Hearth Record

Heart of Angel Hospice & Palliative Inc.

A hospice in San Gabriel, California 91776

417 S San Gabriel Blvd Suite E, San Gabriel, California 91776. (818) 985-4555.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 20 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

20 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 106 hospices serving ZIP code 91776 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 12, 2024: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

20 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

20 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 21, 2023: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care20 deficiencies
  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 11 (Patient 1) did not have evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Patient 1: The EOB does not contain evidence that the patient chose a health care provider including attending physician.”

    Rule L0515. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 163 words

    “Upon patient record review 5 of 11 (Patient 1,2,9,10,11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient 1: The comprehensive assessment by the RN does not include a spiritual care assessment and the SC did not make a visit as the pt refused SC. Patient 2: The comprehensive assessment by the RN does not include a spiritual care assessment and the SC did not make a visit as the pt refused SC. Patients 9,10,11: The comprehensive assessment by the RN did not include a spiritual care or Psychosocial assessment and the SC documented in all 3 records the Pt’s caregivers requesting later visits than within the first 5 days but the SC and MSW have no documentation in the record that visits were made at all.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 11 (Patient 1) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: Patient 1: The POC contains an order for Tylenol Q8 hours prn, the medication profile has Tylenol Q4 hours prn. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 11 (Patient #9,10,11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the Patients 9,10,11: The medical records of these patients do not include a bereavement assessments being completed upon admission.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 11 (Patient 9,10,11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: Patients 9,10,11: The medical records do not contain: Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment, Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes, Reassessment of the patient’s response to care, The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 182 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 11 (Patient 1,2,3,8,) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 1: The nursing care plan includes Alteration of nutrition and hydration with intervention of assessing the tube feeding site includes assessments of an NG and the patient does not have an NG. Pt has a G tube. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The nursing care plan includes a Bladder disturbance goal with an intervention to maintain the catheter. The patient does not have a catheter. Patient 3: The nurse care plan included an intervention for choking and tube dislodgement. The patient does not have any tubes. Patient 8: The nurse care plan included an intervention for foley catheter care. The patient does not have a foley.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 11 (Patient #4) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatment. Patient 4: The POC 1/28/23 contains a Foley order with no size and the order is written to “irrigate 1-2” no frequency. The pt has a G tube and there are no orders for site care.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 11 (Patient 1,4,6) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The POC does not contain DME supply orders. It is documented pt has a G tube with continuous tube feedings and a foley. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The POC 1/28/23 does not contain DME orders. The medical record contains evidence of pt having a hospital bed, suction equipment, oxygen. Patient 6: The POC 5/27/23 does not contain DME orders. The medical record contains evidence of pt having oxygen.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon client record review, 3 of 11 (Patient 9,10,11) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patients 9,10,11: The medical records do not contain evidence of the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 11 (Patient 9,10,11) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patients 9,10,11: There is no evidence in the patient record that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment or note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 240 words

    “Upon client record review, 7 of 11 (Patient 1,2,4,6,9,10,11) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1: The nurse documents on 10/30/23 “Foley catheter changed per physician order” There is no evidence the nurse followed the order and the documentations does not state how the pt tolerated the procedure. The SN documents on 11/27/23 “IV administered as ordered”. Patient 2: The SN documented on 1/10/23 “IV hydration continues as ordered”. There is no evidence the IV is running as ordered. SN documented 1/10/23 “wound care performed”. There is no evidence the SN followed the POC order for wound care. Patient 4: The SN documented on 1/29/23 “IV hydration provided per MD order” There is no evidence the order was followed. Patient 6: The POC 5/27/23 contains an order for SN 1 time per week. The medical record contains evidence of SN visits twice the week of 5/28/23-6/3/23 on 5/30 and 6/3. Both visits are documented at routine visits. Patients 9,10,11: The medical records contained no visits documented past the admission date. The POC contains orders to be seen once a week by nursing. There were no IDG meetings documented. In addition, there was documentation by the MSW that the patients’ caregivers requested their comprehensive assessment be completed later than 5 days but there is no evidence there were any visits completed by the MSW.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(1))

    “Upon patient client record review, 3 of 11 (Patient 9,10,11) did not have evidence that each patient record contains:(this references that the documentation is part of the patient record. Patients 9,10,11: The medical records did not have evidence of any signed and dated progress notes, updated comprehensive assessments, updated POC.”

    Rule L0672. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient client record review, 3 of 11 (Patient 1,5,6) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: Patient 1: The EOB has multiple blank spaces not filled in and has patient’s signature. Patient 5: The EOB has a blank line where the pt is informed of the Medicare coverage. Patient 6: The EOB has a blank line where the pt is informed of the Medicare coverage.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient client record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #9. 10, 11) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient 9,10,11: There were no further visits past admission on these patients despite having visit orders for all disciplines. There was no discharge orders written on any of these patients.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 11 (Patient 1) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1: The SN documented “F/C” for foley catheter. This is not an approved abbreviation.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon client record review, 3 of 11 (Patient 9,10,11) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patients 9,10,11: There were no further visits performed on these patients and no discharge summaries documented.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Written agreement (42 CFR 418.112(c)(5))

    “Upon SNF/NF contract review, 1 of 3 (Heritage Manor) did not have evidence that it is the hospice’s responsibility to provide services at the same level and to the same extent as those services would be provided if the SNF/NF resident were in his or her own home.”

    Rule L0768. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 11 (Patient 2) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient 2: The POC 1/5/23 contains wound care orders but does not state who is to perform the wound care.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

  • Orientation and training of staff (42 CFR 418.112(f))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice provides orientation to personnel of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID regarding the policies and procedures of the provision of care/service including all required content.”

    Rule L0782. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 12, 2024Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health CareNo deficiencies cited
Dec 21, 2023Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care20 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 31, 2020.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 7.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 33.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 78.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 99% at home, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day7.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends33.4%
Visits near death78.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 7 owners or officers are people: Yan Wang (managing employee (under contract), 100%); Yan Wang (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Yan Wang (corporate officer, 100%); Yan Wang (corporate director, 100%); Yan Wang (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Yan Wang (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Jilin Bai (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 75% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 106 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91776, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 20.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.