Hearth Record

Topkare Hospice Inc.

A hospice in San Diego, California 92111

7071 Convoy Court, Suite 101, San Diego, California 92111. (714) 837-0003.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 62 hospices serving ZIP code 92111 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 13, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 13, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission7 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, the hospice did not conduct a patient-specific comprehensive reassessment of the severity of symptoms. During the home visit conducted for RRHV#1, the Hospice Surveyor observed that the Skilled Nurse did not assess the patient’s lung sounds despite the patient having a history of emphysema and assessed dysphagia. This was discussed with the Administrator and CEO following the home visit.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 314 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 10 patient records reviewed, where the patients were actively on service, the organization had not ensured that the plan of care included all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions including interventions to manage symptoms. Identified during the record review for RRHV#1, there was no care plan developed to manage the patient’s dysphagia that was identified during the initial comprehensive assessment. Identified in RRHV#3 there was no care plan developed to manage dysphagia despite it being identified as a problem during the initial comprehensive assessment. Identified during the review for RRNHV#3, there was no care plan developed for risks to skin integrity despite the patient being incontinent, mainly chairbound, and having skin tears upon admission. Additionally there was no Psychosocial care plan developed despite there being no funeral/burial plans. Identified in the review of RRNHV#4, there was no Psychosocial care plan developed despite there being no funeral/burial plans and the Medical Social Worker visiting the patient monthly since the start of care five months prior to the survey. Identified during the record review for RRNHV#6, there were no care plans developed for dysphagia and risk for skin integrity despite these problems being identified during the initial comprehensive assessment. Identified during the record review for RRNHV#7 there was no care plan developed for risk to skin integrity despite the patient weighing 64 lbs., being incontinent, chairfast, having a Braden score of 12 and a history of pressure ulcers. There was also no care plan developed for dysphagia/risk for aspiration despite being documented during the initial comprehensive assessment. Additionally there was no psychosocial care plan developed despite no burial/funeral plans, and no spiritual care plan despite the Spiritual Care Coordinator visiting the patient monthly. This was discussed with the Administrator, Director of Patient Care Services, and the CEO following the record review.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the plan of care did not include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including drugs and treatment necessary to meet the needs of the patient. Reviewed in the record for RRHV#1, the medication profile listed Norco 5-325, 1 tablet every 6 hours as needed for pain level 1-7, and Tramadol HCl 25 mg, 1 tablet twice daily as needed for pain without indicating a pain level for Tramadol or whether the pain medications can or cannot be given together. This was discussed with the Administrator, Director of Patient Care Services, and the CEO following the record review.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 290 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 10 patient records reviewed, where the patient was active, the hospice had not supervised the hospice aide during on-site visits to the patients’ homes no less frequently than every 14 days. Identified in RRHV#1, the hospice missed 13 opportunities for timely supervision of the hospice aide during the 15 months since the start of care. In RRHV#2, the hospice missed two opportunities for timely supervision of the hospice aide during the three months since the start of care. In RRHV#3 the hospice missed 12 opportunities to supervise the hospice aide timely during the past 20 months since the start of care. In RRNHV#1 the hospice missed one opportunities to supervise the hospice aide timely during the past six weeks since start of care. In RRNHV#2 the hospice missed one opportunity to supervise the hospice aide timely during the past nine weeks since start of care. In RRNHV#3, the hospice missed one opportunity to supervise the hospice aide timely during the past 14 weeks since start of care. In RRNHV#4, the hospice missed one opportunity to supervise the hospice aide timely during the month that the aide provided services, five months prior to the survey date. In RRNHV#5 the hospice missed three opportunities to supervise the hospice aide timely during the past seven months since the start of care. In RRHV#6 the hospice missed two opportunities to supervise the hospice aide timely during the past three months when the patient was receiving aide services. In RRNHV#7 the hospice missed three opportunities to supervise the hospice aide timely during the past nine months since the start of care. This was discussed with the Administrator, Director of Patient Care Services, and CEO following the records reviewed.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, the hospice had not included all medications being administered for symptom management and treatments. Observed during the home visit conducted for RRHV#1, the patient’s perineal area was being treated with Equate Diaper Rash ointment with 40% zinc oxide ointment and A&D ointment. These were not included on the hospice medication profile despite the FDA’s classification as human OTC drugs. Identified during the record review for RRNHV#2, A&D ointment was listed as a supply in the patient’s record but not listed on the medication profile. This was discussed with the Administrator, Director of Patient Care Services, and the CEO.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(A))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. Identified during the review of the hospice organization’s Patient and Family Handbook, there was no evidence that the organization’s Drug Disposal Policy had not been provided to patients, family members and/or caregivers prior to or at the time controlled medications were first ordered. This was reviewed with the Administrator, Director of Patient Care Services, and the CEO.”

    Rule L0695. Standard-level.

  • Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(C))

    “Observed in Record Review. During the record review session, the Hospice Surveyor identified that there was no documentation in the patients’ records to validate that the organization had provided their Drug Disposal Policy at the time when controlled medications were first ordered. This was discussed with the Administrator, Director of Patient Care Services, and the CEO.”

    Rule L0697. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 13, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 15, 2020.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 88.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 34% at home, 66% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends11.1%
Visits near death88.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Jamie Hunt (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Jamie Hunt (corporate officer, 100%); Jamie Hunt (corporate director, 100%); Jamie Hunt (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Brian Hilton Graham (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Julie Thomas (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 93% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 83.33% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 46.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 62 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92111, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.