Serenity Hospice LLC
A hospice in Palm Springs, California 92262
777 E Tahquitz Canyon Way, Suite 301, Palm Springs, California 92262. (760) 325-8718.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 6 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 3of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
6 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 53 hospices serving ZIP code 92262 had 6.
The last inspection on record was on Jun 6, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jun 6, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner6 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 391 words
“It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current prescription and over the counter (OTC) drugs, supplements; herbal remedies, and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. This standard was not met as evidenced by observation and interview. In 2 of 4 (50%) home visit observations, the agency did not ensure the drug profile contained the patient’s current prescription and over the counter (OTC) drugs, supplements, herbal remedies, and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. Home Visit 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/06/2023 for the diagnosis of leukemia. The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). During the home visit observation with the Hospice Aide (HA) (Personnel Record 7), a copy of the facility’s medication administration record (MAR) was compared to the hospice medication profile. The facility had the following medications listed that were not on the hospice medication profile, Milk of Magnesia 30 ml every 12 hours dated 01/01/2024, Probiotic 1 capsule daily dated 05/30/2024. The hospice medication profile had the following medications that were not listed on the facility MAR, Robitussin DM every 6 hours as needed dated 09/13/2023, Cosopt eye drops twice daily date 12/19/2023, Senna S twice daily dated 03/14/2024, and Glycopyrrolate three times daily as needed dated 04/20/2024. Home Visit 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/17/2023 for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. The patient resided in a SNF. During the home visit observation with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LPN) (Personnel Record 10), a copy of the facility’s MAR was compared to the hospice medication profile. The facility had the following medications listed that were not on the hospice medication profile, Bisacodyl 5 mg daily dated 11/23/2023, Lasix 20 mg daily dated 11/23/2023, Prosource 30 ml daily dated 11/30/2023, Benadryl 25 mg every 6 hours as needed dated 12/29/2023, Coreg 6.25 mg two times daily dated 11/24/2023 vs hospice had Coreg 1 time a day, Norco every 6 hours as needed dated 11/23/2023 vs hospice had every 6 hours scheduled. The hospice had the following medication listed that were not on the facility MAR, Bisacodyl 10 mg suppository as needed dated 03/15/2024. During an interview and joint record review on 06/05/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services and the Quality Coordinator confirmed there were differences in the drug profiles.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 200 words
“It is required that the comprehensive assessment includes an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals, focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 19 (16%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure an initial bereavement assessment was completed. Clinical Record 13: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/29/2024 for the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clinical record review revealed no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. Clinical Record 14: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/07/2024 for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the lung. Clinical record review revealed no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. Clinical Record 15: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/22/2023 for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Clinical record review revealed no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. During an interview and joint record review on 06/05/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services and the Quality Coordinator confirmed the clinical records did not contain initial bereavement assessments.”
-
Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))
The inspectors’ words, 297 words
“It is required that the hospice care and services provided to patients and families follow the individualized plan of care established by the hospice IDG in collaboration with the attending physician (if any). This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 19 (16%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure hospice care and services provided to patients followed the individualized plan of care. Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/06/2023 for the diagnosis of leukemia. The initial plan of care included an order for skilled nurse visit frequency of 1-3 visits per week. Clinical record review revealed skilled nursing visits were not documented for the weeks of 12/03/2023, 01/14/2024, and 02/05/2024. The clinical record contained no documented reason for the missed nursing visits. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/17/2023 for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. The initial plan of care included an order for skilled nurse frequency of visits, 1-3 visits per week. Clinical record review revealed a skilled nursing visit was not documented for the week of 12/10/2024 and the clinical record contained no documented reason for the missed visit. Clinical Record 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/28/2024 for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the skin. The initial plan of care included an order for skilled nurse frequency of visits 2-4 visits per week. Clinical record review revealed during the week 05/13/2024 only one visit was documented on 05/15/2024. The clinical record contained no documented reason for the missed visit(s). During an interview and joint record review on 06/05/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services and the Quality Coordinator confirmed visits had not been documented or performed as ordered in the plans of care.”
-
Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))
The inspectors’ words, 192 words
“It is required that the bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved per a bereavement plan of care that includes the types of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 3 (67%) clinical records reviewed with bereavement services, the agency did not ensure bereavement services reflected the needs of the bereaved per a bereavement plan of care. Clinical Record 17: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/21/2024 for the diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis. The patient died on 03/24/2024. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that a bereavement plan of care had not been established. Clinical Record 18: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/14/2024 for the diagnosis of heart disease. The patient died on 05/07/2024. The clinical record contained no documented evidence of a post-death bereavement assessment or that a bereavement plan of care had not been established. During an interview and joint record review on 06/05/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services and the Quality Coordinator confirmed that bereavement services were not outlined in plans of care.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 840 words
“It is required that written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 8 of 14 (57%) clinical records reviewed with hospice aide services accepted, the agency did not ensure the Registered Nurse (RN) provided patient-specific care instructions for the hospice aide. Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/06/2023 for the diagnosis of leukemia. The initial nursing assessment dated 09/06/2023 included documentation that the patient had periods of “Requires supplemental oxygen at 2 liters per minute continuously.” The hospice aide care plan dated 09/06/2023 assigned the aide the tasks of bed bath and shampooing hair but did not provide specific instructions to the aide related to the patient’s use of oxygen during tasks. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/17/2023 for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. The initial nursing assessment dated 11/17/2023 included documentation that the patient had “a wound to coccyx and wounds to left toes.” The hospice aide care plan dated 11/17/2023 assigned the aide the tasks of bed bath and visualize condition of skin and report to RN, but the aide care plan did not notify the aide of the patient’s wounds. The aide care plan did not provide specific instructions to the aide related to caring for the wounds and wound dressings while providing care to the patient. Clinical Record 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/25/2023 for the diagnosis of cerebral infarction. The initial nursing assessment dated 12/25/2023 included documentation that the patient is prescribed Keppra 1000 mg seizures. The nursing assessment dated 02/26/2024 included documentation that the patient had an “upper right back wound.” A nursing assessment dated 05/08/2024 included documentation of “right buttocks wound.” The nursing assessment dated 05/15/2024 included documentation of “right buttock pressure ulcer with hydrocolloid dressing.” The hospice aide care plan dated 12/25/2023 assigned the aide the tasks of bed bath, incontinent care and visualize condition of skin every visit and report to RN. The aide care plan did not include notification of seizure precautions and did not provide specific instructions to the aide related to caring for the wound and wound dressing while providing care to the patient. Clinical Record 6: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/22/2024 for the diagnosis of cerebral infarction. The initial nursing assessment dated 05/22/2024 included documentation that the patient had “multiple wounds, pressure sores to coccyx, right heel and left second finger.” The hospice aide care plan dated 05/22/2024 assigned the aide the tasks of bed bath and visualize condition of skin and report to RN. The aide care plan did not notify the aide of the patient’s wounds and did not provide specific instructions to the aide related to caring for the wound and wound dressing while providing care to the patient. Clinical Record 8: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/10/2024 for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the tongue. The initial nursing assessment dated 01/10/2024 included documentation that the patient had a G-tube [gastrostomy tube]. The hospice aide care plans dated 03/15/2024 and 04/11/2024 assigned the aide the tasks of bed bath and visualize condition of skin and report to RN. The aide care plans did not notify the aide of the patient’s G-tube and did not include specific instructions related to G-Tube care while providing care to the patient. Clinical Record 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/28/2024 for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the skin. A physician order dated 01/28/2024 noted “skin tears bilateral arms cover with foam dressing.” The hospice aide care plan dated 01/28/2024 assigned the aide the care tasks of shower and visualize condition of skin and report to RN. The aide care plan did not notify the aide of the patient’s wounds and did not provide specific instructions to the aide related to caring for the wound and wound dressing while providing care to the patient. Clinical Record 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/14/2024 for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The hospice aide care plan dated 3/14/2024 identified that the aide was tasked with giving the patient a bath but did not specify which type of bath: shower, bed bath, partial bed bath or shower chair. Clinical Record 18: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/14/2024 for the diagnosis of heart disease. The hospice aide care plan dated 04/29/2024 assigned the aide the tasks of bed bath and shampooing. The aide care plan notified the aide that the patient was on oxygen at 4 LPM [liters per minute] continuously but did not provide specific instructions to the aide related to the patient’s use of oxygen during tasks. During an interview and joint record review on 06/05/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services and the Quality Coordinator confirmed the hospice aide care plans did not contain specific instructions to the aide related to the patient’s care task assigned.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 679 words
“It is required that the hospice medical director or physician-designee provides written and signed recertification of the terminal illness to meet the hospice care benefit requirement. Recertification is completed no later than two (2) calendar days after the first day of each benefit period, and no more than fifteen (15) days before the next benefit period begins. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 7 of 10 (70%) clinical records reviewed with recertification, the agency did not ensure the recertification of the terminal illness was completed by the physician no later than two calendar days after the first day of the benefit period and no more than 15 days before the next benefit period. Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/06/2023 for the diagnosis of leukemia. Clinical record review revealed the fourth benefit period started on 05/03/2024 and the recertification of terminal illness was signed by the hospice Medical Director on 05/06/2024, 3 days after the start of the benefit period and 1 day outstanding. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/17/2023 for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Clinical record review revealed the second benefit period started on 02/15/2024 and the recertification of terminal illness was signed by the hospice Medical Director on 02/19/2024, 4 days after the start of the benefit period and 2 days outstanding. Clinical Record 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/25/2023 for the diagnosis of cerebral infarction. Clinical record review revealed the fifth benefit period started on 04/02/2024 and the recertification of terminal illness was signed by the hospice Medical Director on 04/10/2024, 8 days after the start of the benefit period and 6 days outstanding. The sixth benefit period started on 06/01/2024 and the recertification of terminal illness was not signed by the hospice Medical Director, as of the date of record review on 06/05/2024, 4 days after the start of the benefit period and 2 days outstanding. Clinical Record 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/29/2023. Clinical record review revealed the second benefit period started on 10/27/2023 and the recertification of terminal illness was signed by the hospice Medical Director on 10/30/2023, 3 days after the start of the benefit period and 1 day outstanding. The third benefit period started on 01/25/2024 and was signed by the hospice Medical Director on 01/29/2024, 4 days after the start of the benefit period and 2 days outstanding. The fourth benefit period started on 03/25/2024 and was signed by the hospice Medical Director on 04/07/2024, 13 days after the start of the benefit period and 11 days outstanding. The fifth benefit period started on 05/24/2024 and was signed by the hospice Medical Director on 05/28/2024, 4 days after the start of the benefit period and 2 days outstanding. Clinical Record 7: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/29/2023 for the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clinical record review revealed the second benefit period started on 03/28/2024 and the recertification of terminal illness was signed by the hospice Medical Director on 04/07/2024, 10 days after the start of the benefit period and 8 days outstanding. Clinical Record 8: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/10/2024 for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the tongue. Clinical record review revealed the second benefit period started on 04/09/2024 and the recertification of terminal illness was signed by the hospice Medical Director on 05/01/2024, 24 days after the start of the benefit period and 22 days outstanding. Clinical Record 15: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/22/2023 for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Clinical record review revealed the eleventh benefit period started on 04/20/2024 and the recertification of terminal illness was signed by the hospice Medical Director on 04/23/2024, 3 days after the start of the benefit period and 1 day outstanding. During an interview and joint record review on 06/05/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services and the Quality Coordinator confirmed the recertifications had not been signed by the Medical Director within the 2-day time frame.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2024 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner | 6 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 18, 2009.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.2% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 75% at home, 19% in assisted living, 6% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 11.0 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 11.2% |
| Visits near death | 97.2% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 10 owners or officers are people: Ziad A Tannous (owns 5% or more directly, 33.34%); Ziad A Tannous (corporate director, 33.34%); Janice Abrille (owns 5% or more directly, 33.33%); Janice Abrille (corporate director, 33.33%); Janice Abrille (managing employee (on the payroll), 33.33%); Peter L Go (owns 5% or more directly, 20.33%); Peter L Go (corporate director, 20.33%); Peter L Go (managing employee (on the payroll), 20.33%); Edward Carter (owns 5% or more directly, 13%); Peter M Kadile (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 81% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 97.65% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 18% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 53 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92262, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 6.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Family Hospice Care LLC | 0 |
| Serenity Hospice LLC This hospice | 6 |
| Blue Horizon Hospice | 5 |
| Desert Care Hospice | 6 |
| Kaiser Foundation Hospital Hospice | 4 |
| Gentiva | 14 |
| Bella Terra Hospice | 1 |
| Mission Hospice Services of San Diego LLC | 3 |
| Destiny Hospice Care Inc. | 7 |
| Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Riverside Hospice | 3 |
| Angel Hospice Provider Inc. | Not given |
| Bella Terra Hospice of the Desert | 4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.