Mission Hospice & Home Care, Inc.
A hospice in San Mateo, California 94402
66 Bovet Rd., Suite 100, San Mateo, California 94402. (650) 554-1000.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 8 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 3of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
8 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 24 hospices serving ZIP code 94402 had 5.5.
The last inspection on record was on May 15, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
May 15, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission8 deficiencies
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 18 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment was completed no later than five calendar days after the election of hospice care. In RRNHV#10 the psychosocial assessment and initial bereavement risk assessment was not documented until March, a month after the election of benefits. These observations were reviewed with the DPCS, Quality Director, and Director of Hospice.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 119 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 18 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure a patient-specific comprehensive assessment and reassessment that identified the patient’s need for hospice care and services was conducted. In review of RRNHV#12 the patient was diabetic with an injectable and 2 oral hypoglycemics yet there was no documentation that an assessment of the endocrine system had been conducted such as history of blood glucose monitoring, patient’s symptom of hypo and/or hyperglycemia. In RRNHV#17 the documentation noted the presence of a peg tube on admission, yet there was no documentation of an assessment of the peg tube site on admission. These observations were reviewed with the Quality Director, Education Coordinator, and Director of Hospice.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 213 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 18 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care included all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. On review of RRHV#1 the patient was noted in the home to be very unsteady requiring assistance with transfers and ambulation and the documentation noted a high fall risk yet there was no care plan established to address the fall risk and mobility issues. In RRHV#4 the patient was diabetic with the use of oral hypoglycemics and documentation in the CTI of weight loss yet the there was no care plan to address diabetes and signs and symptoms of hyper and/or hypoglycemia. The patient had documentation of agitation with combative behaviors yet no nursing care plan to address the issue. In RRNHV#7 there was an established goal that read patient will demonstrate adequate symptom relief from dyspnea as evidenced by WDL respiratory rate and breathing effort, however there was no order or intervention to define the limits. In RRNHV#12 the patient was diabetic on an injectable and 2 oral diabetes medications yet there was no care plan established to monitor and guide the care. These observations were reviewed with the DPCS, Quality director, and Clinical Team Manager.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 169 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 18 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care included all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. On review of RRHV#5 the documentation noted the patient with difficulty swallowing. On home observation the caregiver noted they were using thickener to nectar consistency in the patient’s liquids yet there was no physicians order noted on the plan of care for thickened liquids. In RRNHV#14 there was documentation of a wound and the LVN provided wound treatment, yet there was no order for the wound care until nearly two weeks later. In RRNHV#17 the patient had a peg tube on admission yet the presence of the tube nor the site care was reflected on the plan of care from admission until the tube was removed in April and a care plan for care to the site after removal was addressed. These observations were reviewed with the Education Coordinator, DPCS, and Quality Director.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 115 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 18 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the registered nurse prepared written instructions for the hospice aide. On review of RRHV#4 the documentation and conversation with the RN and caregiver in the home noted the patient with agitation and combative behaviors during assessment and bathing, yet there was no instruction on the hospice aide plan of care to make the aide aware of the issues with agitation nor instructions on how to handle the behaviors while providing care. In RRNHV#8 the patient had a foley catheter yet the catheter was not reflected on the aide plan of care. These observations were reviewed with the Quality Director.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))
The inspectors’ words, 96 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 18 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the hospice aide provided services that were ordered in the plan of care. In review of RRNHV#8 the aide documentation did not specify that tasks assigned were completed in the visit. In a visit in April and one in May the aide checked that bed bath was completed but all other tasks were left blank with no explanation as to why the tasks were not completed. This observation was reviewed with the Guality Director, Director of Hospice, and Education Coordinator.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 116 words
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 6 home visits conducted, the organization failed to ensure that the patient record contain all information to reflect the patient’s care, treatment, and services. On review of RRHV#2 during medication reconciliation the Tylenol bottle in the patient home was labeled Q 4 hours PRN, yet the current medication order per the plan of care was Q6 hours PRN. The medication profile instruction for oxygen and Morphine both listed instructions of use first line for shortness of breath. On discussion with the RN the Morphine should have read use 2nd line and only the oxygen use 1st line. These observations were reviewed with the RN, and the Clinical Team Manager.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. Upon review of live discharge records, the Chief Administrative Officer and Quality Nurse confirmed that the hospice did not provide the patient’s discharge summary to the receiving hospice.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 8 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 12, 1995.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 89.4% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 68% at home, 29% in assisted living, 3% in a nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 14.5 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 9.8% |
| Visits near death | 89.4% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- By the Bay Health runs it.
- 23 owners or officers are people: Stacy A Blanchard (corporate director); Armika J Berkley (corporate director); Karen May (corporate director); Robertina K Szolarova (corporate officer); Robertina K Szolarova (managing employee (on the payroll)); Swaminathan Jayaraman (corporate director); Fred Sanciangco (corporate director); Kenneth G Meislin (corporate director); Michelle S Mourad (corporate director); Tracy A Hogan (corporate director); Catherine Jamentz (corporate director); Wendy C Chow (corporate director); Skelly Wingard (corporate officer); Skelly Wingard (corporate director); Skelly Wingard (managing employee (on the payroll)); Scott T Smith (corporate director); Jeff Gerard (corporate director); Steven Z Pantilat (corporate director); Claritza L Rios (corporate officer); Claritza L Rios (managing employee (on the payroll)); Daniel E Cohn (corporate director); Mukund Acharya (corporate director); Jennifer Mangosong-Shankle (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| By the Bay Health | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 10% | Jan 1, 2024 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 98.55% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 54.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 24 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 94402, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 8.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Mission Hospice & Home Care, Inc. This hospice | 8 |
| Sutter Care at Home | 2 |
| By the Bay Health | 8 |
| Pathways Home Health and Hospice | 4 |
| Kaiser Foundation Hospital Hospice-San Francisco | 0 |
| Kaiser Foundation Hospital Hospice-Santa Clara | 6 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California | 1 |
| Suncrest Hospice | 4 |
| Bristol Hospice - East Bay | 6 |
| Alliance Hospice | 4 |
| Holistic Palliative Care, Inc. | 4 |
| Anx Hospice Care | 5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.