Hearth Record

Grace Hospice Care, Inc.

A hospice in Long Beach, California 90804

1739 Termino Ave Suite A, Long Beach, California 90804. (532) 494-3273.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 17 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

17 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 86 hospices serving ZIP code 90804 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 18, 2024: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

17 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

17 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 18, 2024: follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care4 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 4 (Patient #1) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions Patient #1, Initial RN assessment documents Oxygen 2-3lpm via nasal cannula. No evidence oxygen was added to medication sheet. Oxygen was documented under DME.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 159 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 4 (Patient #1,4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1, Patient has wound care to right and left buttocks, however there are no problems/goals/intervention for wound care in care plan . In addition, patient has Cardio care plan with goal patient will verbalize and or express decrease episodes of chest pain. Patient will maintain optimum peripheral circulation. No evidence documented of chest pain, no evidence of any heart medications or nitro. Patient primary diagnosis is Atrial fibrillation. #4, No initial care plans as the import button was not selected/hit. Corrected on site”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 4 (Patient #1,2) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #1,2, SC initial visit was completed over telephone, no evidence of order for telephone visits.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 4 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient #1, SN note on 6/11/24 documented by LVN states; 3+pitting edema, O2 sats 88-93% with caregiver having concerns of these numbers, wheezes both upper and lower lobes. Patient needs not met as no evidence of LVN instructions for patient to use furosemide, no evidence LVN reported to MD or RN case manager.”

    Rule L0556. Standard-level.

May 2, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies
  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1,2,4,7,10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment takes into consideration the imminence of death. Patients 1,2,4,7,10: did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment takes into consideration the imminence of death.”

    Rule L0528. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 173 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #1,2,4,6,13,14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: Patient 1: The comprehensive assessment has documented pt has a Midline IV requiring heparin and NS flushes. These medications are not included on the medication profile. The medication profile does not contains the thickening agent for fluids the pt is using. Corrected on site. Patient 2: Upon home visit pt is taking Vit D2 since 4/15/24. The POC has Vitamin D3. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The medication profile contains an order for Metamucil with no dose. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The medication profile contains an order for Miralax with no diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 13: The medication profile contains an order for Miralax with no diluent. Patient 14: The medication profile contains an order for Miralax with no diluent and Comfort Cain 1% with no frequency.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 200 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 1: The POC contains orders for a foley, Midline IV. The comprehensive assessment indicates pt is bedbound with a hoyer lift. There is no evidence of goals or interventions related to these problems. Pt has orders for thickened liquids, though no risk of aspiration care plan. SN added goals/interventions for skin integrity and aspiration risk during survey. Patient 2: Pt has orders for thickened liquids though has no care plan for high risk of aspiration. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The POC contains orders for a biliary drain. There are no goals or interventions related to this problem on the care plan. The patient’s hospice diagnosis is Paroxysmal Afib, there are not goals or interventions for cardiac on the care plan. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 183 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #1, 2, 4, 5) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient 1: The Plan of care contains Spiritual care PRN with no quantifier. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The POC 12/29/23 contains an order for MSW within 5 days of admission, 1 time per month and PRN. There is no quantifier for the PRN. Patient 4: The POC contains an order for MSW once a month and PRN with no quantifier. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The POC contains an orders for MSW 1 time a month and PRN with no quantifier. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 202 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,6,12) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: The POC has no diet order. Corrected on site. Upon home visit finding the pt has Thickening agent that the patient is using there is no order for this. Corrected on site. The comprehensive assessment 2/21/24 indicates pt has a Midline IV for Ertapenum and requires NS and Heparin flushes. There are no orders on the POC for the Midline site care, dressing changes, saline or heparin flushes. Patient 2: Upon home visit pt is taking Vit D2 since 4/15/24. The POC has Vitamin D3. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The POC contains orders for wound care to a skin tear on 3/9/24 and a biliary drain site on 2/26/24 but does not state who will perform the wound care. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The POC contains an order for Metamucil with no dose. Patient 6: The POC contains an order for Miralax with no diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 12: The POC contains an order for Miralax with no diluent.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The comprehensive assessment contains evidence that the pt has a hoyer lift, hospital bed, air mattress. These items are not on the POC. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 144 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #4,6) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 4: The medical record contains a note by the physician that pt is c/o feeling cold and he was going to check their thyroid, the MD changed the thyroid medication on 10/6/23. There is no evidence of any goals or interventions in the care plan related to endocrine. Pt is also on a Fentanyl patch and there are no pain goals or interventions in the care plan. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The SN documented on 4/16/24 “open wound from scab to lower leg, pt applying Neosporin and leaving open to air.” There is no evidence the POC was updated. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 240 words

    “Upon client record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1,2,5,6,8) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1: The SN documented 2/23/24 “Pt and family allowed me to flush the IV line”. There are no orders for IV flushes on the POC. Patient 2: The POC contains an order for the SN to visit every 3 days to change the patient’s Fentanyl patch due to pt having no available caregiver to perform the task. The nurse performed a visit on 3/19/24, there is evidence the patch was due to be changed. There is no evidence the nurse changed the patch. SN addended note to say she did change the Fentanyl patch that visit and corrected the documentation for the lab draw. Patient 5: The medical record contains orders for SN twice weekly. The agency has a routing sheet that contains evidence the patient was seen for a second visit the week of 4/21-4/27 on 4/22/24 but the documentation has not been completed. Patient 6: The week of 4/7-4/13 there is missing visit documentation from 4/9/24. The SN wrote a communication note with visit findings that is not signed or dated and has not completed the nursing note. Patient 8: The SN documented 3/21/24 “Skin tear to right hand, cleansed with water and applied bandage”. There is no evidence of an order for this wound care.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient 3: The SN applied gloves at beginning of visit, the SN performed assessment with gloves on and then reached in to her nursing bag with the gloves on. The SN proceeded to perform wound care with the same gloves on. The SN did change gloves after performing the first wound care.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #8) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: Patient 8: The POC contains an order for aide 3 times per week. There is evidence the aide saw the pt on 9/4/23 and 9/7/23 with no 3rd visit completed that week. There was no evidence of refusal or that the RN was notified of missed visit.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 166 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 4 of 13 (Patient #2, 3, 9, 13) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 2: The nurse documented on 12/29/23 “Blood drawn for labs per order”. There is no evidence of specific care that was performed. Patient 3: The SN documented on 3/6/24 “ Dressing change done to biliary drain site”. There is no evidence of the specific care that was performed. SN addended the documentation to support the POC was followed. Patient 9: The SN documented on 12/19/23 “Wound care done per order”. On 12/17/23 the SN documented “16F/cath replaced today”. There is no evidence of specific care that was performed. Patient 13: The SN documented on 12/30/23 “Pox”. This is not an approved abbreviation.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Written agreement (42 CFR 418.112(c)(8))

    “Upon SNF/NF contract review, 1 of 3 (Pacific Palms) did not have a provision stating that the hospice reports all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or verbal, mental, sexual, and physical abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of patient property by anyone unrelated to the hospice to the SNF/NF administrator within 24 hours of the hospice becoming aware of the alleged violation. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0771. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 18, 2024Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care4 deficiencies cited
May 2, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 12, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 88% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 96% at home, 4% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends11.3%
Visits near death88.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Angelo L Cadiente (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Angelo L Cadiente (corporate officer); Angelo L Cadiente (corporate director); Angelo L Cadiente (managing employee (on the payroll)); Angelo L Cadiente (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 76.19% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 86 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 90804, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 17.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.