Hearth Record

Premium Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Norwalk, California 90650

12241 Firestone Blvd., Suite A & B, Norwalk, California 90650. (562) 929-7221.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 245 hospices serving ZIP code 90650 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on May 28, 2025: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 28, 2025: follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission1 deficiency
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 118 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 3 patient records reviewed, During review of RR#1-3 it was noted SN goals on each POC were the same with each goal to be achieved within 14 days e.g.: Within 2 weeks and continuing throughout the benefit period, the patient’s pain will be maintained at an acceptable level as determined by the patient, as evidenced by effective use of prescribed pain regimen, and no signs of uncontrolled pain or distress. Patient will be able to maintain an effective breathing pattern, as evidenced by relaxed breathing at normal rate and depth and absence of dyspnea within 2 weeks and throughout the benefit period. This was discussed with the organization Administrator and DPCS.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

Apr 24, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission8 deficiencies
  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 7 of 7 recertified patient records reviewed, the organization failed to revise the plan of care based on the patient’s progress towards goals. For example, in RRHV #3 the goal stated, pt/cg will demonstrate knowledge of safety measures within 2 weeks and throughout the benefit period as evidenced by the absence of accident fall or accident injury. The goal was not accomplished within the benefit period and was not revised to meet the needs of the patient. There were similar findings throughout multiple charts, RRHV#1, 2, and 3, RRNHV #4 and 7, and RRDC #1 and 2. This was validated and reviewed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0553. Condition-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 7 of 7 recertified patient records reviewed, there was no evidence that the governing body and leadership had established requirements to support patient care treatment and services as evidenced by failure to review and approve documents to ensure staff were following the plan of care and the Physician was being made aware of any plan of care deviations. This was reviewed with the Administrator and Director of Patient Services”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to provide accurate assessment documentation. For example, in Bereavement #2 the home visit documentation note indicated the patient had pain and was medicated for pain but in additional documentation on the same home visit note, the Nurse marked no observable pain. This was validated by the Administrator and the Director of Patient Care Services.”

    Rule L0535. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 156 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 7 of 7 recertified patient records reviewed, the organization failed to follow the plan of care. For example, in RRHV#1, in benefit period 1, the Hospice Nurse indicated the goal as follows, patient will receive appropriate emotional support within 2 weeks and throughout the benefit period and continued the same goal in benefit period number two but there is no documentation in the Hospice Nurse’s notes to support the goal having been worked towards and the Physician being contacted to notify the goal had not been accomplished. In RRHV#3 the goal states, pt/cg will demonstrate knowledge of safety measures within 2 weeks and throughout the benefit period as evidenced by the absence of accident fall or accident injury. There are similar findings in RRHV #1,2, and 3, RRNHV #4 and 7, and RRDC #1 and 2. This was validated and reviewed with the Director of Patient Care Services an the Administrator.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 258 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 7 of 7 recertified patient records reviewed, the organization failed to provide teaching of the interventions established in the plan of care. From example, in RRHV#3 the goal states, pt/cg will demonstrate knowledge of safety measures within 2 weeks and throughout the benefit period as evidenced by the absence of accident fall or accident injury. In the Hospice Nurse’s documentation on several notes there is no documentation to support safety teachings. In fact, safety teaching is marked as “no” on the Hospice Nurse notes. Another example, in RRHV#1, in benefit period 1, the Hospice Nurse indicated the goal as follows, patient will receive appropriate emotional support within 2 weeks and throughout the benefit period. There is no documentation in the notes to address the patient/caregiver receiving “appropriate emotional support”. There were similar records with the same issues, RRHV #1, 2, and 3, RRNHV #4 and 7, and RRDC # 1 and 2. This was validated and reviewed with the Administrator. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the Hospice Nurse failed to follow the order for blood glucose monitoring and sliding scale medication administration. For example, in RRNHV #1 the order states, SN to monitor blood glucose levels and facility to monitor on days the Hospice Nurse does not visit and administer medication per sliding scale. The Hospice Nurse did not monitor the blood glucose level as ordered and did not document if the facility monitored the blood glucose levels. This was validated by the Director of Patient Services.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 121 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, the Medical Social Worker (MSW) failed to notify the Hospice Nurse of the patients complaint of pain. For example, the patient stated, she had been having unresolved pain to her left lower leg and foot for months and has to take one Tramadol in the morning and one at bedtime and in addition, also has her Private Caregiver give two Tylenol at bedtime to help alleviate the pain to be able to sleep. During the visit the MSW did not acknowledge the patient’s complaint of pain nor did the MSW report the pain to the Hospice Nurse. This was validated with the Director of Patient Care Services and the Administrator.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 131 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, the clinician failed to use an organization approved hand sanitizer as per policy 9-009.1. For example, in RRHV #1 the Hospice Nurse had a bottle of hand sanitizer which only contained 62% isopropyl alcohol and also stated, the hand sanitizer within the container was not the hand sanitizer originally in the bottle but the bottle was refilled with hand sanitizer of an unverifiable brand. The organization’s Director of Patient Care Services could also not attest of the contents within the bottle and therefore, the bottle was not approved. The organization’s policy states, organization approved, alcohol based hand rub which conforms to CDC guidelines. CDC guidelines state that 70% isopropyl alcohol. This was validated by the Director of Patient Care Services.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, the Certified Hospice Aide (CHA) failed to follow the plan of care. For example, the CHA ambulated the patient via walker, from the living room to the shower for care. The plan of care stated, the patient should remain in bed due to being bedbound and did not indicate an assistive device could be used to ambulate the patient. This was reviewed with the Administrator and the Direct of Patient Care Services.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 28, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission1 deficiency cited
Apr 24, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 29, 2012.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 67% at home, 15% in assisted living, 18% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.9%
Visits near death94.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 9 owners or officers are people: Annabelle G Agulto (owns 5% or more directly, 94%); Madelene Agulto-Man (runs it (operational or managerial control), 40%); Meagan G Agulto (corporate director, 20%); Alan A Frischer (corporate director, 20%); Madelene Agulto-Man (owns 5% or more directly, 6%); Madelene Agulto-Man (corporate officer, 6%); Annabelle G Agulto (corporate director); Annabelle G Agulto (managing employee (on the payroll)); Madelene Agulto-Man (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 26.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 245 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 90650, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.