Hearth Record

Wisteria Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Long Beach, California 90808

4195 N Viking Way, Suite 140, Long Beach, California 90808. (562) 425-1203.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 133 hospices serving ZIP code 90808 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 18, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 18, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission5 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 12 patient records reviewed, The organization did not conduct the patient’s initial assessment in accordance with written time frames it defines and law and regulation. Examples: HOSHV#1 the social work initial assessment following the SOC was not performed until two weeks later and the Bereavement Risk assessment not until the second benefit period. HOSNHV#2 the spiritual care assessment following the SOC was not performed for a week and a half. In both cases there was no documentation to justify the delay. This was reviewed with the CEO/Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 152 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 12 patient records reviewed, The organization did not assesses and reassesses the patients wound status. Examples: The record review for HOSNHV#2 indicated that the patient had a Stage III pressure ulcer on the patient’s back with wound initial measurements. The wound measurements were not re-assessed until two weeks after the wound was identified. The three subsequent nursing noted had no re-assessment of the wound condition. In HOSNHV#3 wound assessments and re-assessments were not documented during the period of time the patient had an active right buttock Stage III pressure ulcer. There was no documentation of the initial assessment indicating an issue or any subsequent wound assessments or measurements. . The three nursing notes in the following two weeks did not include any mention of the wound. HOSNHV#7 was also lacking right and left buttock wound assessments and reassessments. Reviewed with the CEO/ Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 12 patient records reviewed, It was noted in record review HOSNHV#3 that wound care orders for a Right Buttock Stage III pressure ulcer were not obtained for a week and a half , three days before the order discontinuing the treatment as it had healed. The order called for Hydrogel for two weeks. Reviewed with the CEO/Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 118 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 12 patient records reviewed, The organization planned care and treatment based on information from updates to the patient’s condition however did not obtain timely orders. Examples: In HOSNHV#2 a physician order for a right buttock Stage III pressure ulcer was not obtained. The only order was to discontinue the treatment on 5/30. In the same record, there was no order to treat a left ear Stage II wound. In HOSNH#7 nursing notes from 11/17 - 1/2/25 identify both a Left Buttock and Right buttock wounds however physician orders for treatment only reflect care for a Left Sacrum pressure ulcer within the same period of time. Reviewed with the CEO/Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 3 home visits conducted, The surveyor noted in two of three home visits (HOSRRHV#1and HOSRRHV#2) that the the most current medication profile from the clinical record not matching what was being administered. Examples: HV#1 MVI, Zinc Ointment and Vit C were still being given when an order was in place to discontinue. HV#2 Tylenol and Loperamide were still ordered but not being given. Reviewed with CEO/Clinical Director”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 18, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 13, 2012.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 17.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 1.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 84% at home, 16% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day17.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends1.3%
Visits near death93.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 133 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 90808, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.