Hearth Record

Choice Health at Home

A home health agency in Marble Falls, Texas 78654

2503 N Us Highway 281, Ste 100, Marble Falls, Texas 78654. (830) 637-6300.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 11, 2026: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 11, 2026: recertification inspection1 deficiency
  • Preparing Clinical Notes

    The inspectors’ words, 595 words

    “Preparing clinical notes CFR(s): 484.75(b)(6) Preparing clinical notes; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure skilled professionals maintained responsibility to prepare clinical notes in that the agency did not enforce a written policy for implementation of care for required documentation on missed visits or services for 1 of 7 patients when PTA 1 missed the scheduled visit on 6/9/26 and failed to complete documentation and reason for the missed visit. This failure could place patients at risk for decline in current health status or increased needs from the home health agency. Review of agency’s Administrative Policy Manual, section 40 “Implementing Care and Treatment” revealed ‘when the provision of care and treatment cannot be implemented as established on the care planning document (s), the patient’s/client’s physician or allowed practitioner will be notified. If the Agency misses visits or services as required by the Plan of Care, it must notify the physician responsible or allowed practitioner of the missed visit if there is any potential for clinical impact upon the patient/client. The physician or allowed practitioner will decide whether the patient/client visit may be skipped, or additional intervention is required by the Agency due to the impact on the patient/client. The appropriate documentation will be completed and submitted by the discipline or the Nursing Supervisor.’ Per record review of patient 5’s chart revealed SOC date of 3/8/2026. Patient 5 DOB 8.27.1955 diagnosis: Radiculopathy, Hypertension, Heart Failure, Obesity, Depression, Insomnia, Spinal Stenosis, GERD, Hyperlipidemia, Arthrodesis Status, Bypass Graft, Chronic Pain Syndrome. Review of the Plan of Care for Recertification Period 5/7/26-7/5/26, revealed patients received skilled nursing and physical therapy services. Patient visits notes revealed missed visit dates included 5/23/26, 5/28/26, and 6/9/26. Patient records coordination care notes revealed missed visit coordination note dated 5/23/26 and 5/28/26 patient unable to receive services due to a doctor’s appointment. Coordination notes were reviewed for other missed visits on 6/9/26, services scheduled were physical therapy, however, no documentation with PTA 1 for this missed visit upon record review. Interview with the Administrator on 6/10/26 at 9:20 AM in reference to missed visit documentation on patient #5 for physical therapy agency staff. Administrator reviewed patient records and stated she was unable to locate at this time but will review other areas of patient record due to some notes are faxed or emailed to patients. Administrator stated she will update surveyor once she reviews records in depth. Follow up interview with Branch Director and Administrator on 6/11/26 at 10:40 AM about review of patient records for missed documentation, which Administrator stated she could not locate any documentation for missed visit on 6/9/26 with physical therapist. Asked Administrator who was assigned for the visit on 6/9/26, which she stated was PTA 1. Asked Administrator if the documentation included why the scheduled visit was missing, she stated there was no documentation in the patient record for the reason of the missed visit that she was able to find. Asked agency staff if there were monitoring within patient records when there were any missed visits, Branch Director stated she does run a weekly report where she ‘spot checks’ missed visits. She stated this does not include all missed visits; however, it does include all disciplines offered by the agency. Asked Branch Director why it is important to have all patient records reflect services missed/received. Branch Director responded that the patient has the right to know when the agency staff are coming and physician plan of care must be followed because it is the patient’s rights.”

    Rule G0716. Element-level.

Jul 17, 2025: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 1,866 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to review medications the patient is currently using and failed to include a list of medications in the patient’s clinical record in 2 out of 3 patient records reviewed (Client 1 and Client 2). This failure could place the agency’s patients at risk for medication mismanagement, as agency personnel was unable to monitor for possible side effects, compliance with regimen, or need for medication adjustment. Record review of the document titled “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” for Patient 1, signed and dated 6/26/25, revealed the patient’s Plan of Care for the Certification Period of 5/31/25 to 7/29/25. Under the subtitle “Medications,” it was written “NONE,” as in the patient had no medications. Under the list of diagnoses, the patient was listed as having Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (blood sugar disorder), osteomyelitis (infection of bone), Chronic Kidney Disease (kidney disorder), End Stage Renal Disease (severe kidney disorder), Dependence on Renal Dialysis (needs kidney treatments weekly), Type 2 Diabetes with Diabetic Polyneuropathy (damage of nerves), Hyperlipidemia (high fat in blood), Anemia (low red blood cells in blood), and Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage (bleed of the stomach or intestines). Further review of this document revealed a statement under the heading “Goals/Rehabilitation Potential/Discharge Plans” that read “Patient will demonstrate compliance with medications as prescribed. Patient/caregiver will verbalize/demonstrate understanding of medication schedule, purpose, side effects and any special precautions related to medication regimen by 7/25/25.” Further review of this document revealed a statement under the heading “Orders of Discipline and Treatments” that read, “Skilled nurse to review medication profile and reconcile medications as needed. Skilled nurse may instruct and reinforce medication teaching related to the use of medications to treat disease processes. Skilled nurse may fill medi-planner per current medication orders/profile every visit.” In an interview with Patient 1’s family member, FM 1 on, 7/22/25 at 8:30 AM, FM 1 confirmed that Patient 1 was on multiple medications while receiving services from the agency. She estimated Patient 1 was on over 20 medications at the time. Review of the document titled “Visit Note Report,” for the visit dated 5/31/25, there was a note, signed by RN C, that stated, “Patient was unable to provide medications for review during the SOC [Start of Care] visit as they were located upstairs in the bedroom. Patient was unable to access the medications due to mobility limitations (uses wheelchair) and no one else was home to retrieve them. This prevented proper medication reconciliation and review during the initial assessment.” Record review of the document titled “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” for Patient 2, signed and dated 7/9/25, revealed the patient’s Plan of Care for the Certification Period of 6/11/25 to 8/9/25. Under the subtitle “Medications,” it was written “NONE,” as in the patients had no medications. Under the list of diagnoses, the patient is listed as having Acute Kidney Failure (kidney disorder), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (blood sugar disorder), Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease (kidney disorder), Morbid obesity (severe obesity), hyperlipidemia (fat in the blood), osteoarthritis (painful joints/bones), iron deficiency anemia (low iron in blood), and a presence of a coronary graft (artificial tubing that helps to open artery to increase blood flow in a damaged artery). Further review of this document revealed a statement under the heading “Goals/Rehabilitation Potential/Discharge Plans” that read “Patient will demonstrate compliance with medications as prescribed. Patient/caregiver will verbalize/demonstrate understanding of medication schedule, purpose, side effects and any special precautions related to medication regimen by end of episode.” Further review of this document revealed a statement under the heading “Orders of Discipline and Treatments” that read, “Skilled nurse to review medication profile and reconcile medications as needed. Skilled nurse may instruct and reinforce medication teaching related to the use of medications to treat disease processes. Skilled nurse may fill medi-planner per current medication orders/profile every visit.” In an interview with Patient 2’s family member, FM 1 on, 7/22/25 at 9:49 AM, FM 2 confirmed that Patient 2 was on multiple medications while receiving services from the agency. In an interview with the Alternate Administrator on 7/16/25 at 3:55 PM, the Surveyor asked why no medications were listed on the Plan of Care for either Patient 1 or Patient 2. After taking some time to review the records and make a phone call, the Alternate Administrator confirmed that Patient 1 and Patient 2 should have medications listed. The Alternate Administrator stated that with the severe list of diagnosis that both patients had, there was “no way” they were on no medications. He could not locate the list of medications for either patient in the Electronic Medical Record, and eventually stated that “the reasons we can’t see it in the Electronic Medical Record for those patients is because it is not there.” In an interview with the Alternate Administrator on 7/17/25 at 9:35 AM, he stated that overnight their OASIS reviewers pulled charts and did not locate any other patients with missing medication lists. He stated that they believe these 2 missing medications lists were the result of human error, and that it got missed by multiple people. He stated that the nurse performing the initial assessment must not have performed a medication reconciliation. He stated that once the nurse submits a Plan of Care, the Plan of Care is then reviewed by the OASIS compliance team before being submitted, and that this was missed on that side too. He stated that all clinicians who saw the patients in the meantime should have caught it when doing the med reconciliation, but that it appears no one did. In a phone interview on 7/17/25 at 11:20 AM with RN C, who performed the initial Comprehensive Assessment on Patient 2, she stated that she did have digital photo of Patient 2’s medications at discharge from the hospital, but that she “must not have uploaded it”. The Surveyor asked if a medication reconciliation was performed. RN C stated that they discussed the patient’s pain medications because she was in a lot of pain and not taking all of her prescribed medications. In a phone interview on 7/17/25 at 11:30 AM with RN A, who did later subsequent visits with Patient 1, she stated that she did not think she performed a medication reconciliation during these visits. She stated his medications were kept upstairs and all visits were conducted downstairs, so she did not look at his medications. She stated she was unsure if they discussed his medication, but that she did not recall him letting her know of any changes to his medications. In a phone interview on 7/17/24 at 11:58 AM with RN B, who performed the initial Comprehensive Assessment on Patient 1, she stated that the patient was alone in the house in a wheelchair, and when he tried to perform the medication reconciliation, the patient stated that all his medications were upstairs and that he would not let the nurse go get them. She stated that she was unable to review the patient’s medication that day, but that she put this in her note. The Surveyor asked her if she notified the nurse who would be continuing the patient’s care that the patient’s medications had not been reviewed or listed in the Patient’s Electronic Medical Record. She stated that she documented she was unable to review the medication, and she told the patient to “bring it up with the next nurse”. In an interview with the Administrator on 7/17/25 at 12:05 PM, the Administrator stated that during the initial assessment all clinicians should have performed a medication reconciliation with patients to ensure the agency has an up-to-date list of medications that the patient is currently taking. She stated that these were inputted to the patient’s Plan of Care, which then went to the OASIS review team. The OASIS Review team acted as a quality assurance team and reviewed the documents for errors or missing information before submission. She stated that clinicians are instructed to review medications with patients every visit. They are instructed to pull the medication list up in the Electronic Health Record, and review with the patient to ensure no changes have been made since the last time the medications were reviewed. The Surveyor asked what a nurse should do if for some reason they were unable to perform a medication reconciliation with the patient. The Administrator stated that in that case they instructed nurses to contact the provider for an updated medication list. She stated they could also contact the patient’s family members for assistance. She stated that not having a list of medications in the electronic health record could affect patient care because the nurse would be unable to perform effective medication management if they do not know what the patient is on. She stated that medications are something they “should be looking at every visit to coordinate care”. She stated it is a simple standard practice to do a medication reconciliation for every patient and to have an updated medication list in the electronic health record. In a phone interview with the leader of the OASIS review team, Review Leader, on 7/17/25 at 12:25 PM, Review Leader stated that their team is kind of seen like a Quality Assurance group. Review Leader stated that “we take a chart and should scrub it from A to Z, offer any suggestions, see what is missing, and then submit the OASIS changes for the clinician to change if needed. Or in cases like this we would call the clinician and have them do the medication reconciliation since we would not be able to do that.” Review Leader stated that they review every single Plan of Care that the agency completed. He stated that his team was aware of the missing information for Patient 1 and that they had tried to correct it but there was a miscommunication, and they did not get a response before it got locked. He stated that “the other one [Patient 2] unfortunately fell through the checks that we had.” Review of the agency’s policy titled “Medication List and Monitoring,” last updated 05/02/24, read in part, “An Agency registered nurse (RN) or other clinician qualified to perform comprehensive assessments (physical therapist (PT), occupational therapist (OT), speech-language pathologist (SLP) will be responsible for coordinating the efforts of monitoring the medication regimen by compiling assessment data through a collaborative effort of all Agency staff involved in the patient’s/client’s care. A medication profile/list will be maintained on all patients/clients.” Further review of the policy revealed a statement that read, “The Agency will maintain a current, accurate list of all prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) medications taken by the patient/client (see the Medication Profile form). Oxygen therapy, including liters per minute, route, and frequency, will be documented on the medication profile. Professional clinical staff will update the medication list with any changes in the medication regimen.””

    Rule G0536. Element-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 11, 2026Recertification inspection1 deficiency cited
Jul 17, 2025Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jan 28, 2016.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • Doesn’t offer home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 7 owners or officers are people: David Jackson (owns 5% or more through other companies, 8.93%); Katrina Lanier (corporate officer, 0%); Katrina Lanier (corporate director, 0%); David Jackson (corporate officer, 0%); Emma Hyland (managing employee (on the payroll)); Brenda R Bryant (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Barbara Goodson (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Choice Homecare of Texas LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 23, 2022
Choice Health at Home Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 23, 2024
Choice Primo Hh Intermediate Co LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 23, 2022
Choice Health at Home, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 23, 2024
Choice Rehab, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 23, 2022
Choice Health at Home Intermediate Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 23, 2024
Tcfiii Ch Investor LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies65.43%Oct 23, 2024
Tcfiii Ch LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies65.43%Oct 23, 2024
Trive Capital Fund III LPOwns 5% or more through other companies42.11%Oct 23, 2024
Tcfiii Ch Spv LPOwns 5% or more through other companies23.31%Oct 23, 2024
Coltala Choice, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies16.61%Oct 23, 2024
Choice Rehab Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies8.93%Oct 23, 2024

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (57 surveys completed): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 84% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate80.30% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate8.89% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.07% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 22 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78654, where this agency’s office is, 20 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.75 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.