Hearth Record

American Veterans Hospice

A hospice in Long Beach, California 90815

2750 N Bellflower Blvd, Suite 206, Long Beach, California 90815. (818) 430-4450.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 18 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

18 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 109 hospices serving ZIP code 90815 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 18, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

18 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

18 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 18, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care18 deficiencies
  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Preparedness plan: • Is based on and includes a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach • Includes strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment, including the management of the consequences of power failures, natural disasters, and other emergencies that would affect the hospice’s ability to provide care”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • Arrangement with Other Facilities (42 CFR 418.113(b)(5))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence of contracts/agreements with other facilities/agencies/hospices to receive patients in the event the hospice cannot provide care to their patients during an emergency.”

    Rule E0025. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 266 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patients #1,#2,#3,#5,#6,#8,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of oxygen included in the medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of oxygen included in the medication profile. The medication profile also contained duplicative listings of bisocodyl, levsin, lorazepam, morphine, and phenergan. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of oxygen included in the medication profile. The medication profile also contained duplicative listings of Miralax and polythethylene. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medication profile also contained oxygen with no frequency and a lidocaine patch with no area defined for administration. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of oxygen included in the medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medication profile contained oxygen with no defined delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The medication profile contained Miralax oral powder with no instructions for a diluent.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient 3: There was no evidence of a comprehensive physical assessment by the RN between 11/17/23 and 12/16/23.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient issue with dysphagia. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to dysphagia included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 150 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patients #1,#3,#5,#6,#8,#9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: There was no evidence of an order for oxygen dose, frequency, and delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The medical record contained an order for oxygen with no frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medical record contained an order for oxygen with no frequency and a lidocaine patch with no area defined for administration. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The medical record contained an order for oxygen with no frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medical record contained an order for oxygen with no delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The medical record contained an order for Miralax oral powder with no instructions for a diluent.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 265 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patients #1,#2,#3,#4,#7,#8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a wheelchair, commode, and oxygen equipment. There was no evidence of orders for the listed DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a hospital bed, bedside table, walker, wheelchair, shower chair, and commode. There was no evidence of orders for the listed DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a walker and oxygen equipment. There was no evidence of orders for the listed DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The aide care plan identifies patient use of a shower chair. There was no evidence of an order for the shower chair included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation 1/4/24 identifying patient use of a shower bench and toilet riser. There was no evidence of orders for the listed DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation 12/9/23 identifying patient use of a wheelchair. There was no evidence of an order for the wheelchair included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 118 words

    “Upon client record review, 4 of 14 (Patients #1, #3,#8, #10) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1: There was no evidence of frequency orders for nursing visits. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The medical record contained an order for nursing frequency of twice weekly effective 12/11/23. There were 4 visits completed the week of 12/10/23, and 3 visits completed the week of 12/24/23. Patient 8: The medical record contained an ordered nursing frequency of once weekly. There were 2 visits completed the weeks of 12/3/23 and 12/17/23. Patient 10: There was no evidence of a frequency order for nursing visits.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #9,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties contain parameters when to report findings to an RN. Patient 9: The aide care plan contained task to obtain vital signs with no parameters of when to report findings to RN. Patient 10: The aide care plan contained task to obtain vital signs with no parameters of when to report findings to RN.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 14 (Patients #4,#8) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 4: The medical record contained an ordered aide frequency of three times weekly. The record shows aide visits twice weekly for December to current. Patient 8: The medical record contained an ordered aide frequency of three times weekly. There was no evidence of a third visit completed the week of 12/31/23.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 3: The medical record contained the first aide visit completed 11/20/23. There was no evidence of an aide supervisory visit completed until 12/16/23.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient 5: The medical record contained an election form identifying the patient elected to receive the notification of non-covered items. There was no evidence the notification was provided. Corrected on site with delivery and confirmation of receipt 1/17/24.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient 10: There was no evidence of an order to discharge due to moving to noncontracted hospital.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 103 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 3: The medical record identified the patient transferred from another hospice agency upon admission in benefit period 11/9/23-2/8/24. The chart contained a signed CTI for benefit period 1/10/24-4/8/24. There should not be a new benefit period starting until 2/9/24. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #13,#14) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary Patient 13: There was no evidence of a discharge summary sent to an attending physicians upon revocation. Patient 14: There was no evidence of a discharge summary sent to an attending physicians upon revocation.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon client record review, 3 of 14 (Patients #10,#13,#14) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient 10: The discharge summary did not contain the required elements. Patient 13: The discharge summary did not contain the required elements. Patient 14: The discharge summary did not contain the required elements.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 10: There was no evidence of a frequency order for nursing. Visits were completed twice weekly throughout hospice stay.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

  • Multiple locations (42 CFR 418.116(a))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the organizational chart matches the hospice’s information submitted to CMS and/or State licensing agencies for ownership and management personnel.”

    Rule L0799. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 18, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care18 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 4, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 16.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 85% at home, 14% in assisted living, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day15.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends16.8%
Visits near death94.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 82.61% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 23.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 109 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 90815, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 18.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.