Hearth Record

Prohealth Home Care

A home health agency in Waukesha, Wisconsin 53188

N17w24100 Riverwood Dr., Suite 200, Waukesha, Wisconsin 53188. (262) 928-7444.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 1, 2025: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 1, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Condition Of Participation: Patient Rights.

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Condition of Participation: Patient rights. CFR(s): 484.50 Condition of participation: Patient rights. The patient and representative (if any), have the right to be informed of the patient’s rights in a language and manner the individual understands. The HHA must protect and promote the exercise of these rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency staff failed to notify/discuss with the patient’s physician the planned discharge of 2 of 2 patients discharged for not meeting homebound status (Patient #1 and #3) in a total of 4 records reviewed. Findings Include: Agency staff failed to notify/discuss discharge plans with patient’s attending physician prior to discharge. See Tag G458.”

    Rule G0406. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Outcomes/Goals Have Been Achieved

    The inspectors’ words, 557 words

    “Outcomes/goals have been achieved CFR(s): 484.50(d)(3) The transfer or discharge is appropriate because the physician or allowed practitioner, who is responsible for the home health plan of care and the HHA agree that the measurable outcomes and goals set forth in the plan of care in accordance with §484.60(a)(2)(xiv) have been achieved, and the HHA and the physician or allowed practitioner, who is responsible for the home health plan of care agree that the patient no longer needs the HHA’s services; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, agency staff failed to notify the patient, patient’s representative, and the physician responsible for the patient’s plan of care when patient no longer needed home care services in 2 of 2 patients discharged for homebound status in a total of 4 records reviewed. (Patient #1 and Patient #3) Findings Include: Review of agency policy titled, “PHHC Discharge. Transfer or Referral” dated 04/17/2024 revealed in part, “Discharges are based on the following criteria: c) The transfer or discharge is appropriate because the authorized prescriber, who is responsible for the plan of care, and the HHA agree that the measurable outcomes and goals set forth in the plan of care have been achieved and the patient no longer needs the HHA’s services.” The above policy also revealed, “The patient and/or representative and authorized prescriber are active participants in the discharge, transfer, and/or referral process. A discharge notice will be completed and issued.” Patient #1 was a 74-year-old with a Home Health Agency (HHA) start of care date 03/31/2023. Patient #1’s diagnoses included: Pressure Ulcer of the right hip, stage 4 (a deep open wound that extends through the skin, underlying tissue, and potentially exposes muscle tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone), Multiple Sclerosis, Paraplegia, and Malignant neoplasm of upper lobe of lung, endometrium, and secondary malignant neoplasm of bone with multiple other secondary diagnoses. Review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed Patient #1 was discharged from home care services on 01/17/2025. Reason for discharge on the form titled, “Registered Nurse (RN) OASIS Discharge” revealed under, “Discharge with Not Improved Outcomes, Reason: Change in Patient Circumstances, No Longer Homebound.” There is no documentation within the record that supported either reasons for discharge or that a written notice of pending discharge was given to the patient or ordering Physician prior to discharge. The ordering physician acknowledged Patient #1’s discharge via electronic signature on 01/20/2025 (3 days after discharge). Patient # 3 was a 54-year-old with a Home Health Agency (HHA) start of care date 02/26/2025. Patient #3’s diagnoses include: Cerebral Infarction and left sided weakness. Patient #3 was discharged due to no longer being homebound, working half days. Review of Patient #3’ s medical record revealed Patient #3 was discharged from home care services on 03/06/2025. Document titled, “Registered Nurse (RN) OASIS Discharge” revealed under, “Homebound Status: Patient is homebound: No”. There is no documentation within the record that supported either reasons for discharge or that a written notice of pending discharge was given to the patient or ordering Physician prior to discharge. Physician electronic signature acknowledging Patient #3’s discharge noted on 03/17/2025 (11 days after discharge). During an interview with Administrator B on 03/31/2025 at 03:37 PM Administrator B confirmed the ordering physician acknowledged Patient #1’s discharge via electronic signature on 01/20/2025 (3 days after discharge).”

    Rule G0458. Element-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 1, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jan 23, 1986.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Prohealth Care Inc. owns 100% directly since Mar 1, 2012.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Michelle Noonan (managing employee (on the payroll)); Thomas W Johnson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Peter Bacon (corporate officer); Gary Anthony Beyer (corporate director); John Scott Hallet (corporate officer); Andrew S Gutierrez (corporate director); Andrew S Gutierrez (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Prohealth Care Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Mar 1, 2012

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (762 surveys completed): 90% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, worse; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate89.03% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate13.40% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.31% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 17 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 53188, where this agency’s office is, 16 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.