Hearth Record

Amedisys Home Health

A home health agency in Bellevue, Washington 98005

1800 136th Pl Ste 100, Bellevue, Washington 98005. (225) 292-2031.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 7, 2026: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them at condition level, the most serious.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 7, 2026: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Release Of Patient Identifiable Oasis Info.

    The inspectors’ words, 217 words

    “Release of patient identifiable OASIS info. CFR(s): 484.40 Condition of participation: Release of patient identifiable OASIS information. The HHA and agent acting on behalf of the HHA in accordance with a written contract must ensure the confidentiality of all patient identifiable information contained in the clinical record, including OASIS data, and may not release patient identifiable OASIS information to the public. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: . Based on document review, record review and interview, the agency failed to accurately completed the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) data for M0102 and M014 (repeated non-compliance from previous survey). Failure to accurately complete the OASIS data places patients at risk for physical harm due to not receiving services in a timely manner. Findings Included: 1. Failure to accurately complete the OASIS data places patients at risk for physical harm due to not receiving services in a timely manner for 2 of 10 patients. 2. Repeated non-compliance identified in recertification survey conducted on 08/31/23. The agency was previously cited under Tag G0374, Accuracy of encoded OASIS data, 42.CFR 484.45 (b), Failure to accurately complete the OASIS data. Based on the scope and severity of deficiencies identified under 42 CFR 484.40 Condition of Participation: Release of patient identifiable OASIS information is NOT MET. Cross Reference: G0374 .”

    Rule G0350. Condition-level.

  • Comprehensive Assessment Of Patients

    The inspectors’ words, 240 words

    “Comprehensive Assessment of Patients CFR(s): 484.55 Condition of participation: Comprehensive assessment of patients. Each patient must receive, and an HHA must provide, a patient-specific, comprehensive assessment. For Medicare beneficiaries, the HHA must verify the patient’s eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit including homebound status, both at the time of the initial assessment visit and at the time of the comprehensive assessment. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: . Based on document review, record review and interview, the agency failed to conduct the initial assessment visit within 48 hours of completing the referral (repeated non-compliance from previous survey). Failure to conduct initial assessments within 48 hours of completing the referral puts patients at risk of physical harm due to not receiving services in a timely manner. . Findings Included: 1. Failure to conduct the initial assessment visit within 48 hours of completing the referral and notifying patients or their legal representative of the delayed services for 3 of 10 patients. 2. Repeated non-compliance identified in recertification survey conducted on 08/31/23. The agency was previously cited under Tag G0514, Initial Assessment Visit, 42.CFR 484.55(a)(1), for failure to do the initial assessment within forty-eight hours of referral, or forty-eight hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician-ordered start of care date. Based on the scope and severity of deficiencies identified under 42 CFR 484.55 Condition of Participation: Comprehensive assessment of patients is NOT MET. Cross Reference: G0514 .”

    Rule G0510. Condition-level.

  • Accuracy Of Encoded Oasis Data

    The inspectors’ words, 432 words

    “Accuracy of encoded OASIS data CFR(s): 484.45(b) Standard: The encoded OASIS data must accurately reflect the patient’s status at the time of assessment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: . Based on document review, record reviews, and interviews, the agency failed to accurately complete the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) datas for M0102 and M0104 for 3 of 10 patients (Patient #101, Patient #106, and Patient #109). Failure to accurately complete the OASIS data places patients at risk for physical harm due to not receiving services in a timely manner. . Findings included: 1. Document review of agency’s policy titled, “Oasis Outcome and Information Set,” (Last Review Date: 06/09/25) showed that as part of the condition of participation reporting OASIS in accordance with §484.55 encoded Oasis data must accurately reflect the patient’s status at the time of assessment. 2. Record review of patient’s records for Patient #101, Patient #106, and Patient #109 showed: a. Patient #101 was admitted on 09/18/24 with the primary diagnosis of Left Knee Infection. Documentation showed the OASIS M0102 Start of Care (SOC) date of 09/18/24 rather than the accurate data of M0104 and the date of 09/10/24. In addition, documentation in the Intake Care Coordination note showed referral date of 09/10/24, and that there was no documentation of a physician order’s for M0102. b. Patient #106 was admitted on 03/17/26 with the primary diagnosis of Dementia. Documentation showed the OASIS M0102 SOC date of 03/17/26 rather than the accurate data of M0104 and the date of 03/16/26. In addition, documentation in the Intake Care Coordination note showed referral date of 03/16/26, and that there was no documentation of a physician order’s for M0102. c. Patient #109 was admitted on 12/28/24 with a primary diagnosis of Right Lower Extremity Amputation. Documentation showed the OASIS M0102 SOC date of 12/27/24 rather than the accurate data of M0104 and the date of 12/20/24. In addition, documentation in the Intake Care Coordination note showed referral date of 12/22/24, and that there was no documentation of a physician order’s for M0102. 3. On 05/06/26 at 2:00 PM, the Surveyor interviewed the agency’s Area Administrator (Staff #112) about lack of accuracy in OASIS Data entry for M0102 and M0104. Staff #112 acknowledged the OASIS data error findings and stated that the agency reviews the OASIS data for accuracy prior to submission but stated that they were not able to provide documentation as to why the OASIS M0102 and M0104 were inaccurate. This is a REPEAT CITATION, previously cited under Tag G0374 on the last CMS survey completed on 08/31/23. .”

    Rule G0374. Standard-level.

  • Rn Performs Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 450 words

    “RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: . Based on document review, record reviews, and interview, the agency failed to conduct the initial assessment visit within the 48 hours of completing the referral for 2 of 10 patients (Patient #101 and Patient #109). Failure to meet this requirement places patients at risk for physical harm due to not receiving services in a timely manner. Findings included: 1. Document review of agency’s policy titled, “Initial Referral/Admission Process,” (Policy AA-002, Last Review date: 06/09/25) indicated that the admitting discipline will perform the admission assessment within 48 hours of both the facility discharge and receipt of referral. 2. Record review of patient’s records for Patient #101 and Patient #109 showed: a. Patient #101’s Start of Care (SOC) date was 09/18/24. The patient was admitted for primary diagnosis of Left Knee Infection. The agency completed the referral on 09/10/24 for the Skilled Nursing (SN) initial assessment, but the SOC for the SN services did not occur until 09/18/24. There was no documentation of why SN services did not occur within 48 hours of the referral, and no documentation that the patient and the patient’s physician was notified of the delayed admission. b. Patient #109’s SOC date was 12/28/24. The patient was admitted for primary diagnosis of Right Lower Extremity Amputation. The agency completed the referral on 12/22/24 for the Physical Therapy (PT) initial assessment, but the SOC for the PT services did not occur until 12/28/24. There was no documentation of why the PT services did not occur within 48 hours of the referral, and no documentation that the patient and the patient’s physician was notified of the delayed admission. 3. On 05/06/26 at 11:00 AM, the Surveyor interviewed the agency’s Office Manager (Staff #111) regarding the lack of documentation that explains why the services did not occur within 48 hours of the referral and the notification of the patient and their physician of the delayed SOC. Staff #111 acknowledged the findings and stated that referrals go through the agency’s centralized intake, but stated that they were not able to provide documentation as to why the services were delayed. This is a REPEAT CITATION, previously cited under Tag G0514 on the last CMS survey completed on 08/31/23.”

    Rule G0514. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 7, 2026Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Aug 21, 2013.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy and medical social services.
  • Doesn’t offer speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Amedisys Holding LLC owns 100% directly since Aug 2, 2007.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Bridget R Kaigler (managing employee (on the payroll)); Bridget R Kaigler (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer); Kristina J Braud (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kristina J Braud (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jeanne Shingleton (corporate officer); Mary Jane Zauala (managing employee (on the payroll)); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 14, 2025
Amedisys Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 2, 2007
Amedisys Holding LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Aug 2, 2007

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (74 surveys completed): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 73% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate83.37% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate10.79% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.55% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 98005, where this agency’s office is, 11 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.