Hearth Record

Bristol Hospice - East Bay

A hospice in Pleasanton, California 94588

5820 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 209, Pleasanton, California 94588. (925) 446-4004.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 36 hospices serving ZIP code 94588 had 6.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 10, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 6, 2024: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 431 words

    “Based on record review and interview the agency failed to provide nursing services follow as plan of care for three of 14 sample selected patients (Patient 1 and Patient 4). This failure in practice had a potential effect of Patient 1 and Patient 4s quality of care and lack of appropriate services as ordered by the physician. A review of Patient 1s “;Hospice Plan of Care” indicated, Patient 1 was admitted to the hospice agency with multiple diagnoses including stroke (a serious life-threatening medical condition that happens when the blood supply to part of the brain is cut off), and the visit frequency for nurses was 2W1 (2 times a week for 1 week), 2W13 (2 times a week for 13 weeks) + 3 visits PRN (as needed). A review of Patient 1s list of visits indicated one nursing visit was missed on the week of 6/19/23 and one nursing visit was missed on the week of 7/3/23 without any documentation. A review of Patient 4s “;Hospice Plan of Care” indicated Patient 4 was admitted to the agency with multiple diagnoses including dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person’s daily life and activities) and the frequency for Hospice Care Assistant (HCA) was 5W9 (5 times a week for 9 weeks) + 1 PRN. A review of Patient 4s list of visits indicated one HCA visit was missed on the week of 5/29/24 without any documentation. During a concurrent record review and interview on 6/5/24 at 10:45 a.m. with the Regional Director of Clinical Operation (RDCO), RDCO confirmed the missed visits for Patient 1 and 4 and stated when the agency establishes a care plan and visit frequencies for the patients, they need to follow the plan. The missed visits should be reschedule for the same week and any missed visits should be documented for team communications. During an interview on 6/5/24 at 11:10 a.m. with the Hospice Aid (HA), HA stated its important to document the missed visits for the communication between the team. A review of the agencys policy and procedure “;Missed Visits,” dated 2003, indicated “;... 1. If a visit is missed for any reason, the clinician should attempt to rescheduled it for the same week so that the physician ordered frequency is maintained and would not be considered a missed visit. 2. If a visit is missed and not rescheduled the clinician will: A. Notify the IDG (Interdisciplinary Group) and director of patient care services/clinical supervisor of the missed visit and reason for missed visit...””

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 231 words

    “Based on interview and record review the agency did ensure to provide bereavement services (Assessing strengths, bereavement risk, and concerns and needs related to grief and loss) for one of 14 sample selected patients (Patient 14), when Patient 14s family did not receive any bereavement services after Patient 14s death. This failure in practice had the potential for Patient 14s family to not have the needed emotional support during the grieving process. A review of Patient 14s “;Clinical Summary” indicated Patient 14 was admitted to the agency in June 2023 and passed away six days later. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/6/24 at 11:50 a.m. with the Regional Director of Clinical Operation (RDCO), RDCO reviewed Patient 14s clinical record and did not find any documents that showed the agency provided bereavement services for Patient 14s family. RDCO stated she could not find any care plan for bereavement and no documents about bereavement services for Patient 14. RDCO stated bereavement services are for the family’s emotional support and if the agency doesnt provide bereavement services, it is a possibility for the family to do not go through the grieving correctly. A review of the agencys policy and procedure “;Bereavement Services,” dated 2023, indicated “;... The hospice will provide an organized bereavement program supervised by a qualified bereavement coordinator for up to (1) year following the death of the patient...””

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

Dec 21, 2023: initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner4 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 196 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 19 (5%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the hospice interdisciplinary group (IDG) completed an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 8: The patient elected hospice care on 1/31/23. A review of the clinical record revealed no documented evidence of a Medical Social Worker (MSW) initial assessment. There was no evidence that MSW services were offered and refused by the patient/caregiver within the initial comprehensive five-day window. During an interview on 12/20/23, the Administrator/Alternate Director of Patient Care Services, Regional Vice President (VP) of Clinical Operations, Regional VP of Operations, and Director of Clinical Operations agreed that the MSW did not complete an initial comprehensive assessment or documentation that the MSW was offered and refused by the patient.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 235 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse who is a member of the Interdisciplinary Group. The written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, observation, and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed of patients who received hospice aide services, the agency did not ensure the hospice aide received specific written instructions to meet the patient’s care needs. Clinical Record 2/Home Visit 4: The patient elected hospice care on 3/17/23. The plan of care dated 11/12/23 ordered “Wound # 5... 2. Gently pat dry and apply Calmoseptine ointment. ... 4. Repeat after each episode of incontinence.” During the home visit with the Hospice Aide [Personnel Record 2] on 12/19/23, the Hospice Aide stated that she applied Calmoseptine ointment to the patient’s buttocks during every visit. The hospice aide care plan dated 11/12/23 did not document a task with instructions on applying Calmoseptine ointment. During an interview on 12/20/23, the Administrator/Alternate Director of Patient Care Services, Regional Vice President (VP) of Clinical Operations, Regional VP of Operations, and the Director of Clinical Operations agreed that the agency did not ensure the hospice aide care plan included a task with appropriate instructions to meet the care needs of the patient.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 390 words

    “It is required that a hospice aide provides services included in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, observation, and interview. In 4 of 13 (31%) clinical records reviewed of patients that received hospice aide services, the agency did not ensure the hospice aide provided services included in the plan of care (POC). Clinical Record 1/Home Visit 1: The patient elected hospice care on 7/6/23. The hospice aide care plan dated 12/1/23 assigned the hospice aide the task: “Partial/Complete Bath: Shower Bath.” The registered nurse (RN) [Personnel Record 1] interviewed during the home visit on 12/19/23 stated that the hospice aide provided a “bed bath” for the patient every visit. A review of the hospice aide visit notes dated 12/1/23 through 12/18/23 documented the hospice aide performed a “Shower Bath” during each visit. Clinical Record 2/Home Visit 4: The patient elected hospice care on 3/17/23. The plan of care dated 11/12/23 ordered “Wound # 5... 2. Gently pat dry and apply Calmoseptine ointment. ... 4. Repeat after each episode of incontinence.” During the home visit with the Hospice Aide [Personnel Record 2] on 12/19/23, the Hospice Aide stated that she applied Calmoseptine ointment to the patient’s buttocks during every visit. The hospice aide care plan dated 11/12/23 did not document a task for applying Calmoseptine ointment. Clinical Record 3/Home Visit 2: The patient elected hospice care on 9/7/23. The hospice aide care plan dated 9/7/23 assigned the hospice aide the task: “Bathing: Shower Bath.” During the home visit with the social worker (SW) [Personnel Record 3] on 12/19/23, the hospice aide was observed performing a “bed bath.” Clinical Record 17: The patient elected hospice care on 8/30/22. The hospice aide care plan dated 11/21/23 assigned the hospice aide the task: “... Bed Bath 2x per week.” For the week of 12/3/23, the hospice aide documented that a bed bath was performed three times: 12/4/23, 12/6/23, and 12/8/23. For the week of 12/10/23, the hospice aide documented that a bed bath was performed three times: 12/11/23, 12/13/23, and 12/15/23. During an interview on 12/20/23, the Administrator/Alternate Director of Patient Care Services, Regional Vice President (VP) of Clinical Operations, Regional VP of Operations, and Director of Clinical Operations (DCO) agreed the hospice aide did not provide tasks assigned in the hospice aide care plan.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 427 words

    “It is required that a patient clinical record containing past and current findings is maintained for each hospice patient. The record contains correct clinical information that is available to the patient’s attending physician and hospice staff. Each patient’s record includes, at a minimum, physician orders. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, observation, and interview. In 4 of 19 (21%) clinical records reviewed and home visits observed, the agency did not ensure the clinical record included a physician order for services provided. Clinical Record 1/Home Visit 1: The patient elected hospice care on 9/2/23 and resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). The plans of care (POC) dated 9/2/23 and 12/1/23 ordered Humalog insulin to be given three times a day with sliding scale dosing based on fingerstick blood sugar (FSBS) results. During the home visit with the registered nurse (RN) [Personnel Record 1) on 12/19/23, The RN stated that the SNF was performing FSBS on the patient. A clinical record review revealed no documented evidence of a physician order for FSBS. Clinical Record 3/Home Visit 2: The patient elected hospice care on 9/7/23. The POC dated 12/6/23 ordered “Aspirations Precautions.” During the home visit on 12/17/23, bedside suction was observed at the patient’s bedside. A clinical record review revealed no evidence of a physician’s order for the bedside suction and its use in patient care. Clinical Record 17: The patient elected hospice care on 8/30/22. The initial nursing assessment dated 8/30/22 documented the patient’s diet as “nothing by mouth” (NPO) except mouth care and Jevity feedings through a “G-tube” (gastrostomy tube). The POC dated 8/30/22 documented “Nasogastric (NG) Tube.” A clinical record review revealed no evidence of a physician’s order for the NPO diet and the use of the G-tube. The agency reported the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) provided the drop-down option of “NG Tube” only. Clinical Record 18: The patient elected hospice care on 10/12/23. The nursing assessment completed on 12/13/23 documented, “Arm protection sleeves provided to patient...” A physician order dated 12/19/23 provided orders for the following supplies: Neosporin and sterile 4x4 gauze. A clinical record review revealed no evidence of a physician order for the arm protection sleeves and no specific instructions for using the Neosporin and sterile 4x4 gauze. During an interview, the Administrator/Alternate Director of Patient Care Services, the Regional Vice President (VP) of Clinical Operations, the Regional VP of Operations, and the Director of Clinical Operations in an interview on 12/20/23 agreed that the agency did not ensure a physician order was written for services provided.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 10, 2024Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jun 6, 2024Recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited
Dec 21, 2023Initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 16, 2016.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 45% at home, 38% in assisted living, 16% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day15.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.3%
Visits near death97.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Sojourn Eastbay Holdings LLC owns 100% directly since Aug 1, 2016.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Alex Edward Mauricio (corporate officer, 100%); Alex Edward Mauricio (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); John Charles Garbarino (corporate officer, 0%); Tyrone E Snipes (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Michael Derrick (corporate officer, 0%); Michael Derrick (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Alfred Tablante (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David A Malm (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Bristol Hospice Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 9, 2020
Bristol Ultimate Holdco, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 21, 2023
Sojourn Eastbay Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Aug 1, 2016
Bristol Hospice, L.L.C.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 9, 2020
Bristol Hospice Topco Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 9, 2020
Webster Equity Partners Bristol Cf LPOwns 5% or more through other companies76.82%Jan 21, 2023
Webster Equity Partners IV Bristol Cf LPOwns 5% or more through other companies6.43%Feb 21, 2023

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 76% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 77% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.1% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 50.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 52 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 36 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 94588, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6.5; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.