Hearth Record

Destiny Hospice Care Inc.

A hospice in Moreno Valley, California 92557

12364 Perris Blvd, Moreno Valley, California 92557. (951) 243-8871.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 132 hospices serving ZIP code 92557 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on May 2, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 2, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission6 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 125 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, During HOSRR#2 it was noted the initial RN evaluation did not include an assessment of the patient’s diabetic status that was documented as a comorbidity with 2 types of insulins prescribed. In addition, the patient was treated in a hospital ER for a chemical burn of his eyes caused by a ruptured battery and returned home with bandages to his eyes as documented in a communication note in March 2025. There was lack of an SN assessment of the injury post ER visit. During HOSHV#3 it was noted lack of an assessment of the patient’s diabetic status during the initial RN evaluation with glipizide and Jardiance prescribed. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, During HOSRR#2 it was noted the middle of April 2025, a physician order for Bactrim and Pyridium x 3days to treat the patient’s UTI, however, during the IDG meeting 5 days later the RN summary lacked documentation of the UTI. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, During HOSRR#5 it was noted the patient had a pressure ulcer on the right buttock. The interventions for wound care on the POC listed a different body part and treatment order than the pressure ulcer wound care order in the POC summary. The POC lacked the accurate documentation of the location and treatment for wound care. The documentation was corrected during the survey. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”

    Rule L0535. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 335 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 14 patient records reviewed, During HOSRR#1 the RN, during the initial evaluation, documented the patient’s secondary diagnosis was cachexia, dysphagia and abnormal weight loss, however, the POC lacked nutritional assessment and interventions. The patient had a new order for oxygen therapy and nebulizer treatments as needed for SOB. The POC lacked interventions on use and safety of oxygen therapy and use of the nebulizer. The patient was assessed by the RN during the initial visit to have a high risk for skin breakdown identified on the Braden assessment however there were no interventions on the POC related to prevention of skin breakdown. During HOSRR#2 it was noted the patient developed a UTI, however the POC lacked assessment of the GU status and interventions related to the patient’s UTI. During HOSRR#2 it was noted the patient was admitted to a hospital emergency department after a bilateral eye chemical burn in March 2025 and returned home with ointment and cream and instructions to keep eye covered per communication log documentation. There was lack of an update to the POC for assessment, treatment and interventions related to the chemical burn. During HOSHV#4 it was noted a circulatory deficit on the POC however there were no interventions documented. During RR#4 it was noted a deficit of anxiety on the POC with the following goal: pt/pcg will be able to manage anxiety with interventions in place within the next IDG meeting however the POC lacked interventions with only assessments documented to accomplish the goal. During HOSRR#9 it was noted the patient had a UTI with antibiotics prescribed. The POC lacked interventions related to assessment of the UTI, instruction on perineal care, hydration, and s/s UTI. During HOSRR#8 it was noted in April 2025 during an IDG meeting, the RN documented a stage 1 pressure area to the patient’s left elbow. The POC was not updated to include interventions for the newly identified left elbow pressure area. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, During HOSHV#1 it was noted the frequency of visits for SN, MSW and SC had PRN visits ordered without documentation of the reasons for the additional visits if needed. During HOSHV#3 it was noted PRN visits for the SN and MSW without documentation of the reasons for the as needed visits. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, During HOSRR#4 it was noted on the POC an intervention under an endocrine deficit to monitor for hyperglycemia. There was lack of documentation that hyperglycemia s/s were assessed on 6 SN notes to date after the initial RN evaluation. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

Oct 11, 2024: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 914 words

    “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the agency failed to ensure the medications listed in the patient’s current medication profile and the Plan of Care (POC) were updated, accurate, and complete for one of four patients reviewed (Patient 7) when: Two medications Acarbose (a medication used for diabetes- a condition when there is too much sugar in the blood) 25 milligram (mg - a unit of measurement) one tablet oral (by mouth) three times a day, and Singulair (medication used to prevent asthma and breathing problem) 10 mg one tablet oral daily were not available for use and were still listed in Patient 7’s current POC and current medication profile; Two medications Thera Tears eye drop for extra dry eye therapy and Safe Tussin DM (for cough and congestion) were available for use but the medications were not listed in Patient 7’s current POC and medication Profile. This failure had the potential for Patient 7’s primary caregiver (PCG) and the agency not to be able to identify the significant side effects, drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and patient’s noncompliance with prescribed medications and administration of medications not currently prescribed by the physician. Findings: On October 9, 2024, Patient 7’s record was reviewed. Patient 7 was admitted to the agency with the Start of Care (SOC) date of September 20, 2024, with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a lung disease). The physician Certification of Terminal Illness (CTI) for the certification period from September 20, 2024 to December 18, 2024, indicated Patient 7 was dependent on oxygen at three liters per minute through nasal cannula (a small tube that provides oxygen with two prongs through the nose). Patient 7 had a weight loss of eight to 10 pounds within two months, poor mentation, and short of breath on exertion. The POC/IDG (Interdisciplinary Group - a team responsible for the care of the patient) dated September 20, 2024 and October 2, 2024, indicated Patient 7 was on medications Acarbose 25 mg one tablet three times a day, and Singulair 10 mg one tablet oral daily. The frequency of Skilled Nurse (SN) visit indicated two times a week and three visits as needed. On October 10, 2024, at 9 a.m., a home visit was conducted with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) for Patient 7. Patient 7’s PCG was present during the visit. Patient 7 was observed awake, lying in bed with oxygen on at three liters per minute through nasal cannula. Patient 7 was verbally responsive in short words. The PCG/DPOC (Durable Power of Attorney - a person who was given the power to make decisions on behalf of the patient) signed the consent for the home visit. On October 10, 2024, at 9:53 a.m., a concurrent interview and medication review was conducted with the LVN and the PCG. The PCG stated she managed and administered Patient 7’s daily medications. During the medication reconciliation (a process of comparing a patient’s current medications to the medication orders to identify and resolve discrepancies) the following were observed: - The two medications Acarbose 25 mg one tablet oral 3x a day and Singulair 10 mg tablet oral one tablet daily were not available for use. The medications were listed in Patient 7’s current medication profile and current POC; and The PCG stated the two medications had been discontinued by Patient 7’s primary care physician prior to the SOC. - The two medications Thera Tears eye drop and Safe Tussin DM were available for use but the medications were not listed in Patient 7’s current medication profile and current POC. The PCG stated the medication Thera eye drops had been prescribed by Patient 7’s primary care physician since last year. She stated she had been giving Patient 7 the Thera eye drops one eye drop to each eye every three to four hours as needed for dry eyes. The PCG stated the medication Safe Tussin for cough and congestion was bought over the counter. She had been giving Patient 7 two table spoon every four hours as needed for her cough. The LVN stated she was not aware the medications Acarbose and Singulair were discontinued and were not available. She stated she did not know Patient 7 was using the Thera Tears eye drop and the Safe Tussin cough syrup as needed. She stated she had not conducted the medication reconciliation during her visits on October 1, 2024 and October 3, 2024. The LVN acknowledged the medications Acarbose and Singulair were still listed in Patient 7’s current medication profile and current POC. She stated the medications Thera Tears eye drop and the Safe Tussin cougn syrup should have been listed in Patient 7’s current medication profile and current POC. On October 11, 2024, at 1:30 p.m., the Clinical Coordinator was interviewed. She stated the licensed nurses should have conducted the medication reconciliation on every visit for Patient 7. A review of the agency’s policy and procedure tilled, “Comprehensive Assessment,” dated October 2014, indicated,”...A comprehensive patient assessment will be performed by the hospice IDG...in consultation with attending physician...During the comprehensive assessment relevant information will be documented...Review of current and related past medications, including prescription and over-the-counter medications...” A review of the agency’s policy and procedure titled, “Medication Monitoring,” dated October 2014, indicated, “...Ongoing patient medication monitoring will be use a collaborative approach among the clinicians, physicians, pharmacist, and patients and family/caregivers...Evaluate the continued use of a medication in the current regimen, evaluate patient adherence to the prescribed medication...””

    Rule L0530. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 2, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission6 deficiencies cited
Mar 12, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Oct 11, 2024Complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 1, 2012.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 75% at home, 20% in assisted living, 5% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.3%
Visits near death96.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Udoekpo N Ekpo (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Joy N Ekpo (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Joy N Ekpo (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Joy N Ekpo (corporate director); Sarah Gower (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.13% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 32% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 132 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92557, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.