Hearth Record

Horizon Home Care and Hospice

A home health agency in Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53224

11002 West Park Place, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53224. (414) 365-8300.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 25, 2025: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 25, 2025: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 884 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to develop individualized and/or measurable Plan of Care (POC) goals to meet the needs of the patient in 7 of 17 patient records reviewed (Patient #2, #3, #5, #6, #7, #10 and #11). Findings include: Record review of Patient #2’s “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” dated 06/16/2025 to 08/14/2025 revealed Patient #2 had a primary diagnosis of “Encounter for Orthopedic Aftercare” with a secondary diagnosis of “Cutaneous Abscess of Right Foot.” Patient #2 receives skilled nursing care 3 times per week for wound care. Patient #2’s POC goals revealed “Patient will demonstrate improved wound status as evidence by a decrease in size/drainage of wound, absence of infection, and decreased pain.” The goals are not measurable with time specific dates and/or individualized to meet the patient needs. Record review of Patient #6’s “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” dated 05/04/2025 to 07/02/2025 revealed Patient #6 had a primary diagnosis of “Encounter for Attention to Colostomy”. Patient #6 receives skilled nursing care 3 times per week for colostomy care and wound care for a buttock wound. Patient #6’s POC goals revealed “Patient will demonstrate improved wound status as evidence by a decrease in size/drainage of wound, absence of infection, and decreased pain.” The goals are not measurable with time specific dates and/or individualized to meet the patient needs. Record review of Patient #11’s “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” dated 06/15/2025 to 08/13/2025 revealed Patient #11 had a primary diagnosis of “Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage” and has additional diagnosis of “Other Specified Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.” Patient #11 receives skilled nursing care 1 time per week. The POC orders revealed in part, “Skilled Nurse to observe and assess cardiovascular system to identify changes and intervene to minimize complications...May perform oxygen saturation levels PRN (as needed) for signs and symptoms of possible respiratory complications. Goals: Abnormal oxygen saturation levels will be reported to physician.” The goals are not measurable with time specific dates and/or individualized goal parameters to meet the patient needs. During an interview on 06/25/2025 at 10:15 AM with Substitute Administrator B, findings for Patient #2, #6, and #11 were reviewed. Substitute Administrator B agreed that the goals were either not measurable or not individualized for Patients #2, #6, and #11. Findings include: Review of agency policy titled, “Care Planning Process- Home care” dated 02/04/2025 revealed in part, “The initial Plan of Care will include: Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the Agency and the patient.” Record review of Patient #3’s “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” for certification period 05/28/2025 to 07/26/2025 revealed primary diagnosis of “Displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing” receiving SN care 3 times per week for wound care. POC goals revealed “Wound status will improve as evidence by a decrease in size/drainage of wound, absence of infection, and decreased pain.” The goals are not measurable with time specific dates and/or individualized to meet the patient needs. Record review of Patient #5’s “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” for certification period 06/10/2025 to 08/08/2025 revealed primary diagnosis of “Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with other skin ulcer” receiving SN care 3 times per week for wound care. POC goals revealed “Wound status will improve as evidence by a decrease in size/drainage of wound, absence of infection, and decreased pain.” The goals are not measurable with time specific dates and/or individualized to meet the patient needs. Record review of Patient #7’s “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” for certification period 05/16/2025 to 07/12/2025 revealed primary diagnosis of “Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) receiving SN care 1 time per week for intravenous (IV) infusion. POC goals revealed “IV fluids/meds will be administered per orders. Patient will verbalize/demonstrate tolerance.” The goals are not measurable with time specific dates and/or individualized to meet the patient needs. Record review of Patient #10’s “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” for certification period 05/16/2025 to 07/14/2025 revealed primary diagnosis of “Pressure ulcer of right buttock, stage 2” receiving SN care 1 time per week for wound care. POC goals revealed “Wound status will improve as evidence by a decrease in size/drainage of wound, absence of infection, and decreased pain.” The goals are not measurable with time specific dates and/or individualized to meet the patient needs.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Onsite Supervisory Visit Every 14 Days

    The inspectors’ words, 318 words

    “Onsite supervisory visit every 14 days CFR(s): 484.80(h)(1)(i) (1)(i) If home health aide services are provided to a patient who is receiving skilled nursing, physical or occupational therapy, or speech language pathology services— (A) A registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional who is familiar with the patient, the patient’s plan of care, and the written patient care instructions described in paragraph (g) of this section, must complete a supervisory assessment of the aide services being provided no less frequently than every 14 days; and (B) The home health aide does not need to be present during the supervisory assessment described in paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) of this section. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency Registered Nurse (RN) failed to supervise the Home Health Aide (HHA) no less than every 14 days in 1 of 2 patients (Patient #10) receiving HHA services in a total of 17 patient records reviewed. Findings include: Review of agency policy titled, “Clinical Supervision / Joint Visits” dated 02/20/2025 revealed in part, “4. The case manager for patients receiving home health aide with skilled services or hospice services will complete a direct or indirect supervisory visit for paraprofessional staff to evaluate staff competency and patient experience at least every 14 days…5. Direct or indirect supervisory visits for both skilled and non-skilled services with home health aide will be completed in the medical record on the appropriate supervisory visit form…” Record review of Patient #10’s medical record with start of care date of 11/17/2024 revealed “Skilled Nurse (SN) 1 time per week. HHA 2 times per week.” SN visit note documentation revealed HHA supervision was documented to be occurring every 60 days on 01/15/2025, 03/14/2025 and 05/13/2025. During an interview on 06/25/2025 at 8:20 AM, Substitute Administrator B stated, “I could not find that supervisory visits were completed at least every 14 days for this patient.””

    Rule G0808. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 25, 2025Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Sep 9, 1976.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Froedtert Thedacare Health, Inc. owns 50% directly since Jul 1, 2008; Ascension Wisconsin, Inc. owns 50% directly since Nov 13, 2001.
  • 16 owners or officers are people: Victoria Lynn Sergent (corporate director, 12.5%); Christopher P Kowalkiewicz (corporate director, 12.5%); Andre Storey (corporate director, 12.5%); Daniel W Wright (corporate director, 12.5%); Austin Reeder (corporate director, 12.5%); Diane L Ehn (corporate director, 12.5%); John Joyce (corporate director, 12.5%); Selina Dallas (corporate director, 12.5%); Vicki D Meyer (corporate officer); Vicki D Meyer (corporate director); Vicki D Meyer (managing employee (on the payroll)); Vicki D Meyer (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Coleen M Schmidt (corporate officer); Coleen M Schmidt (corporate director); Coleen M Schmidt (managing employee (on the payroll)); Coleen M Schmidt (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Froedtert Thedacare Health, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly50%Jul 1, 2008
Ascension Wisconsin, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly50%Nov 13, 2001
Ascension HealthOwns 5% or more through other companies25%Jan 1, 2005

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (629 surveys completed): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, better; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, worse.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate80.42% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate7.72% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate5.49% (worse than the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 22 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 53224, where this agency’s office is, 15 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.