Hearth Record

Radiant Hospice

A hospice in San Diego, California 92111

7675 Dagget Street, Suite 370, San Diego, California 92111. (619) 550-3570.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 62 hospices serving ZIP code 92111 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on May 21, 2024: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 31, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #5: Patient admitted 12/8/23 with metastatic rectal cancer. He had indwelling Foley Catheter 14 Fr, 10cc balloon. He had colostomy (Nov 2023). There were no related problems, goals interventions included in IDG Plan of Care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 243 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #2, 9, 10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #2: 12/05/23: Initial orders included Stage 3 coccyx - Cleanse with wound cleanser and pat dry. Apply calcium alginate. Cover with hydrocolloid wound dressing. Wound care 3x/week OR as needed without qualifying reason for PRN. 12/17/23 wound care order for Right rectal Stage #2 wound. Hospice SN will clean area with wound spray, pat dry. Apply zinc oxide based ointment liberally. Change diaper if needed TWO times a week and as needed which is an unclear frequency. 12/17/23 Sacrum stage #2. Hospice SN will clean TWO a week and as needed with wound spray pat dry which is an unclear frequency. Patient #9: 11/27/23 Cleanse wounds to skin tear left forearm with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply alginate, then cover with dry dressing. Change every 7 days or as needed if dressing becomes soiled or dislodged (“or” should be and. Alginate should be specific). Patient #10: 10/26/23 order. New wound care order. Cleanse stage II pressure ulcer to coccyx area with NS or wound cleanser, pat dry. Apply alginate and cover with bordered dressing. Change every 3 day or as needed if dressing become soiled or dislodged. May be performed by SN or CG (“or” should be and. Alginate should be specific).”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 163 words

    “Upon client record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #2, 5, 6, 10) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #2: 12/14/23 physician order for ST evaluation r/t dysphagia. Evaluation performed 12/29/23. There was a follow-up/discharge visit 1/10/24, however there was no evidence of a physician order for the follow up visit. Patient #5: Patient had Foley catheter change 12/27/23. Foley catheter changed during visit with clear yellow urine return. Tolerated well. 16 Fr. There is no order for Foley catheter changes. Patient #6: 12/21/23 physician order for PT Evaluation. Another order 1/5/24 PT order received from Dr. Greer for evaluation to determine if treatment is warranted. There was no evidence these were completed. Patient #10: Patient record includes volunteer visit notes for Sept., Oct. and Nov, 2023. There were no notes beyond November. There is no physician order to start volunteer and no physician order to discontinue.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient #1: MSW 12/19/23 assessment noted need for volunteer and emailed VC who left message for family. There was no evidence of follow up, refusal documented or an order.”

    Rule L0556. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 166 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 1: SOC 12/11/23. Patient had history of fall resulting in fracture, hospitalization and rehab. HA assignment included task for shower. POC/MD Orders included DME of shower chair, walker, bedside commode. The assistive devices were not specified in assignment for HA.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 2 of 14 (Personnel #12, 14) did not have evidence the hospice employees and contract employees have received orientation on the hospice philosophy. Personnel #12, 14, (contracted staff who had performed visits) had no documented evidence of orientation to hospice philosophy.”

    Rule L0661. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 169 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1, 3, 8) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #1: HA documented visit type as ALF 12/26/23, 1/23/24 and as home 1/25/24. Patient resides in home setting. 12/18/23 PT Evaluation. PT summary notes that patient is admitted to home health. Addresses homebound status. Patient #3: MSW visit 12/28/23 includes in summary that patient was admitted with terminal illness of colon cancer. All other documentation references admitting diagnosis of Alzheimer’s. Staff interview clarifies MSW made error and made late entry documentation to correct. Patient #8: F2F 12/12/23 NP documents patient is a 95 year old female admitted to hospice. Physician’s 12/18/23 CTI says patient is 81 year old female admitted to hospice for protein calorie malnutrition.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Multiple locations (42 CFR 418.116(a))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the organizational chart matches the hospice’s information submitted to CMS and/or State licensing agencies for ownership and management personnel. The agency reports that new administrator was appointed administrator January 2023 and new DPCS August 2023. By end of survey, the agency had not presented evidence reporting changes in organizational chart to CMS and/or state licensing.”

    Rule L0799. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 21, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jan 31, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 9, 2018.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 56% at home, 3% in assisted living, 5% in a skilled nursing facility, 35% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.2%
Visits near death92.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: April M Bolles (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); April M Bolles (corporate officer, 100%); April M Bolles (corporate director, 100%); April M Bolles (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Danielle M Greer (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 89.47% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 44.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 62 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92111, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.