Tranquil Oaks Hospice Care
A hospice in West Covina, California 91791
2155 E Garvey Ave N, Suite B-10, West Covina, California 91791. (562) 222-1190.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 8 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
8 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 121 hospices serving ZIP code 91791 had 6.
The last inspection on record was on Jun 18, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jun 18, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 189 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #1,#4) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1: The medication profile indicated Melatonin 5 mg tablet, strength 05 mg, and instruction to take 1 tablet daily as needed for sleep. Discrepancy with the milligram and the strength noted. Patient #4: The medication profile instructs nystatin powder to be applied to the affected area 2 times daily for 14 days. No evidence noted where the medication is to be applied. The medication profile has diclofenac topical gel, to apply every 6 hours to affected joint as needed. No evidence noted where to apply the medication. Medication reconciliation completed while performing a home visit, Milk of Magnesia and PRN oxygen were present on the hospice medication profile but was not reflected on the LTC medication profile.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 127 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #5, #8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #5: The patient admitted on 5-9-24. The initial bereavement risk assessment was completed on 2-24-25 and is outside of the 5 day requirement. Patient #8: The patient admitted on 4-24-26. The initial bereavement risk assessment was completed on 4-30-26 and is outside of the 5 day requirement.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 272 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,#2,#4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1 The patient was admitted with Senile Degeneration of the Brain. It was documented patient has a complaints of pain, constipation, incontinence, unsteady gait, sleep disturbance and altered skin integrity. There is no evidence the plan of care reflects patient goals, interventions and outcomes for these issues. Documentation by RN noted patient uses a cane for ambulation. No evidence of safety with the use of a cane noted in the care plan. The medical record indicated patient was on aspirin therapy. There was not evidence of bleeding precautions initiated on the plan of care. Patient #2: The medical record indicated patient has a unsteady gait requiring use of a walker. There is no evidence that the hospice plan of care reflects patient goals, interventions and outcomes for safety with use of a walker. The medication profile indicates oxygen therapy for shortness of breath. There is no evidence of patient goals and interventions for management of shortness of breath. Patient #4: The medical record indicated the patient is incontinent and utilizes barrier cream for prevention of impaired skin integrity. There is no evidence the plan of care reflects patient goals, interventions and outcomes for monitoring skin integrity.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 177 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,#2,#4) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: The record indicated an order for melatonin 5 mg, strength 05, to take 1 tablet every night with discrepancy in strength noted. The record indicated an order for the nurse to check oxygen saturation every visit if patient appears short of breath. The order was lacking additional instructions on parameters and when to notify the physician. Patient #2: The record indicated an order for the nurse to check oxygen saturation every visit if patient appears short of breath. The order was lacking additional instructions on parameters and when to notify the physician. Patient #4: The record indicated an order for nystatin powder to the affected area without evidence of a specific location. The record indicated an order for Diclofenac topical gel to apply every 6 hours to affected joints as needed without evidence of a specific location.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 261 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #1: Documentation by the nurse in the medical record indicated the patient utilized a cane with ambulation. No evidence of this equipment present on the hospice plan of care. Patient #2: Documentation by the nurse in the medical record indicated the patient utilized a nebulizer machine, walker, and oxygen. No evidence of this equipment present on the hospice plan of care. Patient #3: Documentation by the nurse in the medical record indicated the patient utilized oxygen and a Hoyer lift. No evidence of this equipment present on the hospice plan of care. Patient #4: Documentation by the nurse in the medical record indicated the patient had a fall mat, shower chair and bed rails. No evidence of this equipment present on the hospice plan of care. Patient #5: During a home visit a bedside commode, fall mat and heel protectors were noted in the patients room. No evidence this equipment present on the hospice plan of care. Documentation by the nurse in the EMR wound console of weekly wound care being provided. No evidence of wound care supplies listed on the hospice plan of care. Patient #9: Documentation by the nurse in the medical record indicated the patient utilized a hospital bed, over the bed table, and shower chair. No evidence of this equipment present on the hospice plan of care.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 250 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #3,#5) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #3: Documentation by the nurse in the medical record identified a Hoyer lift was to be used with all transfers from bed to chair. The aide plan of care was not updated to reflect the use of a Hoyer lift. Patient #5: During a home visit heel protectors, half rails, fall mat and bedside commode were present in the patients room. No evidence these items were identified on the aide plan of care. No evidence of documentation or instructions to when the heel protectors should to be applied. Documentation by the nurse identified the patient requires assist of 1 to stand and transfer from the bed to wheelchair. The wheelchair was not identified as a form of mobility on the aide plan of care.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))
“Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient #4: Documentation noted in the medical record by the RN and MSW stating patients niece is the POA. No evidence of this document scanned into the patients medical record.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 94 words
“Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #2: The medical record shows the start of care began on 4-4-26. This date did not match the signed election of benefits document which noted the hospice start of care to begin 4-3-26.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 8 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 1, 2014.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 98.8% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 83% at home, 11% in assisted living, 6% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 13.9 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 5.3% |
| Visits near death | 98.8% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 10 owners or officers are people: Daniel D Ghalchi (corporate officer, 100%); Daniel D Ghalchi (corporate director, 100%); Daniel D Ghalchi (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Daniel D Ghalchi (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Ray Y Hahn (corporate officer, 100%); Ray Y Hahn (corporate director, 100%); Ray Y Hahn (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Ray Y Hahn (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Daniel D Ghalchi (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Ray Y Hahn (owns 5% or more directly, 50%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 67% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 66% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 81.31% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 11.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 121 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91791, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 8.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Tranquil Oaks Hospice Care This hospice | 8 |
| Quality Care Hospice, Inc. | Not given |
| Accord Hospice and Palliative Care, Inc. | 7 |
| Physician’s Choice Hospice LLC | 8 |
| Lighthouse Hospice & Palliative Care Services | 0 |
| Kaiser Foundation Hospital Hospice Program | 3 |
| Providence at Home With Compassus Hospice Care La County | 5 |
| Kaiser Foundation Hospital Los Angeles - Hospice | 3 |
| Vnacare | 9 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corp | 18 |
| Torrance Memorial Hospice | 4 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.