (2) liters of oxygen via nasal cannula in place. Patient #1 was unresponsive to verbal or tactile stimuli, respirations were deep, and swallow and he/she received Morphine and Lorazepam every three (3) hours with effectiveness. Review of Patient #1’s coordination note report dated 05/14/2024 at 6:45 PM by the hospice’s on-call RN #2, identified the Patient had terminal secretions (the accumulation of saliva and mucus in the upper airway of a patient nearing the end of life which is treated with positioning, mouth swabs and medication) but had no medication in the home to treat the secretions and a nursing visit was planned for the morning. Review of Patient #1’s coordination note report dated 05/14/2024, identified the Patient had expired and a nursing visit was scheduled. Review of Patient #1’s nursing note dated 05/14/2024 at 9:15 PM, identified the Patient #1 was pronounced at 9:15 PM by the nurse, the Morphine and Lorazepam was discarded and emotional support was provided to the caregivers. Interview with the Administrator and SCS #1 on 07/23/2025 at 11:30 AM, failed to identify the on-call RN #2 followed the Agency Service Hours and After-Hours Process policy, as on-call RN #2 identified the Patient had not received the hospice Comfort Pak medication to treat the Patient’s terminal secretions, but failed to provide additional interventions such as contacting the primary physician for an additional order or schedule an on-call hospice clinician to perform an after-hours visit for the management of the end of life symptoms of the terminal illness. Review of the Agency Service Hours and After-Hours Process policy, identified the hospice after-hour visits may be unscheduled, initiated through the after-hours system, or scheduled to accommodate a particular patient’s need or request. During a patient call to the answering service/ Virtual Care Center RN, the RN would medically triage the patient call and recommend clinical interventions based on the hospice plan of care or contact the primary physician for additional orders or schedule on-call hospice clinicians to perform an after hours visit. The hospice staff would offer a home visit when the patient’s pain or other symptoms are not controlled and require intervention.”
Aug 15, 2024: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
-
Federal, state, local laws & regulations (42 CFR 418.116)
The inspectors’ words, 843 words
“Based on clinical record review, review of agency policies and interview with agency personnel for one of three patients (Patient #1) reviewed for premature discharge, the hospice agency failed to follow agency policies and the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies. The finding includes. Patient #1 elected the Hospice benefits on 4/16/24. The patients diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure and dementia without behaviors. The physician’s orders dated 4/16/24 included nursing services two times a week for assessments, hospice aide services and social work services. Physicians orders included Morphine 5 milligrams/0.25 milliliters (mg/ml) orally twice daily and every three hours as needed for pain. On 6/02/24 at 11:35 AM, RN #1 (weekend on-call nurse) conducted an as needed visit for constipation per request of the next of kin. Registered Nurse/RN #1 spoke with the next of kin #1 prior to the visit, who was unsure of the last bowel movement, requested assistance with a transfer back to bed and indicated that despite administering Morphine 0.25 ml one half hour prior to calling the RN, the patient was in pain. RN #1 instructed the next of kin #1 to administer an additional dose of Morphine 0.25 ml prior to the visit. Upon the nurses arrival, the patient was sitting comfortably on the couch with next of kin #1 and #2 present. The patient was conversive, denied pain and made eye contact with the nurse. Prior to transfer, the nurse asked for permission from the patient to transfer him/her back to bed with the assistance of next of kin #2 and the patient indicated to RN #1 that “;s/he would fight the nurse”. RN #1 asked for clarification of what was said, the patient stated, “;that is what s/he does”. RN #1 explained to the patient that s/he was slipping off the couch and wanted him/her to be safe and comfortable. The patient then indicated that “;s/he would not fight” the nurse. Once the patient was transferred back to bed, RN #1 and next of kin #2 grasped the pad underneath the patient and boosted the patient up in bed, at which time, the patient swung his/her right hand and hit the nurse on the right side of the face and scratched the nurse. The nurse responded by requesting the patient not to hit him/her again and asked permission to assess the patients abdomen. Upon auscultation of the abdomen, the patient began to bend and tense his/her arm, at which time, the nurses stopped the exam and explained to the family that s/he was uncomfortable continuing with the exam. The next of kin #1 then held the patients hand and encouraged the nurse to continue with the exam. The family reported that the case manager, RN #2, also had been hit by the patient. Education provided to the family concerning the need for frequent perineal care, use of medications to prevent constipation and comfort medications to utilize. Upon exiting the home, the nurse called the weekend supervisor (RN #3) to inform him/her of being slapped during the visit. Review of RN #3s Client Coordination Note dated 6/02/24 at 6:16 PM, identified calling next of kin #3 to discuss the patient slapping RN #1 and #2 and the concern with the lack of intervention by the family. RN #3 indicated that patient and staff safety are a priority and given the severity of the incident, the agency must take appropriate measures including discharging the patient. Interview and review of the clinical record and RN #1s nursing note dated 6/02/24 with the Administrator and Hospice Program Director on 8/15/24 at 1:40 PM, indicated that upon further investigation of the patients behavior, including a hospice aide kicked in the abdomen on 5/31/24, but never reported it, and two incidents of the patient slapping the nurses, the decision was made to emergently discharge the patient, but failed to identify that the Risk Manager was contacted, a two-day notice was given and/or a termination letter informing the patient/representative of the reasons for termination of services with the names, addresses and phone numbers of other agencies which may be able to provide services, was completed according to agency discharge policies. Review of agency discharge policy directed, if hospice services can no longer be provided due to behavior issues, the hospice agency will make a serious effort to resolve the problem presented by the patients behavior or situation such as attempting to contract with the patient/family, the Risk Manager will be contacted when the hospice determines discharging the patient is necessary, will obtain a signed physicians order authorizing the discharge from the medical director, give adequate notice to the patient/representative and physician before terminating services to allow the patient to arrange for needed alternative care, and notify the patient of the impending discharge at least two (2) days in advance of the discharge date. For all patients, sends or delivers a termination letter informing the patient/representative of the reasons for termination of services and provides the names, addresses and phone numbers of other agencies which may be able to provide services.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2025 | Recertification inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Jul 23, 2025 | Complaint inspection by the state | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Aug 15, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | 1 deficiency cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 19, 1994.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 13.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.4% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 49% at home, 15% in assisted living, 13% in a nursing facility, 22% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 13.3 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 13.1% |
| Visits near death | 94.4% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Trinity Home Health Services owns 100% directly since Oct 1, 2017.
- 17 owners or officers are people: Ray Anderson (corporate director); Marcus A Bowens (corporate officer); Corinne Francis (corporate director); Benjamin E Petersen (corporate officer); Daniel Roth (corporate director); Julianne Artman (managing employee (on the payroll)); Joshua Moore (corporate director); Donald Mathews (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Daniel Drake (corporate officer); Daniel Drake (corporate director); Daniel Drake (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Robert F Casalou (corporate officer); Robert F Casalou (corporate director); Melinda Jarjura (managing employee (on the payroll)); Daniel Isacksen (corporate director); Christine Seppala (corporate officer); Russ Granich (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Home Health Services | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Oct 1, 2017 |
| Trinity Health Corporation | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Oct 1, 2017 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 76% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 75% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 98.26% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 71.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 9 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 06112, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 3.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Trinity Health of New England at Home This hospice | 3 |
| Hartford Healthcare at Home | 0 |
| Masonicare Home Health and Hospice Inc. | 10 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corporation Atlantic | 2 |
| Compassus - Greater Connecticut | 0 |
| Beacon Hospice, An Amedisys Company | 9 |
| Accentcare Hospice & Palliative Care of Conecticut | 0 |
| Constellation Home Care | 14 |
| Athena Home Health & Hospice | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.