Medvista Healthcare, Inc.
A hospice in Burlingame, California 94010
25 Edwards Ct, Suite 206, Burlingame, California 94010. (510) 398-8688.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 9 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 7of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
9 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 34 hospices serving ZIP code 94010 had 6.
The last inspection on record was on Aug 14, 2026: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jun 25, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
-
Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)
“Condition of Participation: Initial and Comprehensive Assessment of the Patient.”
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
The inspectors’ words, 131 words
“Upon patient record review 4 of 14 (Patient #3,#4,#8,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #3: Admission date 12-3-25. Spiritual care coordinator comprehensive assessment was completed on 12-10-26 which is greater than the 5 day requirement. Patient #4: Admission date 1-14-26. Spiritual care coordinator comprehensive assessment was completed on 1-20-26 which is greater than the 5 day requirement. Patient #8: Admission date 9-25-25. Spiritual comprehensive assessment was completed on 10-1-25 which is greater than the 5 day requirement. Patient #10: Admission date 4-2-26. Psychosocial comprehensive assessment was completed on 4-11-26 which is greater than the 5 day requirement.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))
“Upon patient record review 2 of 14 (Patient #5, #9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #5, #9: No evidence a Spiritual care comprehensive assessment was completed.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 254 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #2, #3, #5, #6, #7) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #2: The medication profile states artificial tears ophthalmic eye drops as needed for dry eye but is lacking which eye or eyes both to administer the medication. Patient #3: The medication profile states to apply Lidocaine 4% topical patch for pain. Does not provide instructions where to apply the medication patch. The medication profile indicates MiraLAX to be administered daily for constipation. Lacking the quantity of fluid required to reconstitute prior to administration. Patient #5: The medication profile indicates patient to receive Vyzulta eye drops. Instructions are to administer 1 drop daily for glaucoma. No evidence on the medication profile which eye or both to administer the medication. Patient #6: The medication profile indicates to apply 1 Lidoderm patch every day on for 12 hours for pain. No indication of where to apply the medicated patch for pain management. Patient #7: The medication profile contains duplicate therapies for scheduled MiraLAX stool softener. Both orders were entered on 3-1-26. First order indicates MiraLAX to be given twice a day. The second order indicates MiraLAX to be given once daily.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 139 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #4, #5, #8, #10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #4, #10: No evidence the initial bereavement risk assessment was completed. Patient #5: Start of care 8-21-25. The initial bereavement risk assessment was completed on 5-13-26 which is outside of the 5 day requirement. Patient #8: Start of care 9-25-25. The initial bereavement risk assessment was completed on 1-21-26 which is outside of the 5 day requirement.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 131 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #2,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #2: Documentation in the medical record indicates patient is on an anticoagulant. Unable to identify individual goals and interventions were initiated for monitoring bleeding precaution interventions. Patient #9: Documentation in the medical record indicates patient has impaired skin integrity. Unable to identify individualized goals and interventions were in place for monitoring effectiveness of current interventions.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 207 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #2: Medication order for artificial tears ophthalmic eye drops present. The medication did not specify which eye or both to administer the medicated drops. Patient #3: Medication order for Lidocaine 4% topical patch - lacking where to apply the medication patch. Order written on 5-4-26 for wound care to right dorsal foot. Order does not indicate who is responsible for completing the daily dressing changes. Order on 4-4-26 for MiraLAX laxative. Lacking reconstitution instructions. Patient #4: Medication order instructed skilled nurse to obtain oxygen saturations at every visit. The order did not identify parameters or when to notify the physician. Patient #5: Medication order for Vyzulta eye drops. The medication order did not specify which or both eyes to administer the medication. Patient #6: Medication order for Lidoderm pain patch. The medication order did not include where to apply the medicated patch. Patient #9: Medication order to check oxygen saturation daily. The order did not identify parameters or when to notify the physician.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 215 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #1,#2,#3, #6, #7, #9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #1:Documentation in the medical record indicated the patient had bedrails, nebulizer, and lamb wool to be placed between toes. The hospice plan of care DME / Supplies list did not include these items. Patient #2: Documentation in the medical record indicated the patient utilized a walker and required incontinence supplies. The hospice plan of care did not include the equipment. Patient #3: Documentation in the medial records indicated the patient utilized oxygen as needed for shortness of breath. The hospice plan of care did not include the equipment. Patient #6: Documentation in the medical record indicated the patient utilizes a wheelchair for mobility and a Hoyer lift with all transfers. The hospice plan of care did not include the equipment. Patient #7:Documentation noted in the medical record that patient utilizes a Hoyer lift with all transfers. The hospice plan of care did not include the equipment. Patient #9: Documentation noted in the medical record that patient has a wheel chair for mobility. The hospice plan of care did not include the equipment.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 512 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #2,4,5,7,8,10) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #2: Documentation in the medical record indicates patient utilizes a shower chair and walker and wheelchair for mobility. No evidence the aide plan of care was updated to reflect this equipment. The medical record indicates this patient is currently on a scheduled blood thinner. No evidence the aide plan of care was updated to include bleeding precautions. The medical record indicates this patient has oxygen available as needed for shortness of breath. No evidence the aide plan of care was updated to reflect oxygen safety. The medical record indicates patient with an active history of seizures. No evidence the aide plan of care was updated to reflect seizure precautions. The medical record indicates patient has aspiration precautions in place. No evidence the aide care plan was updated to reflect aspiration precautions. Patient #4: Documentation in the medical record indicates patient is to utilize bed rails while in bed. No evidence the hospice aide plan of care was updated to reflect this task. Patient utilizes incontinence supplies and there is no evidence these items are reflected on the hospice plan of care. Patient #5: Documentation in the medical record indicated the patient utilized a walker for ambulation and utilized oxygen 2Liters as needed for shortness of breath. No evidence the aide care plan was individualized to include a walker or oxygen. Patient #7: Documentation found in the medical record states the patient is utilizing a prescribed blood thinner. No evidence of bleeding precautions listed on the aide care plan. Documentation in the medical records by the nurse indicated the patient had a active wound to the right lower leg. No evidence the aide plan of care was updated to reflect the location and instructions on how to preserve the adhesive dressing during bathing. Documentation in the medical record states patient has fall mats to be used when the patient is in bed. No evidence the aide care plan was updated to include this task. Patient #8: Order written 4-29-26 for compression stocking for bilateral lower leg edema. No evidence in the aide plan of care instructing the aide to removing and applying the stockings during a visit. Patient #10: Documentation by the nurse indicated the patient utilized a walker for ambulation. No evidence the hospice aide plan of care was updated to include this form of mobility.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2026 | Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | No deficiencies cited |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 9 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 6, 2020.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 19.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 65% at home, 7% in assisted living, 29% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 19.1 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 10.2% |
| Visits near death | 100.0% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 4 owners or officers are people: Maria Bilyak (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Maria Bilyak (corporate officer); Maria Bilyak (corporate director); Maria Bilyak (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 92.16% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 7.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 7 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 34 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 94010, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 9.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| American Carequest Hospice | 5 |
| Helping Hands Home Health Care & Hospice, Inc. | 6 |
| Anx Hospice Care | 5 |
| Medvista Healthcare, Inc. This hospice | 9 |
| Sutter Care at Home | 0 |
| By the Bay Health | 8 |
| Pathways Home Health and Hospice | 4 |
| Kaiser Foundation Hospital Hospice-San Francisco | 0 |
| Kaiser Foundation Hospital Hospice-Santa Clara | 6 |
| Mission Hospice & Home Care, Inc. | 8 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California | 1 |
| Sutter Care at Home | 2 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.