Hearth Record

A and S Hospice Palliative Care, Inc.

A hospice in Burbank, California 91506

1425 W Burbank Blvd., Suite J, Burbank, California 91506.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

15 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 95 hospices serving ZIP code 91506 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 15, 2025: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

15 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 23, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care15 deficiencies
  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of participation: Interdisciplinary group, care planning, and coordination of services. The hospice must designate an interdisciplinary group or groups as specified in paragraph (a) of this section which, in consultation with the patient’s attending physician, must prepare a written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must specify the hospice care and services necessary to meet the patient and familyspecific needs identified in the comprehensive assessment as such needs relate to the terminal illness and related conditions.”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Hospice aide and homemaker services (42 CFR 418.76)

    “Condition of participation: Hospice aide and homemaker services. All hospice aide services must be provided by individuals who meet the personnel requirements specified in paragraph (a) of this section. Homemaker services must be provided by individuals who meet the personnel requirements specified in paragraph (j) of this section.”

    Rule L0607. Condition-level.

  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence that during the initial assessment visit in advance of furnishing care, the hospice provided the patient and/or family with verbal (meaning spoken) and written notice of the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities in a language and manner that the patient understands. Patient#1,#2: Record indicates patient primary language is Armenian. During home visit this was verified. There is no evidence in the home or in chart that patients rights and responsibilities were provided in writing in a language patient understands.”

    Rule L0502. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient#9: The record indicates patient admitted on 12/9/24. There is no evidence of an initial psychosocial assessment completed until 12/17/24.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 144 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #3,#7) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient#3: The record indicates an order on 12/11/24 for wound care. There is no evidence of of measurements of wound noted in chart by hospice RN. Patient#7: The record indicates patient admitted with wound to right side of head from a fall. Plan of care states Assess changes in wound status - check size, integrity, location, type/stage, signs and symptoms of infection, drainage, effectiveness of current treatment. There is no evidence of measurement or description of wound. Record indicates wound is not healed.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 191 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,#5,#7) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient#1: The record indicates there is a doctor order from admit for skin precautions and aspiration precautions. The patient also requires appetite stimulant and nurse frequently documents patient having decreased appetite and educating on nutritional needs. There is no evidence of problems with goals and interventions related to these issues. Corrected on site. Patient#5: The record indicates there is a physician order for fall precautions, aspirations, and diabetic foot protocol. There is no evidence of problems with goals and interventions related to these orders. Corrected on site. Patient#7: The record indicates the RN documented on admit that patient requires seizure precautions. There are no problems with goals and interventions related to this issue. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #3,#11) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient#3: There is no evidence of a physician order for referral for California Wound Healing to assess and treat patient wound. Corrected on site. Patient#11: There is no evidence of physician order for discharge due to extended prognosis.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “Upon client record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patient#2: There is no evidence of notes or documentation of progress to goals by SC or MSW for IDG 4/28/25, 4/14, or 3/31. Patient#3,#5,#6,#7: There is no evidence of notes or documentation of progress to goals by SC or MSW for IDG 4/28/25, 4/14, 3/31, 3/17, 3/3, 2/17. Patient#4: There is no evidence of notes or documentation of progress to goals by SC or MSW for IDG 4/28/25, 4/14, 3/31, 3/17, 3/12.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #3,#9) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient#3: The record indicates nurse made a PRN visit on 4/27/25. There is no evidence of an order for PRN visits. Patient#9: The record indicates SN frequency ordered at 1 time a week. LVN visit 2/25/25, 2/4, 1/25, and 1/10 are blank. There is no evidence these visit were completed.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that the IDG documents the sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all settings, whether the care and services are provided directly or under arrangement. Patient#3: The record indicates the patient was receiving wound services from California Wound Healing. There is no evidence of coordination of collaboration of care with the wound care company in patient record.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 272 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #7,#8) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient#7: The aide plan of care completed by RN only states for aide to report changes and report pain. The record indicates the aide is seeing patient twice a week. Aide documentation has no task checked as completed. Aide documents “CHHA service provided according to care plan. Patient verbalized satisfaction with care. Notified regarding the next visit” for all visits. Per conversation with the aide she is completing transfer, shower, change linens, dressing patient, continence care and skin care. These task are not on aide plan of care and are not documented by aide. Patient#8: The aide plan of care completed by RN only indicates for aide to assist with ambulation and incontinence care. No other task are documented by the aide as being completed . Per conversation with aide he is bathing patient, dressing patient, changing linens when soiled and performing light housekeeping at weekly visits.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient#1: The record indicates aide visits on 4/18/25, 4/21, 4/25, and 4/28 have no assigned task checked as being completed and is not signed. The aide narrative states “completed care per POC and patient verbalized satisfaction”.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 155 words

    “Upon patient record review 4 of 14 (Patient #1,#3,#7,#8) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient#1: There is no evidence of aide supervisory visits being completed by RN between 04/03/24- 05/09/24, between 08/24/24-09/14/24, between 10/12/24-12/7/24, and from 02/15/25 to present. Patient#3: There is no evidence of aide supervisory visit being completed by RN between 11/11/24-12/09/24, between 12/9/24- 01/06/24, and between 01/06/25- 04/14/25. Patient#7: There is no evidence of aide supervisory visit being completed by RN from admit on 02/13/25 to 04/10/25. Patient#8: The record indicates aide services started on 2/24/25. There is no evidence of aide supervisory visit being completed by RN from 2/24- 3/20.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that before the recertification period for each patient, the medical director or physician designee must review the patient’s clinical information and provide written documentation that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less. Patient#4: There is no evidence of a MD narrative or signature on CTI for benefit period starting 5/11/25.”

    Rule L0668. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 132 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #3,9) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient#3: The record indicates on 3/17 /25 visit RN documented no wounds. However, sacral wound is still active on plan of care. Patient#9: The record indicates the RN completed an aide plan of care however, aide services were declined at admit. There is also evidence the RN completed an aide supervisory visit listing an aide name on 12/23/24, 1/6/25, 2/3, 3/9, 4/6. There is no evidence of any aide visits being completed.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 15, 2025Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health CareNo deficiencies cited
May 23, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care15 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 21, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 17.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 83.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends17.7%
Visits near death83.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Sarkis Ter-Akopyan (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Sarkis Ter-Akopyan (corporate officer, 100%); Sarkis Ter-Akopyan (corporate director, 100%); Sarkis Ter-Akopyan (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Shi Tang (managing employee (on the payroll)); Harut H Ter-Akopyan (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 70.73% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 95 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91506, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 15.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.