Atlas Healthcare Inc.
A home health agency in Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53227
9401 W. Beloit Rd., Suite 403, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53227. (414) 433-4783.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- Not rated quality of patient care rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jan 19, 2024: a recertification inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jan 19, 2024: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
-
Plan Based On All Hazards Risk Assessment
The inspectors’ words, 444 words
“Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment CFR(s): 484.102(a)(1)-(2) §403.748(a)(1)-(2), §416.54(a)(1)-(2), §418.113(a)(1)-(2), §441.184(a)(1)-(2), §460.84(a)(1)-(2), §482.15(a)(1)-(2), §483.73(a)(1)-(2), §483.475(a)(1)-(2), §484.102(a)(1)-(2), §485.68(a)(1)-(2), §485.542(a)(1)-(2), §485.625(a)(1)-(2), §485.727(a)(1)-(2), §485.920(a)(1)-(2), §486.360(a)(1)-(2), §491.12(a)(1)-(2), §494.62(a)(1)-(2) [(a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following:] (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach.* (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. * [For Hospices at §418.113(a):] Emergency Plan. The Hospice must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment, including the management of the consequences of power failures, natural disasters, and other emergencies that would affect the hospice’s ability to provide care. *[For LTC facilities at §483.73(a):] Emergency Plan. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least annually. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach, including missing residents. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(a):] Emergency Plan. The ICF/IID must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach, including missing clients. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency staff failed to document an all-hazards risk assessment as part of the Emergency Preparedness plan in 1 of 1 plan reviewed. Findings include: Review of policy “Emergency Preparedness Policy” dated 2023 states in part, “An emergency will be described as an unforeseen happening which causes much damage; examples of emergencies include but not limited to: Tornados, Floods, Snowstorms, Chemical Spills, Industrial Accidents, Earthquakes, Biohazardous Weapons.” There was a form located in the “Emergency Preparedness Binder” labeled Risk Assessment, that was not completed, addressing all hazards that had the potential to impact the patients, staff, and agency. An interview was conducted 01/18/2024 at 2:45 PM with Administrator A. When asked if an all-hazards risk assessment had been conducted as part of the Emergency Plan, Administrator A stated “No”.”
-
Program Data
The inspectors’ words, 363 words
“Program data CFR(s): 484.65(b)(1),(2),(3) Standard: Program data. (1) The program must utilize quality indicator data, including measures derived from OASIS, where applicable, and other relevant data, in the design of its program. (2) The HHA must use the data collected to- (i) Monitor the effectiveness and safety of services and quality of care; and (ii) Identify opportunities for improvement. (3) The frequency and detail of the data collection must be approved by the HHA’s governing body. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the QAPI (Quality Assessment Performance Improvement) program utilized program quality indicator data in identifying improvement opportunities, monitoring effectiveness, and outlining detail interventions and frequency of data collection in 1 of 1 QAPI programs reviewed. Findings include: Record review of policy and procedure titled “Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement” (QAPI) not dated, revealed in part: “Purpose: The agency’s performance improvement program consists of, but is not limited to the following: Outcome based OBQI (Outcome Based Quality Improvement) and OBQM (Outcome Based Quality Monitoring) data from OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set) submission documents. OASIS review and evaluation. Risk management program to evaluate areas of concern and implement plans to improve patient’s quality of care…. To implement and maintain a QAPI Program within our Home Care Program designed to have a method of objectivity identifying areas of improvement, systematically monitoring the outcomes and appropriateness of patient care and continuously improve the quality of services rendered.” Record review of the QAPI binder contents revealed: no documentation the agency utilized quality indicator data nor indicated at what detail and frequency to gather data to identify opportunities of improvement as part of the QAPI program as listed per policy. Per interview on 01/18/2024 at 3:30 PM with Administrator A, when asked about the agency’s wide specific QAPI program and how data is collected identifying areas of concern to improve on, Administrator A replied “We have not done an OASIS for years, we have not had any skilled cases. We wouldn’t have anything specific for our agency. Our area of concern was/is loss of reimbursement when the required EVV (Electronic Visit Verification) was implemented.””
-
Plan Of Care Must Include The Following
The inspectors’ words, 755 words
“Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, agency staff failed to individualize patient goals based on each patient’s need in 7 of 7 patient record reviews completed (Patients #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 and #7). Findings include: Review of policy titled “Case Conference/Progress Summary” not dated revealed in part, “Case conferences will be held at the start of care and at least every 60 days to review the frequency and type of service, changes in the patient’s overall status, problems, and progress towards goals.” Review of Patient #1’s “Home Health Certificate and Plan of Care,” SOC (start of care) date 02/13/2020 revealed, Patient #1 was being seen 2 hours a day, 7 days a week by a PCW (personal care worker) for assistance with daily tasks of living. The listed goal “personal care services through the end of certification period; no plans for discharge,” fails to support the reason and need for the assistance with daily tasks of living. Review of Patient #2’s “Home Health Certificate and Plan of Care,” SOC date 03/03/2016 revealed Patient #2 was being seen 6 hours a day, 7 days a week by a PCW for assistance with daily tasks of living. The listed goal “Personal care services to be met through the end of certification period, no plans for discharge,” fails to address the need for assistance with daily tasks of living. Review of Patient #3’s “Home Health Certificate and Plan of Care,” SOC date 03/24/2023 revealed Patient #3 was being seen 2 hours a day, 5 days a week by a PCW for assistance with daily tasks of living. The listed goal “Demonstrate compliance with medical regimen, no plans for discharge,” fails to support the reason and need for the assistance with daily tasks of living. Review of Patient #4’s “Home Health Certificate and Plan of Care,” SOC date 06/15/2021 revealed Patient #4 was being seen 4.5 hours a day, 7 days a week by a PCW for assistance with daily tasks of living. The listed goal “Demonstrate compliance with medical regimen, no plans for discharge,” fails to support the reason and the need for assistance with daily tasks of living. Review of Patient #5’s “Home Health Certificate and Plan of Care,” SOC date 05/05/2023 revealed Patient #5 was being seen 2 hours a day, 7 days a week by a PCW for assistance with daily tasks of living. The listed goal “Demonstrate competence with medical regimen, no plans for discharge,” fails to support the reason and the need for assistance with daily tasks of living. Review of Patient #6’s “Home Health Certificate and Plan of Care,” SOC date 02/20/2017 revealed Patient #6 was being seen 3 hours a day, 5 days a week by a PCW for assistance with daily tasks of living. The listed goal “Personal care services to be met through the end of certification period, no plans for discharge,” fails to address the need for assistance with daily tasks of living. Review of Patient #7’s “Home Health Certificate and Plan of Care,” SOC date 12/19/2022 revealed Patient #7 was being seen 5 hours a day, 3 days a week by a PCW for assistance with daily tasks of living. The listed goal “Demonstrate competence with medical regimen, no plans for discharge,” fails to support the reason and the need for assistance with daily tasks of living. An interview was conducted on 01/19/2024 at 2:30 PM with Administrator A to review the above findings. Administrator A confirmed the above findings, “we have unskilled cases with plans to provide assistance with daily tasks of living with no discharge plans.””
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2024 | Recertification inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Oct 20, 2008.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care and home health aide services.
- Doesn’t offer physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 3 owners or officers are people: Sheena Jones (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Sheena Jones (corporate officer, 100%); Deanna Bajanen (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “No survey results are available for this period.”
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | Not rated |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Aurora at Home | 4.5 |
| Centerwell Home Health | 5 |
| Professional Home Care Services | Not given |
| Atlas Healthcare Inc. This home health agency | Not given |
| Horizon Home Care and Hospice | 4 |
| Laabs Home Health Care | Not given |
| Ascension at Home | 4 |
| North Shore at Home | Not given |
| North Shore at Home | 3 |
| Commonheart Home Health | 2.5 |
| St. Camillus Home Health Agency | 2 |
| Prohealth Home Care | 3.5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.