Hearth Record

Lifeguard Hospice Care, Inc.

A hospice in Pleasanton, California 94566

6700 Koll Center Parkway, #115, Pleasanton, California 94566. (925) 226-7185.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 35 hospices serving ZIP code 94566 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 23, 2025: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 14, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission12 deficiencies
  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Record Review. it was noted by the nurse surveyor that Leadership failed to draft and approve a functional policy that provided clear direction and oversite to medical staff regarding their expectations for the documentation of CTI (Certification of Terminal Illness) as evidenced by record review and that the following Condition of Participation was not met: §418.102.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 patient records reviewed, for active records, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that for RRHV#1, RRHV#2, RRHV#3, RRHV#4, RRNHV#1, RRNHV#2, RRNHV#3, RRNHV#4, RRNHV#5, RRNHV#6, RRNHV#7, RRNHV#8, RRNHV#9, and RRNHV#10 the physician’s certificate of terminal illness (CTI) did not contain the required narrative. The CTI was mostly blank stating “medical record reviewed” or was blank and did not contain any information regarding patient physical findings or the facts that were taken into account that demonstrated the patient was hospice appropriate. Findings were validated by the Administrator, the DPCS, and the Nurse Case Manager.”

    Rule L0667. Condition-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that for RRNHV#2 the RN did not visit the hospice patient no less than 15 days to conduct an assessment. The patient had been seen by LPNs for 23 days until a RN with a reassessment was conducted. Finding was verified by the DPCS and the RN Case Manager.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 patient records reviewed, for active patients, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that PRN frequencies for the skilled nurse, medical social worker, and spiritual counselor did not have a reason for when to make the as needed PRN visits (they were not qualified). For RRHV#1, RRHV#2, RRHV#3, RRHV#4, RRNHV#1, RRNHV#2, RRNHV#3, RRNHV#4, RRNHV#5, RRNHV#6, RRNHV#7, RRNHV#8, RRNHV#9, and RRNHV#10, all PRN visit frequencies were quantified for a number of how many could be made, but not for the reason in which they would be made.. Finding was verified by the DPCS and the Nurse Case Manager.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 128 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 14 patient records reviewed, for active patients, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that medication orders were not clear or complete. For RRHV#1 and RRHV#2, the families were encouraged to use zinc oxide on reddened areas on the patients’ coccyx, however, there were no physician orders for the use of zinc on the plan of care. Findings were verified with the DPCS and the Nurse Case Manager. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, It was noted during RRHV#3 that patient was prescribed zinc oxide for wound care, family was educated on use, but an order was not found and it was not listed on the medication list. This was discussed with the DPCS and administrator.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Observed in Record Review. It was noted by the nurse surveyor that for RRHV#3 the hospice aide care visit was missed without orders or documentation of reason for missed visit noted. Findings were discussed with the administrator. Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, for active patients, the nurse surveyor noted that care was not provided according to the hospice plan of care. For RRHV#2, the skilled nurse frequency was 2xwk, however on the third week of service, the patient was seen by the SN one time. There was no explanation in the electronic record for the missed nurse visit. Finding was verified by the DPCS and the nurse case manager.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 282 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 4 of 4 home visits conducted, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the staff failed to follow acceptable practice and agency policy when performing patient care. During RRHV#1, the registered nurse hand sanitized, went over to the patient and before touching him, came across the room and touched other objects, he then went back to the patient without hand sanitizing. The skilled nurse did not hand sanitize again until he donned gloves for cleaning his equipment, then doffed the gloves without hand sanitizing per policy. During RRHV#2, the registered nurse set up her barriers, went into her bag without hand sanitizing, put her equipment on her barrier, cleaned it, put it back where she had initially laid it, then took the patient’s vital signs. She then put the equipment back in the same place on the barrier then later returned her equipment back to her bag without cleaning. The Registered nurse also went into her bag several times without hand sanitizing. Findings were verified by the Director of Patient care services (DPCS) who was present on the visits. Observed in Patient Home. it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the hospice staff did not complete hand hygiene consistent with policy. For RRHV#3, the chaplain went in and out of his bag without hand sanitizing after anointing the patient with oil, and placed the container back into the bag without cleaning it. For RRHV#4, the CHHA did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes after providing a bath/perineal care and before picking up notepad to chart per policy. Findings were verified by the Director of Patient Care Services (DCPS) who was present on the visit.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 199 words

    “Observed in Record Review. it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the hospice aide care plan did not contain all the necessary or current information. For RRHV#3, RRHV#4, RRNHV#6, RRNHV#7, RRNHV#8, RRNHV#10, the patient is on continuous oxygen, the hospice aide care plan did not have any information regarding what the hospice aide was supposed to do with the oxygen during the patient’s shower/bath Findings were observed by the Director of Patient Care Services (DCPS) who was present onsite. Observed in Record Review. In 13 of 14 patient records reviewed, for active patients, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the hospice aide care plan did not contain all the necessary or current information. For RRHV#1, the patient was on continuous oxygen, the hospice aide care plan did not have any information regarding what the hospice aide was supposed to do with the oxygen during the patient’s bath. For RRHV#2, RRNHV#1, RRNHV#2, RRNHV#3, RRNHV#4, RRNHV#5. the patient is was on PRN oxygen yet the care plan did not address what the aide should do regarding the oxygen should the patient be on it during the bath. Findings were discussed with the DPCS and the Nurse Case Manager.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 13 patient records reviewed, for active patients with the hospice aide, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that hospice aide supervisory visits were not documented no less frequently than every fourteen days. For RRHV#2, in the last month there was a hospice aide supervisory visit that was documented sixteen days apart. Findings were verified with the DPCS and the Nurse Case Manager.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 3 patient records reviewed, for active patients who were recertified, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that for RRHV#1 (4 recertifications), RRNHV#4 (1 recertification), and RRNHV#7 (1 recertification), the physician’s certificate of terminal illness (CTI) for recertification did not contain the required narrative. The CTI was mostly blank stating “medical record reviewed” or was blank and did not contain any information regarding patient physical findings or the facts that were considered that demonstrated the patient was hospice appropriate. Findings were validated by the Administrator, the DPCS, and the Nurse Case Manager.”

    Rule L0668. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, it was noted by the surveyor during the medication review by the nurse that the medication profile did not accurately reflect what the patient was taking. For RRHV#2, there was an order for nebulizer treatments, DuoNeb 3mg-).5mg/3ml. Solution for inhalation, 1 via nebulizer every 4 hours while awake, the medication profile did not reflect the specific instruction of using every 4 hours. This portion of the order had been left off. Finding was validated by the DPCS who was present during the visit.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 103 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 patient records reviewed, for active records for patients with oxygen, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that education related to the safe use of equipment or medical gases provided by the agency. For RRHV#1, RRHV#2, RRHV#3, RRHV#4, RRNHV#1, RRNHV#2, RRNHV#3, RRNHV#4, RRNHV#5, RRNHV#6, RRNHV#7, RRNHV#8, RRNHV#9, and RRNHV#10.there was no documentation in the EMR related to use of the oxygen concentrator or back up cylinders. The written material provided was very limited and did not include any information regarding the care of the equipment. Finding was discussed with the DPCS and Nurse Case Manager.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 23, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 14, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission12 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 29, 2015.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 52% at home, 42% in assisted living, 6% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.5%
Visits near death95.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 10 owners or officers are people: Editha M Mallari (owns 5% or more directly, 80%); Jeffrey Mallari (owns 5% or more directly, 10%); Consuelo Lemye (owns 5% or more directly, 10%); Jeffrey Mallari (corporate officer); Jeffrey Mallari (corporate director); Consuelo Lemye (corporate officer); Consuelo Lemye (corporate director); Consuelo Lemye (managing employee (on the payroll)); Editha M Mallari (corporate officer); Editha M Mallari (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 62.96% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 18.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 35 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 94566, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 12.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.