Hearth Record

Alive Hospice Care, Inc.

A hospice in Burbank, California 91506

712 S Main St Suite A, Burbank, California 91506. (818) 293-8808.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 95 hospices serving ZIP code 91506 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 11, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 11, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care7 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 219 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1, #2, #5, #7, #9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1: The medication list said “Oxygen 2-4 L inhalation as needed for shortness of breath which was is not an appropriate mode of delivery. Calmoseptine was in a treatment order but was missing from the med list. Upon review of the medication list the Lidocaine 4%/menthol 1% 1 unit topical every 12 hours prn pain was missing an application location. Lidocaine was corrected on site. Patient #2: There were treatment orders for Calmoseptine, Fleets Enema, Dulcolax Suppository and oxygen but the medications were not on the medication list. Patient #5: There was a treatment order for Calmoseptine but the medication was not on the medication list. Corrected onsite. Patient #7: There was a treatment order for oxygen but oxygen was not on the medication list. Patient #9: There was a treatment order for oxygen but the oxygen was not on the medication list.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 151 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #3, #9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #3: RN initial assessment the Braden score indicated the patient was a high risk for skin issues however, there was no evidence of a skin integrity problem with goals and interventions on the care plan. Corrected on site. Patient #9: RN initial assessment the Braden score indicted the patient was a high risk for skin issues however, there was no evidence of a skin integrity problem with goals and interventions on the care plan.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 222 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient #1: There was evidence that the Spiritual Care Coordinator and the Social Worker have visit frequency of “initial and then 1 visit per month as needed.” Corrected onsite. Patient #2: There was evidence that the Social Worker have visit frequency of “initial and may do 1 visit per month as needed” and the Spiritual Care Coordinator had a visit frequency of “initial and then 1-2 visits/week prn.” Corrected onsite. Patient #3, #4, #5, #6, #7: There is evidence that the Social Worker have visit frequency of “initial and may do 1 visit per month as needed” and the Spiritual Care Coordinator had a visit frequency of “initial and then 1-2 visits prn.” Corrected onsite for #3, #4 and #5.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 137 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1, 2, 3) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: There is an order for “Oxygen 2-4 L inhalation as needed for shortness of breath which is not a correct mode of oxygen delivery. The Lidocaine 4%/menthol 1% 1 unit topical every 12 hours PRN pain is missing an application location. Lidocaine order was corrected on site. Patient #2: There was a treatment orders for Calmoseptine, Fleets enema, Dulcolax Suppository and oxygen PRN but they are not complete as they are missing the dose and the frequency. Patient #3: There is an order for Calmoseptine PRN missing the application location, frequency and indication. Corrected onsite.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 168 words

    “Upon client record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #5, #6, #8 and #9) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #5: The visit frequency for the aide was indicated as 2x/week. There is no evidence that the aide made any visits to the patient. Patient #6: The visit frequency for the aide was indicated as 2x/week. There is no evidence that the aide made 2 visits the week of 6/16/25 or any visits the week of 6/23/25. There is no documentation to support why the visits were not made. Patient #8: The visit frequency for both the MSW and the SC is for 1 recert visit. There is no evidence of an order for the MSW visits made on 5/1/25 and 5/29/25 and for the SC visit made on 5/6/25. Patient #9: The visit frequency for the aide was 2x/week. The documentation revealed only one visit the weeks of 3/31/25 and 4/7/25.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 161 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable. Patient #1: The patient is on Eliquis and there is no bleeding precautions included on the aide care plan. There is documentation the patient is bedbound but the aide care plan says to provide a shower.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 155 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #1: Upon review of the record the aide care plan said to give the patient a shower but in 15 of 15 visits the aide documented that a bed bath was completed Upon review of the aide visit documentation in 14 of 15 visits it said a shampoo was completed but the care plan doesn’t say to provide a shampoo. The 8/5/2025 visit documentation said the aide emptied the foley bag but task is not on the care plan. There was no documentation of a call to an RN to support the change of care provided.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 11, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 1, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 95 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91506, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.